Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Carbon emission intensity of electricity generation in Belt and Road Initiative countries: a benchmarking analysis

  • 622 Accesses

  • 4 Citations

Abstract

The scope of this study is to analyze the carbon emissions intensity of electricity generation in “Belt and Road Initiative” (BRI) countries. The total CO2 emissions from electricity generation in BRI nations increases from 4232.34 Mt in 2013 to 4402.38 Mt in 2015, accounting for 34.45% of global CO2 emissions from electricity generation. Logarithmic mean Divisia index methodology is applied to analyze the drivers of carbon emissions intensity in BRI nations. The decomposition results revealed that the regional carbon emissions intensity in BRI nations increases during 2013–2015 and the power generation efficiency is the essential factor to improve carbon emissions performance in BRI developing countries. For BRI developing countries, promoting clean and efficient thermal power is a pragmatic priority for green power development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Notes

  1. 1.

    The electricity generated from biomass and waste is excluded but its associated carbon emissions are included when calculating the ACI.

  2. 2.

    IEA World Energy Balance Statistics Database (<https://www.iea.org/statistics/>).

  3. 3.

    The fossil fuel mix contains only coal (anthracite, coking coal, lignite, other bituminous coal, and sub-bituminous coal), natural gas, and petroleum (crude oil, diesel oil and fuel oil).

References

  1. Ang BW (2004) Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method? Energy Policy 32(9):1131–1139

  2. Ang BW (2015) LMDI decomposition approach: a guide for implementation. Energy Policy 86:233–238

  3. Ang BW, Su B (2016) Carbon emission intensity in electricity production: a global analysis. Energy Policy 94:56–63

  4. Ang BW, Zhou P, Tay LP (2011) Potential for reducing global carbon emissions from electricity production—a benchmarking analysis. Energy Policy 39:2482–2489

  5. CEC (2017) Report on clean development of coal power in China, Beijing

  6. Dai S, Zhang M, Huang W (2016) Decomposing the decoupling of CO2 emission from economic growth in BRICS countries. Nat Hazards 84(2):1055–1073

  7. Duan F, Ji Q, Liu B, Fan Y (2018) Energy investment risk assessment for nations along China’s Belt & Road Initiative. J Clean Prod 170:535–547

  8. Ersin K, Alper A, Bayram D, Mustafa K (2016) Hierarchical structure of the countries based on electricity consumption and economic growth. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 454:1–10

  9. Fei L, Dong S, Xue L, Liang Q, Yang W (2011) Energy consumption-economic growth relationship and carbon dioxide emissions in China. Energy Policy 39(2):568–574

  10. Gogan K, Partanen R, Denk W (2017) European Climate Leadership Report 2017. Energy For Humanity

  11. Goh T, Ang BW, Su B, Wang H (2018) Drivers of stagnating global carbon intensity of electricity and the way forward. Energy Policy 113:149–156

  12. Hamit-Haggar M (2012) Greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: a panel cointegration analysis from Canadian industrial sector perspective. Energy Econ 34(1):358–364

  13. Han L, Han B, Shi X, Su B, Lv X, Lei X (2018) Energy efficiency convergence across countries in the context of China’s belt and road initiative. Appl Energy 213:112–122

  14. IEA (2016a) World energy outlook 2016. International Energy Agency, Paris

  15. IEA (2016b) Re-powering markets: market design and regulation during the transition to low-carbon power systems. International Energy Agency, Paris

  16. IEA (2017) CO2 emissions from fuel combustion. International Energy Agency, Paris

  17. IEA (2018) IEA world energy balances 2018. International Energy Agency, Paris

  18. IEEFA (2018) China 2017 review: World’s second-biggest economy continues to drive global trends in energy investment. Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, Cleveland

  19. Ji Q, Fan Y, Troilo M, Ripple RD, Feng L (2018) China’s natural gas demand projections and supply capacity analysis in 2030. Energy J 39(6):53–70

  20. Ji Q, Xia T, Liu F, Xu J (2019) The information spillover between carbon price and power sector returns: evidence from the major European electricity companies. J Clean Prod 2018:1178–1187

  21. Kais S, Sami H (2016) An econometric study of the impact of economic growth and energy use on carbon emissions: panel data evidence from fifty-eight countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 59:1101–1110

  22. Karmellos M, Kopidou D, Diakoulaki D (2016) A decomposition analysis of the driving factors of CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions from the power sector in the European Union countries. Energy 94:680–692

  23. Li H, Li F, Yu X (2018a) China’s contributions to global green energy and low-carbon development: empirical evidence under the belt and road framework. Energies 11

  24. Li X, Liao H, Du Y, Wang C, Wang J, Liu Y (2018b) Carbon dioxide emissions from the electricity sector in major countries: a decomposition analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(7):6814–6825

  25. Liu Y, Hao Y (2018) The dynamic links between CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic development in the countries along “the belt and road”. Sci Total Environ 645:674–683

  26. Madaleno M, Moutinho V (2017) A new LDMI decomposition approach to explain emission development in the EU: individual and set contribution. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(11):10234–10257

  27. Malla S (2009) CO2 emissions from electricity generation in seven Asia-Pacific and North American countries: a decomposition analysis. Energy Policy 37:1–9

  28. Niu S, Ding Y, Niu Y, Li Y, Luo G (2011) Economic growth, energy conservation and emissions reduction: a comparative analysis based on panel data for 8 Asian-Pacific countries. Energy Policy 39(4):2121–2131

  29. Ozcan B (2013) The nexus between carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Middle East countries: a panel data analysis. Energy Policy 62:1138–1147

  30. Peng J, Xie R, Lai M (2018) Energy-related CO2 emissions in the China’s iron and steel industry: a global supply chain analysis. Resour Conserv Recycl 129:392–401

  31. Ren P, Liu C, Zhang L (2017) Survey of China’s participation in coal generation projects in BRI nations. Global Environment Institute, Beijing (in Chinese)

  32. REN21 (2017) Renewable 2017 Global Status Report. Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century, Paris

  33. State Council (2015) Vision and proposed actions outlined on jointly building silk road economic belt and 21st-century maritime silk road. State Council, Beijing (in Chinese)

  34. Stram BN (2016) Key challenges to expanding renewable energy. Energy Policy 96:728–734

  35. Sun C, Ding D, Yang M (2017) Estimating the complete CO2 emissions and the carbon intensity in India: from the carbon transfer perspective. Energy Policy 109:418–427

  36. Tang X, Jin Y, Wong X et al (2017) Will China’s trade restructuring reduce CO2 emissions embodied in international exports? J Clean Prod 161:1094–1103

  37. Wang H, Ang BW, Su B (2017) A multi-region structural decomposition analysis of global CO2 emission intensity. Ecol Econ 142:163–176

  38. WDI (2018) World Bank Data Indicator. http://data.worldbank.org.cn/indicator

  39. WRI (2013) China’s foreign investment in wind and solar energy industry: trends and motivations. World Resource Institute, Washington, DC

  40. Yan Q, Zhang Q, Zou X (2016) Decomposition analysis of carbon dioxide emissions in China’s regional thermal electricity generation, 2000–2020. Energy 112:788–794

  41. Yu S, Hu X, Fan J, Cheng J (2018) Convergence of carbon emissions intensity across Chinese industrial sectors. J Clean Prod 194:179–192

  42. Yuan JH, Xu Y, Zhang XP (2014a) Income growth, energy consumption, and carbon emissions: the case of China. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 50(5):169–181

  43. Yuan JH, Xu Y, Hu Z, Zhao C, Xiong M, Guo J (2014b) Peak energy consumption and CO2 emissions in China. Energy Policy 68(2):508–523

  44. Yuan JH, Li P, Wang Y, Liu Q, Shen X, Zhang K, Dong L (2016) Coal power overcapacity and investment bubble in China during 2015–2020. Energy Policy 97:136–144

  45. Yuan JH, Zhao CH, Zhang HN (2018) Research on the green power cooperation. North China Electric Power University, Beijing (in Chinese)

  46. Zhang Y, Jin Y, Shen B (2018) Measuring the energy saving and CO2 emissions reduction potential under China’s belt and road initiative. Comput Econ in press

  47. Zhao CH, Zhang HN, Zeng YR et al (2018) Total-factor energy efficiency in BRI nations: an estimation based on three-stage DEA model. Sustainability 10(1)

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the funding of National Natural Science Foundation of China (71673085), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2018ZD14), Beijing Social Science Fund (16YJB027), and the 111 Project (B18021). The authors would also like to acknowledge great thanks to anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments which largely improve the academic quality of this paper. The usual caveats apply.

Author information

Correspondence to Jiahai Yuan.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, X., Zhang, H., Zhao, C. et al. Carbon emission intensity of electricity generation in Belt and Road Initiative countries: a benchmarking analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 15057–15068 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04860-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)
  • Carbon emission intensity
  • LMDI