Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 31, pp 31644–31653 | Cite as

Elimination of carcinogenic bromate ions from aqueous environment with 4-vinyl pyridine-g-poly(ethylene terephthalate) fibers

  • Kübra Günay
  • Metin Arslan
  • Ogün Bozkaya
  • Yaşar Aluç
  • Zehra Gün GökEmail author
Research Article
  • 82 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, poly(ethylene terephthalate) fibers grafted with 4-vinyl pyridine (PET-g-4VP) was synthesized with using a radical polymerization method and its removal capacity for bromate ions in the aqueous solution was explored. The synthesized graft copolymer was structurally characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The effect of some parameters such as pH, grafting rate, processing time, and ion concentration on bromate removal was examined with batch experiments. The sorptions of bromate onto the PET-g-4VP fibers were both verified with FTIR and X-ray fluorescence analysis (XRF) and the remaining amount of bromate after adsorption process was determined with an ion chromatography (Shimadzu). Moreover, kinetic and isotherm studies were also performed for adsorption of bromate with the grafted fibers. The point of zero charge (pHpzc) of the PET-g-4VP fibers was found to be 7.5 and the fibers removed maximum amount of bromate from aqueous solution at pH 3. Equilibrium time of adsorption was determined to be 75 min and the adsorption kinetic was found to be pseudo-second-order model. It was observed that the increase in the amount of grafted 4VP onto the PET fibers increased the bromate removal capacity of the fibers; however, when the grafting yield of 4VP was over 80%, the bromate removal ability of the fibers decreased. The maximum bromate removal capacity of the PET-g-4VP was determined to be 183 mg/g when the initial bromate amount was 800 mg/L, treatment time was 75 min, pH of the solution was 3, and 4VP grafting yield was 80%. When the initial bromate concentration was higher than 800 mg/L, the removal rate of the PET-g-4VP fibers was not changed. In addition, bromate ion adsorption data indicated compliance with the Freundlich isotherm. The adsorbent fibers obtained by this study may be promising candidates for the removal of bromate ions from the aqueous media.

Keywords

Poly(ethylene terephthalate) Copolymerization 4-Vinyl Pyridine Bromate Adsorption Aqueous solution 

Notes

References

  1. Alves WA, Faria RB (2002) Vibrational investigation of the stretching region of bromate ion in solution. Spectrochim Acta A 58:1395–1399.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-1425(01)00589-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arslan M (2011) Preparation and application of glycidyl methacrylate and methacrylic acid monomer mixture-grafted poly(ethylene terephthalate) fibers for removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution. J. Appl Polym Sci 119:3034–3042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arslan M, Günay K (2017) Synthesis and use of PET fibers grafted with 4-vinyl pyridine and 2-methylpropenoic acid for removal of rhodamine B and methylene blue from aqueous solutions. J Polym Sci Appl 1:3Google Scholar
  4. Arslan M, Günay K (2018a) Synthesis of amine-functionalized methacrylic acid-g-poly(ethylene terephthalate) fiber and its Congo red removal ability. Polym Bull 75:1701–1713.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-017-2121-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arslan M, Günay K (2018b) Application of 4-VP-g-PET fibers and its N-oxide derivative as an adsorbent for removal of cationic dye. Polym Bull 76:953–965.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-018-2400-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhatnagar A, Yanghun C, Yeojoon Y, Shin YS, Byonghun J, Kang JW (2009) Bromate removal from water by granular ferric hydroxide (GFH). J Hazard Mater 170:134–140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.04.123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bozkaya O, Yiğitoğlu M, Arslan M (2012) Investigation on selective adsorption of Hg(II) ions using 4-vinyl pyridine grafted poly(ethylene terephthalate) Fiber. J Appl Polym Sci 124:1256–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen WF, Zhang ZY, Li Q, Wang HY (2012) Adsorption of bromate and competition from oxyanions on cationic surfactant-modified granular activated carbon (GAC). Chem Eng J 203:319–325.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.07.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen S, Zhu Q, Su Y, Xing Z (2018) Preparation and performance of Fe(II)-akaganeite (b-FeOOH) modified red mud granule filter material. Res Chem Intermediat 44:7583–7593.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-018-3575-x(0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,-volV) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chiu YT, Lee PY, Wi-Afedzi T, Lee J, Lin KYA (2018) Elimination of bromate from water using aluminum beverage cans via catalytic reduction and adsorption. J Colloid Interface Sci 532:416–425.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.07.112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coşkun R, Er E, Delibaş A (2018) Synthesis of novel resin containing carbamothiolylimidamide group and application for Cr (VI) removal. Polym Bull 75:963–983.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-017-2068-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ding L, Deng H, Han X, Dong L, Wang P, Ridder DD (2010) Adsorption characteristics of phosphate from aqueous solutions by sponge iron: isotherm, kinetics, and thermodynamics studies. Fresenius Environ Bull 19:2548–2561Google Scholar
  13. Foo KY, Hameed BH (2010) Insights into the modeling of adsorption isotherm systems. Chem Eng J 156:2–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.09.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fragal VH, Cellet TSP, Pereira GM, Fragal EH, Costa MA, Nakamura CV, Asefa T, Rubira AF, Silva R (2016) Covalently-layers of PVA and PAA and in situ formed Ag nanoparticles as versatile antimicrobial surfaces. Int J Biol Macromol 91:329–337.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.05.056v CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gün Gök Z, Günay K, Arslan M, Yiğitoğlu M (2019) Removing of Congo red from aqueous solution by 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-g-poly(ethylene terephthalate) fibers. Polymer Bull.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-019-02721-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Han P, Xia Y (2018) Thiol-functionalized metal-organic framework for highly efficient removal of bromate from water. J Environ Chem Eng 6:3384–3391.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.03.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Han Q, Wang H, Dong W, Liu T, Yin Y (2014) Suppression of bromate formation in ozonation process by using ferrate(VI): batch study. Chem Eng J 236:110–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.09.072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Han D, Zhao Z, Xu Z, Li Y, Zhang P, Guo X (2018) β-FeOOH-coupled activated carbon prepared by the high temperature impregnation method for bromate removal from water. J Chem Eng Data 63:2243–2251.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.8b00191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ji H, Wu W, Li F, Yu X, Fu J, Jia L (2017) Enhanced adsorption of bromate from aqueous solutions on orderedmesoporous Mg-Al layered double hydroxides (LDHs). J Hazard Mater 334:212–222.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.04.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Junaid Bushiri M, Kochuthresia TC, Athimoolam S, Ramakrishnan V, Vaidyan VK (2013) X-Ray crysatllographic and vibrational spectroscopic studies of thorium bromate hydrate. CSTA 2:70–74.  https://doi.org/10.4236/csta.2013.22010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kevin L, Mao B, Cebe P (2014) Electrospun fibers of poly(ethylene terephthalate) blended with poly(lactic acid). J Therm Anal Calorim 116:1351–1359.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-013-3583-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li S, Yang Q, Zhong Y, Chen F, Xie T, Yao F, Sun J, Jiang C, Li X, Zeng G (2016) Adsorptive bromate removal from aqueous solution by commercial strongly basic resin impregnated with hydrated ferric oxide (HFO): kinetics and equilibrium studies. J Chem Eng Data 61:1305–1312.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.5b00947 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liang D, Li Q, Cui H, Tang R, Xu H, Xie X, Zhai J (2010) Electrocatalytic reduction of bromate ion using a polyaniline modified electrode: an efficient and green technology for the removal of BrO3 -1 in aqueous solutions. Electrochim Acta 55:8471–8475.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2010.07.062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Merle T, Pronk W, Gunten UV (2017) MEMBRO3X-A novel combination of a membrane contactor with advanced oxidation (O3/H2O2) for simultaneous micropollutant abatement and bromate minimization. Environ Sci Technol Lett 4:180–185.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mittal H, Ray SS (2016) A study on the adsorption of methylene blue onto gum ghatti/TiO2 nanoparticles-based hydrogel nanocomposite. Int J Biol Macromol 88:66–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.03.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mittal H, Alhassana SM, Ray SS (2018) Efficient organic dye removal from wastewater by magnetic carbonaceous adsorbent prepared from corn starch. J Environ Chem Eng 6(6):7119–7131.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moore MM, Chen T (2006) Mutagenicity of bromate: implications for cancer risk assessment. Toxicology 221:190–196.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2005.12.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Naushad M, Khan MR, Alothman ZA, Alsohaimi I, Rodriguezreinoso F, Turki TM, Ali R (2015) Removal of BrO3 - from drinking water samples using newly developed agricultural waste-based activated carbon and its determination by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:15853–15865.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4786-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Temoçin Z, Yiğitoğlu M (2010) Studies on selective uptake behavior of Hg(II) and Pb(II) by functionalized poly(ethylene terephthalate) fiber with 4-vinyl pyridine/2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate. Water Air Soil Pollut 210:463–472.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-009-0271-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. US EPA (1999) Alternative disinfectants and oxidants, Guidance Manual, pp 3.1–3.52.Google Scholar
  31. Wang Y, Sun FL, Zhang XD, Tao H, Yang YQ (2016) Microwave assisted synthesis of esterified bacterial celluloses to effectively remove Pb(II). Acta Physico-Chim Sin 32(3):753–762.  https://doi.org/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201512294 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wisniewski JA, Kabsch-Korbutowicz M, Kakomska S (2011) Donnan dialysis and electrodialysis as viable options for removing bromates from natural water. Desalination 281:257–262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.07.069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wu X, Yang Q, Xu D, Zhong Y, Luo K, Li X, Chen H, Zeng G (2013) Simultaneous adsorption/reduction of bromate by nanoscale zerovalent iron supported on modified activated carbon. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:12574–12581.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie4009524 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Xiao Q, Wang T, Yu S, Yi P, Li L (2017) Influence of UV lamp, sulfur(IV) concentration, and pH on bromate degradation in UV/sulfite systems: mechanisms and applications. Water Res 111:288–296.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Xu P, Zeng GM, Huang DL, Feng CL, Hu S, Zhao MH, Lai C, Wei Z, Huang C, Xie GX, Liu ZF (2012) Use of iron oxide nanomaterials in wastewater treatment: a review. Sci Total Environ 424:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.02.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xu C, Wang X, Shi X, Lin S, Zhu L, Chen Y (2013) Bromate removal from aqueous solutions by ordered mesoporous carbon. Environ Technol 35:984–992.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2013.857725 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xu Z, Han D, Li Y, Zhang P, You L, Zhao Z (2018) High removal performance of a magnetic FPA90-Cl anion resin for bromate and coexisting precursors: kinetics, thermodynamics, and equilibrium studies. Environ Sci Pollut R 25:18001–18014.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2029-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yang Y, Ding Q, Wen D, Yang M, Wang Y, Liu N, Zhang X (2018) Bromate removal from aqueous solution with novel flower-like Mg-Al-layered double hydroxides. Environ Sci Pollut R 25:27503–27513.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2781-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yiğitoğlu M, Arslan M (2005) Adsorption of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions using 4-vinyl pyridine grafted poly(ethylene terephthalate) fibers. Polym Bull 55:259–268.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-005-0440-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yiğitoğlu M, Arslan M (2009) Selective removal of Cr(VI) ions from aqueous solutions including Cr(VI), Cu(II) and Cd(II) ions by 4-vinly pyridine/2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate monomer mixture grafted poly(ethylene terephthalate) fiber. J Hazard Mater 166:435–444.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.11.075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of ScienceKırıkkale UniversityYahsihanTurkey
  2. 2.Chemistry and Chemical Processing Technologies Department, Kırıkkale Vocational High SchoolKırıkkale UniversityYahsihanTurkey
  3. 3.Kırıkkale University Scientific and Technological Research Application and Research CenterYahsihanTurkey
  4. 4.Department of BioengineeringKırıkkale UniversityYahsihanTurkey

Personalised recommendations