Advertisement

Investigating the effect of starch/Fe3O4 nanoparticles on biodesulfurization using molecular dynamic simulation

  • Soltan Sabaghian
  • Fatemeh YazdianEmail author
  • Behnam RasekhEmail author
  • Marziyeh Shekarriz
  • Nabiallah Mansouri
Research Article
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

The application of dibenzothiophene (DBT) as a source of energy leads to air pollution. The key solution to overcome this drawback is desulfurization. Magnetic nanoparticles have shown an excellent performance in the desulfurization of dibenzothiophene. In this study, molecular dynamic (MD) simulation was considered for the first time to gain insight about the molecule interactions in the biodesulfurization (BDS) process of DBT using Rhodococcus erythropolis IGTS8, in the presence and absence of starch/magnetic nanoparticles. According to the MD simulation results, the density of the system in the presence of starch/Fe3O4 was ascending while in the absence of these nanoparticles, the density was descending. Starch/magnetic nanoparticles caused more rapid equilibrium state in the biodesulfurization process. The energy diagram showed that magnetic nanoparticles decrease the energy fluctuation and increase the difference of non-bounding energy and potential energy (8 times) compared to (BDS) without nanoparticle, which reflects higher bounded energy in the system using starch/magnetic nanoparticles. The height of RDF peak in the presence of starch/Fe3O4 was 4 times more than the RDF peak in the absence of nanoparticle. In addition, the nanoparticles decreased the fluctuations around optimal temperature in BDS up to 5% compared to other state.

Keywords

Molecular dynamic simulations Dibenzothiophene Biodesulfurization Nanoparticle Starch/Fe3O4 

Notes

Supplementary material

11356_2019_6453_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.4 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 1457 kb)

References

  1. Alamdar N, Rasekh B, Yazdian F (2018) Effects of Fe/SDS and Au nanoparticles on Pseudomonas aeroginosa bacterial growth and biosurfactant production. IET Nanobiotechnology 12:26–28.  https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-nbt.2016.0260 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansari F, Grigoriev P, Libor S, Tothill IE, Ramsden JJ (2009) DBT degradation enhancement by decorating Rhodococcus erythropolis IGST8 with magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Biotechnol Bioeng 102:1505–1512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashouri R, Ghasemipoor P, Rasekh B, Yazdian F, Mofradnia SR, fattahi M (2018) The effect of ZnO-based carbonaceous materials for degradation of benzoic pollutants: a review. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-2056-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernardi RC, Schulten K, Pascutti PG (2013) Molecular dynamics studies of buckminsterfullerene derivatives as drug carriers. Biophys J 104:335aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Das A, Ghosh MM (2015) MD simulation-based study on the melting and thermal expansion behaviors of nanoparticles under heat load. Comput Mater Sci 101:88–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.01.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Franken LPG, Marcon NS, Treichel H, Oliveira D, Freire DMG, Dariva C, Destain J, Oliveira JV (2010) Effect of treatment with compressed propane on lipases hydrolytic activity. Food Bioprocess Technol 3:511–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gupta N, Roychoudhury PK, Deb JK (2005) Biotechnology of desulfurization of diesel: prospects and challenges. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 66:356–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kang M, Loverde SM (2014) Molecular simulation of the concentration-dependent interaction of hydrophobic drugs with model cellular membranes. J Phys Chem B 118:11965–11972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Karadima KS, Mavrantzas VG, Pandis SN (2017) Molecular dynamics simulation of the local concentration and structure in multicomponent aerosol nanoparticles under atmospheric conditions. Phys Chem Chem Phys 19:16681–16692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Karimi E, Jeffryes C, Yazdian F, Akhavan Sepahi A, Hatamian A, Rasekh B, Rashedi H, Omidi M, Ebrahim-Habibi MB, Ashrafi SJ (2017) DBT desulfurization by decorating Rhodococcus erythropolis IGTS8 using magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles in a bioreactor. Eng Life Sci 17:528–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Karimi E, Yazdian F, Rasekh B, Jeffryes C, Rashedi H, Sepahi AA, Shahmoradi S, Omidi M, Azizi M, Bidhendi ME, Hatamian A (2018) DBT desulfurization by decorating bacteria using modified carbon nanotube. Fuel 216:787–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Khezri A, Karimi A, Yazdian F, Jokar M, Mofradnia SR, Rashedi H, Tavakoli Z (2018) Molecular dynamic of curcumin/chitosan interaction using a computational molecular approach: emphasis on biofilm reduction. Int J Biol Macromol #pagerange# 114:972–978.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.03.100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kilbane JJ II (2006) Microbial biocatalyst developments to upgrade fossil fuels. Curr Opin Biotechnol 17:305–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lammers LN, Bourg IC, Okumura M, Kolluri K, Sposito G, Machida M (2017) Molecular dynamics simulations of cesium adsorption on illite nanoparticles. J Colloid Interface Sci 490:608–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu X, Zhou G, Zhang X, Zhang S (2010) Molecular dynamics simulation of desulfurization by ionic liquids. AICHE J 56:2983–2996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mofradnia SR, Ashouri R, Tavakoli Z et al (2018a) Effect of zero-valent iron/starch nanoparticle on nitrate removal using MD simulation. Int J Biol MacromolGoogle Scholar
  17. Mofradnia SR, Tavakoli Z, Yazdian F, Rashedi H, Rasekh B (2018b) Fe/starch nanoparticle-Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Bio-physiochemical and MD studies. Int J Biol Macromol #pagerange# 117:51–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.04.191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mukhopadhyaya M, Chowdhury R, Bhattacharya P (2006) Biodesulfurization of hydrodesulfurized diesel in a trickle bed reactor—experiments and modelingGoogle Scholar
  19. Nandi S (2010) Biodesulfurization of hydro-desulfurized diesel in airlift reactorGoogle Scholar
  20. Raheb J (2011) The study of biodesulfurization activity in recombinant E. coli strain by cloning the dsz genes involve in 4S pathway. J Sci Islam Repub Iran 22:213–219Google Scholar
  21. Raheb J, Hajipour MJ, Saadati M, Rasekh B, Memari B (2009) The enhancement of biodesulfurization activity in a novel indigenous engineered Pseudomonas putida. Iran Biomed J 13:207–213Google Scholar
  22. Rajab Beigy M, Rasekh B, Yazdian F, Aminzadeh B, Shekarriz M (2017) High nitrate removal by starch-stabilized Fe 0 nanoparticles in aqueous solution in a controlled system. Eng Life Sci 18:1–30.  https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201700127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rezapour N, Rasekh B, Mofradnia SR (2018) Molecular dynamics studies of polysaccharide carrier based on starch in dental cavities. Int J Biol Macromol #pagerange# 121:616–624.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sahebnazar Z, Mowla D, Karimi G, Yazdian F (2017) Zero-valent iron nanoparticles assisted purification of rhamnolipid for oil recovery improvement from oily sludge. J Environ Chem Eng 6:917–922.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.11.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shariatinia Z, Jalali AM, Taromi FA (2016) Molecular dynamics simulations on desulfurization of n-octane/thiophene mixture using silica filled polydimethylsiloxane nanocomposite membranes. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 24:35002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. SHILPI A (2012) In silico modeling and analysis for improving desulfurizing bacterial strainsGoogle Scholar
  27. Song C (2000) Chemistry of diesel fuels. CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  28. Vlachakis D, Bencurova E, Papangelopoulos N, Kossida S (2014) Current state-of-the-art molecular dynamics methods and applications. In: Advances in Protein Chemistry and Structural Biology Elsevier, pp 269–313Google Scholar
  29. Wang H, Feng Y, Zhang X, Lin W, Zhao Y (2015) Study of coal hydropyrolysis and desulfurization by ReaxFF molecular dynamics simulation. Fuel 145:241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wei H, Wei S, Zhu X, Lu X (2017) Investigation of structural, thermal, and dynamical properties of Pd–Au–Pt ternary metal nanoparticles confined in carbon nanotubes based on MD simulation. J Phys Chem C 121:12911–12920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wizert A, Iskander DR, Cwiklik L (2017) Interaction of lysozyme with a tear film lipid layer model: a molecular dynamics simulation study. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA)-Biomembranes 1859:2289–2296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yazdian F, Rasekh B, Rashedi H, Rostami AD (2016) Effect of metal nanoparticles on biological denitrification process: a review. J Appl Biotechnol Reports 3:353–358Google Scholar
  33. Zheng X, Su Y, Chen Y, Wan R, Liu K, Li M, Yin D (2014) Zinc oxide nanoparticles cause inhibition of microbial denitrification by affecting transcriptional regulation and enzyme activity. Environ Sci Technol 48:13800–13807CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Science and Research BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Life Science Engineering, Faculty of New Science and TechnologiesUniversity of TehranTehranIran
  3. 3.Research Institute of Petroleum Industry (RIPT)TehranIran
  4. 4.Chemical, Polymeric and Petrochemical Technology Development Division, Faculty of Downstream Technology DevelopmentResearch Institute of Petroleum IndustryTehranIran
  5. 5.Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Science and Research BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations