Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 31, pp 32624–32635 | Cite as

Azolla pinnata, Aspergillus terreus, and Eisenia fetida for fasterrecycling of nutrients from wheat straw

  • Manveen Arora
  • Arvinder KaurEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

A vast amount of surplus wheat straw/stubble (a carbon-rich bioresource) is wasted every year by burning. Harmful gases and residue matter released due to burning cause harmful effects on the environment and human health. Therefore, there is a strong need to recycle this bioresource in a sustainable manner. In the present study, wheat straw (W) was spiked with cattle dung (C), Azolla pinnata (A), and Aspergillus terreus (F) to make eight different treatments (1 kg each), viz. W (1 kg), WC (666 g + 334 g), WA (980 g + 20 g), WF (980 g + 20 ml), WCF (666 g + 314 g + 20 ml), WCA (666 g + 314 g + 20 g), WFA (960 g+ 20 ml + 20 g), and WCFA(666 g + 294 g + 20 ml + 20 g), and subjected to vermicomposting (Vcom) and aerobic composting (Acom). A comparison was made for the time required for degradation and nutrient profile of the products. The fastest recycling of wheat straw/stubble (120 days) was observed in WCA and WCFA, but the nutrient quality of WCA was better (N 18.67, P 3.88, K 38.84 g/kg). In the Acom group, longer time was required for degradation of various mixtures, but in this group also, WCA was degraded first of all (138 days) and yielded a product with the best nutrient quality (N 14.77, P 2.56, K 28.80 g/kg). Maximum growth of E. fetida and maximum number of hatchlings were observed in WCA while the highest cocoon production was observed in WCFA. It was observed that azolla enhanced conversion of wheat straw into a nutrient-rich product for agronomic use. Thus its use will reduce the amount of cattle dung in the mixture and the bulk to be handled by the farmers for ecosafe disposal of surplus straw/stubble. Therefore, this technology can be adopted as an alternative to burning.

Keywords

Wheat straw/stubble Azolla pinnata Cattle dung Aspergillus terreus Eisenia fetida 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The help of Dr. Rubina Sharma for statistical analysis is duly acknowledged.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

The authors express their gratitude to the Department of Science and Technology Innovation in Science Pursuit for Inspired Research (INSPIRE) fellowship and UGC-SAP for financial assistance.

References

  1. Aalok A, Soni P, Kumar A (2009) Role of earthworms in breakdown of different organic wastes into manure: a review. Dyn Soil Dyn Plant 3:13–20Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed T, Ahmad B, Ahmad W (2015) Why do farmers burn rice residue ? Examining farmers’ choices in Punjab, Pakistan. Land Use Policy 47:448–458.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anitha KC, Rajeshwari YB, Prasanna SB, Shilpa Shree J (2016) Nutritive evaluation of azolla as livestock feed. J Exp Biol Agric Sci 4:670–674Google Scholar
  4. Ansari AA, Ismail SA (2012) Role of earthworms in vermitechnology. J Agric Technol 8:403–415Google Scholar
  5. Arjinder K (2017) Crop residue in Punjab agriculture- status and constraints. J Krishi Vigyan 5:22–26.  https://doi.org/10.5958/2349-4433.2017.00005.8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arora M, Kaur A (2019) Azolla pinnata, Aspergillus terreus and Eisenia fetida for enhancing agronomic value of paddy straw. Sci Rep 9 (1).  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37880-1
  7. Badarinath KVS, Chand TRK, Prasad VK (2006) Agriculture crop residue burning in the Indo-Gangetic Plains - a study using IRS-P6 AWiFS satellite data. Curr Sci 91:1085–1089Google Scholar
  8. Bakker R, Elbersen W, Poppens R, Lesschen P (2013) Rice straw and wheat straw potential feedstocks for the biobased economyGoogle Scholar
  9. Bansal S, Kapoor KK (2000) Vermicomposting of crop residues and cattle dung with Eisenia foetida. Bioresour Technol 73:95–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00173-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bhat SA, Singh J, Vig AP (2015) Potential utilization of bagasse as feed material for earthworm Eisenia fetida and production of vermicompost. Springerplus 4:11.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-014-0780-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bhat SA, Singh J, Vig AP (2017) Instrumental characterization of organic wastes for evaluation of vermicompost maturity. J Anal Sci Technol 8:2.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40543-017-0112-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bhat SA, Singh J, Vig AP (2018) Earthworms as organic waste managers and biofertilizer producers. Waste and Biomass Valorization 9:1073–1086.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-9899-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bhattacharya SS, Chattopadhyay GN (2004) Transformation of nitrogen during vermicomposting of fly ash. Waste Manag Res 22:488–491.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X04048625 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bhuvaneshwari K, Kumar A (2013) Agronomic potential of the association Azolla – Anabaena. Sci Res Report 3:78–82Google Scholar
  15. Cassou E (2018) Field burning. Agricultural pollution. World Bank, Washington, DC. © World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/29504 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO
  16. Chauhan HK, Singh K (2013) Effect of tertiary combinations of animal dung with agrowastes on the growth and development of earthworm Eisenia fetida during organic waste management. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric 2:11.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-7715-2-11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Das D, Bhattacharyya P, Ghosh BC, Banik P (2012) Effect of vermicomposting on calcium, sulphur and some heavy metal content of different biodegradable organic wastes under liming and microbial inoculation. J Environ Sci Heal - Part B Pestic Food Contam Agric Wastes 47:205–211.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2012.634346 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Das D, Powell M, Bhattacharyya P, Banik P (2014) Changes of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium content during storage of vermicomposts prepared from different substrates. Environ Monit Assess 186:8827–8832.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-4046-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Das V, Satyanarayan S, Satyanarayan S (2017) Recycling of recalcitrant solid waste from herbal pharmaceutical industry through vermicomposting. Int J Environ Agric Biotechnol 2:1151–1161.  https://doi.org/10.22161/ijeab/2.3.19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Edwards CA, Bohlen PJ (1996) Biology and ecology of earthworms, 3rd edn. Chapman & HallGoogle Scholar
  21. Edwards CA, Dominguez J, Neuhauser EF (1998) Growth and reproduction of Perionyx excavatus (Perr.) (Megascolecidae) as factors in organic waste management. Biol Fertil Soils 27:155–161.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050414 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Elvira C, Sampedro L, Benitez E, Nogales R (1998) Vermicomposting of sludges from paper mill and dairy industries with Eisenia andrei: a pilot-scale study. Bioresour Technol 63:205–211.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(97)00145-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Emtiazi G, Naghavi N, Bordbar A (2001) Biodegradation of lignocellulosic waste by Aspergillus terrus. Biodegrad. 12(4):259–263Google Scholar
  24. Fan YT, Zhang YH, Zhang SF, Hou HW, Ren BZ (2006) Efficient conversion of wheat straw wastes into biohydrogen gas by cow dung compost. Bioresour Technol 97:500–505.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.02.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fornes F, Mendoza-Hernandez D, Garcia-de-la-Fuente R et al (2012) Composting versus vermicomposting: a comparative study of organic matter evolution through straight and combined processes. Bioresour Technol 118:296–305.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Garg VK (2005) Growth and reproduction of Eisenia foetida in various animal wastes during vermicomposting. Appl Ecol Environ Res 3:51–59.  https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/0302_051059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Garg P, Gupta A, Satya S (2006) Vermicomposting of different types of waste using Eisenia foetida: a comparative study. Bioresour Technol 97:391–395.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.03.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gupta PK, Sahai S, Singh N et al (2004) Residue burning in rice – wheat cropping system: causes and implications. Curr Sci 87:1713–1717Google Scholar
  29. Gupta KK, Aneja KR, Rana D (2016) Current status of cow dung as a bioresource for sustainable development. Bioresour Bioprocess 3:28.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-016-0105-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hakeem KR, Akhtar MS, Abdullah SNA (2016) Plant, soil and microbes: volume 1: implications in crop scienceGoogle Scholar
  31. Hesammi E, Talebi AB, Hesammi A (2014) A review on the burning of crop residue on the soil properties. WALIA J 30:192–194Google Scholar
  32. IARI (2012) Crop residues management with conservation agriculture: potential, constraints and policy needs. vii + 32Google Scholar
  33. Jimenez L, Perez I, De La Torre MJ et al (2000) Use of formaldehyde for making wheat straw cellulose pulp. Bioresour Technol 72:283–288.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00119-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kaparaju P, Serrano M, Belinda A et al (2009) Bioethanol , biohydrogen and biogas production from wheat straw in a biorefinery concept. Bioresour Technol 100:2562–2568.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kaur A, Singh J, Vig AP, Dhaliwal SS, Rup PJ (2010) Cocomposting with and without Eisenia fetida for conversion of toxic paper mill sludge to a soil conditioner. Bioresour Technol 101:8192–8198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.05.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Khan TS, Mubeen U (2012) Wheat straw: a pragmatic overview. Curr Res J Biol Sci 4:673–675Google Scholar
  37. Kumar AK, Parikh BS (2015) Cellulose-degrading enzymes from Aspergillus terreus D34 and enzymatic saccharification of mild-alkali and dilute-acid pretreated lignocellulosic biomass residues. Bioresources and Bioprocessing 2 (1).  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-015-0038-8
  38. Kumar P, Kumar S, Joshi L (2015) Socioeconomic and environmental implications of agricultural residue burning: a case study of Punjab, India. SpringerBriefsGoogle Scholar
  39. Lakshmi CSR, Rao PC, Sreelatha T et al (2013) Manurial value of different vermicomposts and conventional composts. Glob Adv Res J Agric Sci 2:59–64Google Scholar
  40. Lim SL, Wu TY, Sim EYS, Lim PN, Clarke C (2012) Biotransformation of rice husk into organic fertilizer through vermicomposting. Ecol Eng 41:60–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.01.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lim SL, Lee LH, Wu TY (2016) Sustainability of using composting and vermicomposting technologies for organic solid waste biotransformation: recent overview, greenhouse gases emissions and economic analysis. J Clean Prod 111:262–278.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Malińska K, Zabochnicka-Świątek M, Cáceres R, Marfà O (2016) The effect of precomposted sewage sludge mixture amended with biochar on the growth and reproduction of Eisenia fetida during laboratory vermicomposting. Ecol Eng 90:35–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLENG.2016.01.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Memon SA, Wahid I, Khan MK, Tanoli M, Bimaganbetova M (2018) Environmentally friendly utilization of wheat straw ash in cement-based composites. Sustainability 10:1–21.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051322 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mistry J, Mukhopadhyay AP, Nath Baur G (2015) Status of N P K in vermicompost prepared from two common weeds and two medicinal plants. Int J Appl Sci Biotechnol 3:193–196.  https://doi.org/10.3126/ijasbt.v3i2.12533 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mupondi LT, Mnkeni PNS, Muchaonyerwa P (2010) Effectiveness of combined thermophilic composting and vermicomposting on biodegradation and sanitization of mixtures of dairy manure and waste paper. Afr J Biotechnol 9:4754–4763.  https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB09.1894 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ndegwa PM, Thompson SA (2000) Effects of C-to-N ratio on vermicomposting of biosolids. Bioresour Technol 75:7–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00038-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pattnaik S, Reddy MV (2010) Nutrient status of vermicompost of urban green waste processed by three earthworm species— Eisenia fetida, Eudrilus eugeniae, and Perionyx excavatus. Appl Environ Soil Sci 2010:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/967526 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Paul A, Hatté C, Pastor L, Thiry Y, Siclet F, Balesdent J (2016) Hydrogen dynamics in soil organic matter as determined by 13C and 2H labeling experiments. Biogeosciences 13:6587–6598.  https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-6587-2016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pigatin LBF, Atoloye IA, Obikoya OA, Borsato AV, Rezende MOO (2016) Chemical study of vermicomposted agroindustrial wastes. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric 5:55–63.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40093-016-0117-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Qureshi N, Saha ÆBC, Cotta ÆMA (2007) Butanol production from wheat straw hydrolysate using Clostridium beijerinckii. 419–427. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-007-0137-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Raja W, Rathaur P, John SA, Ramteke PW (2012) Azolla-Anabaena association and its significance in supportable agriculture. Hacettepe J Biol Chem 40:1–6Google Scholar
  52. Ravindran B, Contreras-Ramos SM, Sekaran G (2015) Changes in earthworm gut associated enzymes and microbial diversity on the treatment of fermented tannery waste using epigeic earthworm Eudrilus eugeniae. Ecol Eng 74:394–401.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.10.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ravindran B, Wong JWC, Selvam A, Sekaran G (2016) Influence of microbial diversity and plant growth hormones in compost and vermicompost from fermented tannery waste. Bioresour Technol 217:200–204.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Senesi N (1989) Composted materials as organic fertilizers. Sci Total Environ 81–82:521–542.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(89)90161-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shak KPY, Wu TY, Lim SL, Lee CA (2014) Sustainable reuse of rice residues as feedstocks in vermicomposting for organic fertilizer production. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:1349–1359.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1995-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sharma K, Garg VK (2018) Comparative analysis of vermicompost quality produced from rice straw and paper waste employing earthworm Eisenia fetida (Sav.). Bioresour Technol 250:708–715.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.11.101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sidhu BS, Rupela OP, Beri V, Joshi PK (1998) Sustainability implications of burning rice- and wheat-straw in Punjab. Econ Polit Wkly 33:A163–A168.  https://doi.org/10.2307/4407214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Singh WR, Kalamdhad AS (2016) Transformation of nutrients and heavy metals during vermicomposting of the invasive green weed Salvinia natans using Eisenia fetida. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric 5:205–220.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40093-016-0129-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Singh L, Singh J (2015) Assessment of crop residue potential for power generation using geographical information system. J Sci Ind Res 74:34–37Google Scholar
  60. Singh A, Singh RV, Saxena AK et al (2014) Comparative studies on composting efficiency of Eisenia foetida (Savigny) and Perionyx excavatus (Perrier). J Exp Biol Agric Sci 2:508–517Google Scholar
  61. Sinha RK, Valani D, Chauhan K, Agarwal S (2010) Embarking on a second green revolution for sustainable agriculture by vermiculture biotechnology using earthworms: reviving the dreams of Sir Charles Darwin. J Agric Biotechnol Sustain Dev 2:113–128Google Scholar
  62. Spiers GA, Gagnon D, Nason GE, Packee EC, Lousier JD (1986) Effects and importance of indigenous earthworms on decomposition and nutrient cycling in coastal forest ecosystems. Can J For Res 16:983–989.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x86-172 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Streets DG, Yarber KF, Woo J-H, Carmichael GR (2003) Biomass burning in Asia: annual and seasonal estimates and atmospheric emissions. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 17.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2003gb002040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Subedi P, Shrestha J (2015) Improving soil fertility through Azolla application in low land rice: a review. Azarian J Agric 2:35–39Google Scholar
  65. Sudhakar G, Lourduraj AC, Rangasamy ACLA et al (2002) Effect of vermicompost application on the soil properties, nutrient availability, uptake and yield of rice - a review. Agric Rev 23:127–133Google Scholar
  66. Suthar S (2007) Nutrient changes and biodynamics of epigeic earthworm Perionyx excavatus (Perrier) during recycling of some agriculture wastes. Bioresour Technol 98:1608–1614.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Suthar S (2009) Bioremediation of agricultural wastes through vermicomposting. Bioremediat J 13:21–28.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10889860802690513 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Suthar S (2010) Recycling of agro-industrial sludge through vermitechnology. Ecol Eng 36(8):1028–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Suthar S, Kumar K, Mutiyar PK (2014) Nutrient recovery from compostable fractions of municipal solid wastes using vermitechnology. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 17:174–184.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-014-0238-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Taguiling MALG (2016) Effect of green biomasses on compost quality. Int J Sci Res Publ 6:509–513Google Scholar
  71. Tripathi S (2015) Impact of crop residue burning on climate change: a scenario of Madhya Pradesh , India. Res J Recent Sci 4:94–96Google Scholar
  72. Tripathi G, Bhardwaj P (2004) Comparative studies on biomass production, life cycles and composting efficiency of Eisenia fetida (Savigny) and Lampito mauritii (Kinberg). Bioresour Technol 92:275–283.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2003.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Velmourougane K, Raphael K (2011) Chemical and microbiological changes during vermicomposting of coffee pulp using exotic (Eudrilus eugeniae) and native earthworm (Perionyx ceylanesis) species. Biodegradation 22:497–507.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-010-9422-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Viel M, Sayag D, Peyre A, André L (1987) Optimization of in-vessel co-composting through heat recovery. Biol Wastes 20:167–185.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7483(87)90152-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Vig AP, Singh J, Wani SH, Singh Dhaliwal S (2011) Vermicomposting of tannery sludge mixed with cattle dung into valuable manure using earthworm Eisenia fetida (Savigny). Bioresour Technol 102:7941–7945.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.05.056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yadav A, Garg VK (2011) Recycling of organic wastes by employing Eisenia fetida. Bioresour Technol 102:2874–2880.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Yadav RK, Abraham G, Singh YV, Singh PK (2014) Advancements in the utilization of Azolla-Anabaena system in relation to sustainable agricultural practices. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad 80:301–316.  https://doi.org/10.16943/ptinsa/2014/v80i2/55108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zhang R, Li X, Fadel J (2002) Oyster mushroom cultivation with rice and wheat straw. Bioresour Technol 82:277–284.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00188-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ZoologyGuru Nanak Dev UniversityAmritsarIndia

Personalised recommendations