Advertisement

Dynamic linkages among CO2 emissions, human development, financial development, and globalization: empirical evidence based on PMG long-run panel estimation

  • Zhaohua Wang
  • Yasir Rasool
  • Muhammad Mansoor Asghar
  • Bo WangEmail author
Research Article
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of the human capital index, globalization, and financial development on carbon dioxide of grouping OECD countries using pool mean group estimation technique from 1990 to 2015. This study also applies the second-generation cross-sectional augmented Dickey-Fuller and cross-sectional Im, Pesaran, Shin panel (CIPS) unit root, and the latest (Westerlund 2008) cointegration tests for further investigations. The result shows that both the human development index and financial development stimulate environmental improvement by using PMG long-run panel estimation approach. Furthermore, the pairwise Dumitrescu-Hurlin panel causality results prove the two-way causal association between financial development and carbon emissions. The unidirectional causality running from globalization and human development index towards carbon emission is also supported. Based on the aforementioned results, we provide a set of recommendations for policy implication.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Financial development Globalization Human development index CO2 emissions OECD countries 

Notes

Funding information

This study is supported by the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (Reference No. 71625003), Yangtze River Distinguished Professor of MOE, National Key Research and Development Program of China (Reference No. 2016YFA0602504), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Reference No. 91746208, 71573016, 71403021, 71521002, 71774014, 71804010), national social science foundation (Reference No.17ZDA065), Humanities and Social science Fund of Ministry of Education of China (Reference No. 17YJC630145), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Reference No. 2017M620648, 2019T120055).

References

  1. Abbasi F, Riaz K (2016) CO 2 emissions and fi nancial development in an emerging economy : An augmented VAR approach. Energy Policy 90:102–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.12.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed Z, Wang Z (2019) Investigating the impact of human capital on the ecological footprint in India: An empirical analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26(26):26782–26796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed Z, Wang Z, Ali S (2019a) Investigating the non-linear relationship between urbanization and CO2 emissions: An empirical analysis. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health 12(8):945-953Google Scholar
  4. Ahmed Z, Wang Z, Mahmood F, Hafeez M, Ali N (2019b) Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26(18):18565-18582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ahmad M, Zhao Z-Y, Irfan M, Mukeshimana MC (2019) Empirics on influencing mechanisms among energy , finance , trade , environment , and economic growth : a heterogeneous dynamic panel data analysis of China. Environ Sci Pollut ResGoogle Scholar
  6. Akadiri SS, Lasisi TT, Uzuner G, Akadiri AC (2019) Examining the impact of globalization in the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the case of tourist destination states. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26:12605–12615.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04722-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Alam MJ, Mohammad, Ara I, et al (2012) Energy consumption , carbon emissions and economic growth nexus in Bangladesh : Cointegration and dynamic causality analysis. Energy Policy 45:217–225. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Al-mulali U, Lee JYM (2013) Estimating the impact of the financial development on energy consumption: Evidence from the GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council) countries. Energy 60:215–221.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.07.067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I (2015) The effect of energy consumption, urbanization, trade openness, industrial output, and the political stability on the environmental degradation in the MENA (Middle East and North African) region. Energy 84:382–389.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Antweiler W, Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2001) Is Free Trade Good for the Environment ? Am Econ VOL. 91 NO:Google Scholar
  11. Ashraf A, Khalid M, Cui S (2017) Exploring environmental Kuznets curve ( EKC ) in relation to green revolution : A case study of Pakistan. Environmental Science & Policy 77:166–171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.08.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Asongu SA (2018) RESEARCH ARTICLE CO 2 emission thresholds for inclusive human development in sub-Saharan Africa. Environmental Science and Pollution Research:26005–26019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Aziz AA (2011) On the Causal Links between Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in Malaysia. Int Rev Bus Res Pap 7:180–189Google Scholar
  14. Baloch MA (2018) Financial instability and CO 2 emissions : the case of Saudi Arabia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research:26030–26045Google Scholar
  15. Bano S, Zhao Y, Ahmad A et al (2018) Identifying the impacts of human capital on carbon emissions in Pakistan. Journal of Cleaner Production.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bedir S, Merve V (2016) CO 2 emissions and human development in OECD countries : granger causality analysis with a panel data approach. European Economic Review 6:97–110.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-015-0037-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bekhet HA, Matar A, Yasmin T (2017) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, and financial development in GCC countries: Dynamic simultaneous equation models. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 70:117–132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Boutabba MA (2014) The impact of financial development, income, energy and trade on carbon emissions: Evidence from the Indian economy. Economic Modelling 40:33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Breusch T, Pagan A (1980) Lagrange Multiplier Test and to Model Applications Specification in Econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies 47Google Scholar
  20. Chang N (2012) The empirical relationship between openness and environmental pollution in China. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management:37–41.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2011.628087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Costa L, Rybski D, Kropp JP (2011) A Human Development Framework for CO 2 Reductions. 6:. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029262 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Creutzig F (2015) Evolving Narratives of Low-Carbon Futures in Transportation Evolving Narratives of Low-Carbon Futures in Transportation. Transport Reviews 1647.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1079277 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dasgupta S, Laplante B, Mamingi N (2006) Pollution and Capital Markets in Developing Countries 1. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 42:310–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dias J, Mcdermott J (2006) Institutions , education , and development : The role of entrepreneurs. Journal of Development Economics 80:299–328.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dritsaki C, Dritsaki M (2014) Causal Relationship between Energy Consumption , Economic Growth and CO2 Emissions. A Dynamic Panel Data Approach 4:125–136Google Scholar
  26. Dumitrescu EI, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling 29:1450–1460.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Farhani S, Ozturk I (2015) Causal relationship between CO2 emissions, real GDP, energy consumption, financial development, trade openness, and urbanization in Tunisia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4767-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ganda F (2019) The environmental impacts of financial development in OECD countries : a panel GMM approach. Environ Sci Pollut ResGoogle Scholar
  29. Haider Zaidi SA, Zafar MW, Shahbaz M, Hou F (2019) Dynamic linkages between globalization, financial development and carbon emissions: Evidence from Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. Journal of Cleaner Production.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.210 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Haseeb A, Xia E, Abbas K (2018) Financial development, globalization, and CO2 emission in the presence of EKC: evidence from BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25:31283–31296.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3034-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Haseeb A, Xia E, Saud S, Ahmad A, Khurshid H (2019) Does information and communication technologies improve environmental quality in the era of globalization? An empirical analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res Sci Pollut Res doi 26:8594–8608.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04296-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. He X, Reiner D (2016) Electricity demand and basic needs : Empirical evidence from China ’ s households. Energy Policy 90:212–221.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.12.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hübner K, Monnet J (2014) Economic Globalization and Carbon Emissions . Facts and MythsGoogle Scholar
  34. IEA IEA (2011) The International Energy Agency in Global Energy Governance 2:40–50.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00120.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. IEA (2019) Electricity Information 2019 first edition, International Energy Agency. http://wds.iea.org/wds/pdf/ele_documentation.pdf
  36. Islam F, Shahbaz M, Ahmed AU, Alam MM (2013) Financial development and energy consumption nexus in Malaysia: A multivariate time series analysis. Economic Modelling 30:435–441.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.09.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jalil A, Feridun M (2012) The impact of growth , energy and fi nancial development on the environment in China : A cointegration analysis. Energy Economics 33:284–291. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kahouli B (2017) The short and long run causality relationship among economic growth , energy consumption and fi nancial development : Evidence from South Mediterranean Countries ( SMCs ). Energy Economics 68:19–30. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.09.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kanjilal K, Ghosh S (2013) Environmental Kuznet ’ s curve for India : Evidence from tests for cointegration with unknown structural breaks. Energy Policy 56:509–515.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kao C, Chiang M (1997) On the Estimation and Inference of a Cointegrated Regression in Panel DataGoogle Scholar
  41. Katircio S, Alkhazaleh MMH, Katircioglu S (2018) Interactions between oil prices and financial sectors ’ performances : empirical evidence from Amman Stock Exchange. Environmental Science and Pollution Research:33702–33708Google Scholar
  42. Katircioglu S (2017) Investigating the Role of Oil Prices in the Conventional EKC Model: Evidence from Turkey. Asian Econ Financ Rev 7:498–508.  https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr/2017.7.5/102.5.498.508 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Khan AQ (2017) Financial development , income inequality , and CO 2 emissions in Asian countries using STIRPAT modelGoogle Scholar
  44. Khan D, Ullah A (2019) Testing the relationship between globalization and carbon dioxide emissions in Pakistan: does environmental Kuznets curve exist? Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26:15194–15208.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04913-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kraft JK and A (2017) On the Relationship Between Energy and GNP. J Energy Dev 3:401–403Google Scholar
  46. Kwabena D, Danso-mensah K, Bokpin GA (2017) Research in International Business and Finance The environmental e ff ects of economic growth and globalization in Sub-Saharan Africa : A panel general method of moments approach. Research in International Business and Finance 42:939–949.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Latif Z, Mengke Y, Danish et al (2018) The dynamics of ICT, foreign direct investment, globalization and economic growth: Panel estimation robust to heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence. Telematics and Informatics 35:318–328.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Corinne Le Quéré, Robbie M. Andrew, Pierre Friedlingstein, Stephen Sitch JH, Julia Pongratz, , Penelope A. Pickers, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Glen P. Peters, Josep G. Canadell, Almut Arneth, Vivek K. Arora, Leticia Barbero, Ana Bastos LB, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Philippe Ciais, Scott C. Doney, Thanos Gkritzalis, Daniel S. Goll, Ian Harris, Vanessa Haverd, Forrest M. Hoffman, Mario Hoppema, Richard A. Houghton, George Hurtt, Tatiana Ilyina, Atul K. Jain TJ, et al (2018) Global Carbon Budget. Earth Syst Sci Data Discuss pre print:1–79. doi:  https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2017-123
  49. Lee K, Min B (2014) Globalization and Carbon Constrained Global Economy : A Fad or a Trend ? J Asia-Pacific Bus 37–41. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1080/10599231.2014.904181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Liu Y, Hao Y (2018) Science of the Total Environment The dynamic links between CO 2 emissions Liu Y, Hao Y (2018) Science of the Total Environment The dynamic links between CO 2 emissions , energy consumption and economic development in the countries along “ the Belt and Roa. Sci Total Environ 645:674–683. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Maji IK, Habibullah MS, Saari MY (2017) Financial development and sectoral CO 2 emissions in Malaysia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24:7160–7176.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8326-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mombeuil C, Fotiadis AK, Wang Z hua (2019) The Pandora’s box of corporate social irresponsibility: An exploratory study within a failed State context. Journal of Cleaner Production 234:1306–1321. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.262 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pablo-romero MP, Sánchez-braza A (2015) Productive energy use and economic growth : Energy , physical and human capital relationships. Energy Economics 49:420–429. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.03.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pedroni P (1996) FULLY MODIFIED OLS FOR HETEROGENEOUS COINTEGRATED PANELS AND THE CASE OF PURCHASING POWER PARITYGoogle Scholar
  55. Pesaran MH (2004) General Diagnostic Tests for Cross-section Dependence in Panels. Fac Econ 1–39. doi: 10.17863/CAM.5113Google Scholar
  56. Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics 22:265–312.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RP (1999) Pooled Mean Group Estimation of Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association 94(446):621–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pîrlogea C (2012) The human development relies on energy. Panel data evidence Procedia - Soc Behav Sci 3:496–501.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00186-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rasool Y, Anees S, Zaidi H, Zafar MW (2019) Determinants of carbon emissions in Pakistan ’ s transport sector. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 1–15Google Scholar
  60. Riti JS, Shu Y, Song D, Kamah M (2017) The contribution of energy use and fi nancial development by source in climate change mitigation process : A global empirical perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production 148:882–894.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sadorsky P (2010) The impact of financial development on energy consumption in emerging economies. Energy Policy 38:2528–2535.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Saidi K, Mbarek MB (2017) The impact of income , trade , urbanization , and financial development on CO 2 emissions in 19 emerging economies. 12748–12757. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6303-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Salahuddin M, Alam K, Ozturk I, Sohag K (2017) The e ff ects of electricity consumption , economic growth , fi nancial development and foreign direct investment on CO 2 emissions in Kuwait. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 1–9. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Saud S, Chen S, Haseeb A (2018a) Impact of financial development and economic growth on environmental quality : an empirical analysis from Belt and Road Initiative ( BRI ) countriesGoogle Scholar
  65. Saud S, Danish, Chen S (2018b) An empirical analysis of financial development and energy demand : establishing the role of globalization. 3:. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2488-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Saud S, Chen S, Haseeb A, et al (2019) The nexus between financial development , income level , and environment in Central and Eastern European Countries : a perspective on Belt and Road Initiative Agency for International Development. Environ Sci Pollut ResGoogle Scholar
  67. Shah S (2016) Determinants of Human Development Index : A Cross-Country Empirical Analysis. Int J Econ Manag Stud 3:40–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Shahbaz M (2013) Does fi nancial instability increase environmental degradation ? Fresh evidence from Pakistan. Economic Modelling 33:537–544.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.04.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Shahbaz M, Lean HH, Shabbir MS (2012) Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis in Pakistan: Cointegration and Granger causality. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16:2947–2953.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Shahbaz M, Adebola S, Mahmood H, Arouri M (2013a) Does fi nancial development reduce CO 2 emissions in Malaysian economy ? A time series analysis. Economic Modelling 35:145–152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.06.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Shahbaz M, Kumar A, Nasir M (2013b) The effects of fi nancial development , economic growth , coal consumption and trade openness on CO 2 emissions in South Africa. Energy Policy 61:1452–1454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Shahbaz M, Ozturk I, Afza T et al (2013c) Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve in a global economy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 25:494–502.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Shahbaz M, Mallick H, Kumar M (2015) Does globalization impede environmental quality in India ? Ecological Indicators 52:379–393.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Shahbaz M, Mallick H, Kumar M, Sadorsky P (2016) The role of globalization on the recent evolution of energy demand in India : Implications for sustainable development. Energy Economics 55:52–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.01.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Shahbaz M, Jawad S, Shahzad H (2017a) Does Globalisation Worsen Environmental Quality in Developed Economies ? Env Model Assess 141–156. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-017-9574-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Shahbaz M, Khan S, Ali A, Bhattacharya M (2017b) The Impact of Globalization on CO2 Emissions in China. MPRA Pap 0–28Google Scholar
  77. Shahbaz M, Kumar M, Jawad S, Shahzad H (2019) Testing the globalization-driven carbon emissions hypothesis : International evidence. The International Economy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2019.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sinha A, Sen S (2016) Atmospheric consequences of trade and human development : A case of BRIC countries. Atmospheric Pollution Research.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2016.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Stern DI (2004) The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. World Development 32:1419–1439.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tamazian A, Chousa JP, Vadlamannati KC (2009) Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation : Evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy 37:246–253.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tariq M, Khan I, Yaseen MR, Ali Q (2017) Dynamic relationship between fi nancial development , energy consumption , trade and greenhouse gas : Comparison of upper middle income countries from Asia , Europe , Africa and America. Journal of Cleaner Production 161:567–580. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tiwari AK, Shahbaz M, Adnan Hye QM (2013) The environmental Kuznets curve and the role of coal consumption in India: Cointegration and causality analysis in an open economy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 18:519–527.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Toman MA, Jemelkova B (2003) Energy and Economic Development: An Assessment of the State of Knowledge. The Energy Journal 24:93–112.  https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol24-No4-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wang B, Wang Z (2018a) Heterogeneity evaluation of China's provincial energy technology based on large-scale technical text data mining, Journal of Cleaner Production 202:946–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wang B, Wang X, Guo D, Zhang B, Wang Z (2018b) Analysis of factors influencing residents’ habitual energy-saving behaviour based on NAM and TPB models: Egoism or altruism, Energy Policy 116:68–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wang M, Che Y, Yang K et al (2011) A local-scale low-carbon plan based on the STIRPAT model and the scenario method: The case of Minhang District, Shanghai, China. Energy Policy 39:6981–6990.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wang Z, Zhang B, Wang B (2018) Renewable energy consumption, economic growth and human development index in Pakistan: Evidence form simultaneous equation model. Elsevier LtdGoogle Scholar
  88. Wang Z, Ahmed Z, Zhang B, et al (2019a) The nexus between urbanization , road infrastructure , and transport energy demand : empirical evidence from Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06542-8
  89. Wang Z, Asghar MM, Zaidi SAH, Wang B (2019b) Dynamic linkages among CO2 emissions, health expenditures, and economic growth: empirical evidence from Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26:15285–15299.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04876-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Westerlund J (2008) PANEL COINTEGRATION TESTS OF THE FISHER EFFECT. Journal of Applied Econometrics 233:193–233.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jae CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wu Q, Maslyuk S, Clulow V (2012) Energy Consumption Inequality and Human Development. Energy EfficGoogle Scholar
  92. Xu Z, Baloch MA, Danish, et al (2018) Nexus between financial development and CO 2 emissions in Saudi Arabia : analyzing the role of globalization. Environ Sci Pollut ResGoogle Scholar
  93. You W, Lv Z (2018) Spillover effects of economic globalization on CO 2 emissions : A spatial panel approach. Energy Economics 73:248–257.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.05.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Zafar MW, Saud S, Hou F (2019) The impact of globalization and financial development on environmental quality: evidence from selected countries in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26:13246–13262.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04761-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Zaman K, Ahmad A, Hamzah tengku adeline adura tengku, Yusoff mariney mohed (2016) Environmental Factors Affecting Health Indicators. Social Indicators Research 129:215–228. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1100-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Zhu H, Duan L, Guo Y, Yu K (2016) The effects of FDI, economic growth and energy consumption on carbon emissions in ASEAN-5: Evidence from panel quantile regression. Economic Modelling 58:237–248.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Management and EconomicsBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina
  2. 2.Energy & Environmental Policy ResearchBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina
  3. 3.Collaborative Innovation Center of Electric Vehicles in BeijingBeijingChina
  4. 4.Beijing Key Lab of Energy Economics and Environmental ManagementBeijingChina
  5. 5.Sustainable Development Research Institute for Economy and Society of BeijingBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations