Advertisement

Photocatalytic degradation of ketoconazole by Z-scheme Ag3PO4/graphene oxide: response surface modeling and optimization

  • Nafiseh Nourieh
  • Ramin Nabizadeh
  • Mohammad Ali Faramarzi
  • Simin Nasseri
  • Kamyar Yaghmaeian
  • Babak Mahmoudi
  • Mahmood AlimohammadiEmail author
  • Mehdi KhoobiEmail author
Research Article
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

Ketoconazole is an imidazole fungicide which is commonly used as pharmaceutical and healthcare products. Residual amount of this compound can cause adverse ecological health problems. The present study investigated ketoconazole photocatalytic degradation using Ag3PO4/graphene oxide (GO). Ag3PO4/GO and Ag3PO4 as visible light-driven photocatalysts was synthesized using the in situ growth method. Degradation of ketoconazole at the concentration of 1–20 mg/L in aqueous solutions was optimized in the presence of Ag3PO4/GO nanocomposite with the dosage of 0.5–2 g/L, contact time of 15–20 min, and pH of 5–9 using response surface methodology. A second-order model was selected as the best fitted model with R2 value and lack of fit as 0.935 and 0.06, respectively. Under the optimized conditions, the Ag3PO4/GO catalyst achieved a photocatalytic efficiency of 96.53% after 93.34 min. The photocatalytic activity, reaction kinetics, and stability were also investigated. The results indicated that the Ag3PO4/GO nanocomposite exhibited higher photocatalytic activity for ketoconazole degradation, which was 2.4 times that of pure Ag3PO4. Finally, a direct Z-scheme mechanism was found to be responsible for enhanced photocatalytic activity in the Ag3PO4/GO nanocomposite. The high photocatalytic activity, acceptable reusability, and good aqueous stability make the Ag3PO4/GO nanocomposite a promising nanophotocatalyst for photocatalytic degradation of azoles contaminants.

Keywords

Ag3PO4/GO Ketoconazole RSM Visible-light photocatalysis Z-scheme 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding information

This research was financially supported by the Tehran University of Medical Sciences, the Center for Water Quality Research, the Institute for Environmental Research, under the project no. 95-04-46-33499.

References

  1. Almasi A, Dargahi A, Mohamadi M, Biglari H, Amirian F, Raei M (2016) Removal of Penicillin G by combination of sonolysis and photocatalytic (sonophotocatalytic) process from aqueous solution: process optimization using RSM (response surface methodology). Electron Physician 8:2878.  https://doi.org/10.19082/2878 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakre PV, Volvoikar PS, Vernekar AA, Tilve S (2016) Influence of acid chain length on the properties of TiO2 prepared by sol-gel method and LC-MS studies of methylene blue photodegradation. J Colloid Interface Sci 474:58–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.04.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen ZF, Ying GG (2015) Occurrence, fate and ecological risk of five typical azole fungicides as therapeutic and personal care products in the environment: a review. Environ Int 84:142–153.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2015.07.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen Z-F, Ying G-G, Ma Y-B, Lai H-J, Chen F, Pan C-G (2013) Occurrence and dissipation of three azole biocides climbazole, clotrimazole and miconazole in biosolid-amended soils. Sci Total Environ 452:377–383.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen Z-F et al (2014) Photodegradation of the azole fungicide fluconazole in aqueous solution under UV-254: Kinetics, mechanistic investigations and toxicity evaluation. Water Res 52:83–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.12.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen X-j, Dai Y-z, Wang X-y, Guo J, Liu T-h, Li F-f (2015a) Synthesis and characterization of Ag3PO4 immobilized with graphene oxide (GO) for enhanced photocatalytic activity and stability over 2, 4-dichlorophenol under visible light irradiation. J Hazard Mater 292:9–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.01.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen X, Dai Y, Wang X (2015b) Methods and mechanism for improvement of photocatalytic activity and stability of Ag3PO4: a review. J Alloys Compd 649:910–932.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.07.174 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chong MN, Jin B, Chow CW, Saint C (2010) Recent developments in photocatalytic water treatment technology: a review. Water Res 44:2997–3027.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. da Silva WL, Lansarin MA, Livotto PR, dos Santos JHZ (2015) Photocatalytic degradation of drugs by supported titania-based catalysts produced from petrochemical plant residue. Powder Technol 279:166–172.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2015.03.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deng Y, Zhao R (2015) Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) in wastewater treatment. Curr Pollut Rep 1:167–176.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-015-0015-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dinh C-T, Nguyen T-D, Kleitz F, Do T-O (2011) Large-scale synthesis of uniform silver orthophosphate colloidal nanocrystals exhibiting high visible light photocatalytic activity. Chem Commun 47:7797–7799.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CC12014J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ebrahimi M et al (2016) Improved solar-driven photocatalytic activity of hybrid graphene quantum dots/ZnO nanowires: a direct Z-scheme mechanism. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:367–375.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01738 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Enayatifard R, Khalili N, Rahimizadeh M, Akbari J (2011) A kinetics study of the chemical stability of ketoconazole in aqueous solutions by spectrophotometric method. Analy Chem Lett 1:370–374.  https://doi.org/10.1080/22297928.2011.10648240 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gaya UI, Abdullah AH (2008) Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants over titanium dioxide: a review of fundamentals, progress and problems. J Photochem Photobiol C: Photochem Rev 9:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2007.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ge M (2014) Photodegradation of rhodamine B and methyl orange by Ag3PO4 catalyst under visible light irradiation. Chin J Catal 35:1410–1417.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(14)60079-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ghanbarian M, Nabizadeh R, Nasseri S, Shemirani F, Mahvi AH, Beyki MH, Mesdaghinia A (2017) Potential of amino-riched nano-structured MnFe2O4@ cellulose for biosorption of toxic Cr (VI): Modeling, kinetic, equilibrium and comparing studies. Int J Biol Macromol 104:465–480.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.06.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gholibegloo E et al (2018) Carnosine-graphene oxide conjugates decorated with hydroxyapatite as promising nanocarrier for ICG loading with enhanced antibacterial effects in photodynamic therapy against Streptococcus mutans. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 181:14–22.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CP42465G10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2018.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ghosh S (2018) Visible-light-active photocatalysis: nanostructured catalyst design, mechanisms, and applications;Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany.Google Scholar
  19. Huang G-F et al (2013) Ag 3 PO 4 semiconductor photocatalyst: possibilities and challenges. J Nanomater 2013:1.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/371356 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jyoti K, Baunthiyal M, Singh A (2016) Characterization of silver nanoparticles synthesized using Urtica dioica Linn. leaves and their synergistic effects with antibiotics. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 9:217–227.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2015.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kahle M, Buerge IJ, Hauser A, Muller MD, Poiger T (2008) Azole fungicides: occurrence and fate in wastewater and surface waters. Environ Sci Technol 42:7193–7200.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es8009309 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kathiravan MK, Salake AB, Chothe AS, Dudhe PB, Watode RP, Mukta MS, Gadhwe S (2012) The biology and chemistry of antifungal agents: a review. Bioorg Med Chem 20:5678–5698.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2012.04.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lenth RV (2009) Response-Surface Methods in R, using rsm. J Stat Softw 32:1–17.  https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v032.i07 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li X, Shen R, Ma S, Chen X, Xie J (2018) Graphene-based heterojunction photocatalysts. Appl Surf Sci 430:53–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.194 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liang Q, Shi Y, Ma W, Li Z, Yang X (2012) Enhanced photocatalytic activity and structural stability by hybridizing Ag 3 PO 4 nanospheres with graphene oxide sheets. Phys Chem Chem Phys 14:15657–15665.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CP42465G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu B, Fang Y, Li Z, Xu S (2015) Visible-light nanostructured photocatalysts—a review. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 15:889–920.  https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2015.9784 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Low J, Jiang C, Cheng B, Wageh S, Al-Ghamdi AA, Yu J (2017) A review of direct Z-scheme photocatalysts. Small Methods 1:1700080.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.201700080 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Malakootian M, Gharaghani MA, Dehdarirad A, Khatami M, Ahmadian M, Heidari MR, Mahdizadeh H (2019a) ZnO nanoparticles immobilized on the surface of stones to study the removal efficiency of 4-nitroaniline by the hybrid advanced oxidation process (UV/ZnO/O3). J Mol Struct 1176:766–776.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2018.09.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Malakootian M, Nasiri A, Amiri Gharaghani M (2019b) Photocatalytic degradation of ciprofloxacin antibiotic by TiO2 nanoparticles immobilized on a glass plate. Chem Eng Commun:1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2019.1573168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Malakootian M, Olama N, Nasiri A (2019c) Photocatalytic degradation of metronidazole from aquatic solution by TiO 2-doped Fe 3+ nano-photocatalyst International. J Environ Sci Technol 16:4275–4284.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1836-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Matthiessen P, Weltje L (2015) A review of the effects of azole compounds in fish and their possible involvement in masculinization of wild fish populations. Crit Rev Toxicol 45:453–467.  https://doi.org/10.3109/10408444.2015.1018409 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM (2016) Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. John Wiley and Sons ( Fourth Edition)Google Scholar
  33. Naeem K, Feng O (2009) Parameters effect on heterogeneous photocatalysed degradation of phenol in aqueous dispersion of TiO2. J Environ Sci 21:527–533.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62303-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nishiyama N, Fujiwara Y, Adachi K, Inumaru K, Yamazaki S (2015) Preparation of porous metal-ion-doped titanium dioxide and the photocatalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol under visible light irradiation. Appl Catal B Environ 176:347–353.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.04.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Olga P, Vesna R, Zoran K (2013) A review: current analytical methods for determination of ketoconazole in pharmaceutical and biological samples. IJPI’s J Analy Chem 3:1–14Google Scholar
  36. Panigrahy B, Srivastava S (2016) Minuscule weight percent of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide modified Ag 3 PO 4: new insight into improved photocatalytic activity. New J Chem 40:3370–3384.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NJ03118D CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peng X, Huang Q, Zhang K, Yu Y, Wang Z, Wang C (2012) Distribution, behavior and fate of azole antifungals during mechanical, biological, and chemical treatments in sewage treatment plants in China. Sci Total Environ 426:311–317.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sahoo PK, Panigrahy B, Bahadur D (2014) Facile synthesis of reduced graphene oxide/Pt–Ni nanocatalysts: their magnetic and catalytic properties. RSC Adv 4:48563–48571.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA07686A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shi L et al (2016) Facile synthesis of graphene–enwrapped Ag3PO4 composites with highly efficient visible light photocatalytic performance. Nano 11:1650001.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793292016500016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Song C, Li X, Wang L, Shi W (2016) Fabrication, characterization and response surface method (RSM) optimization for tetracycline photodegration by Bi3.84W0.16O6.24- graphene oxide (BWO-GO). Sci Rep 6:37466.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37466
  41. Stamatis N, Antonopoulou M, Konstantinou I (2015) Photocatalytic degradation kinetics and mechanisms of fungicide tebuconazole in aqueous TiO2 suspensions. Catal Today 252:93–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2014.09.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Suib SL (2013) New and future developments in catalysis: catalysis for remediation and environmental concerns. Elsevier Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  43. Sun J, Meng D, Jiang S, Wu G, Yan S, Geng J, Huang Y (2012) Multiple-bilayered RGO–porphyrin films: From preparation to application in photoelectrochemical cells. J Mater Chem 22:18879–18886.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2JM33900E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thakare SR, Gaikwad G, Khati N, Wankhade A (2015) Development of new, highly efficient and stable visible light active photocatalyst Ag2ZrO3 for methylene blue degradation. Catal Commun 62:39–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2014.12.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang C, Meng D, Sun J, Memon J, Huang Y, Geng J (2014a) Graphene wrapped TiO2 based catalysts with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Adv Mater Interfaces 1:1300150.  https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201300150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang C et al (2014b) Photocatalytic degradation of bisphenol A and dye by graphene-oxide/Ag3PO4 composite under visible light irradiation. Ceram Int 40:8061–8070.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.12.159 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wei N, Cui H, Wang M, Wang X, Song X, Ding L, Tian J (2017) Highly efficient photocatalytic activity of Ag 3 PO 4/Ag/ZnS (en) 0.5 photocatalysts through Z-scheme photocatalytic mechanism. RSC Adv 7:18392–18399.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA01001J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Xiang Q, Lang D, Shen T, Liu F (2015) Graphene-modified nanosized Ag3PO4 photocatalysts for enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity and stability. Appl Catal B Environ 162:196–203.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.06.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Xu Y, Bai H, Lu G, Li C, Shi G (2008) Flexible graphene films via the filtration of water-soluble noncovalent functionalized graphene sheets. J Am Chem Soc 130:5856–5857.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja800745y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Xu L, Huang W-Q, Wang L-L, Huang G-F (2014a) Interfacial interactions of semiconductor with graphene and reduced graphene oxide: CeO2 as a case study. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:20350–20357.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am5058772 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Xu L, Huang W-Q, Wang L-L, Huang G-F, Peng P (2014b) Mechanism of superior visible-light photocatalytic activity and stability of hybrid Ag3PO4/graphene nanocomposite. J Phys Chem C 118:12972–12979.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5034273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Xu D, Cheng B, Cao S, Yu J (2015) Enhanced photocatalytic activity and stability of Z-scheme Ag2CrO4-GO composite photocatalysts for organic pollutant degradation. Appl Catal B Environ 164:380–388.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.09.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Xu Q, Zhang L, Yu J, Wageh S, Al-Ghamdi AA, Jaroniec M (2018) Direct Z-scheme photocatalysts: principles, synthesis, and applications. Mater Today 21:1042–1063.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2018.04.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yang L, Liya EY, Ray MB (2008) Degradation of paracetamol in aqueous solutions by TiO2 photocatalysis. Water Res 42:3480–3488.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.04.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yu X, Lu Z, Wu D, Yu P, He M, Chen T, Shi W, Huo P, Yan Y, Feng Y (2014) Heteropolyacid–chitosan/TiO 2 composites for the degradation of tetracycline hydrochloride solution. React Kinet Mech Catal 111:347–360.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-013-0631-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yu W, Xu D, Peng T (2015) Enhanced photocatalytic activity of gC 3 N 4 for selective CO 2 reduction to CH 3 OH via facile coupling of ZnO: a direct Z-scheme mechanism. J Mater Chem A 3:19936–19947.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA05503B CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhou L, Alvarez OG, Mazon CS, Chen L, Deng H, Sui M (2016) The roles of conjugations of graphene and Ag in Ag 3 PO 4-based photocatalysts for degradation of sulfamethoxazole. Cataly Sci Technol 6:5972–5981.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CP42465G10.1039/C6CY00192K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zúñiga-Benítez H, Aristizábal-Ciro C, Peñuela GA (2016) Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of the endocrine-disrupting chemical benzophenone-3: parameters optimization and by-products identification. J Environ Manag 167:246–258.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nafiseh Nourieh
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ramin Nabizadeh
    • 1
  • Mohammad Ali Faramarzi
    • 3
  • Simin Nasseri
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kamyar Yaghmaeian
    • 1
  • Babak Mahmoudi
    • 1
  • Mahmood Alimohammadi
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
    Email author
  • Mehdi Khoobi
    • 5
    • 6
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public HealthTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  2. 2.Center for Water Quality Research (CWQR), Institute for Environmental Research (IER)Tehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  3. 3.Department of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biotechnology Research CenterTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  4. 4.Health Equity Research Center (HERC)Tehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  5. 5.Biomaterials Group, The Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (TIPS)Tehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  6. 6.Department of Pharmaceutical Biomaterials, Faculty of PharmacyTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran

Personalised recommendations