Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 30, pp 31178–31197 | Cite as

Does foreign ownership affect corporate sustainability disclosure in Pakistan? A sequential mixed methods approach

  • Adeela RustamEmail author
  • Ying Wang
  • Hashim Zameer
Research Article
  • 110 Downloads

Abstract

The objective of this study is to investigate the potential impacts of foreign ownership on the corporate sustainability disclosure of leading non-financial companies in the context of an emerging economy of Pakistan. The study employed data from the year 2006 to 2018 gathered from the Pakistan stock exchange. Further, the data on foreign ownership and corporate sustainability disclosure obtained from the firm’s annual reports and the global reporting initiatives (GRI) database. This study employed a sequential mixed methods technique. The empirical results indicate that foreign ownership has a significant impact on total sustainability disclosure (TCSRI). Whereas having an individual assessment, we found that foreign ownership is positively associated with each component (economic, social, and environmental) disclosure respectively. Moreover, our findings prove that firm size and growth are positively related to foreign ownership, TCSRI, and its aspects. In contrast, the study reveals a negative relationship among financial leverage, TCSRI, and economic, social, and environmental sustainability exposure. Summing up, the study indicates that foreign ownership effectively improves sustainability governance mechanism, and at the same time, it is also found that higher financial leverage restricts the sustainability disclosure capacity of firms. Results from this study have technical, theoretical, and policy implications for regulatory institutions, corporate management, and investors in emerging economies. Hence, we put forward the policy implications that the regulatory institutions need to reconsider the policy guidelines subject to diversification of ownership and activism of foreign shareholders in both small/large size firms to enhance the sustainability disclosure practices. Also, reduce the increasing level of financial leverage, which is curbing the firm’s economic, social, and environmental reporting activities.

Keywords

Sustainability disclosure Foreign ownership Sustainability governance GRI Financial leverage 

Notes

References

  1. Abiodun BY (2013) The effect of firm size on firms profitability in Nigeria. J Econ Sustain Dev 4(5):90–94Google Scholar
  2. Adeniyi S, Adebayo HO (2018) Effect of financial leverage on voluntary corporate social disclosure among listed firms on Nigerian stock exchange: a study of selected manufacturing firms. Acad J Econ Stud 4(3):18–24Google Scholar
  3. Aldrugi A, Abdo H (2014) Determining the motives or reasons that make companies disclose environmental information. J Econ, Bus Manag 2(2):117–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Gamrh B, Al-Dharnari RA (2016) Firm characteristic and corporate social responsibility. Int Bus Manag 10(8):4283–4291Google Scholar
  5. Alhaj A (2019) Sustainability disclosure on environmental reporting: a review of literature in developing countries. Am Based Res J 8(2019–01):01–13Google Scholar
  6. Ali M, Ali Q, Rafique MA, Malik QA, Waheed A (2017a) Corporate governance and environmental reporting in Pakistan corporate governance and environmental reporting in Pakistan. Pak Adm Rev 1(2):103–114Google Scholar
  7. Ali W, Frynas JG, Mahmood Z (2017b) Determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in developed and developing countries: a literature review. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 24(4):273–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Almas Z (2008) Pakistan’s current account deficit: tackling the sustainability issue. Policy Perspect 5(3):85–113Google Scholar
  9. Andrew B, Gul F, Guthrie J, Teoh HY (1989) A note on corporate social disclosure practices in developing countries: the case of Malaysia and Singapore. Br Account Rev 21:371–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Arshad IS, Muhammad T, Al Astal AYM (2015) Empirical study on corporate social responsibility in the United Arab Emirates. Int J Sci Res Publ 5(7):1–5Google Scholar
  11. Ashmarina SI, Zotova AS, Smolina ES (2016) Implementation of financial sustainability in organizations through valuation of financial leverage effect in Russian practice of financial management. Int J Environ Sci Educ 11(10):3775–3782Google Scholar
  12. Ashraf, J., & Ghani, W. I. (2005). Accounting in a country : the case of Pakistan accounting in a country : the case of Pakistan. In Working Paper Google Scholar
  13. Bae SM, Masud AK, Kim JD (2018) A cross-country investigation of corporate governance and corporate sustainability disclosure: a signaling theory perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2611(10):1–16Google Scholar
  14. Barako DG, Brown AM (2008) Corporate social reporting and board representation: evidence from the Kenyan banking sector. J Manag Gov 12:309–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Belal AAR (2000) Environmental reporting in developing countries: empirical evidence from Bangladesh. Eco-Management and Auditing 7(3):114–121Google Scholar
  16. Bhalla M (2018) Company characteristics influencing web-based environment disclosure- an empirical analysis of selected Indian manufacturing companies. Int J Soc Sci Econ Res 03(01):200–217Google Scholar
  17. Blowfield, M.; Murray, A. (2008). Corporate Responsibility: A Critical Introduction; UKGoogle Scholar
  18. Branco MC, Rodrigues LL (2008) Factors influencing social responsibility disclosure by Portuguese Companies. Journal of Business Ethics 83(4):685–701Google Scholar
  19. Brown HS, De Jong M, Lessidrenska T (2009) The rise of the global reporting initiative: a case of institutional entrepreneurship. Environ Politics 18:182–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Camilleri MA (2017) Corporate sustainability and responsibility: creating value for business, society and the environment. Asian J Sustain Soc Responsibility 2(1):59–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ching HY, Gerab F (2017) Sustainability reports in Brazil through the lens of signaling, legitimacy and stakeholder theories. Soc Responsib J 13:95–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Clarkson PM, Li Y, Richardson GD, Vasvari FP (2008) Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: an empirical analysis. Acc Organ Soc 33(4–5):303–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Comyns B (2016) Determinants of GHG reporting: an analysis of global oil and gas companies. Journal of Business Ethics 136(2):349–369Google Scholar
  24. Creswell JW (2013) Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  25. Deegan C, Rankin UJ (2006) Financial Accounting Theory (European e). McGraw Hill, MaidenheadGoogle Scholar
  26. Delgado-García JB, de Quevedo-Puente E, Fuente-Sabaté (2010) The impact of ownership structure on corporate reputation: evidence from Spain. J M Corp Gov: Int Rev 8(6):540–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Delgado-Márquez BL, Pedauga LE, Cordon Pozo E. (2016). Industries regulation and firm environmental Disclosure: a stakeholders ’ perspective on the importance of legitimation and international activities. Organization & Environment, 1–19Google Scholar
  28. Dienes D, Sassen R, Fischer J (2016) What are the drivers of sustainability reporting? A systematic review. Sustain Account, Manag Policy J 7(2):154–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dissanayake D, Tilt C, Xydias-Lobo M (2016) Sustainability reporting by publicly listed companies in Sri Lanka. Journal of Cleaner Production 129:169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dohoo I, Ducrot C, Fourichon C, Donald A, Hurnik D (1997) An overview of techniques for dealing with large numbers of independent variables in epidemiologic studies. Prev Vet Med 29(3):221–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Draz MU (2014) Financial crises and accounting reforms: evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Economics and Management 8(1):70–89Google Scholar
  32. Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 533–544Google Scholar
  33. Eljayash K (2017) Environmental disclosure studies in the Middle East and northern Africa in the shadow of theoretical context. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management, and Sustainable Development 13(4):334–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Eyigege I (2018) The influence of financial leverage, customer deposit and capital adequacy on the financial sustainability of some selected Nigerian micro finance banks. Glob J Manag Bus Res 18(3)Google Scholar
  35. Ezhilarasi G, Kabra KC (2017) The Impact of Corporate Governance Attributes on Environmental Disclosures: Evidence from India. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance 10(1):24–43Google Scholar
  36. Faisal FAF (2017) Sustainability: an imperative for improving governance and management in Pakistan. Pak Econ Soc Rev 55(1):53–78Google Scholar
  37. Faller CM, Zu KAD (2016) Does equity ownership matter for corporate social responsibility? A Literature Review of Theories and Recent Empirical Findings. J Bus Ethics 1–26Google Scholar
  38. Faruqee R, Kemal AR (2016) Role of economic policies in protecting the environment: the experience of Pakistan. Pak Dev Rev 35(4)Google Scholar
  39. Fatima S (2016) Corporate governance in Pakistan: beyond A minimalist approach. Thesis published, The University Of BedfordshireGoogle Scholar
  40. Fatima S, Mortimer T, Asghar BM (2018) Corporate governance failures and the role of institutional investors in Pakistan: lessons to be learnt from UK. International Journal of Law and Management 60(2):00–00CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fernández-Gago R, Cabeza-García L, Nieto M (2018) Independent directors’ background and CSR disclosure. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 1(11)Google Scholar
  42. Gallo PJ, Christensen LJ (2011) Firm size matters: an empirical investigation of organizational size and ownership on sustainability-related behaviors. Bus Soc 50(2):315–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. GCRI (2018) Available at https://climate-risk-transfer.org (germanwatch.org/de/14638)
  44. Gill A, Biger N, Mathur N (2011) The effect of capital structure on profitability: evidence from the United States. Int J Manag 28(4):3–15Google Scholar
  45. GR1. (2010).Sustainability Report.(www.globalreporting.org)
  46. Gray R, Owen DLMK (1987) Corporate social reporting: accounting and accountability. Prentice-Hall International Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. Gray R, Kouhy R, L. S. (1995) Corporate social and environmental reporting. A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosures. Account Audit Account J 8(2):47–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gul S, Muhammad F, Rashid A (2017) Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility : the case of small, medium, and large firms. Pak J Commer Soc Sci 11(1):1–34Google Scholar
  49. Gulzar MA, Cherian J, Hwang J, Jiang Y, Sial MS (2019) The impact of board gender diversity and foreign institutional investors on the corporate social responsibility (CSR) engagement of Chinese listed companies. Sustainability (Switzerland) 11(2):1–19Google Scholar
  50. Haddad AE, AlShattarat WK, AbuGhazaleh NM, Nobanee H (2015) The impact of ownership structure and family board domination on voluntary disclosure for Jordanian listed companies. Eur Bus Rev 5(2):203–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Haladu A, Haliru Beri M (2016) Corporate characteristics and sustainability reporting environmental agencies’ moderating effects. IOSR J Humanit Soc Sci 21(08):19–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hall M, Weiss L (1967) Firm size and profitability. Rev Econ Stat 49(3):319–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Harjoto MA, J. H. (2011) Corporate governance and CSR nexus. J Bus Ethics, 100(1), 45–67Google Scholar
  54. Hartikayanti HN, Siregar IW (2018) The effect of stock ownership toward the corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure. KnE Social Sciences 3(10):1314–1324Google Scholar
  55. Hassan MS, Wajid A, Kalim R (2017) Factors affecting trade deficit in Pakistan, India and Bangladesh. Econ Polit 34(2):283–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hassan M, Khan Afridi M, Irfan Khan M (2019) Energy policies and environmental security: a multi-criteria analysis of energy policies of Pakistan. Int J Green Energy 16(7):510–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Homer CJ, Klatka K, R. D. (2008) A review of the evidence for the medical home for children with special health care needs. Pediatrics 2008Google Scholar
  58. Husain I (2018) Pakistan’s economy and regional challenges. Int Stud 55(3):253–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hussain N, Rigoni U, Orij RP (2016) Corporate governance and sustainability performance: analysis of triple bottom line performance. J Bus Ethics 149(2):411–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ibrahim, M. H. I. (2015). Corporate environmental disclosure: a case from the Libyan construction industry. In Liverpool John Moores University Google Scholar
  61. Ikpor, I.M., & Agha, N. (2016). Determinants of voluntary disclosure quality in emerging economies: evidence from firms listed on Nigeria stock exchange. International. Journal of Research in Engineering & Technology, 4(2)Google Scholar
  62. Ismail AH, Rahman AA (2016) The quality of environmental disclosure in various reporting media of oil and gas companies in developing countries. Corp Ownersh Control 203Google Scholar
  63. Ivankova NV, Creswell JW, Stick SL (2006) Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: from theory to practice. Field Methods 18(1):3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Jain R, Winner L (2016) CSR and sustainability reporting practices of top companies in India. Corp Commun Int J 21(1):36–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Janjua N, Kasi P, Nawaz H (2006) Acute health effects of the Tasman Spirit oil spill on residents of Karachi, Pakistan. BMC Public Health 6(1):84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Javid AY, Iqbal R (2010) Corporate governance in Pakistan: corporate valuation, ownership, and financing. PIDE Working Papers 57:1–87Google Scholar
  67. Jensen M, Meckling W (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. J Financ Econ 3:305–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (2012). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. The Economic Nature of the Firm: A Reader, Third Edition, 283–303Google Scholar
  69. Jiang C, Fu Q (2019) A win-win outcome between corporate environmental performance and corporate value: from the perspective of stakeholders. Sustainability 11(3):921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Kanwal S, Chong R, Pitafi AH (2019) China–Pakistan economic corridor projects development in Pakistan: local citizens benefits perspective. J Public Aff 19(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Katmon N, Mohamad ZZ, Norwani NM, Al Farooque O (2017) Comprehensive board diversity and quality of corporate social responsibility disclosure: evidence from an emerging market. J Bus Ethics 1–35Google Scholar
  72. Khan H (2010) The effect of corporate governance elements on corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting. Int J Law Manag 52(2):82–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Khan M, Hassan A (2019) Environmental reporting in Pakistan's Oil and Gas Industry. Int Res J Bus Stud 12(1):15–29Google Scholar
  74. Khan MN, Khan F (2011) Does ownership matter ? A study of family and non family firms in. Problems of Management in The 21th Century, 2(2006):95–109Google Scholar
  75. Khan FU, Nouman M (2017) Does ownership structure affect Firm’S performance? Empirical evidence from Pakistan. Pakistan Business Review (April 2017) 1–23Google Scholar
  76. Khan MA, Ullah R, Shah NH (2012) A relationship between insider’s ownership and firm value: a case of Pakistani companies. Int J Asian Soc Sci 2(9):1519–1532Google Scholar
  77. Khan A, Muttakin MB, SJ. (2013). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: evidence from an emerging economy. J Bus Ethics, 114(2), 207–223Google Scholar
  78. Khan FU, Zhang J, Usman M, Badulescu A, Sial MS (2019a) Ownership reduction in state-owned enterprises and corporate social responsibility: perspective from secondary privatization in China. Sustainability 11(1008):1–13Google Scholar
  79. Khan I, Khan I, Saeed BB (2019b) Does board diversity affect quality of corporate social responsibility disclosure? Evidence from Pakistan. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 1–11Google Scholar
  80. Kim Y-B, An HT, Kim JD (2015) The effect of carbon risk on the cost of equity capital. Journal of Cleaner Production 93:279–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Kirat M (2015) Corporate social responsibility in the oil and gas industry in Qatar perceptions and practices. Public Relat Rev 41(4):438–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Kouser R, Bano T, Scholar MP, Azeem M, Assistant M-U-H (2012) Inter-relationship between profitability, growth and size: a case of non-financial companies from Pakistan. Sociol Sci 6(2):405–419Google Scholar
  83. Kumar K, Prakash A (2019) Examination of sustainability reporting practices in Indian banking sector. Asian J Sustain Soc Respon 4(1)Google Scholar
  84. Li X, Zheng C, Liu G, Sial MS (2018) The Effectiveness of Internal Control and Corporate Social Responsibility : Evidence from Chinese Capital Market. Sustainability 10(4006)1–18Google Scholar
  85. Lin FJ (2008) Solving multicollinearity in the process of fitting regression model using the nested estimate procedure. Qual Quant 42(3):417–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Lodhia S (2018) Is the medium the message? Advancing the research agenda on the role of communication media in sustainability reporting. Meditari Account Res 26(1):2–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Lone JE, Ali A, Khan I (2016) Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: evidence from Pakistan. Int J Bus Soc 16(5):1–22Google Scholar
  88. Lu Y, Abeysekera I, Cortese C (2015) Corporate social responsibility reporting quality, board characteristics and corporate social reputation: evidence from China. Pac Account Rev 27(1):95–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Lucia L, Ria R (2018) The effect of firm ’ S characteristic and corporate governance to sustainability report disclosure. SEEIJ (Social Econ Ecol Int J) 1(2):71–81Google Scholar
  90. Mahmood Z, Ahmad Z, Ali W, Ejaz A (2017) Does environmental disclosure relate to environmental performance? Reconciling legitimacy theory and voluntary disclosure theory. Pak J Commer Soc Sci 11(3):1134–1152Google Scholar
  91. Mahmood Z, Kouser R, Ali W, Ahmad Z, Salman T (2018) Does corporate governance affect sustainability disclosure? A mixed methods study. Sustainability (Switzerland) 10(1):1–20Google Scholar
  92. Majeed S, Aziz T, Saleem S (2015) The effect of corporate governance elements on corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure: an empirical evidence from listed companies at KSE Pakistan. Int J Financ Stud 3(4):530–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Mansor N, Jamil A, Bahari A (2017) Integrated Waqf reporting system. Int J Account, Finance Bus 2(6):155–166Google Scholar
  94. Marcus M (1969) Profitability and size of firm: some further evidence. Rev Econ Stat 51(1):104–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Martínez-Ferrero J, García-Sánchez IM (2017) Sustainability assurance and assurance providers: corporate governance determinants in stakeholder-oriented countries. J Manag Organ 23(25):647–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Masud AK, Nurunnabi M, Bae SM (2018) The effects of corporate governance on environmental sustainability reporting: empirical evidence from south Asian countries. Asian J Sustain Soc Respon 3(3):1–26Google Scholar
  97. Maxwell, J., Bickman. I. L. & Rog, D. J. (1997). Designing a qualitative study. (in L. Bick). Thousand Oaks, CA: SageGoogle Scholar
  98. Meo S, Al-Drees A, Meo I (2008) Lung function in subjects exposed to crude oil spill into seawater. Mar Pollut Bull 56(1):88–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Mirza, M. (2016). Sustainability reporting; The evolving landscape in about ACCA. Retrieved from www.accaglobal.com
  100. Modugu KP, Eboigbe SU (2017) Corporate attributes and corporate disclosure level of listed companies in Nigeria: a post-IFRS adoption study. J Financ Account 5(2):44–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Momin MA, Parker LD (2013) Motivations for corporate social responsibility reporting by MNC subsidiaries in an emerging country: the case of Bangladesh. Br Account Rev 45(17):215–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Myers SC (1977) Determinants of corporate borrowing. J Financ Econ 5:147–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Naeem Nawaz SM, Alvi S (2018) Energy security for socio-economic and environmental sustainability in Pakistan. Heliyon 4(10):e00854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Nazari JA, Herremans IM, Warsame HA, Nazari JA, Herremans IM, Warsame HA (2015) Sustainability reporting: external motivators and internal facilitators. Corp Gov 15(3):375–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Ntim CG, Lindop S, Thomas DA (2013) Corporate governance and risk reporting in South Africa: a study of anal., corporate risk disclosures in the pre- and post-2007/2008 global financial crisis periods. Int Rev Financ 30(2013):363–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Nutting PA, Miller WL, C. B. (2009) Initial lessons from the frst national demonstration project on practice transformation to a patient-centered medical home. Ann Fam Med 7(3):254–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. O’Brien RM (2007) A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Qual Quant 41(5):673–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Odriozola MD, Baraibar-Diez E (2017) Is corporate reputation associated with quality of CSR reporting?Evidence from Spain. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 24:121–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Oh WY, Chang YK, M. A. (2011) The effect of ownership structure on corporate social responsibility: empirical evidence from Korea. J Bus Ethics 104(2):283–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Patten DM (1991) Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure. J Account Policy, Public 10(4):297–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Patten DM (1992) Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: a note on legitimacy theory. Acc Organ Soc 17(5):471–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Patten DM (2002) The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: a research note. Acc Organ Soc 27(8):763–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Pérez-López D, Moreno-Romero A, Barkemeyer R (2015) Exploring the relationship business, between sustainability reporting and sustainability management practices. Strateg Environ 24(8):720–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. PICG (Pakistan Institute of Corporate Governance). (2013). Survey: conference on sustainability reporting, Corporate Social Responsibility and GovernanceGoogle Scholar
  115. Rashid, K., and Naseer M (2016). The relationship between environmental reporting and corporate governance: empirical evidence from Pakistan. In Intech: Vol. i (p. 13)Google Scholar
  116. Reverte C (2009) Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms. J Bus Ethics 88:351–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Rossi A, Tarquinio L (2017) An analysis of sustainability report assurance statements: evidence from Italian listed companies. Manag Audit J 32(6):578–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Salahuddin M, Gow J (2019) Effects of energy consumption and economic growth on environmental quality: evidence from Qatar. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(18):18124–18142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Sari, R. A. (2012). The influence of corporate characteristics to corporate social responsibility disclosure in manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia stock exchangeGoogle Scholar
  120. Sari D, Tjen C (2016) Corporate social responsibility disclosure, environmental performance, and tax aggressiveness. Int Res J Bus Stud 9(2):93–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Schipper K (1981) Discussion of voluntary corporate disclosure: the case of interim reporting. Journal of Accounting Research 19:85Google Scholar
  122. Sekerez V (2017) Environmental accounting as a cornerstone of corporate sustainability reporting. Int J Manag Sci Bus Adm 4(1):7–14Google Scholar
  123. Shah SH, Raja IA, Rizwan M, Rashid N, Mahmood Q, Shah FA, Pervez A (2018) Potential of microalgal biodiesel production and its sustainability perspectives in Pakistan. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81(July 2017):76–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Sharif M, Rashid K (2014) Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting: an empirical evidence from commercial banks (CB) of Pakistan. Qual Quant 48(5):2501–2521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Shouket B, Zaman K, Nassani AA, Aldakhil AM, Abro MMQ (2019) Management of green transportation: an evidence-based approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(12):12574–12589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Soufeljil, M., Sghaier, A., Kheireddine, H., & Mighri, Z. (2016). Ownership structure and corporate performance: the case of listed Tunisian firms Business & Financial Affairs 5(4)Google Scholar
  127. Stojanovic-Aleksic V, Boskovic A (2017) What really drives corporate social responsibility? Manag: J Sustain Bus Manag Solutions Emerging Econ 22(3):75Google Scholar
  128. Swandari F, Sadikin A (2017) The effect of ownership structure, profitability, leverage, and firm size on corporate social responsibility (CSR). Binus Business Review 7(3):315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Teddlie C, Yu F (2007) Mixed methods sampling: a typology with examples. J Mixed Methods Res 1:77–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Teoh H-Y, Thong G (1984) Another look at corporate social responsibility and reporting: An empirical study in a developing country. Accounting, Organizations and Society 9(2):189–206Google Scholar
  131. Trotman KT, Bradley GW (1981) Associations between social responsibility disclosure and characteristics of companies. Accounting, Organizations and Society 6(4):355–362Google Scholar
  132. Ulfa, M. (2009). The influence of corporate characteristics on corporate social responsibility disclosure. Universitas Islam IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  133. Ullah M, R., & Qadir, A. (2009) Assessment of groundwater contamination in an industrial city, Sialkot, Pakistan. Afr J Environ Sci Technol 3(12)Google Scholar
  134. Ullah H, Rahman A (2015) Corporate social responsibility reporting practices in banking companies in Bangladesh. J Financ Rep Account 13:200–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Ullah H, Hossain M, Yakub KM (2014) Environmental Disclosure Practices in Annual And, Report of the Listed Textile Industries in Bangladesh. Global. Journal of Management Business Research 14(1):97–108Google Scholar
  136. Uwuigbe U, Uwuigbe O, Ajayi AO (2011) Corporate social responsibility disclosures by environmentally visible corporations: a study of selected firms in Nigeria. Eur J Bus Manag 3(9)Google Scholar
  137. Uwuigbe U, Teddy O, Uwuigbe OR, Emmanuel O, Asiriuwa O, Eyitomi GA, Taiwo OS (2018) Sustainability reporting and firm performance: a bi-directional approach. Acad Strateg Manag J 17(3):1–16Google Scholar
  138. Vijayakumaran R (2019) Agency costs, ownership, and internal governance mechanisms: evidence from Chinese listed companies. Asian Econ Finan Rev 9(1):133–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Waddock SA, Graves SB (1977) The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strateg Manag J 18:303–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Waluyo W (2017) Firm size, firm age, and firm growth on corporate social responsibility in Indonesia: the case of real estate companies. Eur Res Stud J 20(4):360–369Google Scholar
  141. Wang J, Wang X (2015) Benefits of Foreign Ownership: Evidence from Foreign Direct Investment in China. Journal of International Economics 1–47Google Scholar
  142. Whetman LL (2018) The impact of sustainability reporting on firm profitability the impact of sustainability reporting on firm profitability. Undergrad Econ Rev 14(1):1–21Google Scholar
  143. Wise V, M. A. (2008) Case studies on corporate governance and corporate social responsibility. South Asian J Manag 15(3):136–149Google Scholar
  144. World Bank (2015) Pakistan overview, Retrieved April 2016Google Scholar
  145. World Bank Climate Change Report (2018) www.worldbank.org/en/topic/climatechange/2018

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations