Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 32, pp 33440–33450 | Cite as

Monitoring survey of caffeine in surface waters (Lis River) and wastewaters located at Leiria Town in Portugal

  • Paula Paíga
  • Sandra Ramos
  • Sandra Jorge
  • Jaime Gabriel Silva
  • Cristina Delerue-MatosEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Investigation during 11-month period was performed to study the presence of caffeine in the Lis River in Leiria Town in Portugal, and a monitoring during 9-month period was realized to check the contribution of the human pollution of two wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) that discharge their effluents to the studied river. The samples were collected in five sampling points along the river and in two influents and two effluents of the studied WWTPs. Caffeine was detected in all ninety-one collected samples. The caffeine concentration ranged from 25.3 to 321 ng/L in the river samples, from 112 to 1927 ng/L in the WWTP effluents, and from 9478 to 83,901 ng/L in the WWTP influents. The highest concentration in the river was detected in the two sampling points located after the effluent discharge points and reached 315 and 321 ng/L. Risk assessment was performed for three trophic levels using the risk quotient calculation and revealed that caffeine do not cause toxic effect on Daphnia magna and on fish but could be possibly toxic to algae. The results proved that caffeine can be an effective indicator of human-born pollution.

Keywords

Caffeine Liquid chromatography Mass spectrometry Monitoring study Risk assessment 

Notes

Funding information

The authors received funding from the EU and FCT/UEFISCDI/FORMAS for funding, in the frame of the collaborative international consortium REWATER financed under the ERA-NET Cofund WaterWorks2015 Call. This ERA-NET is an integral part of the 2016 Joint Activities developed by the Water Challenges for a Changing World Joint Programme Initiative (Water JPI). This work was also supported by UID/QUI/50006/2019 with funding from FCT/MCTES through national funds.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11356_2019_6168_MOESM1_ESM.docx (687 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 687 kb)

References

  1. 2002/657/EC (2002) European Commission 2002/657/EC. Commission decision of 12 August 2002 implementing council directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results (notified under document number C(2002) 3044, L221/8. Available at: http://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/eur49615.pdf. Accessed date: August 2017
  2. Akcay H, Oguz A, Karapire C (2003) Study of heavy metal pollution and speciation in Buyak Menderes and Gediz river sediments. Water Res 37:813–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benotti MJ, Brownawell BJ (2007) Distributions of pharmaceuticals in an urban estuary during both dry- and wet-weather conditions. Environ Sci Technol 41:5795–5802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boisvert M, Fayad P, Sauvé S (2012) Development of a new multi-residue laser diode thermal desorption atmospheric pressure chemical ionization tandem mass spectrometry method for the detection and quantification of pesticides and pharmaceuticals in wastewater samples. Anal Chim Acta 754:75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buerge IJ, Poiger T, Muller MD, Buser H-R (2003) Caffeine, an anthropogenic marker for wastewater contamination of surface waters. Environ Sci Technol 37:691–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ECOSAR Ecological Structure Activity Relationships (ECOSAR) (n.d.) Predictive ModelGoogle Scholar
  7. Edwards QA, Kulikov SM, Garner-O’Neale LD (2015) Caffeine in surface and wastewaters in Barbados, West Indies. SpringerPlus 4:57, 1–57,12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. EMEA (2006) Guideline on the environmental risk assessment of medicinal products for human use. European Medicines Agency Pre-Authorisation Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use. London, 01 June 2006. Doc. Ref. EMEA/CHMP/SWP/4447/00 corr 2. Available at: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/10/WC500003978.pdf. Accessed date: June 2017)
  9. Fernández C, González-Doncel M, Pro J, Carbonell G, Tarazona JV (2010) Occurrence of pharmaceutically active compounds in surface waters of the Henares-Jarama-Tajo River system (Madrid, Spain) and a potential risk characterization. Sci Total Environ 408:543–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferreira AP (2005) Caffeine as an environmental indicator for assessing urban aquatic ecosystems. Cad Saude Publica 21:1884–1892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Florescu D, Ionete RE, Sandru C, Iordache A, Culea M (2011) The influence of pollution monitoring parameters in characterizing the surface water quality from Romania southern area. Rom J Phys 56:1001–1010Google Scholar
  12. Glassmeyer ST, Furlong ET, Kolpin DW, Cahill JD, Zaugg SD, Werner SL, Meyer MT, Kryak DD (2005) Transport of chemical and microbial compounds from known wastewater discharges: potential for use as indicators of human fecal contamination. Environ Sci Technol 39:5157–5169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heberer T (2002) Tracking persistent pharmaceutical residues from municipal sewage to drinking water. J Hydrol 266:175–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hillebrand O, Nödler K, Licha T, Sauter M, Geyer T (2012) Caffeine as an indicator for the quantification of untreated wastewater in karst systems. Water Res 46:395–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huerta-Fontela M, Galceran MT, Martin-Alonso J, Ventura F (2008) Occurrence of psychoactive stimulatory drugs in wastewaters in north-eastern Spain. Sci Total Environ 397:31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kiguchi O, Sato G, Kobayashi T (2016) Source-specific sewage pollution detection in urban river waters using pharmaceuticals and personal care products as molecular indicators. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:22513–22529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim S-C, Carlson K (2007) Quantification of human and veterinary antibiotics in water and sediment using SPE/LC/MS/MS. Anal Bioanal Chem 387:1301–1315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kurissery S, Kanavillil N, Verenitch S, Mazumder A (2012) Caffeine as an anthropogenic marker of domestic waste: a study from Lake Simcoe watershed. Ecol Indic 23:501–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. LeiriaMunicipality (n.d.) Available http://www.cm-leiria.pt/. Accessed 14 Dec 2017
  20. Loos R, Wollgast J, Huber T, Hanke G (2007) Polar herbicides, pharmaceutical products, perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS), perfluorooctanoate (PFOA), and nonylphenol and its carboxylates and ethoxylates in surface and tap waters around Lake Maggiore in Northern Italy. Anal Bioanal Chem 387:1469–1478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mahoney CR, Giles GE, Marriott BP, Judelson DA, Glickman EL, Geiselman PJ, Lieberman HR, (2019) Intake of caffeine from all sources and reasons for use by college students. Clinical Nutrition 38 (2):668-675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Martín J, Camacho-Munoz D, Santos JL, Aparicio I, Alonso E (2012) Occurrence of pharmaceutical compounds in wastewater and sludge from wastewater treatment plants: removal and ecotoxicological impact of wastewater discharges and sludge disposal. J Hazard Mater 239-240:40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nannou CI, Kosma CI, Albanis TA (2015) Occurrence of pharmaceuticals in surface waters: analytical method development and environmental risk assessment. Int J Environ Anal Chem 95:1242–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Paíga P, Santos LHMLM, Ramos S, Jorge S, Silva JG, Delerue-Matos C (2016) Presence of pharmaceuticals in the Lis river (Portugal): sources, fate and seasonal variation. Sci Total Environ 573:164–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Paíga P, Santos LHMLM, Delerue-Matos C (2017) Development of a multi-residue method for the determination of human and veterinary pharmaceuticals and some of their metabolites in aqueous environmental matrices by SPE-UHPLC–MS/MS. J Pharm Biomed Anal 135:75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Panuwet P, Hunter REJ, D’Souza PE, Chen X, Radford SA, Cohen JR, Marder ME, Kartavenka K, Ryan PB, Barr DB (2016) Biological matrix effects in quantitative tandem mass spectrometry-based analytical methods: advancing biomonitoring. Crit Rev Anal Chem 46:93–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Peteffi GP, Fleck JD, Kael IM, Girardi V, Bündchen R, Krajeski DM, Demoliner M, Silva FP, daRosa DC, Antunes MV, Linden R (2018) Caffeine levels as a predictor of Human mastadenovirus presence in surface waters-a case study in the Sinos River basin-Brazil. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 25(16):15774–15784.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1649-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. R Development Core Team (2016) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  29. Seiler RL, Zaugg SD, Thomas JM, Howcroft DL (1999) Caffeine and pharmaceuticals as indicators of wastewater contamination in wells. Ground Water 37:405–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Siegener R, Chen RF (2002) Caffeine in Boston Harbor seawater. Mar Pollut Bull 44:383–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stamatis NK, Konstantinou IK (2013) Occurrence and removal of emerging pharmaceutical, personal care compounds and caffeine tracer in municipal sewage treatment plant in Western Greece. J Environ Sci Health B 48:800–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Thomaidi VS, Stasinakis AS, Borova VL, Thomaidis NS (2015) Is there a risk for the aquatic environment due to the existence of emerging organic contaminants in treated domestic wastewater? Greece as a case-study. J Hazard Mater 283:740–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vazquez-Roig P, Andreu V, Blasco C, Picó Y (2012) Risk assessment on the presence of pharmaceuticals in sediments, soils and waters of the Pego-Oliva marshlands (Valencia, eastern Spain). Sci Total Environ 440:24–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vieira J, Fonseca A, Vilar VJP, Boaventura RAR, Botelho CMS (2012) Water quality in Lis river, Portugal. Environ Monit Assess 184:7125–7140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yang Y-Y, Liu W-R, Liu Y-S, Zhao J-L, Zhang Q-Q, Zhang M, Zhang J-N, Jiang Y-X, Zhang L-J, Ying G-G (2017) Suitability of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) and artificial sweeteners (ASs) as wastewater indicators in the Pearl River Delta, South China. Sci Total Environ 590–591:611–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paula Paíga
    • 1
  • Sandra Ramos
    • 2
  • Sandra Jorge
    • 3
  • Jaime Gabriel Silva
    • 4
    • 5
  • Cristina Delerue-Matos
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.REQUIMTE/LAQV, Instituto Superior de Engenharia do PortoPolitécnico do PortoPortoPortugal
  2. 2.CEAUL, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal and LEMA, Instituto Superior de Engenharia do PortoInstituto Politécnico do PortoPortoPortugal
  3. 3.Águas do Centro Litoral, SA, Grupo Águas de PortugalETA da BoavistaCoimbraPortugal
  4. 4.Águas de Santo André, Cerca da ÁguaVila Nova de Santo AndréPortugal
  5. 5.Departamento de Engenharia Civil, Instituto Superior de Engenharia do PortoInstituto Politécnico do PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations