Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 30, pp 31401–31413 | Cite as

Study on the efficiency of phytoremediation of soils heavily polluted with PAHs in petroleum-contaminated sites by microorganism

  • Liqun Hou
  • Rui LiuEmail author
  • Na Li
  • Yuanyuan Dai
  • Jun Yan
Research Article

Abstract

The effects of Fire Phoenix (a mixture of Festuca L.) and Purple coneflower (Echinacea purpurea (L.) Moench) on the remediation of two different high concentrations of PAH-contaminated soils were studied under the effect of strain N12 (Mycobacterium sp.), and the changes in rhizosphere enzymatic activity were preliminarily studied. The results of three culture stages (60 d, 120 d, and 150 d) showed that N12 has a promotional effect on the biomass of Fire Phoenix and E. purpurea, and the effect of N12 on the biomass of Fire Phoenix is better. Under the strengthening of N12, the maximum removal rates of Fire Phoenix reached 86.77% and 67.82% at two high PAH concentrations (A and B, respectively). The activity of dehydrogenase (DHO) is positively correlated with the degradation rate of PAHs at the A concentration (P < 0.05). The activity of DHO in soil will continue to increase at a higher level of the B concentration, but the positive correlation between the activity of DHO and the degradation rate of PAH is weakened. In the rhizosphere soil of the two plants, the change in polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activity with time has a significant negative correlation with the degradation rate of PAHs (P < 0.05). The experiment proved that Fire Phoenix is more suitable for the remediation of heavy PAH-contaminated soil under the condition of microorganism-strengthening, and it can achieve a better degradation effect when the concentrations of PAHs are < 150 mg·kg−1. Results provide a further scientific basis for the remediation of contaminated sites.

Keywords

Oil field Bioremediation PAH-contaminated soil Heavy pollution Enhanced remediation Enzymatic activity 

Notes

Funding information

This work was financially supported by two general projects of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 31470547, 31770545).

References

  1. Abhilash PC, Srivastava S, Srivastava P, Singh B, Jafri A, Singh N (2011) Influence of rhizospheric microbial inoculation and tolerant plant species on the rhizoremediation of lindane. Environ Exp Bot 74:127–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agnello AC, Bagard M, van Hullebusch ED, Esposito G, Huguenot D (2016) Comparative bioremediation of heavy metals and petroleum hydrocarbons co-contaminated soil by natural attenuation, phytoremediation, bioaugmentation and bioaugmentation-assisted phytoremediation. Sci Total Environ 563:693–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amezcua-Allieri MA, Avila-Chavez MA, Trejo A, Melendez-Estrada J (2012) Removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from soil: a comparison between bioremoval and supercritical fluids extraction. Chemosphere 86:985–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andreolli M, Lampis S, Poli M, Gullner G, Biro B, Vallini G (2013) Endophytic Burkholderia fungorum DBT1 can improve phytoremediation efficiency of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Chemosphere 92:688–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aslantas R, Cakmakci R, Sahin F (2007) Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on young apple tree growth and fruit yield under orchard conditions. Sci Hortic-Amsterdam 111:371–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baran S, Bielinska JE, Oleszczuk P (2004) Enzymatic activity in an airfield soil polluted with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Geoderma 118:221–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belimov AA, Dodd IC, Hontzeas N, Theobald JC, Safronova VI, Davies WJ (2009) Rhizosphere bacteria containing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase increase yield of plants grown in drying soil via both local and systemic hormone signalling. New Phytol 181:413–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen J, Xue QH, McErlean CSP, Zhi JH, Ma YQ, Jia XT, Zhang M, Ye XX (2016) Biocontrol potential of the antagonistic microorganism Streptomyces enissocaesilis against Orobanche cumana. Biocontrol 61:781–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen Y, Wang CX, Wang ZJ, Huang SB (2004) Assessment of the contamination and genotoxicity of soil irrigated with wastewater. Plant Soil 261:189–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Falciglia PP, De Guidi G, Catalfo A, Vagliasindi FGA (2016) Remediation of soils contaminated with PAHs and nitro-PAHs using microwave irradiation. Chem Eng J 296:162–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gan S, Lau EV, Ng HK (2009) Remediation of soils contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). J Hazard Mater 172:532–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gao YC, Wang JN, Xu JB, Kong X, Zhao L, Zeng DH (2013) Assessing the quality of oil-contaminated saline soil using two composite indices. Ecol Indic 24:105–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gao YZ, Li QL, Ling WT, Zhu XZ (2011) Arbuscular mycorrhizal phytoremediation of soils contaminated with phenanthrene and pyrene. J Hazard Mater 185:703–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garcia-Sanchez M, Kosnar Z, Mercl F, Aranda E, Tlustos P (2018) A comparative study to evaluate natural attenuation, mycoaugmentation, phytoremediation, and microbial-assisted phytoremediation strategies for the bioremediation of an aged PAH-polluted soil. Ecotox Environ Safe 147:165–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gianfreda L, Rao MA, Piotrowska A, Palumbo G, Colombo C (2005) Soil enzyme activities as affected by anthropogenic alterations: intensive agricultural practices and organic pollution. Sci Total Environ 341:265–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glaser K, Hackl E, Inselsbacher E, Strauss J, Wanek W, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S, Sessitsch A (2010) Dynamics of ammonia-oxidizing communities in barley-planted bulk soil and rhizosphere following nitrate and ammonium fertilizer amendment. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 74:575–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gray EJ, Smith DL (2005) Intracellular and extracellular PGPR: commonalities and distinctions in the plant-bacterium signaling processes. Soil Biol Biochem 37:395–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guan S (1986) Soil enzymes and research methods. China Agricultural Science Press, Beijing, pp 274–323 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  19. Hu F, Su Z, Sun J, Li X, Zhang H, Sun J (2011) Isolation and identification of a highly efficient pyrene-degrading Mycobacterium sp. strain N12. Chin J Appl Ecol 22:1566–1572 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  20. Innemanova P, Filipova A, Michalikova K, Wimmerova L, Cajthaml T (2018) Bioaugmentation of PAH-contaminated soils: a novel procedure for introduction of bacterial degraders into contaminated soil. Ecol Eng 118:93–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Joner EJ, Johansen A, Loibner AP, Dela Cruz MA, Szolar OHJ, Portal JM, Leyval C (2001) Rhizosphere effects on microbial community structure and dissipation and toxicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in spiked soil. Environ Sci Technol 35:2773–2777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Juwarkar AA, Jambhulkar HP (2008) Phytoremediation of coal mine spoil dump through integrated biotechnological approach. Bioresour Technol 99:4732–4741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaimi E, Mukaidani T, Miyoshi S, Tamaki M (2006) Ryegrass enhancement of biodegradation in diesel-contaminated soil. Environ Exp Bot 55:110–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Khanjari Y, Eikani MH, Rowshanzamir S (2016) Remediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from soil using superheated water extraction. J Supercrit Fluids 111:129–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kong FX, Sun GD, Liu ZP (2018) Degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil mesocosms by microbial/plant bioaugmentation: performance and mechanism. Chemosphere 198:83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kukla M, Plociniczak T, Piotrowska-Seget Z (2014) Diversity of endophytic bacteria in Lolium perenne and their potential to degrade petroleum hydrocarbons and promote plant growth. Chemosphere 117:40–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee SH, Lee WS, Lee CH, Kim JG (2008) Degradation of phenanthrene and pyrene in rhizosphere of grasses and legumes. J Hazard Mater 153:892–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu B, Li YX, Gao SY, Chen XC (2017a) Copper exposure to soil under single and repeated application: selection for the microbial community tolerance and effects on the dissipation of antibiotics. J Hazard Mater 325:129–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu R, Xiao N, Wei SH, Zhao LX, An J (2014) Rhizosphere effects of PAH-contaminated soil phytoremediation using a special plant named Fire Phoenix. Sci Total Environ 473:350–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu R, Dai YY, Sun LB (2015) Effect of rhizosphere enzymes on phytoremediation in PAH-contaminated soil using five plant species. PLoS One 10:e0120369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu SS, Lu YX, Yang C, Liu CP, Ma L, Dang Z (2017b) Effects of modified biochar on rhizosphere microecology of rice (Oryza sativa L.) grown in As-contaminated soil. Environ Sci Pollut R 24:23815–23824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lu YF, Lu M (2015) Remediation of PAH-contaminated soil by the combination of tall fescue, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and epigeic earthworms. J Hazard Mater 285:535–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Margesin R, Zimmerbauer A, Schinner F (2000) Monitoring of bioremediation by soil biological activities. Chemosphere 40:339–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Perez-Hernandez I, Ochoa-Gaona S, Schroeder RHA, Rivera-Cruz MC, Geissen V (2013) Tolerance of four tropical tree species to heavy petroleum contamination. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Prapagdee B, Chanprasert M, Mongkolsuk S (2013) Bioaugmentation with cadmium-resistant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria to assist cadmium phytoextraction by Helianthus annuus. Chemosphere 92:659–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rajamanickam S, Karthikeyan G, Kavino M, Manoranjitham SK (2018) Biohardening of micropropagated banana using endophytic bacteria to induce plant growth promotion and restrain rhizome rot disease caused by Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp carotovorum. Sci Hortic-Amsterdam 231:179–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ryu CM, Hu CH, Locy RD, Kloepper JW (2005) Study of mechanisms for plant growth promotion elicited by rhizobacteria in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Soil 268:285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shi W, Zhang XN, Jia HB, Feng SD, Yang ZX, Zhao OY, Li YL (2017) Effective remediation of aged HMW-PAHs polluted agricultural soil by the combination of Fusarium sp and smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis Leyss.). J Integr Agric 16:199–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sikora RA, Schafer K, Dababat AA (2007) Modes of action associated with microbially induced in planta suppression of plant-parasitic nematodes. Australas Plant Path 36:124–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith MJ, Flowers TH, Duncan HJ, Saito H (2011) Study of PAH dissipation and phytoremediation in soils: comparing freshly spiked with weathered soil from a former coking works. J Hazard Mater 192:1219–1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sun Y, Gong Z, Su Z, Jin J, Li X, Liu W, Li P (2011) Identification and degradation characteristics of a bacteria strain degrading high concentration of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Chin J Ecol 30:2503–2508 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  42. Teng Y, Shen YY, Luo YM, Sun XH, Sun MM, Fu DQ, Li ZG, Christie P (2011) Influence of Rhizobium meliloti on phytoremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by alfalfa in an aged contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater 186:1271–1276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tokala RK, Strap JL, Jung CM, Crawford DL, Salove MH, Deobald LA, Bailey JF, Morra MJ (2002) Novel plant-microbe rhizosphere interaction involving Streptomyces lydicus WYEC108 and the pea plant (Pisum sativum). Appl Environ Microbiol 68:2161–2171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Van der Waarde JJ, Dijkhuis EJ, Hessen MJC, Keuning S. (1995) Enzyme assays as indicators for biodegradation. In: van der Brick WJ, Bosman R, Arendt F, editors. Contam soil, pp. 1377–1378Google Scholar
  45. Wang CY, Wang F, Wang T, Bian YR, Yang XL, Jiang X (2010) PAHs biodegradation potential of indigenous consortia from agricultural soil and contaminated soil in two-liquid-phase bioreactor (TLPB). J Hazard Mater 176:41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wise SA, Sander LC, Schantz MM (2015) Analytical methods for determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) - a historical perspective on the 16 US EPA priority pollutant PAHs. Polycycl Aromat Compd 35:187–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Xiao N, Liu R, Jin CX, Dai YY (2015) Efficiency of five ornamental plant species in the phytoremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-contaminated soil. Ecol Eng 75:384–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Xiao R, Bai JH, Wang JJ, Lu QQ, Zhao QQ, Cui BS, Liu XH (2014) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in wetland soils under different land uses in a coastal estuary: toxic levels, sources and relationships with soil organic matter and water-stable aggregates. Chemosphere 110:8–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Xie Y, Fan JB, Zhu WX, Amombo E, Lou YH, Chen L, Fu JM (2016) Effect of heavy metals pollution on soil microbial diversity and Bermuda grass genetic variation. Front Plant Sci 7:755Google Scholar
  50. Xu Y, Sun GD, Jin JH, Liu Y, Luo M, Zhong ZP, Liu ZP (2014) Successful bioremediation of an aged and heavily contaminated soil using a microbial/plant combination strategy. J Hazard Mater 264:430–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ye JS, Yin H, Peng H, Bai JQ, Li YP (2014) Pyrene removal and transformation by joint application of alfalfa and exogenous microorganisms and their influence on soil microbial community. Ecotox Environ Safe 110:129–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yonghai J, Shangzheng WEI, Beidou XI, Huayong Z, Hongjiang LI (2009) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons(PAHs) pollution in soils in China: recent advances and future prospects. Ecol Environ 18:1176–1181 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  53. Yu XZ, Wu SC, Wu FY, Wong MH (2011) Enhanced dissipation of PAHs from soil using mycorrhizal ryegrass and PAH-degrading bacteria. J Hazard Mater 186:1206–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yu Y, Zhang W, Chen GH, Gao YC, Wang JN (2014) Preparation of petroleum-degrading bacterial agent and its application in remediation of contaminated soil in Shengli oil field, China. Environ Sci Pollut R 21:7929–7937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhang M, Xu LH, Lee SS, Ok YS (2016) Sorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by dietary fiber extracted from wheat bran. Chem Speciat Bioavailab 28:13–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhou LK (1987) The science of soil enzyme. The Science Press, Beijing, pp 267–270 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  57. Zhou QX, Cheng Y, Zhang QR, Liang JD (2004) Quantitative analyses of relationships between ecotoxicological effects and combined pollution. Sci China Ser C 47:332–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhou QX, Sun FH, Liu R (2005) Joint chemical flushing of soils contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons. Environ Int 31:835–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liqun Hou
    • 1
    • 2
  • Rui Liu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Na Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yuanyuan Dai
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jun Yan
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Pollution Ecology and Environmental Engineering, Institute of Applied EcologyChinese Academy of SciencesShenyangChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations