Response mode of hydrochemical types of river water to altitude gradient in alpine regions
- 4 Downloads
The study investigates the hydrochemical type and characteristics of river water in permafrost regions in the Tibetan Plateau by analyzing 532 samples collected from the source region of the Yangtze River. The hydrochemical type of the river water was Cl−-Na+-SO42−, and its hydrochemical characteristics were primarily influenced by the soil sources, though the influence of the sea sources and anthropogenic factors could not be ignored. Significant negative correlations were found between temperature and NO3−, SO42−, Mg2+, Ca2+, and between precipitation, relative humidity, and SO42− and Mg2+ in the river water. River water in the higher altitudes of over 5000 m above sea level was mainly recharged from glacier snowmelt water and by the supra-permafrost water and precipitation at the altitudes between 3500 and 5000 m above sea level. The controlled sources of hydrochemical characteristics of glacier snowmelt water were different for different ablation rates in the area with elevations of over 5000 m above sea level. Different hydrochemical types in different ablation rates implied the hydrochemical type was extremely sensitive to ablation periods in areas with elevation of over 5000 m above sea level. However, hydrochemical type was not sensitive to ablation periods from 3500 to 5000 m above sea level. The ionic concentration of glacier snowmelt water was mainly controlled by pollutants in glaciers and snow. Melting rates of glacier snowmelt water also had a certain effect on ionic concentration. Meanwhile, the stability of the hydrochemical type implied river water mainly controlled the hydrochemical type from 3500 to 5000 m above sea level. Hydrochemical type had no effect on elevation in end ablation.
KeywordsHydrochemical process River water Alpine regions Tibetan Plateau
This study was supported by the National “Plan of Ten Thousand People” Youth Top Talent Project; the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (STEP; Grant No. 2019QZKK0405); the Youth Innovation Promotion Association, CAS (2013274); the open funding from the Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Earth Surface Process; the open funding from the State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology (SKLLQG1814); the Open Foundation of MOE Key Laboratory of Western China’s Environmental System, Lanzhou University; the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (lzujbky-2018-kb01); and the National Nature Science Foundation of China (91547102).
- Li Z, Feng Q, Liu W, Wang T, Cheng A, & Gao Y, et al. (2014) Study on the contribution of cryosphere to runoff in the cold alpine basin: a case study of hulugou river basin in the qilian mountains. Global & Planetary Change, 122:345–361Google Scholar
- Li Z, Feng Q, Zongjie L, Ruifeng Y, Juan G, Yuemin L (2018a) Climate background, fact and hydrological effect of multiphase water transformation in cold regions of the Western China: a review. Earth-Sci Rev 190:33–57Google Scholar
- Wanda EMM, Mamba BB, Msagati TAM (2016) Hydrochemical modelling of water quality in terms of emerging micropollutants in Mpumalanga, Gauteng and north west provinces. Physics Chem Earth A B C 100Google Scholar
- Wang G, Li Y, Wang Y, Shen Y (2007) Impacts of alpine ecosystem and climate changes on surface runoff in the headwaters of the Yangtze River. J Glaciol Geocryol 29(2):159–168 (In Chinese)Google Scholar
- Zhu YL, Chen J, Chen GC (2011) Runoff variation and its impacting factors in the headwaters of the Yangtze River in recent 32 years. J Yangtze River Sci Res Inst 28(6):1–4Google Scholar