Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 31, pp 31632–31643 | Cite as

Do renewable energy consumption and service industry development contribute to CO2 emissions reduction in BRICS countries?

  • Yue-Jun ZhangEmail author
  • Wei Wang
Research Article

Abstract

In recent years, BRICS countries have attached great importance to renewable energy development and actively promoted the shift of economic structure towards service industry, in order to achieve the decoupling of economic development from carbon emissions. However, relevant studies mostly neglect the cross-sectional dependence and heterogeneity issues, which may cause biased results. Therefore, this paper selects the panel data of BRICS countries during 1996–2017 and employs the common correlated effects mean group (CCEMG) method, which are based on the cross-sectional dependence and heterogeneity assumptions, to explore the influence of renewable energy consumption and service industry development on CO2 emissions in BRICS countries. Besides, we also use the random effects model and pooled estimated generalized least squares model, as well as fully modified OLS model for comparison. The results indicate that enhancing the proportion of renewable energy consumption in the total energy consumption is an effective measure to reduce CO2 emissions in BRICS countries. Moreover, the steadily rising contribution of service industry to economic growth in BRICS countries during the sample period does not necessarily contribute to reduce CO2 emissions.

Keywords

BRICS countries Renewable energy consumption Service industry development CO2 emissions Cross-sectional dependence Heterogeneity 

Notes

Funding information

The authors received financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 71774051), the National Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals (no. W02070325), Changjiang Scholars Program of the Ministry of Education of China (no. Q2016154), Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Hunan province (No. 2018JJ1010), and Hunan Youth Talent Program.

References

  1. Al Mamun M, Sohag K, Mia MAH, Uddin GS, Ozturk I (2014) Regional differences in the dynamic linkage between CO2 emissions, sectoral output and economic growth. Renew Sust Energ Rev 38:1–11Google Scholar
  2. Alcántara V, Padilla E (2009) Input–output subsystems and pollution: an application to the service sector and CO2 emissions in Spain. Ecol Econ 68(3):905–914Google Scholar
  3. Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I (2016) The investigation of environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in the advanced economies: the role of energy prices. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:1622–1631Google Scholar
  4. Al-mulali U, Sheau-Ting L (2014) Econometric analysis of trade, exports, imports, energy consumption and CO2 emission in six regions. Renew Sust Energ Rev 33:484–498Google Scholar
  5. Apergis N (2016) Environmental Kuznets curves: new evidence on both panel and country-level CO2 emissions. Energy Econ 54:263–271Google Scholar
  6. Bai J, Kao C, Ng S (2009) Panel cointegration with global stochastic trends. J Econ 149(1):82–99Google Scholar
  7. Bhattacharya M, Paramati SR, Ozturk I, Bhattacharya S (2016) The effect of renewable energy consumption on economic growth: evidence from top 38 countries. Appl Energy 162:733–741Google Scholar
  8. Boutabba MA (2014) The impact of financial development, income, energy and trade on carbon emissions: evidence from the Indian economy. Econ Model 40:33–41Google Scholar
  9. BP (2018) BP statistical review of world energy. BPGoogle Scholar
  10. Cowan WN, Chang TY, Inglesi-Lotz R, Gupta R (2014) The nexus of electricity consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in the BRICS countries. Energy Policy 66:359–368Google Scholar
  11. De Hoyos RE, Sarafidis V (2006) Testing for cross-sectional dependence in panel-data models. Stata J 6(4):482–483Google Scholar
  12. Dogan E, Ozturk I (2017) The influence of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and real income on CO2 emissions in the USA: evidence from structural break tests. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 24(11):10846–10854Google Scholar
  13. Dogan E, Seker F (2016) The influence of real output, renewable and non-renewable energy, trade and financial development on carbon emissions in the top renewable energy countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 60:1074–1085Google Scholar
  14. Dogan E, Turkekul B (2016) CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 23(2):1203–1213Google Scholar
  15. Dong KY, Sun RJ, Hochman G (2017) Do natural gas and renewable energy consumption lead to less CO2 emission? Empirical evidence from a panel of BRICS countries. Energy 141(15):1466–1478Google Scholar
  16. Dong K, Hochman G, Zhang YQ, Sun RJ, Li H, Liao H (2018) CO2emissions, economic and population growth, and renewable energy:Empirical evidence across regions. Energy Econ 75:180–192Google Scholar
  17. Dudin MN, Frolova ЕЕ, Artemieva JA, Bezbah VVE, Kirsanov AN (2016) Problems and perspectives of BRICS countries transfer to “green economy” and law-carbon energy industry. Int J Energy. Econ Policy 6(4):714–720Google Scholar
  18. Dumitrescu E, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29:1450–1460Google Scholar
  19. Fang Z, Chang Y (2016) Energy, human capital and economic growth in Asia Pacific countries-evidence from a panel cointegration and causality analysis. Energy Econ 56:177–184Google Scholar
  20. Gielen D, Boshell F, Saygin D, Bazilian DM, Wagner N, Gorini R (2019) The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energy Strat Rev 24:38–50Google Scholar
  21. Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research, No. w3914Google Scholar
  22. Gu J, Renwick N, Xue L (2018) The BRICS and Africa’s search for green growth, clean energy and sustainable development. Energy Policy 120:675–683Google Scholar
  23. Hamit-Haggar M (2016) Clean energy-growth nexus in sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from cross-sectionally dependent heterogeneous panel with structural breaks. Renew Sust Energ Rev 57:1237–1244Google Scholar
  24. Kaika D, Zervas E (2013) The environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) theory-Part A: concept, causes and the CO2 emissions case. Energy Policy 62:1392–1402Google Scholar
  25. Khan MA, Khan MZ, Zaman K, Arif M (2014) Global estimates of energy-growth nexus: Application of seemingly unrelated regressions. Renew Sust Energ Rev 29:63–71Google Scholar
  26. Kuznets S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev 45:1–28Google Scholar
  27. Liu XY, Zhang S, Bae JH (2017a) The impact of renewable energy and agriculture on carbon dioxide emissions: investigating the environmental Kuznets curve in four selected ASEAN countries. J Clean Prod 164:1239–1247Google Scholar
  28. Liu XY, Zhang S, Bae JH (2017b) The nexus of renewable energy- agriculture- environment in BRICS. Appl Energy 204:489–496Google Scholar
  29. Mi ZF, Wei YM, Wang B, Meng J, Liu Z, Shan YL, Liu JR, Guan DB (2017) Socioeconomic impact assessment of China’s CO2 emissions peak prior to 2030. J Clean Prod 142:2227–2236Google Scholar
  30. Narayan PK, Saboori B, Soleymani A (2016) Economic growth and carbon emissions. Econ Model 53:388–397Google Scholar
  31. Nassani AA, Aldakhil AM, Abro MMQ, Zaman K (2017) Environmental Kuznets curve among BRICS countries: spot lightening finance, transport, energy and growth factors. J Clean Prod 154:474–487Google Scholar
  32. Nguyen HK, Kakinaka M (2019) Renewable energy consumption, carbon emissions, and development stages: some evidence from panel cointegration analysis. Renew Energy 132:1049–1057Google Scholar
  33. Özbuğday FC, Erbas BC (2015) How effective are energy efficiency and renewable energy in curbing CO2 emissions in the long run? A heterogeneous panel data analysis. Energy 82:734–745Google Scholar
  34. Ozturk I (2015) Sustainability in the food-energy-water nexus: Evidence from BRICS (Brazil, the Russian Federation, India, China, and South Africa) countries. Energy 93:999–1010Google Scholar
  35. Pao HT, Tsai CM (2010) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in BRIC countries. Energy Policy 38(12):7850–7860Google Scholar
  36. Pappas D, Chalvatzis KJ, Guan DB, Ioannidi A (2018) Energy and carbon intensity: a study on the cross-country industrial shift from China to India and SE Asia. Appl Energy 225:183–194Google Scholar
  37. Pedroni P (1999) Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61:653–670Google Scholar
  38. Perraton J (2006) Heavy constraints on a “weightless world”? Am J Econ Sociol 65(3):641–691Google Scholar
  39. Pesaran MH, Yamagata T (2008) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J Econ 142:50–93Google Scholar
  40. Rauf A, Liu X, Amin W, Ozturk I, Rehman OU, Hafeez M (2018) Testing EKC hypothesis with energy and sustainable development challenges: a fresh evidence from Belt and Road Initiative economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 25(32):32066–32080Google Scholar
  41. Robaina-Alves M, Moutinho V, Costa R (2016) Change in energy-related CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions in Portuguese tourism: a decomposition analysis from 2000 to 2008. J Clean Prod 11(B):520–528Google Scholar
  42. Ruggiero S, Lehkonen H (2017) Renewable energy growth and the financial performance of electric utilities: a panel data study. J Clean Prod 142(4):3676–3688Google Scholar
  43. Sasana H, Ghozali I (2017) The impact of fossil and renewable energy consumption on the economic growth in Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. Int J Energy Econ Policy 7(3):194–200Google Scholar
  44. Sebri M, Ben-Salha O (2014) On the causal dynamics between economic growth, renewable energy consumption, CO2 emissions and trade openness: fresh evidence from BRICS countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 39:14–23Google Scholar
  45. Shahbaz M, Mahalik MK, Shahzad SJH, Hammoudeh S (2019) Does the environmental Kuznets curve exist between globalization and energy consumption? Global evidence from the cross-correlation method. Int J Financ Econ 24:540–557Google Scholar
  46. Sharif A, Raza SA, Ozturk I, Afshan S (2019) The dynamic relationship of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption with carbon emission: a global study with the application of heterogeneous panel estimations. Renew Energy 133:685–691Google Scholar
  47. Simonova M, Zakrahov VE, Mamiy I (2019) Prospects of renewable energy sources: the case study of the BRICS countries. Int J Energy Econ Policy 9(5):186–193Google Scholar
  48. Swamy PAVB (1970) Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model. Econometrica 38:311–323Google Scholar
  49. Topcu M, Payne JE (2018) Further evidence on the trade-energy consumption nexus in OECD countries. Energy Policy 117:160–165Google Scholar
  50. Ummalla M, Samal A (2019) The impact of natural gas and renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions and economic growth in two major emerging market economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 26(20):20893–20907Google Scholar
  51. Wang Y, Li L, Kubota J, Han R (2016) Does urbanization lead to more carbon emission? Evidence from a panel of BRICS countries. Appl Energy 168:375–380Google Scholar
  52. World Bank (2018) World development indicators 2018. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  53. Wu LF, Liu SF, Liu DL, Fang ZG, Xu HY (2015) Modelling and forecasting CO2 emissions in the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) countries using a novel multi-variable grey model. Energy 79:489–495Google Scholar
  54. Zaman K, bin Abdullah A, Khan A, bin Mohd Nasir MR, Hamzah TAAT, Hussain S (2016) Dynamic linkages among energy consumption, environment, health and wealth in BRICS countries: green growth key to sustainable development. Renew Sust Energ Rev 56:1263–1271Google Scholar
  55. Zhang WC, Peng SJ, Sun CW (2015) CO2 emissions in the global supply chains of services: an analysis based on a multi-regional input-output model. Energy Policy 86:93–103Google Scholar
  56. Zhang YJ, Bian XJ, Tan W, Song J (2017) The indirect energy consumption and CO2 emission caused by household consumption in China: an analysis based on the Input-Output method. J Clean Prod 163:69–83Google Scholar
  57. Zhang YJ, Jin YL, Shen B (2018) Measuring the energy saving and CO2 emissions reduction potential under China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Computat Econ.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-018-9839-0
  58. Zhou A, Li J (2019) Heterogeneous role of renewable energy consumption in economic growth and emissions reduction: evidence from a panel quantile regression. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 26(22):22575–22595Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business SchoolHunan UniversityChangshaChina
  2. 2.Center for Resource and Environmental ManagementHunan UniversityChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations