Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 30, pp 30893–30906 | Cite as

Wastewater treatment in electrocoagulation systems: investigation of the impact of temperature using a fuzzy logic control algorithm

  • Yavuz Demirci
  • Abdurrahman ÖzbeyazEmail author
Research Article


In an electrocoagulation process, controlling various parameters, such as temperature, pH, and conductivity, increases the performance of the process. In this study, fuzzy logic algorithms were used to control the temperature of the electrocoagulation system for the removal of pollutants from textile wastewater. In the experimental part, we used a reactor with a cooling jacket to control the temperature, and the flow rate of the cooling water was a variable that we could manipulate. Also, we investigated the use of a single-variable fuzzy control process and a multivariable fuzzy control process to control the dynamic behavior of the system. In the single variable control process, the effect of temperature was investigated at chosen original temperatures, i.e., 17.2 °C, 20 °C, and 23 °C. In the multivariable control, the temperature-pH and temperature-conductivity pairs were controlled separately in different processes. When the removal efficiencies were determined for the two control approaches, it was observed that the temperature-pH control process outperformed the temperature-conductivity control process, and its removal efficiencies for COD, color, and turbidity were about 74.6%, 85.2%, and 91.0%, respectively. Thus, the results obtained from this study will be useful for other investigators in the field.

Graphical abstract



Electrocoagulation Temperature control Fuzzy Treatment of wastewater MATLAB/Simulink 



  1. Alinsafi A, Khemis M, Pons MN, Leclerc JP, Yaacoubi A, Benhammou A, Nejmeddine A (2005) Electro-coagulation of reactive textile dyes and textile wastewater. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 44:461–470. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Assis Filho RB d, Araújo CMB d, Baptisttella AMS et al (2019) Environmentally friendly route for graphene oxide production via electrochemical synthesis focused on the adsorptive removal of dyes from water. Environ Technol:1–12.
  3. Attarakih M, Abu-Khader M, Bart H-J (2013) Dynamic analysis and control of sieve tray gas absorption column using MATALB and SIMULINK. Appl Soft Comput 13:1152–1169. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Can OT, Kobya M, Demirbas E, Bayramoglu M (2006) Treatment of the textile wastewater by combined electrocoagulation. Chemosphere 62:181–187. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen G (2004) Electrochemical technologies in wastewater treatment. Sep Purif Technol 38:11–41. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chopra AK, Sharma AK, Kumar V (2011) Overview of electrolytic treatment: an alternative technology for purification of wastewater. Arch Appl Sci Res 5:191–206Google Scholar
  7. Demirci Y (2014) Textile wastewater conductivity control of electrocoagulation process using Matlab/Simulink. Glob NEST J 16:348–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Demirci Y, Pekel LC, Alpbaz M (2015a) Investigation of different electrode connections in electrocoagulation of textile wastewater treatment. Int J Electrochem Sci 10:2685–2693Google Scholar
  9. Demirci Y, Pekel LC, Altinten A, Alpbaz M (2015b) Improvement of the performance of an electrocoagulation process system using fuzzy control of pH. Water Environ Res 87:2045–2052. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Demirci Y, Pekel LC, Altınten A, Alpbaz M (2015c) Application of fuzzy control on the electrocoagulation process to treat textile wastewater. Environ Technol 36:3243–3252. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Demirci Y, Pekel LC, Altınten A, Alpbaz M (2016) Elektrokoagülasyon reaktöründe bulanık kontrol metodu ile pH, iletkenlik ve sıcaklığın eş zamanlı kontrolü. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Derg 31:0. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kuokkanen V, Kuokkanen T, Rämö J, Lassi U (2013) Recent applications of electrocoagulation in treatment of water and wastewater—a review. Green Sustain Chem 03:89–121. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lafi R, Gzara L, Lajimi RH, Hafiane A (2018) Treatment of textile wastewater by a hybrid ultrafiltration/electrodialysis process. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 132:105–113. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mikko V (2012) Electrocoagulation in the treatment of industrial waters and wastewaters. Dissertation, Lappeenranta University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  15. Moussa DT, El-Naas MH, Nasser M, Al-Marri MJ (2017) A comprehensive review of electrocoagulation for water treatment: potentials and challenges. J Environ Manag 186:24–41. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Paździor K, Bilińska L, Ledakowicz S (2018) A review of the existing and emerging technologies in the combination of AOPs and biological processes in industrial textile wastewater treatment. Chem Eng J. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tu K-Y, Lee T-T, Wang W-J (2000) Design of a multi-layer fuzzy logic controller for multi-input multi-output systems. Fuzzy Sets Syst 111:199–214. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Vasudevan S, Lakshmi J, Jayaraj J, Sozhan G (2009) Remediation of phosphate-contaminated water by electrocoagulation with aluminium, aluminium alloy and mild steel anodes. J Hazard Mater 164:1480–1486. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yetilmezsoy K (2012) Fuzzy-logic modeling of Fenton’s oxidation of anaerobically pretreated poultry manure wastewater. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19:2227–2237. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yilmaz AE, Boncukcuoğlu R, Kocakerim MM, Yilmaz MT, Paluluoğlu C (2008) Boron removal from geothermal waters by electrocoagulation. J Hazard Mater 153:146–151. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental EngineeringAdiyaman UniversityAdiyamanTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Electronics EngineeringAdiyaman UniversityAdiyamanTurkey

Personalised recommendations