Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 31, pp 31786–31792 | Cite as

Characterization of activated sludge flocs in membrane bioreactor: stable and unstable flocs

  • Yifei Sang
  • Shengli Wang
  • Lianfa Song
  • Jingbo Guo
  • Lanhe Zhang
  • Haifeng ZhangEmail author
Research Article
  • 64 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, the properties of unstable and stable flocs were investigated under the steady operation of a membrane bioreactor (MBR). The extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) composition, surface charge, and hydrophobicity of unstable and stable flocs were examined and compared. Interfacial interactions of the membrane with unstable flocs, unstable flocs themselves, and unstable and stable flocs were assessed using the extended Derjaguin–Landau–Verwey–Overbeek (XDLVO) models. Cake layer resistance was found to contribute more than 80% of total resistance under steady operating conditions. Compared with stable flocs, unstable flocs possessed a higher level of EPS, more diverse protein, more negative charge, weaker hydrophobicity, and higher fouling potential. Thermodynamic analyses showed that unstable flocs had a higher adhesive strength (− 63.4 mJ/m2) with the membrane, lower self-cohesive strength (− 18.3 mJ/m2), and higher cohesive strength (− 54.3 mJ/m2) with stable flocs. Therefore, some unstable flocs remained on the membrane surface to form the cake layer due to their poor cohesion strength.

Keywords

Membrane bioreactor Extracellular polymeric substances Sludge flocs Stability Membrane fouling potential Interaction energy 

Notes

Funding information

The authors wish to thank the National Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51478093 and 51678119) and the Jilin Province Scientific and Technological Planning Project of China (No. 20170519013JH).

References

  1. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:254–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burger W, Krysiak-Baltyn K, Scales PJ, Martin GJO, Stickland AD, Gras SL (2017) The influence of protruding filamentous bacteria on floc stability and solid-liquid separation in the activated sludge process. Water Res 123:578–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burton K (1956) A study of the conditions and mechanism of the diphenylamine reaction for the colorimetric estimation of deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochem J 62(2):315–323Google Scholar
  4. Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, Eaton AD (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater 20th. American Public Health Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Das T, Sehar S, Manefield M (2013) The roles of extracellular DNA in the structural integrity of extracellular polymeric substance and bacterial biofilm development. Environ Microbiol Rep 5:778–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28:350–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eriksson L, Steen I, Tendaj M (1992) Evaluation of sludge properties at an activated sludge plant. Water Sci Technol 25:251–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gao D, Fu Y, Ren N (2013) Tracing biofouling to the structure of the microbial community and its metabolic products: a study of the three-stage MBR process. Water Res 47:6680–6690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hong H, Peng W, Zhang M, Chen J, He Y, Wang F, Wen X, Yu H, Lin H (2013) Thermodynamic analysis of membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor and its implications. Bioresour Technol 146:7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hong H, Zhang M, He Y, Chen J, Lin H (2014) Fouling mechanisms of gel layer in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Bioresour Technol 166:295–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hubbe MA, Metts JR, Hermosilla D, Angeles BM, Laleh Y, Fariborz H, Petra LL, Zahra K, Kamali M, Elliott A (2016) Wastewater treatment and reclamation: a review of pulp and paper industry practices and opportunities. BioResources 11(3):7953–8091Google Scholar
  12. Jorand F, Zartarian F, Thomas F, Block J, Bottero J, Villemin G, Urbain V, Manem J (1995) Chemical and structural (2D) linkage between bacteria within activated sludge flocs. Water Res 29:1639–1647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Larsen P, Nielsen J, Svendsen T, Nielsen H (2008) Adhesion characteristics of nitrifying bacteria in activated sludge. Water Res 42:2814–2826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lei Q, Li F, Shen L, Yang L, Liao B, Lin H (2016) Tuning anti-adhesion ability of membrane for membrane bioreactor by thermodynamic analysis. Bioresour Technol 216:691–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Matar G, Gonzalez-Gil G, Maab H, Nunes S, Le-Clech P, Vrouwencelder J, Saikaly PE (2016) Temporal changes in extracellular polymeric substances on hydrophobic and hydrophilic membrane surfaces in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Res 95:27–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meng F, Zhang H, Yang F, Li Y, Xiao J, Zhang X (2006) Effect of filamentous bacteria on membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactor. J Membr Sci 272:161–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nguyen V, Chia T, Turner M, Fegan N, Dykes G (2011) Quantification of acid-base interactions based on contact angle measurement allows XDLVO predictions to attachment of Campylobacter jejuni but not Salmonella. J Microbiol Methods 86:89–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ordóñez R, Hermosilla D, San PI, Blanco A (2010) Replacement of fresh water use by final effluent recovery in a highly optimized 100% recovered paper mill. Water Sci Technol 62(7):1694–1703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sheng G, Yu H, Li X (2006) Stability of sludge flocs under shear conditions: roles of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). Biotechnol Bioeng 93:1095–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Skouteris G, Hermosilla D, López P, Negro C, Blanco Á (2012) Anaerobic membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment: a review. Chem Eng J 198:138–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sun M, Yan L, Zhang L, Song L, Guo J, Zhang H (2019) New insights into the rapid formation of initial membrane fouling after in-situ cleaning in a membrane bioreactor. Process Biochem 78:108–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tian Y, Li Z, Ding Y, Lu Y (2013) Identification of the change in fouling potential of soluble microbial products (SMP) in membrane bioreactor coupled with worm reactor. Water Res 47:2015–2024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tian Y, Su X (2012) Relation between the stability of activated sludge flocs and membrane fouling in MBR: under different SRTs. Bioresour Technol 118:477–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Van Oss C (2008) The properties of water and their role in colloidal and biological systems. Academic, BuffaloGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang B, Chang Q, Peng D, Hou Y, Li H, Pei L (2014a) A new classification paradigm of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in activated sludge: separation and characterization of exopolymers between floc level and microcolony level. Water Res 64:53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang Q, Wen Q, Chen Z (2019) Long term effects of Pb2+ on the membrane fouling in a hydrolyticanoxic-oxic-membrane bioreactor treating synthetic electroplating wastewater. Chemosphere 232:430–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang Y, Sun X, Xia P, Xing S, Song C, Wang S (2014b) Influences of D-tyrosine on the stability of activated sludge flocs. Bioresour Technol 154:26–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Xu J, Yu H, Li X (2016) Probing the contribution of extracellular polymeric substance fractions to activated-sludge bioflocculation using particle image velocimetry in combination with extended DLVO analysis. Chem Eng J 303:627–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yan L, Li R, Song Y, Jia Y, Li Z, Song L, Zhang H (2019) Characterization of the fouling layer on the membrane surface in a membrane bioreactor: evolution of the foulants’ composition and aggregation ability. Membranes 9:85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang H, Fan X, Wang B, Song L (2016) Calcium ion on membrane fouling reduction and bioflocculation promotion in membrane bioreactor at high salt shock. Bioresour Technol 200:535–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang H, Sun M, Song L, Guo J, Zhang L (2019) Fate of NaClO and membrane foulants during in-situ cleaning of membrane bioreactors: combined effect on thermodynamic properties of sludge. Biochem Eng J 147:146–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang X, Wang Z, Wu Z, Wei T, Lu F, Tong J, Mai S (2011) Membrane fouling in an anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactor (AnDMBR) for municipal wastewater treatment: characteristics of membrane foulants and bulk sludge. Process Biochem 46:1538–1544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhu L, Zhou J, Lv M, Yu H, Zhao H, Xu X (2015) Specific component comparison of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in flocs and granular sludge using EEM and SDS-PAGE. Chemosphere 121(5):26–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Chemistry EngineeringNortheast Electric Power UniversityJilin CityPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Civil, Environmental, and Construction EngineeringTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA
  3. 3.School of Civil and Architecture EngineeringNortheast Electric Power UniversityJilin CityPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations