Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 21, pp 21274–21294 | Cite as

Monitoring of water quality inflow and outflow of a farm in Italian Padana plain for rice cultivation: a case study of two years

  • Fabio GosettiEmail author
  • Elisa Robotti
  • Bianca Bolfi
  • Eleonora Mazzucco
  • Fabio Quasso
  • Marcello Manfredi
  • Simone Silvestri
  • Arianna Facchi
  • Emilio Marengo
Research Article
  • 263 Downloads

Abstract

Rice cultivation requires a large use of pesticides and nutrients to control weed proliferation and improve production. The water quality of four neighboring rice fields located in the Lomellina area (Italian Padana plain) was monitored in this study along with the cultivation period (before, during, and after the period of planting), for two successive agricultural seasons (2015 and 2016). Two paddy fields were traditionally cultivated with wet-seeding and the other fields with dry-seeding. Eighteen sampling points were considered: eight points for surface water, two points for underground water, and eight points for porous cups with two different depths. In order to evaluate the goodness of the paddy field system to maintain unchanged the quality of the inflow with respect to the outflow water, three of the most used herbicides in Italian rice cultivation (imazamox, oxadiazon, and profoxydim) and other physical–chemical parameters were determined, namely biological oxygen demand after 5 days; chemical oxygen demand; total suspended solids; anionic surfactants; total hardness; total amount of phosphorus, nitrogen, and potassium; and heavy metal concentrations. In general, all the collected data confirmed that paddy fields did not contribute to worsen the environmental pollution. The different flooding techniques adopted in the fields did not highlight significant differences in concentrations of pesticides or metals. The pesticides reached their maximum concentration (of the magnitude order of few ng mL−1) on the day after the administration and on the day after the application in the adjacent field. A slight reduction of total As in grain was obtained adopting a dry period from steam elongation up to booting. From the collected data, it was possible to identify a general water flow direction in the paddy fields from north–west to south–east: this prevailing flow direction was useful to understand not only the diffusion of the pesticides and their degradation products in the fields but also that of the nutrients. Concerning nutrients, it was important not to activate a recirculation of the water in the field during the first 10 days from the administration, in order to avoid loss of nitrogen in the water vents or for percolation. Moreover, the monitoring of potassium concentration allowed to avoid the use of unnecessary potassic fertilization when there was already a high amount of this element in the paddy field derived from irrigation. However, all the investigated water quality parameters were under the limits fixed by the European regulation. In addition, the presence of seven unexpected compounds was identified by the nontarget approach in both campaigns in samples collected in the early summer period. Four of these emerging contaminants were identified as N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide, tricyclazole, amidosulfuron, and one of the imazamox photodegradation products. Although the obtained low concentrations of oxadiazion, tricyclazole, and arsenic, in particular, justified a preexisting contamination of the water inflow or of the investigated paddy area, the obtained results supported the good quality of the paddy water outflow, confirming the rational use of the water resource and the correct use of agronomic practices.

Keywords

Paddy water Water quality Nontarget analysis Imazamox Oxadiazon Profoxydim 

Notes

Funding

The study was funded by Fondazione Cariplo in the context of WATPAD project (grant no. 2014-1260).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11356_2019_5155_MOESM1_ESM.docx (15 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 15 kb)
11356_2019_5155_MOESM2_ESM.docx (17 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 16 kb)
11356_2019_5155_MOESM3_ESM.docx (13 kb)
ESM 3 (DOCX 13 kb)

References

  1. Arao T, Kawasaki A, Baba K, Mori S, Matsumoto S (2009) Effect of water management on cadmium and arsenic accumulation and dimethylarsenic acid concentrations in Japanese rice. Environ Sci Technol 43:9361–9367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball DA, Yenish JP, Alby T (2003) Effect of imazamox soil persistence on dryland rotational crops. Weed Technol 17:161–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyd-Boland AA, Pawliszyn JB (1995) Solid-phase microextraction of nitrogen containing herbicides. J Chromatogr A 704:163–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carrijo DR, Li C, Parikh SJ, Linquist BA (2019) Irrigation management for arsenic mitigation in rice grain: timing and severity of a single soil drying. Sci Total Environ 649:300–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Choi S-K, Jeong J, Kim M-K (2017) Simulating the effects of agricultural management on water quality dynamics in rice paddies for sustainable rice production—model development and validation. Water 9:869–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Codex Alimentarius Commission (2006) Joint FAO/WHO food standards programme, Codex Alimentarius Commission. Twenty-Ninth Session, Geneva, Switzerland 3–7 July 2006Google Scholar
  7. Codex Alimentarius Commission (2014). Joint FAO/WHO food standards programme. Thirty-Seventh Session, CICG, Geneva, Switzerland 14–18 July 2014Google Scholar
  8. Commission Regulation 2006/1881/EC (2006) Setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Off J Eur Un 364:5–24Google Scholar
  9. Directive 98/83/EC 1998 ((1998)) On the quality of water intended for human consumption. Off J Eur Commun 330:32–54Google Scholar
  10. Directive 2000/60/EC (2000) The European Parliament and the Council established a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Off J Eur Commun 327:1–72Google Scholar
  11. Garrido EM, Lima JLFC, Delerue-Matos C, Borges MFM, Oliveira Brett AM (2001) Electroanalytical determination of oxadiazon and characterization of its base-catalyzed ring-opening products. Electroanalysis 13:199–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gosetti F, Bolfi B, Chiuminatto U, Manfredi M, Robotti E, Marengo E (2018) Photodegradation of the pure and formulated alpha-cypermethrin insecticide gives different products. Environ Chem Lett 16:581–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gosetti F, Bottaro M, Gianotti V, Mazzucco E, Frascarolo P, Zampieri D, Olivieri C, Viarengo A, Gennaro MC (2010b) Sun light degradation of 4-chloroaniline in waters and its effect on toxicity. A high performance liquid chromatography – diode array – tandem mass spectrometry study. Environ Pollut 158:592–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gosetti F, Chiuminatto U, Mazzucco E, Mastroianni R, Bolfi B, Marengo E (2015) Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography tandem high-resolution mass spectrometry study of tricyclazole photodegradation products in water. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:8288–8295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gosetti F, Chiuminatto U, Zampieri D, Mazzucco E, Marengo E, Gennaro MC (2010a) A new on-line solid phase extraction high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method to study the sun light photodegradation of mono-chloroanilines in river water. J Chromatogr A 1217:3427–3434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hallè C, Huck PM, Peldszus S (2015) Emerging contaminant removal by biofiltration: temperature, concentration, and EBCT impacts. J Am Water Works Assoc 107:E364–E379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harir M, Frommberger M, Gaspar A, Martens D, Kettrup A, Azzouzi ME, Schmitt-Kopplin P (2007) Characterization of imazamox degradation by-products by using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry and high-resolution Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 389:1459–1467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Honma T, Ohba H, Kaneko A, Nakamura K, Makino T, Katou H (2016) Effects of soil amendments on arsenic and cadmium uptake by rice plants (Oryza sativa L. cv. Koshihikari) under different water management practices. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 62:349–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Inao K, Watanabe H, Karpouzas DG, Capri E (2008) Simulation models of pesticides fate and transport in paddy environment for ecological risk assessment and management. Jpn Agric Res Q 42:13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ishibashi M, Suzuki M (1988) Simultaneous XAD-2 resin extraction and high-resolution electron-capture gas chromatography of chlorine-containing herbicides in water samples. J Chromatogr A 456:382–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ISPRA (2017). Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale, Monitoraggio nazionale dei pesticidi nelle acque. Manuali e Linee Guida, 152/2017Google Scholar
  22. ISPRA (2018). Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale, Rapporto nazionale pesticidi nelle acque dati 2015-2016. Edizione 2018, 282/2018Google Scholar
  23. Italian IRSA-CNR 2040 method (2003) Determination of hardness for the quality of the water.  APAT, Rapporti 29/2003Google Scholar
  24. Italian IRSA-CNR 2090 method (2003) Determination of total suspended solids, for the quality of the water.  APAT, Rapporti 29/2003Google Scholar
  25. Italian IRSA-CNR 4060 method (2003) Determination of total nitrogen for the quality of the water.  APAT, Rapporti 29/2003Google Scholar
  26. Italian IRSA-CNR 5120 method (2003) Determination of Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5), for the quality of the water. APAT, Rapporti 29/2003Google Scholar
  27. Italian IRSA-CNR 5130 method (2003) Determination of chemical oxygen demand (COD) for the quality of the water. APAT, Rapporti 29/2003Google Scholar
  28. Italian IRSA-CNR 5170 method (2003) Determination of anionic surfactants for the quality of the water. APAT, Rapporti 29/2003Google Scholar
  29. Italian Legislative Decree 152/06 (2006) Code on the Environment. 2006Google Scholar
  30. Jang TI, Kim HK, Seong CH, Lee EJ, Parl SW (2012) Assessing nutrient losses of reclaimed wastewater irrigation in paddy fields for sustainable agriculture. Agric Water Manag 104:235–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jang TI, Lee SB, Sung CH, Lee HP, Park SW (2010) Safe application of reclaimed water reuse for agriculture in Korea. Paddy Water Environ 8:227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jang TI, Park SW, Kim HK (2008) Environmental effects analysis of a wastewater reuse system for agriculture in Korea. Water Sci Technol 8:37–42Google Scholar
  33. Kang MS, Kim SM, Park SW, Lee JJ, Yoo KH (2007) Assessment of reclaimed wastewater irrigation impacts on water quality, soil and rice cultivation in paddy fields. J Environ Sci Health A 42:439–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kang MS, Park SW, Lee JJ, Yoo KH (2006) Applying SWAT for TMDL programs to a small watershed containing rice paddy fields. Agric Water Manag 79:72–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kadokami K, Morimoto M, Haraguchi K, Koga M, Shinohara R (1991) Multiresidue determination of trace pesticides in water by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry with selected ion monitoring. Anal Sci 7:247–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kawara O, Hirayma K, Kunimatsu T (1996) A study on pollutant loads from the forest and rice paddy fields. Water Sci Technol 33:159–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kobayashi H, Ohyama K, Tomiyama N, Jimbo Y, Matano O, Goto S (1993) Determination of pesticides in river water by gas chromatography–mass spectometry–selected-ion monitoring. J Chromatogr A 643:197–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kumarathilaka P, Seneweera S, Meharg A, Bundschuh J (2018) Arsenic speciation dynamics in paddy rice soil-water environment: source, phyco-chemical, and biological factors—a review. Water Res 140:403–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. LaHue GT, Chaney RL, Adviento-Borbe MA, Linquist BA (2016) Alternate wetting and drying in high yielding direct-seeded rice systems accomplishes multiple environmental and agronomic objectives. Agric Ecosyst Environ 229:30–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. La N, Lamers M, Nguyen VV, Streck T (2014) Modeling the fate of pesticides in paddy rice-fish pond farming systems in northern Vietmnam. Pest Manag Sci 70:70–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Li D, Nanseki T, Chomei Y, Yokota S (2018) Production efficiency and effect of water management on rice yield in Japan: two stage DEA model on 110 paddy fields of a large-scale farm. Paddy Water Environ 16:643–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Li RY, Stroud JL, Ma JF, McGrath SP, Zhao FJ (2009) Mitigation of arsenic accumulation in rice with water management and silicon fertilization. Environ Sci Technol 43:3779–3783Google Scholar
  43. Liao W, Joe T, Cusik WG (1991) Multiresidue screening method for fresh fruits and vegetables with gas chromatography/mass spectrometric detection. J Off Assoc Anal Chem 74:554–565Google Scholar
  44. Luo Y, Spurlock F, Gill S, Goh KS (2012) Modeling complexity in simulating pesticide fate in a rice paddy. Water Sci Technol 53:253–261Google Scholar
  45. Matsuno Y, Nakamura K, Masumoto T, Matsui H, Kato T, Sato Y (2006) Prospects for multifunctionality of paddy rice cultivation in Japan and other countries in monsoon Asia. Paddy Water Environ 4:189–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mattern GC, Liu C-H, Louis JB, Rosen JD (1991) GC/MS and LC/MS determination of 20 pesticides for which dietary oncogenic risk has been estimated. J Agric Food Chem 39:700–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moore MT, Locke MA, Cullum RF (2018) Expanding wetland mitigation: can rice fields remediate pesticides in agricultural runoff? J Environ Qual 47:1564–1571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Padovani L, Capri E, Padovani C, Puglisi E, Trevisan M (2006) Monitoring tricyclazole residues in rice paddy watersheds. Chemosphere 62:303–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Polati S, Gosetti F, Gianotti V, Gennaro MC (2006) Sorption and desorption behavior of chloroanilines and chlorophenols on montmorillonite and kaolinite. J Environ Sci Health B 41:765–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Saptomo SK, Chadirin Y, Setiawan BI, Budiasa IW, Kato H, Kubota J (2015) Quantify water balance of subak paddy field based on continuous field monitoring. J Teknologi 76:53–59Google Scholar
  51. Sánchez P, Kubitza J, Dohmen GP, Tarazona JV (2006) Aquatic risk assessment of the new rice herbicide profoxydim. Environ Pollut 142:181–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sarkar MIU, Islam MN, Jahan A, Islam A, Biswas JC (2017) Rice straw as a source of potassium for wetland rice cultivation. Geol Ecol Landscape 1:184–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Seong CH, Kang MS, Jang TI, Kim HK, Lee EJ, Park SW (2010) Modeling bacteria concentration in a rice paddy irrigated with reclaimed wastewater. Desalination Water Treat 19:32–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Song JH, Ryu JH, Park J, Jun SM, Song I, Jang J, Kim SM, Kang MS (2016) Paddy field modelling system for water quality management. Irrig Drain 65:131–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Song I, Song JH, Ryu JH, Kim K, Jang JR, Kang MS (2017) Long-term evaluation of the BMPs scenarios in reducing nutrient surface loads from paddy rice cultivation in Korea using the CREAM-PADDY model. Paddy Water Environ 15:59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sopeña FMC, Maqueda C, Morillo E (2009) Controlled release formulations of herbicides based on micro-encapsulation. Cien Inv Agr 35:27–42Google Scholar
  57. US EPA (2018a) United States Environmental Protection Agency. Chemistry dashboard: profoxydim. https://comptox.epa.gov/dashboard/dsstoxdb/results?utf8=%E2%9C%93&search=Profoxydim. Accessed on 20 August 2018
  58. US EPA (2018b) United States Environmental Protection Agency. Chemistry dashboard: oxadiazon. https://comptox.epa.gov/dashboard/dsstoxdb/results?search=24239. Accessed on 20 August 2018
  59. Wang X, Suo Y, Feng Y, Shohag M J I, Gao J, Zhang Q, Xie S, Lin X (2011) Recovery of 15N-labeled urea and soil nitrogen dynamics as affected by irrigation management and nitrogen application rate in a double rice cropping system. Plant and Soil 343:195–208Google Scholar
  60. Wang Z, Zhang W, Beebout SS, Zhang H, Liu L, Yang J, Zhang J (2016) Grain yield, water and nitrogen use efficiencies of rice as influenced by irrigation regimes and their interaction with nitrogen rates. Field Crop Res 193:54–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ying G-G, Williams B (1999) The degradation of oxadiazon and oxyfluorflen by photolysis. J Environ Sci Health B 34:549–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zenobio JE, Sanchez BC, Leet JK, Archuleta LC, Sepùlveda MS (2015) Presence and effects on pharmaceutical and personal care products on the Baca National Wildlife Refuge, Colorado. Chemosphere 120:750–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhang H, Zhang S, Zhang J, Yang J, Wang Z (2008) Postanthesis moderate wetting drying improves both quality and quantity of rice yield. Agron J 100:726–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhang H, Xue Y, Wang Z, Yang J, Zhang J (2009) An alternate wetting and moderate soil drying regime improves root and shoot growth in rice. Crop Sci 49:2246–2260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhao FJ, McGrath SP, Meharg AA (2010) Arsenic as food chain contaminant: mechanisms of plant uptake and metabolism and mitigation strategies. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61:535–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhou Q, Zhu Y (2003) Potential pollution and recommended critical levels of phosphorous in paddy soils of the southern Lake Tai area, China. Geoderma 115:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zou J, Huang Y, Zheng X, Wang Y (2007) Quantification direct N2O emission in paddy fields during rice growing season in mainland China: dependence on water regime. Atmos Environ 41:8030–8042CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Science and Technological InnovationUniversity of Piemonte OrientaleAlessandriaItaly
  2. 2.ISALIT S.r.l.NovaraItaly
  3. 3.ENR, Ente Nazionale RisiCastello d’AgognaItaly
  4. 4.Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences—Production, Landscape, AgroenergyUniversità degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations