Evaluating the performance of carbon tax on green technology: evidence from India

  • Aaqib Ahmad BhatEmail author
  • Prajna Paramita Mishra
Research Article


Introduction of carbon tax and the resulting National Clean Energy and Environment Fund are seen as important policy reforms in India’s quest for achieving energy security and reducing the carbon intensity of energy. This study seeks to evaluate the impact of carbon tax on R&D in energy efficient technologies. To carry out the analysis, the study employed the difference-in-difference technique for the period 2005–2017. The results highlighted that there are less chances of achieving a ‘Double Dividend Hypothesis’ for carbon tax in India. Except the renewable energy sector, the support initiatives for enhancing energy efficiency have been rather limited and the government’s own revenue considerations seem to be dominating. The study holds that the NCEEF should be insulated from the vagaries of fiscal politics and that a strong reformation in guidelines, utilisation and allocation patterns is required to optimally realise the potential of the fund.


Carbon tax NCEEF R&D Double dividend hypothesis Difference-in-difference technique 



  1. Ambec S, Cohen MA, Elgie S, Lanoie P (2013) The Porter hypothesis at 20: can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Rev Environ Econ Policy 7(1):2–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bali S, Mongia N (2013) Promoting effective utilisation of national clean energy fund. National Institute of Public Finance and PolicyGoogle Scholar
  3. Baranzini A, Bergh J, Carattini S, Howarth R, Padilla E, Roca J (2015) Seven reasons to use carbon pricing in climate policy. Working Paper wpdea1507, Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Q J Econ 119(1):249–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Besley T, Case A (2000) Unnatural experiments? Estimating the incidence of endogenous policies. Econ J 110(467):672–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhat JA (2018) Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption—impact on economic growth and CO2 emissions in five emerging market economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(35):35515–35530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhat AA, Mishra PP (2018) The Kyoto Protocol and CO2 emission: is India still hibernating? Indian Growth Dev Rev 11(2):152–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhattacharya SC, Jana C (2009) Renewable energy in India: historical developments and prospects. Energy 34(8):981–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhattacharyya SC (1995) Internalising externalities of energy use through price mechanism: a developing country perspective. Energ Environ 6(3):211–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowen A (2011) Raising climate finance to support developing country action: some economic considerations. Clim Pol 11(3):1020–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Callan T, Lyons S, Scott S, Tol RS, Verde S (2009) The distributional implications of a carbon tax in Ireland. Energy Policy 37(2):407–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Card D, Krueger AB (2000) Minimum wages and employment: a case study of the fast-food industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania: Reply. Am Econ Rev 90(5):1397–1420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Columbia University Mail School of Public Health (2018) Difference-in-difference estimation. Accessed on 12 Feb 2019
  14. Faber A, Frenken K (2009) Models in evolutionary economics and environmental policy: towards an evolutionary environmental economics. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 76(4):462–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Georgakellos DA (2010) Impact of a possible environmental externalities internalisation on energy prices: the case of the greenhouse gases from the Greek electricity sector. Energy Econ 32(1):202–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Geroski P (1995) Markets for technology: knowledge, innovation and appropriability. In: Stoneman P (ed) Handbook of the economics innovation and technological change. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp 90–131Google Scholar
  17. Goto N (1995) Macroeconomic and sectoral impacts of carbon taxation: a case for the Japanese economy. Energy Econ 17(4):277–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goulder LH, Schneider SH (1999) Induced technological change and the attractiveness of CO2 abatement policies. Resour Energy Econ 21(3):211–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Govindaraju VC, Tang CF (2013) The dynamic links between CO2 emissions, economic growth and coal consumption in China and India. Appl Energy 104:310–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grimaud A, Lafforgue G (2008) Climate change mitigation policies: are R&D subsidies preferable to a carbon tax? Rev Écon Polit 118(6):915–940Google Scholar
  21. Hall BH, Helmers C (2013) Innovation and diffusion of clean/green technology: can patent commons help? J Environ Econ Manag 66(1):33–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hansen J. Letter to Obama. Archived on 26 January 2009. Retrieved 10 Dec 2009
  23. Helm D (2012) The carbon crunch: how we’re getting climate change wrong—and how to fix it. Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
  24. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Contributions of Working Groups I,II,III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Core Writing Team, Pachauri RK and Reisinger A (eds) IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, p 104Google Scholar
  25. Jaffe AB, Stavins RN (1995) Dynamic incentives of environmental regulations: the effects of alternative policy instruments on technology diffusion. J Environ Econ Manag 29(3):S43–S63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li-An Z, Ye C (2005) The policy effect of tax-and-fees reforms in rural China: a difference-in-differences estimation. Econ Res J 8Google Scholar
  27. Lim JS, Kim YG (2012) Combining carbon tax and R&D subsidy for climate change mitigation. Energy Econ 34:S496–S502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lin B, Li X (2011) The effect of carbon tax on per capita CO2 emissions. Energy Policy 39(9):5137–5146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lin S, Wang B, Wu W, Qi S (2018) The potential influence of the carbon market on clean technology innovation in China. Clim Pol 18(sup1):71–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mondal M, Irfan Z, Ramaswamy S (2016) Does carbon tax makes sense? Assessing global scenario and addressing Indian perspective. Madras School of Economics, Chennai, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  31. MOSPI (2017) Statistical year book India 2017. GOI. Accessed on 27 Aug 2019
  32. MOSPI (2018) Energy statistics 2018. 25th issue. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, GOI. Accessed on 27 Aug 2019
  33. Mukherjee S, Rao RK (2019) Exploring policy options to include petroleum, natural gas and electricity under the goods and services tax (GST) regime in India. Goods and Services Tax in India, 120Google Scholar
  34. Panda GR, Jena N (2012) Evaluating the performance of the national clean energy fund. Econ Polit Wkly 47(37):19Google Scholar
  35. Popp D (2006) R&D subsidies and climate policy: is there a ‘free lunch’? Clim Chang 77(3):311–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Popp D (2011) International technology transfer, climate change, and the clean development mechanism. Rev Environ Econ Policy 5(1):131–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Porter ME (1991) America’s green strategy. Scientific American, April, p 96Google Scholar
  38. Porter ME, Van der Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9(4):97–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pradhan BK, Ghosh J (2012) The impact of carbon taxes on growth emissions and welfare in India: a CGE analysis. IEG Working Paper No. 315, Institute of Economic Growth (IEG), Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  40. Shenglong L, Yahua W, Angang H (2009) The effect of western development program and regional economic convergence in China. Econ Res J 9:94–105Google Scholar
  41. Shukla PR, Dhar S (2011) Climate agreements and India: aligning options and opportunities on a new track. Int Environ Agreements: Polit Law Econ 11(3):229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Siriwardana M, Meng S, McNeill J (2011) The impact of a carbon tax on the Australian economy: results from a CGE model. Business, Economics and Public Policy Working Papers, 2.Google Scholar
  43. Soltmann C, Stucki T, Woerter M (2013) The productivity of environmental innovations. KOF Working Paper, No. 330Google Scholar
  44. Sumner J, Bird L, Dobos H (2011) Carbon taxes: a review of experience and policy design considerations. Clim Pol 11(2):922–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EconomicsUniversity of HyderabadHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations