Advertisement

Adsorption and oxidation of elemental mercury from coal-fired flue gas over activated coke loaded with Mn–Ni oxides

  • Qiang Zeng
  • Caiting LiEmail author
  • Shanhong LiEmail author
  • Miao Liu
  • Xueyu Du
  • Lei Gao
  • Yunbo Zhai
Research Article
  • 93 Downloads

Abstract

A series of Mn–Ni/AC (AC, activated coke) catalysts were synthesized by the impregnation method for the removal of elemental mercury (Hg0) from simulated flue gas. The samples were characterized by BET, ICP-OES, SEM, XRD, XPS, H2-TPR, FT-IR, and TGA. Mn6Ni0.75/AC exhibited optimal removal efficiency of 96.6% in the condition of 6% O2 and balanced in N2 at 150 °C. The experimental results showed that both O2 and NO facilitated Hg0 removal. SO2 could restrain the Hg0 removal in the absence of O2, while the inhibitory effect of SO2 was weakened with the aid of 6% O2. In addition, H2O exhibited a slightly negative influence on Hg0 removal. The characterization of the samples indicated that Mn6Ni0.75/AC possessed larger specific surface area, higher dispersion of metal oxides, and stronger redox ability. In the meantime, the results of XPS and FT-IR demonstrated that the lattice oxygen and chemisorbed oxygen made contributions to Hg0 removal and the consumed oxygen could be compensated by the redox cycle of metal oxides and gas-phase O2. Meanwhile, the mechanisms of Hg0 removal were proposed based on the above studies.

Keywords

Elemental mercury Mn–Ni oxides Activated coke Adsorption Oxidation 

Notes

Funding information

This work was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0204100).

References

  1. Bonomo M, Marrani AG, Novelli V, Awais M, Dowling DP, Vos JG, Dini D (2017) Surface properties of nanostructured NiO undergoing electrochemical oxidation in 3-methoxy-propionitrile. Appl Surf Sci 403:441–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Casapu M, Kröcher O, Elsener M (2009) Screening of doped MnOx–CeO2 catalysts for low-temperature NO-SCR. Appl Catal B Environ 88:413–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen W, Ma Y, Qu Z, Liu Q, Huang W, Hu X, Yan N (2014) Mechanism of the selective catalytic oxidation of slip ammonia over Ru-modified Ce-Zr complexes determined by in situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy. Environ Sci Technol 48:12199–12205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen J, Li C, Li S, Lu P, Gao L, Du X, Yi Y (2018) Simultaneous removal of HCHO and elemental mercury from flue gas over Co-Ce oxides supported on activated coke impregnated by sulfuric acid. Chem Eng J 338:358–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deng J, He S, Xie S, Yang H, Liu Y, Guo G, Dai H (2015) Ultralow loading of silver nanoparticles on Mn2O3 nanowires derived with molten salts: a high-efficiency catalyst for the oxidative removal of toluene. Environ Sci Technol 49:11089–11095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dranga B-A, Lazar L, Koeser H (2012) Oxidation catalysts for elemental mercury in flue gases—a review. Catalysts 2:139–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Du X, Li C, Zhao L, Zhang J, Gao L, Sheng J, Yi Y, Chen J, Zeng G (2018) Promotional removal of HCHO from simulated flue gas over Mn-Fe oxides modified activated coke. Appl Catal B Environ 232:37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fan X, Li C, Zeng G, Zhang X, Tao S, Lu P, Tan Y, Luo D (2012) Hg0 removal from simulated flue gas over CeO2/HZSM-5. Energy Fuel 26:2082–2089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fuente-Cuesta A, Lopez-Anton MA, Diaz-Somoano M, Martínez-Tarazona MR (2012) Retention of mercury by low-cost sorbents: influence of flue gas composition and fly ash occurrence. Chem Eng J 213:16–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Galbreath KC, Zygarlicke CJ (1996) Mercury speciation in coal combustion and gasification flue gases. Environ Sci Technol 30:2421–2426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gao L, Li C, Lu P, Zhang J, Du X, Li S, Tang L, Chen J, Zeng G (2018) Simultaneous removal of Hg0 and NO from simulated flue gas over columnar activated coke granules loaded with La2O3-CeO2 at low temperature. Fuel 215:30–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guo Y, Yan N, Yang S, Liu P, Wang J, Qu Z, Jia J (2012) Conversion of elemental mercury with a novel membrane catalytic system at low temperature. J Hazard Mater 213-214:62–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. He J, Reddy GK, Thiel SW, Smirniotis PG, Pinto NG (2011) Ceria-modified manganese oxide/titania materials for removal of elemental and oxidized mercury from flue gas. J Phys Chem C 115:24300–24309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hua X-Y, Zhou J-S, Li Q, Luo Z-Y, Cen K-F (2010) Gas-phase elemental mercury removal by CeO2 impregnated activated coke. Energy Fuel 24:5426–5431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ivanov EA, Popova GY, Chesalov YA, Andrushkevich TV (2009) In situ FTIR study of the kinetics of formic acid decomposition on V–Ti oxide catalyst under stationary and non-stationary conditions. Determination of kinetic constants. J Mol Catal A Chem 312:92–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jiménez-González C, Boukha Z, de Rivas B, Delgado JJ, Cauqui MÁ, González-Velasco JR, Gutiérrez-Ortiz JI, López-Fonseca R (2013) Structural characterisation of Ni/alumina reforming catalysts activated at high temperatures. Appl Catal A Gen 466:9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jones AP, Hoffmann JW, Smith DN, Murphy JT (2007) DOE/NETL’s phase II mercury control technology field testing program: preliminary economic analysis of activated carbon injection. Environ Sci Technol 41:1365–1371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kambolis A, Matralis H, Trovarelli A, Papadopoulou C (2010) Ni/CeO2-ZrO2 catalysts for the dry reforming of methane. Appl Catal A Gen 377:16–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kang M, Park ED, Kim JM, Yie JE (2007) Manganese oxide catalysts for NOx reduction with NH3 at low temperatures. Appl Catal A Gen 327:261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kwon DW, Seo PW, Kim GJ, Hong SC (2015) Characteristics of the HCHO oxidation reaction over Pt/TiO2 catalysts at room temperature: the effect of relative humidity on catalytic activity. Appl Catal B Environ 163:436–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li Y, Murphy PD, Wu CY, Powers KW, Bonzongo JCJ (2008) Development of silica/vanadia/titania catalysts for removal of elemental mercury from coal-combustion flue gas. Environ Sci Technol 42:5304–5309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li J, Yan N, Qu Z, Qiao S, Yang S, Guo Y, Liu P, Jia J (2010) Catalytic oxidation of elemental mercury over the modified catalyst Mn/alpha-Al2O3 at lower temperatures. Environ Sci Technol 44:426–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li H, Wu CY, Li Y, Zhang J (2011) CeO2-TiO2 catalysts for catalytic oxidation of elemental mercury in low-rank coal combustion flue gas. Environ Sci Technol 45:7394–7400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li H, Wu CY, Li Y, Li L, Zhao Y, Zhang J (2012) Role of flue gas components in mercury oxidation over TiO2 supported MnOx-CeO2 mixed-oxide at low temperature. J Hazard Mater 243:117–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li J, Chen J, Yu Y, He C (2015) Fe–Mn–Ce/ceramic powder composite catalyst for highly volatile elemental mercury removal in simulated coal-fired flue gas. J Ind Eng Chem 25:352–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li D, Yang G, Li P, Wang J, Zhang P (2016a) Promotion of formaldehyde oxidation over Ag catalyst by Fe doped MnOx support at room temperature. Catal Today 277:257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li H, Zhu L, Wang J, Li L, Shih K (2016b) Development of nano-sulfide sorbent for efficient removal of elemental mercury from coal combustion fuel gas. Environ Sci Technol 50:9551–9557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li H, Wang Y, Wang S, Wang X, Hu J (2017) Removal of elemental mercury in flue gas at lower temperatures over Mn-Ce based materials prepared by co-precipitation. Fuel 208:576–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu P, He H, Wei G, Liang X, Qi F, Tan F, Tan W, Zhu J, Zhu R (2016) Effect of Mn substitution on the promoted formaldehyde oxidation over spinel ferrite: catalyst characterization, performance and reaction mechanism. Appl Catal B Environ 182:476–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lopez-Anton MA, Yuan Y, Perry R, Maroto-Valer MM (2010) Analysis of mercury species present during coal combustion by thermal desorption. Fuel 89:629–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Luisetto I, Tuti S, Battocchio C, Lo Mastro S, Sodo A (2015) Ni/CeO2–Al2O3 catalysts for the dry reforming of methane: the effect of CeAlO3 content and nickel crystallite size on catalytic activity and coke resistance. Appl Catal A Gen 500:12–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ma C, Wang D, Xue W, Dou B, Wang H, Hao Z (2011) Investigation of formaldehyde oxidation over Co3O4-CeO2 and Au/Co3O4-CeO2 catalysts at room temperature: effective removal and determination of reaction mechanism. Environ Sci Technol 45:3628–3634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marrani AG, Novelli V, Sheehan S, Dowling DP, Dini D (2014) Probing the redox states at the surface of electroactive nanoporous NiO thin films. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mei Z, Shen Z, Mei Z, Zhang Y, Xiang F, Chen J, Wang W (2008) The effect of N-doping and halide-doping on the activity of CuCoO4 for the oxidation of elemental mercury. Appl Catal B Environ 78:112–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pitoniak E, Wu C-y, Mazyck DW, Powers KW, Sigmund W (2005) Adsorption enhancement mechanisms of silica−titania nanocomposites for elemental mercury vapor removal. Environ Sci Technol 39:1269–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Portzer JW, Albritton JR, Allen CC, Gupta RP (2004) Development of novel sorbents for mercury control at elevated temperatures in coal-derived syngas: results of initial screening of candidate materials. Fuel Process Technol 85:621–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shen B, Tian L, Li F, Zhang X, Xu H, Singh S (2017) Elemental mercury removal by the modified bio-char from waste tea. Fuel 187:189–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sjostrom S, Durham M, Bustard CJ, Martin C (2010) Activated carbon injection for mercury control: overview. Fuel 89:1320–1322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sun C, Snape CE, Liu H (2013) Development of low-cost functional adsorbents for control of mercury (Hg) emissions from coal combustion. Energy Fuel 27:3875–3882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tang L, Li C, Zhao L, Gao L, Du X, Zeng J, Zhang J, Zeng G (2018) A novel catalyst CuO-ZrO2 doped on Cl activated bio-char for Hg0 removal in a broad temperature range. Fuel 218:366–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tao S, Li C, Fan X, Zeng G, Lu P, Zhang X, Wen Q, Zhao W, Luo D, Fan C (2012) Activated coke impregnated with cerium chloride used for elemental mercury removal from simulated flue gas. Chem Eng J 210:547–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tsuji K, Shiraishi I (1997a) Combined desulfurization, denitrification and reduction of air toxics using activated coke: 2. Process applications and performance of activated coke. Fuel 76:555–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tsuji K, Shiraishi I (1997b) Combined desulfurization, denitrification and reduction of air toxics using activated coke: 1. Activity of activated coke. Fuel 76:549–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vidic RD, Siler DP (2001) Vapor-phase elemental mercury adsorption by activated carbon impregnated with chloride and chelating agents. Carbon 39:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wan Q, Duan L, He K, Li J (2011) Removal of gaseous elemental mercury over a CeO2–WO3/TiO2 nanocomposite in simulated coal-fired flue gas. Chem Eng J 170:512–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang J, Yang J, Liu Z (2010) Gas-phase elemental mercury capture by a V2O5/AC catalyst. Fuel Process Technol 91:676–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang L, Wang S, Zhang L, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Nielsen C, McElroy MB, Hao J (2014) Source apportionment of atmospheric mercury pollution in China using the GEOS-Chem model. Environ Pollut 190:166–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang Y, Li C, Zhao L, Xie Y, Zhang X, Zeng G, Wu H, Zhang J (2016) Study on the removal of elemental mercury from simulated flue gas by Fe2O3-CeO2/AC at low temperature. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 23:5099–5110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang H, Guo W, Jiang Z, Yang R, Jiang Z, Pan Y, Shangguan W (2018) New insight into the enhanced activity of ordered mesoporous nickel oxide in formaldehyde catalytic oxidation reactions. J Catal 361:370–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wu Z, Jiang B, Liu Y (2008) Effect of transition metals addition on the catalyst of manganese/titania for low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of nitric oxide with ammonia. Appl Catal B Environ 79:347–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wu H, Li C, Zhao L, Zhang J, Zeng G, Xie Y, Zhang X, Wang Y (2015) Removal of gaseous elemental mercury by cylindrical activated coke loaded with CoOx-CeO2 from simulated coal combustion flue gas. Energy Fuel 29:6747–6757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Xia Y, Lin M, Ren D, Li Y, Hu F, Chen W (2016) Preparation of high surface area mesoporous nickel oxides and catalytic oxidation of toluene and formaldehyde. J Porous Mater 24:621–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Xie Y, Li C, Zhao L, Zhang J, Zeng G, Zhang X, Zhang W, Tao S (2015) Experimental study on Hg0 removal from flue gas over columnar MnOx-CeO2/activated coke. Appl Surf Sci 333:59–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Xu W, Wang H, Zhou X, Zhu T (2014) CuO/TiO2 catalysts for gas-phase Hg0 catalytic oxidation. Chem Eng J 243:380–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yang S, Guo Y, Yan N, Wu D, He H, Xie J, Qu Z, Jia J (2011) Remarkable effect of the incorporation of titanium on the catalytic activity and SO2 poisoning resistance of magnetic Mn–Fe spinel for elemental mercury capture. Appl Catal B Environ 101:698–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yi Y, Li C, Zhao L, Du X, Gao L, Chen J, Zhai Y, Zeng G (2018) The synthetic evaluation of CuO-MnOx-modified pinecone biochar for simultaneous removal formaldehyde and elemental mercury from simulated flue gas. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 25:4761–4775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zeng J, Li C, Zhao L, Gao L, Du X, Zhang J, Tang L, Zeng G (2017) Removal of elemental mercury from simulated flue gas over peanut shells carbon loaded with iodine ions, manganese oxides, and zirconium dioxide. Energy Fuel 31:13909–13920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhang A, Zheng W, Song J, Hu S, Liu Z, Xiang J (2014) Cobalt manganese oxides modified titania catalysts for oxidation of elemental mercury at low flue gas temperature. Chem Eng J 236:29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhang G, Li Z, Zheng H, Fu T, Ju Y, Wang Y (2015) Influence of the surface oxygenated groups of activated carbon on preparation of a nano Cu/AC catalyst and heterogeneous catalysis in the oxidative carbonylation of methanol. Appl Catal B Environ 179:95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhang J, Li C, Zhao L, Wang T, Li S, Zeng G (2017) A sol-gel Ti-Al-Ce-nanoparticle catalyst for simultaneous removal of NO and Hg0 from simulated flue gas. Chem Eng J 313:1535–1547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhao L, Li C, Zhang X, Zeng G, Zhang J, Xie Y (2015) A review on oxidation of elemental mercury from coal-fired flue gas with selective catalytic reduction catalysts. Catal Sci Technol 5:3459–3472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhao L, Li C, Wang Y, Wu H, Gao L, Zhang J, Zeng G (2016) Simultaneous removal of elemental mercury and NO from simulated flue gas using a CeO2 modified V2O5–WO3/TiO2 catalyst. Appl Catal B Environ 198:420–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Environmental Science and EngineeringHunan UniversityChangshaPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution Control (Hunan University), Ministry of EducationChangshaPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations