Metal accumulation from leachate by polyculture in crushed brick and steel slag using pilot-scale constructed wetland in the climate of Pakistan
- 69 Downloads
The temperate climate of Pakistan has enhanced the performance of macrophytes grown in crushed brick and steel slag in constructed wetland for removal of heavy metals from leachate. Two pilot-scale constructed wetlands [constructed wetland 1 (CW1) and constructed wetland 2 (CW2)] were planted with a polyculture of Phragmites australis and Typha latifolia in crushed brick and steel slag, respectively. These wetlands were located in the National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad campus, and operated for 15 months for treatment of leachate with climatic variations of Islamabad. The metal accumulation in a polyculture of Phragmites australis and Typha latifolia and in substrates was analyzed in the laboratory of Institute of Environmental Sciences and Engineering located near wetland site. Despite the high temperature in summer season, removal of Cu, Zn, and Pb was efficient due to the synergistic combination of macrophytes and substrates in both wetlands. Substrates acted as a primary sink of metals and enhanced metal accumulation in the plant’s roots which resulted in poor translocation of Cu, Zn, and Pb to shoots. Despite the variation in precipitation and temperature during summer and winter seasons, the average removal of copper, zinc, and lead was 95%, 91%, and 89% by polyculture in crushed brick in CW1 and 97%, 95%, and 91% in steel slag in CW2, respectively. A The variation in climate has a negligible effect on the sorption of metals by both substrates in CW1 and CW2. Furthermore, Phragmites australis with crushed brick in CW1 was efficient for removal of Zn and Typha latifolia was performing better with steel slag in CW2 for significantly high removal of Cu and Pb in the climate of Islamabad, Pakistan.
KeywordsConstructed wetland Climate Heavy metals Hyperaccumulators Precipitation Pakistan Substrates
The authors are grateful for the facilities provided by the Institute of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad.
The study received research funds provided by the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan.
- Abdullah M, Fasola M, Muhammad A, Malik SA, Bostan N, Bokhari H, Kamran MA, Shafqat MN, Alamdar A, Khan M, Ali N, Eqani SAMAS (2015) Avian feathers as a non-destructive bio-monitoring tool of trace metals signatures: a case study from severely contaminated areas. Chemosphere 119:553–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.06.068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- APHA (American Public Health Association) (1999) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19th edn. American Public Health Association Inc, Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
- Badejo AA, Sridhar MKC, Coker AO, Ndambuki JM, Kupolati WK (2015) Phytoremediation of water using Phragmites karka and Veteveria nigritana in constructed wetland. Phytoremediation 17:847–852. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2014.964849
- Batool A, Zeshan (2017) Effect of chelators and substrates on phytoremediation of synthetic leachate for removal of trace elements effect of chelators and substrates on phytoremediation of synthetic leachate for removal of trace elements. Soil Sediment Contam 26:220–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2017.1274958 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bohórquez E, Paredes D, Arias CA (2016) Vertical flow-constructed wetlands for domestic wastewater treatment under tropical conditions: effect of different design and operational parameters. Env Tech. (United Kingdom) 38(2):199–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2016.1230650
- Bragato C, Brix H, Malagoli M (2006) Accumulation of nutrients and heavy metals in Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steudel and Bolboschoenus maritimus (L.) Palla in a constructed wetland of the Venice lagoon watershed. Environ Pollut 144:967–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2006.01.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dan A, M, Fujii Y, Soda S, Ishigaki T, Machimura T, Ike M (2017) Removal of heavy metals from synthetic landfill leachate in lab-scale vertical flow constructed wetlands. Sci Total Environ 584:742–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.112
- Ge Y, Wang X, Zheng Y, Dzakpasu M, Zhao Y, Xiong J (2015) Functions of slags and gravels as substrates in large - scale demonstration constructed wetland systems for polluted river water treatment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:12982–12991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4573-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Labidi NS (2008) Removal of mercury from aqueous solutions by waste brick. Env Res 2:275–278Google Scholar
- Papaevangelou VA, Gikas GD, Tsihrintzis VA (2017) Chromium removal from wastewater using HSF and VF pilot-scale constructed wetlands: overall performance, and fate and distribution of this element within the wetland environment. Chemosphere 168:716–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rai UN, Upadhyay AK, Singh NK, Dwivedi S, Tripathi RD (2015) Seasonal applicability of horizontal sub-surface flow constructed wetland for trace elements and nutrient removal from urban wastes to conserve Ganga River water quality at Haridwar, India. Ecol Eng 81:115–122Google Scholar
- Soda S, Hamada T, Yamaoka Y, Ike M, Nakazato H, Saeki Y, Kasamatsu T, Sakurai Y (2012) Constructed wetlands for advanced treatment of wastewater with a complex matrix from a metal-processing plant: bioconcentration and translocation factors of various metals in Acorus gramineus and Cyperus alternifolius. Ecol Eng 39:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Syranidou E, Christofilopoulos S, Gkavrou G, Thijs S, Weyens N, Vangronsveld J, Kalogerakis N (2016) Exploitation of endophytic bacteria to enhance the phytoremediation potential of the wetland helophyte Juncus acutus. Front Microbiol 07:1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhu W-L, Cui L-H, Ouyang Y, Long C-F, Tang X-D (2011) Kinetic adsorption of ammonium nitrogen by substrate materials for constructed wetlands. Pedosphere 21(4):454–463Google Scholar