Advertisement

A scale-adaptive method for urban rainwater harvesting simulation

  • Catarina Lúcio
  • Cristina Matos Silva
  • Vitor SousaEmail author
Local, Regional and Global Best Practice for Water
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

At a building or dwelling scale, accurate evaluation of the water savings potential from rainwater harvesting (RWH) can be achieved by simulating the performance of the RWH system using a balance equations model. At an urban scale, water savings potential is usually estimated from the balance between the annual rainfall and annual water consumption. This approach has limited accuracy since it assumes an infinite storage capacity and it disregards the variability of the ratio between the water collected and water consumed in each building. This paper presents a methodology to evaluate rainwater harvesting potential at an urban level taking into consideration buildings’ characteristics and consumption pattern. The complexity of the model is balanced with the format and detail of the information available to allow fast and easy implementation with few resources. The proposed methodology is applied to the city of Lisbon, Portugal, located on the Atlantic coast of the Mediterranean climate region. The results demonstrate water savings potential ranging from 16 to 86% depending on the buildings and occupancy characteristics. The spatial variability of the rainfall in the city of Lisbon was found to be negligible for rainwater harvesting potential evaluation.

Keywords

Rainwater harvesting systems simulation Accuracy/data requirements balance Urban planning Water savings potential Parametric water savings potential functions 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank CEris Research Center. VS acknowledges the financial support from IST – Universidade de Lisboa and the Portuguese National Science Foundation (grant SFRH/BSAB/113784/2015) for the sabbatical leave at École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne where part of this work was carried out.

The authors also acknowledge the relevant contribution of the anonymous reviewers, both correcting mistakes in the original manuscript and promoting the discussion of various important aspects related to RWHS in general.

References

  1. Abdulla FA, Al-Shareef AW (2009) Roof rainwater harvesting systems for household water supply in Jordan. Desalination 243:195–207.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.05.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aladenola OO, Adeboye OB (2010) Assessing the potential for rainwater harvesting. Water Resour Manag 24:2129–2137.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9542-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amado MP, Barroso LM (2013) Sustainable construction: water use in residential buildings in Portugal. Int J Sustain Constr Eng Technol 4:14–22Google Scholar
  4. Amin MT, Kim T-I, Amin MN, Han MY (2013) Effects of catchment, first-flush, storage conditions, and time on microbial quality in rainwater harvesting systems. Water Environ Res 85:2317–2329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Associação Portuguesa de Distribuição e Drenagem de Águas (2011) Crise reduz consumo de água em Lisboa. http://www.apda.pt/pt/noticia/1123 (accessed 10.28.15)
  6. Basinger M, Montalto F, Lall U (2010) A rainwater harvesting system reliability model based on nonparametric stochastic rainfall generator. J Hydrol 392:105–118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belmeziti A, Coutard O, de Gouvello B (2013) A new methodology for evaluating potential for potable water savings (PPWS) by using rainwater harvesting at the urban level: the case of the municipality of Colombes (Paris region). Water (Switzerland) 5:312–326.  https://doi.org/10.3390/w5010312 Google Scholar
  8. Belmeziti A, Coutard O, de Gouvello B (2014) How much drinking water can be saved by using rainwater harvesting on a large urban area? Application to Paris agglomeration. Water Sci Technol 70(11):1782–1788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Belo-Pereira M, Dutra E, Viterbo P (2011) Evaluation of global precipitation data sets over the Iberian Peninsula. J Geophys Res 116:1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015481 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bocanegra-Martínez A, Ponce-Ortega JM, Nápoles-Rivera F, Serna-González M, Castro-Montoya AJ, El-Halwagi MM (2014) Optimal design of rainwater collecting systems for domestic use into a residential development. Resour Conserv Recycl 84:44–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Câmara Municipal de Lisboa (2012) Juntas de Freguesia. http://www.cm-lisboa.pt/municipio/juntas-de-freguesia (accessed 1.10.15)
  12. Campisano A, Modica C (2012) Optimal sizing of storage tanks for domestic rainwater harvesting in Sicily. Resour Conserv Recycl 63:9–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Campisano A, Modica C (2014) Selecting time scale resolution to evaluate water saving and retention potential of rainwater harvesting tanks. Procedia Eng 70:218–227.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.02.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cheng CL, Liao MC (2009) Regional rainfall level zoning for rainwater harvesting systems in northern Taiwan. Resour Conserv Recycl 53:421–428.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Domènech L, Saurí D (2011) A comparative appraisal of the use of rainwater harvesting in single and multi-family buildings of the metropolitan area of Barcelona (Spain): social experience, drinking water savings and economic costs. J Clean Prod 19:598–608.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Environment Agency (2010) Harvesting rainwater for domestic uses: an information guide. Environ Agency Reports 1–32Google Scholar
  17. Eroksuz E, Rahman A (2010) Rainwater tanks in multi-unit buildings: a case study for three Australian cities. Resour Conserv Recycl 54:1449–1452.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.06.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farreny R, Gabarrell X, Rieradevall J (2011a) Cost-efficiency of rainwater harvesting strategies in dense Mediterranean neighbourhoods. Resour Conserv Recycl 55:686–694.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.01.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Farreny R, Morales-Pinzón T, Guisasola A, Tayà C, Rieradevall J, Gabarrell X (2011b) Roof selection for rainwater harvesting: quantity and quality assessments in Spain. Water Res 45:3245–3254.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.03.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fewkes A (1999) The use of rainwater for WC flushing: the field testing of a collection system. Build Environ 34:765–772.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(98)00063-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frich P, Alexander LV, Della-Marta P, Gleason B, Haylock M, Tank Klein AMG, Peterson T (2002) Observed coherent changes in climatic extremes during the second half of the twentieth century. Clim Res 19:193–212.  https://doi.org/10.3354/cr019193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ghisi E (2006) Potential for potable water savings by using rainwater in the residential sector of Brazil. Build Environ 41:1544–1550.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.03.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ghisi E, Bressan DL, Martini M (2007) Rainwater tank capacity and potential for potable water savings by using rainwater in the residential sector of southeastern Brazil. Build Environ 42:1654–1666.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.02.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ghisi E, Montibeller A, Schmidt RW (2006) Potential for potable water savings by using rainwater: an analysis over 62 cities in southern Brazil. Build Environ 41:204–210.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.01.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Imteaz MA, Ahsan A, Naser J, Rahman A (2013) Reliability analysis of rainwater tanks using daily water balance model: variations within a large city. Resour Conserv Recycl 56:80–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.09.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Imteaz MA, Paudel U, Ahsan A, Santos C (2015) Climatic and spatial variability of potential rainwater savings for a large coastal city. Resour Conserv Recycl 105:143–147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.10.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Instituto Nacional de Estatística (2011) 2.02 - Edifícios, segundo o número de pisos, por tipo de edifício e número de alojamentos. http://censos.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=CENSOS&xpgid=censos_quadros_edif (accessed 11.9.14)
  28. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  29. Klein Tank AMG, Wijngaard JB, Können GP, Böhm R, Demarée G, Gocheva A, Mileta M, Pashiardis S, Hejkrlik L, Kern-Hansen C, Heino R, Bessemoulin P, Müller-Westermeier G, Tzanakou M, Szalai S, Pálsdóttir T, Fitzgerald D, Rubin S, Capaldo M, Maugeri M, Leitass A, Bukantis A, Aberfeld R, Van Engelen AFV, Forland E, Mietus M, Coelho F, Mares C, Razuvaev V, Nieplova E, Cegnar T, Antonio López J, Dahlström B, Moberg A, Kirchhofer W, Ceylan A, Pachaliuk O, Alexander LV, Petrovic P (2002) Daily dataset of 20th-century surface air temperature and precipitation series for the European climate assessment. Int J Climatol 22:1441–1453.  https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.773 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lange J, Husary S, Gunkel A, Bastian D, Grodek T (2012) Potentials and limits of urban rainwater harvesting in the Middle East. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:715–724.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-715-2012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lehner B, Döll P, Alcamo J, Henrichs T, Kaspar F (2006) Estimating the impact of global change on flood and drought risks in Europe: a continental, integrated analysis. Clim Chang 75:273–299.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-6338-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Matos C, Teixeira CA, Duarte AALS, Bentes I (2013) Domestic water uses: characterization of daily cycles in the north region of Portugal. Sci Total Environ 458-460:444–450.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.04.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mehrabadi MHR, Saghafian B, Fashi FH (2013) Assessment of residential rainwater harvesting efficiency for meeting non-potable water demands in three climate conditions. Resour Conserv Recycl 73:86–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.01.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mitchell VG, McCarthy DT, Deletic A, Fletcher TD (2008) Urban stormwater harvesting - sensitivity of a storage behaviour model. Environ Model Softw 23:782–793.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.09.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mun JS, Han MY (2012) Design and operational parameters of a rooftop rainwater harvesting system: definition, sensitivity and verification. J Environ Manag 93:147–153.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.08.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Palla A, Gnecco I, Lanza LG (2011) Non-dimensional design parameters and performance assessment of rainwater harvesting systems. J Hydrol 401:65–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.02.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Palla A, Gnecco I, Lanza LG, La Barbera P (2012) Performance analysis of domestic rainwater harvesting systems under various European climate zones. Resour Conserv Recycl 62:71–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pordata (2015) Consumo de água distribuída pela rede pública per capita em Portugal. http://www.pordata.pt/Home (accessed 10.28.15)
  39. Rahman A, Keane J, Imteaz MA (2012) Rainwater harvesting in Greater Sydney: water savings, reliability and economic benefits. Resour Conserv Recycl 61:16–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Silva AS, Ghisi E (2016) Uncertainty analysis of daily potable water demand on the performance evaluation of rainwater harvesting systems in residential buildings. J Environ Manag 180:82–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.05.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Silva CM, Sousa V, Carvalho NV (2015) Evaluation of rainwater harvesting in Portugal: application to single-family residences. Resour Conserv Recycl 94:21–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sistema Nacional de Informação de Recursos Hídricos (2003) Relatório do parâmetro Precipitação diária (mm) em SACAVÉM DE CIMA (21C/01UG). http://www.snirh.pt/index.php?idMain=2&idItem=1 (accessed 10.8.14)
  43. UN (2015) World population prospects: the 2015 revision. United Nations http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/ (accessed 8.18.15)
  44. UNDP (2006) Human development report 2006. J Govern Inform United Nations Dev Program 28:839–840.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-0237(02)00387-8 Google Scholar
  45. UNEP (2002) Global Environment Outlook 3. Geo United Nations Environ Program 24:407.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2807995 Google Scholar
  46. Villarreal EL, Dixon A (2005) Analysis of a rainwater collection system for domestic water supply in Ringdansen, Norrköping, Sweden. Build Environ 40:1174–1184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.10.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto Superior TécnicoUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.CERIS, Instituto Superior TécnicoUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations