Advertisement

Technoeconomic modelling and environmental assessment of a modern PEMFC CHP system: a case study of an eco-house at University of Nottingham

  • Sheng SuiEmail author
  • Rizwan RasheedEmail author
  • Qinglin Li
  • Yuehong Su
  • Saffa Riffat
Research Article
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

This simulation study is aimed to model a contemporary Proton Exchange Membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) CHP system having a ‘heat and power’ autonomy as well as a provision of demand-driven electrical supply to the grid. A novel nanowire-electrode PEMFC stack is adopted within this PEMFC CHP system so to effectively replace the existing natural gas fuelled durable solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) CHP system installed at David Wilson Millennium Eco-house at University of Nottingham. The energy savings, environmental, and economic performances of the proposed PEMFC system are determined and compared to the base case (SOFC) which is operated continuously to maintain a 1.5 kWe. While to meetup the highly fluctuating and seasonal demands of heating and power like in the UK, a PEMFC is more productive and advantageous over a SOFC. The proposed PEMFC unlike to the SOFC will be able to operate and adjust its output and turn down instantly as per changing conditions of ambient temperatures and loads in terms of electricity and heat. The results of the modelling predicted that as compared to the base case scenario, this PEMFC CHP system will efficiently reduce an annual CO2 emission by 65.99% and fiscal costs by 66.74% with a viable internal rate of return as 8.93% and benefit to cost ratio as 1.02.

Keywords

Environmental and economic analysis Fuel cell CHP Techno-economic modelling Heat and power autonomy Pt catalyst loading 

Notes

Funding information

This work is supported by European Commissions Marie Sktodowska-Curie Individual Fellowships (IF-EF) (H2020-MSCA-IF-2014, Grant no. 658217) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 21576164). The authors are supported by Punjab Higher Education Commission (PHEC) Pakistan for the Postdoc Fellowship Award (Letter No. PHEC/A&R/FPDF/1-33/2018), GC University Lahore Pakistan, and University of Nottingham.

References

  1. Adam A, Fraga ES, Brett DJ (2013) Modelling and optimisation in terms of CO2 emissions of a solid oxide fuel cell based micro-CHP system in a four bedroom house in London. Energy Procedia 42:201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akimoto Y, Okajima K (2014) Semi-empirical equation of PEMFC considering operation temperature. Energy Technol Policy 1(1):91–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baogang Z, Chuanping F, Jing Z, Wenli H (2012) Simultaneous reduction of vanadium (V) and chromium (VI) with enhanced energy recovery based on microbial fuel cell technology. J Power Sources 204:34–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baogang ZY, Liu ST, Maosheng Z, Yingxin Z, Caixing T, Hengyuan L, Chuanping F (2014) Enhancement of bacterial denitrification for nitrate removal in groundwater with electrical stimulation from microbial fuel cells. J Power Sources 268:423–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beausoleil-Morrison I, Lombardi K (2009) The calibration of a model for simulating the thermal and electrical performance of a 2.8 kW AC solid-oxide fuel cell micro-cogeneration device. J Power Sources 186(1):67–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyd J (2008) Home fuels cells to sell in Japan-[update]. IEEE Spectr 45(10):20–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Briguglio N, Ferraro M, Brunaccini G, Antonucci V (2011) Evaluation of a low temperature fuel cell system for residential CHP. Int J Hydrog Energy 36(13):8023–8029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown JE, Hendry CN, Harborne P (2007) An emerging market in fuel cells? Residential combined heat and power in four countries. Energy Policy 35(4):2173–2186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chahartaghi M, Kharkeshi BA (2018) Performance analysis of a combined cooling, heating and power system with PEM fuel cell as a prime mover. Appl Therm Eng 128:805–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CIBSE GUIDE A (2015) Environmental Design, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Cozzolino R (2018) Thermodynamic performance assessment of a novel micro-CCHP system based on a low temperature PEMFC power unit and a half-effect Li/Br absorption chiller. Energies 11(2):315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Di-Marcoberardino G, Manzolini G (2017) Investigation of a 5 kW micro-CHP PEM fuel cell based system integrated with membrane reactor under diverse EU natural gas quality. Int J Hydrog Energy 42(19):13988–14002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elmer T, Worall M, Wu S, Riffat SB (2015a) Emission and economic performance assessment of a solid oxide fuel cell micro-combined heat and power system in a domestic building. Appl Therm Eng 90:1082–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elmer T, Worall M, Wu S, Riffat SB (2015b) Fuel cell technology for domestic built environment applications: state of-the-art review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 42:913–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elmer T, Worall M, Wu S, Riffat SB (2016) Assessment of a novel solid oxide fuel cell tri-generation system for building applications. Energy Convers Manag 124:29–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ercolino G, Ashraf MA, Specchia V, Specchia S (2015) Performance evaluation and comparison of fuel processors integrated with PEM fuel cell based on steam or autothermal reforming and on CO preferential oxidation or selective methanation. Appl Energy 143:138–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. European Commission (2003) High level Group for Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies, Hydrogen energy and fuel cells: a vision of our future. Office for Official Publications of the European CommunitiesGoogle Scholar
  18. Facci AL, Cigolotti V, Jannelli E, Ubertini S (2017) Technical and economic assessment of a SOFC-based energy system for combined cooling, heating and power. Appl Energy 192:563–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. FCT (2013) The fuel cell today industry review 2013. In: Fuel Cell Today: The leading authority on fuel cellsGoogle Scholar
  20. Gandiglio M, Lanzini A, Santarelli M, Leone P (2014) Design and optimization of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell CHP system for residential use. Energy Buildings 69:381–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ham SW, Jo SY, Dong HW, Jeong JW (2015) A simplified PEM fuel cell model for building cogeneration applications. Energy Buildings 107:213–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hawkes AD, Aguiar P, Croxford B, Leach MA, Adjiman CS, Brandon NP (2007) Solid oxide fuel cell micro combined heat and power system operating strategy: options for provision of residential space and water heating. J Power Sources 164(1):260–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hawkes A, Staffell I, Brett D, Brandon N (2009) Fuel cells for micro-combined heat and power generation. Energy Environ Sci 2(7):729–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. HM Government (2010) Approved document L2A – conservation of fuel and power, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Howard B, Modi V (2017) Examination of the optimal operation of building scale combined heat and power systems under disparate climate and GHG emissions rates. Appl Energy 185:280–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. IEA (2008) Energy Conservation in Buildings & Community Systems Programme. An Experimental and Simulation-based Investigation of the Performance of Small-scale Fuel Cell and Combustion-based Cogeneration Devices Serving Residential Buildings: Final Report of Annex 42 of the International Energy Agency's Energy Conservation in Buildings and Community Systems Programme. Natural Resources Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  27. IEA (2014) Energy efficiency indicators: fundamentals on statistics. OECD/IEA 2014:117Google Scholar
  28. Jing R, Wang M, Brandon N, Zhao Y (2017a) Multi-criteria evaluation of solid oxide fuel cell based combined cooling heating and power (SOFC-CCHP) applications for public buildings in China. Energy 141:273–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jing R, Wang M, Wang W, Brandon N, Li N, Chen J, Zhao Y (2017b) Economic and environmental multi-optimal design and dispatch of solid oxide fuel cell based CCHP system. Energy Convers Manag 154:365–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim J, Lee SM, Srinivasan S, Chamberlin CE (1995) Modelling of proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance with an empirical equation. J Electrochem Soc 142(8):2670–2674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Loreti G, Facci AL, Baffo I, Ubertini S (2019) Combined heat, cooling, and power systems based on half effect absorption chillers and polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Appl Energy 235:747–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lv H, Li D, Lopes PP, Strmcnik D, Wang R, Markovic NM, Stamenkovic V (2017) From fundamentals to PEMFC systems. In Meeting Abstracts no. 34, pp. 1630-1630. The electrochemical societyGoogle Scholar
  33. Mamaghani AH, Najafi B, Casalegno A, Rinaldi F (2016) Long-term economic analysis and optimization of an HT-PEM fuel cell based micro combined heat and power plant. Appl Therm Eng 99:1201–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mamaghani AH, Najafi B, Casalegno A, Rinaldi F (2018) Optimization of an HT-PEM fuel cell based residential micro combined heat and power system: a multi-objective approach. J Clean Prod 180:126–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Napoli R, Gandiglio M, Lanzini A, Santarelli M (2015) Techno-economic analysis of PEMFC and SOFC micro-CHP fuel cell systems for the residential sector. Energy Buildings 103:131–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nishizaki K (2008) The japanese experience in micro CHP for residential use. In Gas Industry Micro CHP Workshop. https://www.gas.or.jp/en/newsletter/images/08/pdf/conf_02.pdf. Accessed 16 Nov 2018
  37. Onovwiona HI, Ugursal VI (2006) Residential cogeneration systems: review of the current technology. Renew Sust Energ Rev 10(5):389–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ozawa A, Kudoh Y (2018) Performance of residential fuel-cell-combined heat and power systems for various household types in Japan. Int J Hydrog Energy 43(32):15412–15422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ozcan H, Dincer I (2015) Performance evaluation of an SOFC based trigeneration system using various gaseous fuels from biomass gasification. Int J Hydrog Energy 40(24):7798–7807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Peacock AD, Newborough M (2005) Impact of micro-CHP systems on domestic sector CO2 emissions. Appl Therm Eng 25(17–18):2653–2676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ramírez-Minguela JJ, Rangel-Hernández VH, Alfaro-Ayala JA, Uribe-Ramirez AR, Mendoza-Miranda JM, Belman-Flores JM, Ruiz-Camacho B (2018) Energy and entropy study of a SOFC using biogas from different sources considering internal reforming of methane. Int J Heat Mass Transf 120:1044–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rasheed R, Khan N, Yasar A, Su Y, Tabinda AB (2016) Design and cost-benefit analysis of a novel anaerobic industrial bioenergy plant in Pakistan. Renew Energy 90:242–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Romdhane J, Louahlia-Gualous H (2018) Energy assessment of PEMFC based MCCHP with absorption chiller for small scale French residential application. Int J Hydrog Energy 43(42):19661–19680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Romdhane J, Louahlia H, Marion M (2018) Dynamic modeling of an eco-neighborhood integrated micro-CHP based on PEMFC: performance and economic analyses. Energy Buildings 166:93–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Roshandel R, Golzar F, Astaneh M (2018) Technical, economic and environmental optimization of combined heat and power systems based on solid oxide fuel cell for a greenhouse case study. Energy Convers Manag 164:144–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rosli RE, Sulong AB, Daud WRW, Zulkifley MA, Husaini T, Rosli MI, Majlan EH, Haque MA (2017) A review of high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell (HT-PEMFC) system. Int J Hydrog Energy 42(14):9293–9314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Staffell I (2015) Zero carbon infinite COP heat from fuel cell CHP. Appl Energy 147:373–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Staffell I, Green R (2013) The cost of domestic fuel cell micro-CHP systems. Int J Hydrog Energy 38(2):1088–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Strazza C, Del Borghi A, Costamagna P, Gallo M, Brignole E, Girdinio P (2015) Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of a SOFC system for distributed power generation. Energy Convers Manag 100:64–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wei Z, Su K, Sui S, He A, Du S (2015) High performance polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) with gradient Pt nanowire cathodes prepared by decal transfer method. Int J Hydrog Energy 40(7):3068–3074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Windeknecht M, Tzscheutschler P (2015) Optimization of the heat output of high temperature fuel cell micro-CHP in single family homes. Energy Procedia 78:2160–2165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wu Z, Zhang Z, Ni M (2018) Modeling of a novel SOFC-PEMFC hybrid system coupled with thermal swing adsorption for H2 purification: parametric and exergy analyses. Energy Convers Manag 174:802–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang H, Zhao H, Li Z, Hu E (2018) Optimization potentials for the waste heat recovery of a gas-steam combined cycle power plant based on absorption heat pump. J Therm Sci:1–11Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Architecture and Built EnvironmentUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
  2. 2.Institute of Fuel CellsShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  3. 3.Sustainable Development Study CentreGC University LahoreLahorePakistan

Personalised recommendations