Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 13, pp 13299–13310 | Cite as

The adsorption of phosphate using a magnesia–pullulan composite: kinetics, equilibrium, and column tests

  • Yuanyao Ye
  • Jie Jiao
  • Dejun Kang
  • Wei JiangEmail author
  • Jianxiong Kang
  • Huu Hao Ngo
  • Wenshan Guo
  • Yiwen Liu
Research Article

Abstract

A magnesia–pullulan (MgOP) composite has been developed to remove phosphate from a synthetic solution. In the present study, the removal of phosphate by MgOP was evaluated in both a batch and dynamic system. The batch experiments investigated the initial pH effect on the phosphate removal efficiency from pH 3 to 12 and the effect of co-existing anions. In addition, the adsorption isotherms, thermodynamics, and kinetics were also investigated. The results from the batch experiments indicate that MgOP has encouraging performance for the adsorption of phosphate, while the initial pH value (3–12) had a negligible influence on the phosphate removal efficiency. Analysis of the adsorption thermodynamics demonstrated that the phosphate removal process was endothermic and spontaneous. Investigations into the dynamics of the phosphate removal process were carried out using a fixed bed of MgOP, and the resulting breakthrough curves were used to describe the column phosphate adsorption process at various bed masses, volumetric flow rates, influent phosphate concentrations, reaction temperatures, and inlet pH values. The results suggest that the adsorption of phosphate on MgOP was improved using an increased bed mass, while the reaction temperature did not significantly affect the performance of the MgOP bed during the phosphate removal process. Furthermore, higher influent phosphate concentrations were beneficial towards increasing the column adsorption capacity for phosphate. Several mathematic models, including the Adams–Bohart, Wolboska, Yoon–Nelson, and Thomas models, were employed to fit the fixed-bed data. In addition, the effluent concentration of magnesium ions was measured and the regeneration of MgOP investigated.

Keywords

Phosphate Adsorption Breakthrough curve Column experiments Regeneration 

Notes

Funding information

This study is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51409108) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (21177045).

Supplementary material

11356_2019_4858_MOESM1_ESM.docx (657 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 656 kb)

References

  1. Aksu Z, Gönen F (2004) Biosorption of phenol by immobilized activated sludge in a continuous packed bed: prediction of breakthrough curves. Process Biochem 39:599–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arai Y, Sparks DL (2001) ATR–FTIR spectroscopic investigation on phosphate adsorption mechanisms at the ferrihydrite–water interface. J Colloid Interface Sci 241:317–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashekuzzaman S, Jiang J-Q (2017) Strategic phosphate removal/recovery by a re-usable Mg–Fe–Cl layered double hydroxide. Process Saf Environ Prot 107:454–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belelli PG, Fuente SA, Castellani NJ (2014) Phosphate adsorption on goethite and Al-rich goethite. Comput Mater Sci 85:59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bohart G, Adams E (1920) Some aspects of the behavior of charcoal with respect to chlorine. J Am Chem Soc 42:523–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borba C, Guirardello R, Silva E, Veit M, Tavares C (2006) Removal of nickel (II) ions from aqueous solution by biosorption in a fixed bed column: experimental and theoretical breakthrough curves. Biochem Eng J 30:184–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chatterjee S, Mondal S, De S (2017) Design and scaling up of fixed bed adsorption columns for lead removal by treated laterite. J Clean Prod 177:760–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chitrakar R, Tezuka S, Sonoda A, Sakane K, Ooi K, Hirotsu T (2006) Selective adsorption of phosphate from seawater and wastewater by amorphous zirconium hydroxide. J Colloid Interface Sci 297:426–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chowdhury S, Saha PD (2013) Artificial neural network (ANN) modeling of adsorption of methylene blue by NaOH-modified rice husk in a fixed-bed column system. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:1050–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Du Z, Zheng T, Wang P (2018) Experimental and modelling studies on fixed bed adsorption for cu (II) removal from aqueous solution by carboxyl modified jute fiber. Powder Technol 338:952–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fathy M, Moghny TA, Mousa MA, El-Bellihi A-HA, Awadallah AE (2017) Synthesis of transparent amorphous carbon thin films from cellulose powder in Rice straw. Arab J Sci Eng 42:225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guo X, Zeng L, Jin X (2013) Advanced regeneration and fixed-bed study of ammonium and potassium removal from anaerobic digested wastewater by natural zeolite. J Envion Sci 25:954–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guo-Mei C (2006) Ammonium molybdate spectrophotometric method for determination of total phosphorus in municipal sewage sludge [J]. China Water Wastewater 2:032Google Scholar
  14. Hu T, Ding S, Deng H (2016) Application of three surface complexation models on U (VI) adsorption onto graphene oxide. Chem Eng J 289:270–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hu P, Liu Q, Wang J, Huang R (2017) Phosphate removal by Ce(III)-impregnated crosslinked chitosan complex from aqueous solutions. Polym Eng Sci 57:44–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang J, Wu Z, Chen L, Sun Y (2015) Surface complexation modeling of adsorption of Cd (II) on graphene oxides. J Mol Liq 209:753–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huang W, Zhang Y, Li D (2017a) Adsorptive removal of phosphate from water using mesoporous materials: a review. J Environ Manag 193:470–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huang W, Zhang Y, Li D (2017b) Adsorptive removal of phosphate from water using mesoporous materials: a review. J Environ Manage 193:470–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jiang S, Wang X, Yang S, Shi H (2016) Characteristics of simultaneous ammonium and phosphate adsorption from hydrolysis urine onto natural loess. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:2628–2639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kang J, Bo L, Jing S, Li D, Jing Y, Wei Z, Liu D (2011) Defluoridation of water using calcined magnesia/pullulan composite. Chem Eng J 166:765–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kumar IA, Viswanathan N (2017) Development of multivalent metal ions imprinted chitosan biocomposites for phosphate sorption. Int J Biol Macromol 104:1539–1547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lan W, Zhang J, Hu Z, Ji M, Zhang X, Zhang J, Li F, Yao G (2018) Phosphorus removal enhancement of magnesium modified constructed wetland microcosm and its mechanism study. Chem Eng J 335:209–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee C, Jung J, Pawar RR, Kim M, Lee S-M (2017) Arsenate and phosphate removal from water using Fe-sericite composite beads in batch and fixed-bed systems. J Ind Eng Chem 47:375–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li R, Wang JJ, Zhou B, Zhang Z, Liu S, Lei S, Xiao R (2017) Simultaneous capture removal of phosphate, ammonium and organic substances by MgO impregnated biochar and its potential use in swine wastewater treatment. J Clean Prod 147:96–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lin J, Zhang Z, Zhan Y (2017) Effect of humic acid preloading on phosphate adsorption onto zirconium-modified zeolite. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:12195–12211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu R, Chi L, Wang X, Sui Y, Wang Y, Arandiyan H (2018) Review of metal (hydr)oxide and other adsorptive materials for phosphate removal from water. J Environ Chem Eng 6(4):5269–5286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Loganathan P, Vigneswaran S, Kandasamy J, Naidu R (2013) Defluoridation of drinking water using adsorption processes. J Hazard Mater 248:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Loganathan P, Vigneswaran S, Kandasamy J, Bolan NS (2014) Removal and recovery of phosphate from water using sorption. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 44:847–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mor S, Chhoden K, Ravindra K (2016) Application of agro-waste rice husk ash for the removal of phosphate from the wastewater. J Clean Prod 129:673–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Muliwa AM, Leswifi TY, Maity A, Ochieng A, Onyango MS (2018) Fixed-bed operation for manganese removal from water using chitosan/bentonite/MnO composite beads. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:18081–18095Google Scholar
  31. Nguyen T, Ngo H, Guo W, Pham T, Li F, Nguyen T, Bui X (2015) Adsorption of phosphate from aqueous solutions and sewage using zirconium loaded okara (ZLO): fixed-bed column study. Sci Total Environ 523:40–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nur T, Johir M, Loganathan P, Nguyen T, Vigneswaran S, Kandasamy J (2014) Phosphate removal from water using an iron oxide impregnated strong base anion exchange resin. J Ind Eng Chem 20:1301–1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shi S-L, Lv J-P, Liu Q, Nan F-R, Jiao X-Y, Feng J, Xie S-L (2018) Application of Phragmites australis to remove phenol from aqueous solutions by chemical activation in batch and fixed-bed columns. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(24):23917–23928Google Scholar
  34. Shi W, Fu Y, Jiang W, Ye Y, Kang J, Liu D, Ren Y, Li D, Luo C, Xu Z (2019) Enhanced phosphate removal by zeolite loaded with Mg–Al–La ternary (hydr) oxides from aqueous solutions: performance and mechanism. Chem Eng J 357:33–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tang X, Wu M, Li R, Wang Z (2017) Prospect of recovering phosphorus in magnesium slag-packed wetland filter. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:22808–22815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tang X, Li R, Wu M, Dong L, Wang Z (2018) Enhanced phosphorus removal using acid-treated magnesium slag particles. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:3860–3871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tang Q, Shi C, Shi W, Huang X, Ye Y, Jiang W, Kang J, Liu D, Ren Y, Li D (2019) Preferable phosphate removal by nano-La (III) hydroxides modified mesoporous rice husk biochars: role of the host pore structure and point of zero charge. Sci Total Environ 662:511–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thomas HC (1944) Heterogeneous ion exchange in a flowing system. J Am Chem Soc 66:1664–1666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Uzunova EL, Mikosch H (2016) Adsorption of phosphates and phosphoric acid in zeolite clinoptilolite: electronic structure study. Microporous and Mesoporous Mater 232:119–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vieira ML, Pinheiro CP, Silva KA, Lutke SF, Cadaval TRSA, Dotto G, Pinto LADA (2019) Chitosan and cyanoguanidine-crosslinked chitosan coated glass beads and its application in fixed bed adsorption. Chem Eng Commun 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2019.1581618
  41. Wan D, Liu H, Liu R, Qu J, Li S, Zhang J (2012) Adsorption of nitrate and nitrite from aqueous solution onto calcined (Mg–Al) hydrotalcite of different Mg/Al ratio. Chem Eng J 195:241–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wan S, Wang S, Li Y, Gao B (2017) Functionalizing biochar with Mg–Al and Mg–Fe layered double hydroxides for removal of phosphate from aqueous solutions. J Ind Eng Chem 47:246–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang Z, Nie E, Li J, Yang M, Zhao Y, Luo X, Zheng Z (2012) Equilibrium and kinetics of adsorption of phosphate onto iron-doped activated carbon. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19:2908–2917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Willis J (1961) Determination of calcium and magnesium in urine by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Anal Chem 33:556–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wolborska A (1989) Adsorption on activated carbon of p-nitrophenol from aqueous solution. Water Res 23:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Xia T, Wang Y (2014) Dynamic experiment of modified rice husk adsorb methylene blue. Environ Sci Technol 37:417Google Scholar
  47. Xu Z, Cai J-g, Pan B-c (2013) Mathematically modeling fixed-bed adsorption in aqueous systems. J Zhejiang Univ SCI A 14:155–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Xu R, Zhang M, Mortimer RJ, Pan G (2017) Enhanced phosphorus locking by novel lanthanum/aluminum–hydroxide composite: implications for eutrophication control. Environ Sci Technol 51:3418–3425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ye Y, Hu Y, Hussain Z, Li X, Li D, Kang J (2016a) Simultaneous adsorptive removal of fluoride and phosphate by magnesia–pullulan composite from aqueous solution. RSC Adv 6:35966–35976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ye Y, Ngo HH, Guo W, Liu Y, Zhang X, Guo J, B-j N, Chang SW, Nguyen DD (2016b) Insight into biological phosphate recovery from sewage. Bioresour Technol 218:874–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ye Y, Ngo HH, Guo W, Liu Y, Li J, Liu Y, Zhang X, Jia H (2017) Insight into chemical phosphate recovery from municipal wastewater. Sci Total Environ 576:159–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ye Y, Liu W, Jiang W, Kang J, Ngo HH, Guo W, Liu Y (2018a) Defluoridation by magnesia–pullulan: surface complexation modeling and pH neutralization of treated fluoride water by aluminum. J Taiwan Inst Chem E 93:625–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ye Y, Yang J, Jiang W, Kang J, Hu Y, Ngo HH, Guo W, Liu Y (2018b) Fluoride removal from water using a magnesia-pullulan composite in a continuous fixed-bed column. J Environ Manag 206:929–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yoon YH, Nelson J (1984) Application of gas adsorption kinetics I. A theoretical model for respirator cartridge service life. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 45:509–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhang G, Liu H, Liu R, Qu J (2009) Removal of phosphate from water by a Fe–Mn binary oxide adsorbent. J Colloid Interface Sci 335:168–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang J, Shen Z, Shan W, Chen Z, Mei Z, Lei Y, Wang W (2010) Adsorption behavior of phosphate on lanthanum (III) doped mesoporous silicates material. J Envion Sci 22:507–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhang B, Chen N, Feng C, Zhang Z (2018) Adsorption for phosphate by crosslinked/non-crosslinked-chitosan-Fe (III) complex sorbents: characteristic and mechanism. Chem Eng J 353:361–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhu Z, Zeng H, Zhu Y, Yang F, Zhu H, Qin H, Wei W (2013) Kinetics and thermodynamic study of phosphate adsorption on the porous biomorph-genetic composite of α-Fe2O3/Fe3O4/C with eucalyptus wood microstructure. Sep Purif Technol 117:124–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuanyao Ye
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jie Jiao
    • 3
  • Dejun Kang
    • 4
  • Wei Jiang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jianxiong Kang
    • 1
  • Huu Hao Ngo
    • 2
  • Wenshan Guo
    • 2
  • Yiwen Liu
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Environmental Science and EngineeringHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Centre for Technology in Water and Wastewater, School of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of Technology SydneySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Wisdri City Environmental Protection Engineering Co., Ltd.WuhanPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Department of Municipal Engineering, College of Civil EngineeringFuzhou UniversityFuzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations