Advertisement

Bioaccumulation, antioxidative response, and metallothionein expression in Lupinus luteus L. exposed to heavy metals and silver nanoparticles

  • Marta JaskulakEmail author
  • Agnieszka Rorat
  • Anna Grobelak
  • Zayneb Chaabene
  • Małgorzata Kacprzak
  • Franck Vandenbulcke
Research Article
  • 92 Downloads

Abstract

Yellow-lupin (Lupinus luteus L.) was grown on soils contaminated with heavy metals during two parallel studies. In the first one, the soil was contaminated by industrial activities whereas, in the second one, the soil was artificially contaminated with a single metal including Cd, Pb, Zn, Ni (in nitrate form), and Ag (in nitrate and nanoparticles form). The study was performed to assess a plant’s response to contamination including its antioxidative response and molecular mechanisms involved in metal detoxification through the expression level of metallothioneins (MTs). Overall, the study provided insights into identification and validation of housekeeping genes (HKG) in L. luteus under exposure to metal stress and showed the effects of selected heavy metals and silver nanoparticles on the expression of metallothioneins, the activity of guaiacol peroxidase (GPX) and bioaccumulation of metals in leaves of L. luteus. As such, HKG validation using BestKeeper, NormFinder, and geNorm software allowed for the selection of four most stable reference genes in a context metal contamination for the selected plant. Moreover, a significant increase in the expression levels of MT was observed in plants grown under heavy metal stress and none on plants grown on 25 mg kg−1 of silver nanoparticles. Also, the GPX activity and MT expression showed statistically significant changes between different conditions and doses which means that they can be used as highly sensitive stress markers for planning the phytoremediation process on a large scale.

Keywords

Phytotoxicity Bioremediation Heavy metals Oxidative stress Biomarkers Phytoremediation 

Notes

Funding information

This research was funded by internal grant BS PB 401/304/11 and BS/MN-401-303/18.

References

  1. Anjum NA, Shahid U, Iqbal M (2014) Assessment of cadmium accumulation, toxicity, and tolerance in Brassicaceae and Fabaceae plants—implications for phytoremediation. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 21(17):10286–10293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asada K (2006) Production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species in chloroplasts and their functions. Plant Physiol 141(2):391–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balseiro-Romero M, Gkorezis P, Kidd PS, Van Hamme J, Weyens N, Monterroso C, Vangronsveld J (2017) Use of plant growth promoting bacterial strains to improve Cytisus striatus and Lupinus luteus development for potential application in phytoremediation. Sci Total Environ 581–582:676–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernard F, Dumez S, Brulle F, Lemière S, Platel A, Nesslany F, Cuny D, Deram A, Vandenbulcke F (2016) Antioxidant defense gene analysis in Brassica oleracea and Trifolium repens exposed to Cd and/or Pb. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 23:3136–3151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernard F, Dumez S, Lemière S, Platel A, Nesslany F, Deram A, Vandenbulcke F, Cuny D (2018) Impact of cadmium on forage kale (Brassica oleracea var. viridis cv “Prover”) after 3-,10- and 56-day exposure to a Cd-spiked field soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1636-8
  6. Bolan N, Kunhikrishnan A, Thangarajan R, Kumpiene J, Park J, Makino T, Scheckel K (2014) Remediation of heavy metal(loid)s contaminated soils – to mobilize or to immobilize? J Hazard Mater 266:141–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brulle F, Bernard F, Vandenbulcke F (2014) Identification of suitable qPCR reference 533 genes in leaves of Brassica oleracea under abiotic stresses. Ecotoxicology 23(3):459–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caverzan A, Bonifacio A, Carvalho FAL, Andrade CMB, Passaia G, Schünemann M, dos Santos Maraschin F, Martins MO, Teixeira FK, Rauber R, Margis R, Silveira JAG, Margis-Pinheiro M (2014) The knockdown of chloroplastic ascorbate peroxidases reveals its regulatory role in the photosynthesis and protection under photo-oxidative stress in rice. Plant Sci 214:74–87Google Scholar
  9. Chaâbene Z, Rorat A, Hakim IR, Bernard F, Douglas GC, Elleuch A, Vandenbulcke F, Mejdoub H (2018) Insight into the expression variation of metal-responsive genes in the seedling of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera). Chemosphere 197:123–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen Y, Hu B, Tan Z, Liu J, Yang Z, Li Z (2015) Selection of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR normalization in creeping bentgrass involved in four abiotic stresses. Plant Cell Rep 34:1825–1834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chibuike GU, Obiora SC (2014) Heavy metal polluted soils: effect on plants and bioremediation methods. Appl Environ Soil Sci 2014:1–12Google Scholar
  12. Cox A, Venkatachalam P, Sahi S, Sharma N (2016) Silver and titanium dioxide nanoparticle toxicity in plants: a review of current research. Plant Physiol Biochem 107:147–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Egnér H, Riehm H, Domingo WR (1960) Untersuchungen über die chemische Bodenanalyse als Grundlage für die Beurteilung des Nährstoffzustandes der Böden. II. Chemische Extraktionsmethoden zur Phosphor-und Kaliumbestimmung. Swed J Agric Res 26:199–215Google Scholar
  14. Ent AV, Baker AJ, Reeves RD, Pollard AJ, Schat H (2012) Hyperaccumulators of metal and metalloid trace elements: facts and fiction. Plant Soil 362:319–334Google Scholar
  15. Fosso-Kankeu E, Mulaba-Bafubiandi AF (2014) Implication of plants and microbial metalloproteins in the bioremediation of polluted waters: a review. Phys Chem Earth 67–69:242–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Galal TM, Shehata HS (2014) Evaluation of the invasive macrophyte Myriophyllum spicatum L. as a bioaccumulator for heavy metals in some watercourses of Egypt. Ecol Indic 41:209–214Google Scholar
  17. Galal TM, Shehata HS (2015) Bioaccumulation and translocation of heavy metals by Plantago major L. grown in contaminated soils under the effect of traffic pollution. Ecol Indic 48:244–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grobelak A, Placek A, Grosser A, Singh B, Almås Å, Napora A, Kacprzak M (2017) Effects of single sewage sludge application on soil phytoremediation. J Clean Prod 155:189–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grobelak A, Świątek J, Murtaś A, Jaskulak M (2019) Cadmium-induced oxidative stress in plants, cadmium toxicity, and tolerance in plants: from physiology to remediation. Cadmium toxicity and tolerance in plants, 213-231Google Scholar
  20. Gutiérrez-Ginés MJ, Hernández AJ, Pérez-Leblic MI, Pastor J, Vangronsveld J, (2014) Phytoremediation of soils co-contaminated by organic compounds and heavy metals: Bioassays with Lupinus luteus L. and associated endophytic bacteria. J Environ Manag 143:197–207Google Scholar
  21. Huang L, Yan H, Jiang X, Yin G, Zhang X (2014) Identification of candidate reference genes in perennial ryegrass for quantitative RT-PCR under various abiotic stress conditions. PLoS One 9(4):e93724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jaskulak M, Rorat A, Grobelak A, Kacprzak M (2018) Antioxidative enzymes and expression of rbcL gene as tools to monitor heavy metal-related stress in plants. J Environ Manag 218:71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kappen L, Sommerkorn M, Schroeter B (1995) Carbon acquisition and water relations of lichens in polar regions — potentials and limitations. The Lichenologist 27(6):531–545Google Scholar
  24. Klein C, Comero S, Stahlmecke B, Romazanov J, Kuhlbusch T, Van Doren E (2011) NM-series of representative manufactured nanomaterials: NM-300 silver characterisation, stability, homogeneity. Publications Office of the European Union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  25. Leila S, Mhamed M, Hermann H, Mykola K, Oliver W, Christin M, Nadia B (2016) Fertilization value of municipal sewage sludge for Eucalyptus camaldulensis plants. Biotechnol Rep (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 13:8–12Google Scholar
  26. Lambret-Frotté J, Almeida LC, Moura SM, Souza FL, Linhares FS, Alves-Ferreira M (2015) Validating internal control genes for the accurate normalization of qPCR expression analysis of the novel model plant Setaria viridis. PLoS One 10(8):e0135006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu T, Liu B, Zhang W (2014) Nutrients and heavy metals in biochar produced by sewage sludge pyrolysis: its application in soil amendment. Pol J Environ Stud 23(1):271–275Google Scholar
  28. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193(1):265–275Google Scholar
  29. Martins MQ, Fortunato AS, Rodrigues WP (2017) Selection and validation of reference genes for accurate RT-qPCR data normalization in Coffea spp. under a climate changes context of interacting elevated [CO2] and temperature. Front Plant Sci 8:307Google Scholar
  30. Mendes LA, Maria VL, Scott-Fordsmand JJ, Amorim MJB (2015) Ag nanoparticles (Ag NM300K) in the terrestrial environment: effects at population and cellular level in Folsomia candida (Collembola). Int J Environ Res Public Health 12:12530–12542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mitton FM, Ferreira JL, Gonzalez M, Miglioranza KS, Monserrat JM (2016) Antioxidant responses in soybean and alfalfa plants grown in DDTs contaminated soils: useful variables for selecting plants for soil phytoremediation? Pestic Biochem Physiol 130:17–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. International Organization for Standardization (2005) Soil quality - Determination of pH (ISO 10390:2005). Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/40879.html
  33. Niu K, Shi Y, Ma H (2017) Selection of candidate reference genes for gene expression analysis in Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) under abiotic stress. Front Plant Sci 8:193Google Scholar
  34. Oneto CD, Otegui ME, Baroli I, Beznec A, Faccio P, Bossio E, Lewi D (2016) Water deficit stress tolerance in maize conferred by expression of an isopentenyltransferase (IPT) gene driven by a stress- and maturation-induced promoter. J Biotechnol 220:66–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pal S, Patra AK, Reza SK, Wildi W, Pote J (2010) Use of bio-resources for remediation of soil pollution. Nat Resour J 01(02):110–125Google Scholar
  36. Pant PP, Tripathi A (2014) Impact of heavy metals on morphological and biochemical parameters of Shorea robusta plant. Ekologia 33(2):116–126Google Scholar
  37. Placek A, Grobelak A, Hiller J, Stępień W, Jelonek P, Jaskulak M, Kacprzak M (2017) The role of organic and inorganic amendments in carbon sequestration and immobilization of heavy metals in degraded soils. J Sustain Dev Energy Water Environ Syst 5(4):509–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rehman M, Rizwan M, Ali S, Fatima N, Yousaf B, Naeem A, Sabir M, Ahmad HR, Ok YS (2016) Contrasting effects of biochar, compost and farm manure on alleviation of nickel toxicity in maize (Zea mays L.) in relation to plant growth, photosynthesis and metal uptake. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 133:218–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Semane B, Cuypers A, Smeets K, Van Belleghem F, Horemans N, Schat H, Vangronsveld J (2007) Cadmium responses in Arabidopsis thaliana: glutathione metabolism and antioxidative defence system. Physiol Plant 129:519–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sharma R, Bhardwaj R, Handa N, Gautam V, Kohli SK, Bali S, Kaur P, Thukral AK, Arora S, Ohri P, Vig AP (2016) Response of phytochelatins and metallothionins in alleviation of heavy metal stress in plants: an overview. Plant metal interaction. Elsevier, pp 263–277Google Scholar
  41. Sinha P, Saxena RK, Singh VK, Krishnamurthy L, Varshney RK (2015) Selection and validation of housekeeping genes as reference for gene expression studies in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) under heat and salt stress conditions. Front Plant Sci 6:1071Google Scholar
  42. USEPA (1998) Method 3051A. Microwave-assisted acid digestion of sediments, sludges, soils and oils. Revision 1, US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  43. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, Speleman F (2002) Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 3:0034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yang Y, Chen Q, Wall JD, Hu Z (2012) Potential nanosilver impact on anaerobic digestion at moderate silver concentrations. Water Res 46:1176–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Infrastructure and EnvironmentCzestochowa University of TechnologyCzestochowaPoland
  2. 2.Laboratory of Civil Engineering and Environment (LGCgE), Environmental AxisUniversity of LilleVilleneuve d’AscqFrance
  3. 3.Laboratoire des Biotechnologies Végétales Appliquées à l’Amélioration des CulturesUniversité de SfaxSfaxTunisie

Personalised recommendations