Advertisement

Constructed wetland microcosms as sustainable technology for domestic wastewater treatment: an overview

  • Saroj Kumar
  • Venkatesh DuttaEmail author
Review Article
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

Constructed wetland microcosms (CWMs) are artificially designed ecosystem which utilizes both complex and ordinary interactions between supporting media, macrophytes, and microorganisms to treat almost all types of wastewater. CWMs are considered as green and sustainable techniques which require lower energy input, less operational and maintenance cost and provide critical ecological benefits such as wildlife habitat, aquaculture, groundwater recharge, flood control, recreational uses, and add aesthetic value. They are good alternatives to conventional treatment systems particularly for smaller communities as well as distant and decentralized locations. The pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), and temperature are the key controlling factors while several other parameters such as hydraulic loading rates (HLR), hydraulic retention time (HRT), diversity of macrophytes, supporting media, and water depth are critical to achieving better performance. From the literature survey, it is evaluated that the removal performance of CWMs can be improved significantly through recirculation of effluent and artificial aeration (intermittent). This review paper presents an assessment of CWMs as a sustainable option for treatment of wastewater nutrients, organics, and heavy metals from domestic wastewater. Initially, a concise note on the CWMs and their components are presented, followed by a description of treatment mechanisms, major constituents involved in the treatment process, and overall efficiency. Finally, the effects of ecological factors and challenges for their long-term operations are highlighted.

Keywords

Constructed wetland microcosms Domestic wastewater Nutrients Heavy metals Macrophytes Sustainability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge laboratory support extended from Department of Environmental Science, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University (A Central University), Lucknow, throughout this study.

Funding information

This work received financial support in terms of research fellowship (UGC Ref. no. 3525/SC/NET-JULY 2016) to the first author from University Grants Commission, New Delhi.

References

  1. Abou-Elela SI, Elekhnawy MA, Khalil MT, Hellal MS (2017) Factors affecting the performance of horizontal flow constructed treatment wetland vegetated with Cyperus papyrus for municipal wastewater treatment. In J Phyto 19(11):1023–1028Google Scholar
  2. Adrados B, Sanchez O, Arias CA, Becares E, Garrido L, Mas J, Brix H, Morato J (2014) Microbial communities from different types of natural wastewater treatment systems: vertical and horizontal flow constructed wetlands and biofilters. Water Res 55:304–312Google Scholar
  3. Almuktar SA, Abed SN, Scholz M (2018) Wetlands for wastewater treatment and subsequent recycling of treated effluent: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(24):23595–23623Google Scholar
  4. Avila C, Matamoros V, Reyes-Contreras C, Piña B, Casado M, Mita L, Bayona JM (2014) Attenuation of emerging organic contaminants in a hybrid constructed wetland system under different hydraulic loading rates and their associated toxicological effects in wastewater. Sci Total Environ 470:1272–1280Google Scholar
  5. Avila C, Pelissari C, Sezerino PH, Sgroi M, Roccaro P, García J (2017) Enhancement of total nitrogen removal through effluent recirculation and fate of PPCPs in a hybrid constructed wetland system treating urban wastewater. Sci Total Environ 584:414–425Google Scholar
  6. Babatunde AO, Zhao YQ, Zhao XH (2010) Alum sludge-based constructed wetland system for enhanced removal of P and OM from wastewater: concept, design and performance analysis. Bioresour Technol 101(16):6576–6579Google Scholar
  7. Barca C, Meyer D, Liira M, Drissen P, Comeau Y, Andrès Y, Chazarenc F (2014) Steel slag filters to upgrade phosphorus removal in small wastewater treatment plants: removal mechanisms and performance. Ecol Eng 68:214–222Google Scholar
  8. Bialowiec A, Janczukowicz W, Randerson PF (2011) Nitrogen removal from wastewater in vertical flow constructed wetlands containing LWA/gravel layers and reed vegetation. Ecol Eng 37(6):897–902Google Scholar
  9. Bohórquez E, Paredes D, Arias CA (2016) Vertical flow-constructed wetlands for domestic wastewater treatment under tropical conditions: effect of different design and operational parameters. Environ Technol 38(2):199–208Google Scholar
  10. Bruch I, Fritsche J, Banninger D, Alewell U, Sendelov M, Hurlimann H, Alewell C (2011) Improving the treatment efficiency of constructed wetlands with zeolite - containing filter sands. Bioresour Technol 102(2):937–941Google Scholar
  11. Butterworth E, Richards A, Jones M, Mansi G, Ranieri E, Dotro G, Jefferson B (2016) Performance of four full-scale artificially aerated horizontal flow constructed wetlands for domestic wastewater treatment. Water 8(9):365Google Scholar
  12. Calheiros CS, Rangel AO, Castro PM (2008) Evaluation of different substrates to support the growth of Typha latifolia in constructed wetlands treating tannery wastewater over long-term operation. Bioresour Technol 99(15):6866–6877Google Scholar
  13. Calheiros CS, Duque AF, Moura A, Henriques IS, Correia A, Rangel AO, Castro PM (2009) Substrate effect on bacterial communities from constructed wetlands planted with Typha latifolia treating industrial wastewater. Ecol Eng 35(5):744–753Google Scholar
  14. Cao W, Zhang Y (2014) Removal of nitrogen (N) from hypereutrophic waters by ecological floating beds (EFBs) with various substrates. Ecol Eng 62:148–152Google Scholar
  15. Caselles-Osorio A, Vega H, Lancheros JC, Casierra-Martínez HA, Mosquera JE (2017) Horizontal subsurface-flow constructed wetland removal efficiency using Cyperus articulatus L. Ecol Eng 99:479–485Google Scholar
  16. Casierra-Martínez HA, Charris-Olmos JC, Caselles-Osorio A, Parody-Munoz AE (2017) Organic matter and nutrients removal in tropical constructed wetlands using Cyperus ligularis (Cyperaceae) and Echinocloa colona (Poaceae). Water Air Soil Pollut 228(9):338Google Scholar
  17. Chong HLH, Chia PS, Ahmad MN (2013) The adsorption of heavy metal by Bornean oil palm shell and its potential application as constructed wetland media. Bioresour Technol 130:181–186Google Scholar
  18. Choudhary AK, Kumar S, Sharma C (2011) Constructed wetlands: an approach for wastewater treatment. Elixir Pollut 37(8):3666–3672Google Scholar
  19. Cooper PF, Job GD, Green MB (1996) Reed beds and constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Water Res Cen 6(7):49Google Scholar
  20. Dong X, Reddy GB (2010) Soil bacterial communities in constructed wetlands treated with swine wastewater using PCR-DGGE technique. Bioresour Technol 101(4):1175–1182Google Scholar
  21. Dzakpasu M, Scholz M, McCarthy V, Jordan SN (2015) Assessment of long-term phosphorus retention in an integrated constructed wetland treating domestic wastewater. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(1):305–313Google Scholar
  22. Elfanssi S, Ouazzani N, Latrach L, Hejjaj A, Mandi L (2017) Phytoremediation of domestic wastewater using a hybrid constructed wetlands in the mountainous rural area. In J Phyto 20(1):75–87Google Scholar
  23. Faulwetter JL, Gagnon V, Sundberg C, Chazarenc F, Burr MD, Brisson J, Stein OR (2009) Microbial processes influencing performance of treatment wetlands: a review. Ecol Eng 35(6):987–1004Google Scholar
  24. Fountoulakis MS, Daskalakis G, Papadaki A, Kalogerakis N, Manios T (2017a) Use of halophytes in pilot-scale horizontal flow constructed wetland treating domestic wastewater. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(20):16682–16689Google Scholar
  25. Fountoulakis MS, Sabathianakis G, Kritsotakis I, Kabourakis EM, Manios T (2017b) Halophytes as vertical-flow constructed wetland vegetation for domestic wastewater treatment. Sci Total Environ 583:432–439Google Scholar
  26. Garcia J, Rousseau DP, Morato J, Lesage ELS, Matamoros V, Bayona JM (2010) Contaminant removal processes in subsurface-flow constructed wetlands: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 40(7):561–661Google Scholar
  27. Ge Y, Wang X, Zheng Y, Dzakpasu M, Zhao Y, Xiong J (2015) Functions of slags and gravels as substrates in large-scale demonstration constructed wetland systems for polluted river water treatment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(17):12982–12991Google Scholar
  28. Geng Y, Han W, Yu C, Jiang Q, Wu J, Chang J, Ge Y (2017) Effects of plant diversity on phosphorus removal in hydroponic microcosms simulating floating constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng 107:110–119Google Scholar
  29. Gill LW, Ring P, Casey B, Higgins NM, Johnston PM (2017) Long term heavy metal removal by a constructed wetland treating rainfall runoff from a motorway. Sci Total Environ 601:32–44Google Scholar
  30. Guo C, Cui Y, Dong B, Luo Y, Liu F, Zhao S, Wu H (2017) Test study of the optimal design for hydraulic performance and treatment performance of free water surface flow constructed wetland. Bioresour Technol 238:461–471Google Scholar
  31. Haynes RJ (2015) Use of industrial wastes as media in constructed wetlands and filter beds—prospects for removal of phosphate and metals from wastewater streams. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 45(10):1041–1103Google Scholar
  32. He Y, Peng L, Hua Y, Zhao J, Xiao N (2018) Treatment for domestic wastewater from university dorms using a hybrid constructed wetland at pilot scale. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(9):8532–8541Google Scholar
  33. Ilyas H, Masih I (2017) Intensification of constructed wetlands for land area reduction: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(13):12081–12091Google Scholar
  34. Jesus JM, Danko AS, Fiuza A, Borges MT (2018) Effect of plants in constructed wetlands for organic carbonand nutrient removal: a review of experimental factors contributing to higher impact and suggestions for future guidelines. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(5):4149–4164Google Scholar
  35. Jianlong W, Ning Y (2004) Partial nitrification under limited dissolved oxygen conditions. Process Biochem 39(10):1223–1229Google Scholar
  36. Kadlec RH, Knight RL (1996) Treatment wetlands. CRC Press LLC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  37. Kadlec RH, Wallace S (2008) Treatment wetlands. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  38. Kadlec RH, Wallace SD (2009) Treatment wetlands, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  39. Krasnits E, Friedler E, Sabbah I, Beliavski M, Tarre S, Green M (2009) Spatial distribution of major microbial groups in a well-established constructed wetland treating municipal wastewater. Ecol Eng 35(7):1085–1089Google Scholar
  40. Kropfelova L, Vymazal J, Svehla J (2009) Removal of trace elements in three horizontal sub-surface flow constructed wetlands in the Czech Republic. Environ Pollut 157(4):1186–1194Google Scholar
  41. Kumar S, Dutta V (2019) Efficiency of constructed wetland microcosms (CWMs) for the treatment of domestic wastewater using aquatic macrophytes. In: Environmental Biotechnology: for sustainable future. Springer, Singapore, pp 287–307Google Scholar
  42. Kumari M, Tripathi BD (2014) Effect of aeration and mixed culture of Eichhornia crassipes and Salvinia natans on removal of wastewater pollutants. Ecol Eng 62:48–53Google Scholar
  43. Kumwimba MN, Zhu B, Muyembe DK, Dzakpasu M (2017) Growth characteristics and nutrient removal capability of eco-ditch plants in mesocosm sediment receiving primary domestic wastewater. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(30):23926–23938Google Scholar
  44. Lan W, Zhang J, Hu Z, Ji M, Zhang X, Zhang J, Li F, Yao G (2018) Phosphorus removal enhancement of magnesium modified constructed wetland microcosm and its mechanism study. J Chem Eng 335:209–214Google Scholar
  45. Lee CG, Fletcher TD, Sun G (2009) Nitrogen removal in constructed wetland systems. Eng Life Sci 9(1):11–22Google Scholar
  46. Lesage E, Rousseau DPL, Meers E (2007) Accumulation of metals in a horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland treating domestic wastewater in Flanders, Belgium. Sci Total Environ 380(1–3):102–115Google Scholar
  47. Li M, Wu H, Zhang J, Ngo HH, Guo W, Kong Q (2017) Nitrogen removal and nitrous oxide emission in surface flow constructed wetlands for treating sewage treatment plant effluent: Effect of C/N ratios. Bioresour Technol 240:157–164Google Scholar
  48. Lima LKS, Pelosi BT, Silva MGC, Vieira MGA (2013) Lead and chromium biosorption by Pistia stratiotes biomass. Chem Eng Transact 32:1045–1050Google Scholar
  49. Lima MX, Carvalho KQ, Passig FH, Borges AC, Filippe TC, Azevedo JCR, Nagalli A (2018) Performance of different substrates in constructed wetlands planted with E. crassipes treating low-strength sewage under subtropical conditions. Sci Total Environ 630:1365–1373Google Scholar
  50. Liu R, Zhao Y, Doherty L, Hu Y, Hao X (2015) A review of incorporation of constructed wetland with other treatment processes. J Chem Eng 279:220–230Google Scholar
  51. Lv T, Zhang Y, Carvalho PN, Zhang L, Button M, Arias CA, Brix H (2017) Microbial community metabolic function in constructed wetland mesocosms treating the pesticides imazalil and tebuconazole. Ecol Eng 98:378–387Google Scholar
  52. Mazzacano C, Black SH (2013) Ecologically sound mosquito management in wetlands. An overview of mosquito control practices, the risks, benefits, and nontarget impacts, and recommendations on effective practices that control mosquitoes, reduce pesticide use, and protect wetlands. The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation, Portland, OregonGoogle Scholar
  53. Meng P, Pei H, Hu W, Shao Y, Li Z (2014) How to increase microbial degradation in constructed wetlands: influencing factors and improvement measures. Bioresour Technol 157:316–326Google Scholar
  54. Mishra VK, Tripathi BD (2008) Concurrent removal and accumulation of heavy metals by three aquatic macrophytes. Bioresour Technol 99(15):7091–7097Google Scholar
  55. Ojoawo SO, Udayakumar G, Naik P (2015) Phytoremediation of phosphorus and nitrogen with Canna x generalis reeds in domestic wastewater through NMAMIT constructed wetland. Aquat Procedia 4:349–356Google Scholar
  56. Okochi NC, McMartin DW (2011) Laboratory investigations of storm water remediation via slag: effects of metals on phosphorus removal. J Hazard Mater 187(1–3):250–257Google Scholar
  57. Park JH, Wang JJ, Kim SH, Cho JS, Kang SW, Delaune RD, Seo DC (2017) Phosphate removal in constructed wetland with rapid cooled basic oxygen furnace slag. J Chem Eng 327:713–724Google Scholar
  58. Parnian A, Chorom M, Jaafarzadeh N, Dinarvand M (2016) Use of two aquatic macrophytes for the removal of heavy metals from synthetic medium. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 16(3):194–200Google Scholar
  59. Pedescoll A, Sidrach-Cardona R, Hijosa-Valsero M (2015) Design parameters affecting metals removal in horizontal constructed wetlands for domestic wastewater treatment. Ecol Eng 80:92–99Google Scholar
  60. Qasaimeh A, Alsharie H, Masoud T (2015) A review on constructed wetlands components and heavy metal removal from wastewater. J Environ Prot 6(07):710Google Scholar
  61. Rai UN, Upadhyay AK, Singh NK, Dwivedi S, Tripathi RD (2015) Seasonal applicability of horizontal sub-surface flow constructed wetland for trace elements and nutrient removal from urban wastes to conserve Ganga River water quality at Haridwar, India. Ecol Eng 81:115–122Google Scholar
  62. Ren Y, Zhang B, Liu Z, Wang J (2007) Optimization of four kinds of constructed wetlands, substrate combination treating domestic sewage. Wuhan Univ J Natural Sci 12(6):1136–1142Google Scholar
  63. Ren Y, Liu Y, Sun J, Lu H, Yang L, Chen C, Han Y (2016) Lolium perenne as the cultivation plant in hydroponic ditch and constructed wetland to improve wastewater treatment efficiency in a cold region. Wetlands 36(4):659–665Google Scholar
  64. Rozema ER, Rozema LR, Zheng Y (2016) A vertical flow constructed wetland for the treatment of winery process water and domestic sewage in Ontario, Canada: six years of performance data. Ecol Eng 86:262–268Google Scholar
  65. Saeed T, Sun G (2012) A review of nitrogen and organics removal mechanisms in subsurface flow constructed wetlands: dependency on environmental parameters, operating conditions, and supporting media. J Environ Manag 112:429–448Google Scholar
  66. Saeed T, Sun G (2013) A lab-scale study of constructed wetlands with sugarcane bagasse and sand media for the treatment of textile wastewater. Bioresour Technol 128:438–447Google Scholar
  67. Sleytr K, Tietz A, Langergraber G, Haberl R, Sessitsch A (2009) Diversity of abundant bacteria in subsurface vertical flow constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng 35(6):1021–1025Google Scholar
  68. Stefanakis A, Akratos CS, Tsihrintzis VA (2014) Vertical flow constructed wetlands: eco-engineering systems for wastewater and sludge treatment. Elsevier Science, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  69. Sudarsan JS, Roy RL, Baskar G, Deeptha VT, Nithiyanantham S (2015) Domestic wastewater treatment performance using constructed wetland. Sustain Water Res Manage 1(2):89–96Google Scholar
  70. Sun G, Austin D (2007) Completely autotrophic nitrogen removal over nitrite in lab scale constructed wetlands: evidence from a mass balance study. Chemosphere 68(6):1120–1128Google Scholar
  71. Tangahu BV, Abdullah SRS, Basri H, Idris M, Anuar N, Mukhlisin M (2013) Phytoremediation of wastewater containing lead (Pb) in pilot reed bed using Scirpus grossus. Inter J Phyto 15(7):663–676Google Scholar
  72. Tao W, Wang J (2009) Effect of vegetation, limestone, and aeration on nitritation, anammox and denitrification in wetland treatment systems. Ecol Eng 35(5):836–842Google Scholar
  73. Tilak AS, Wani SP, Datta A, Patil MD, Kaushal M, Reddy KR (2017) Evaluation of Ageratum conyzoides in field scale constructed wetlands (CWs) for domestic wastewater treatment. Water Sci Technol 75(10):2268–2280Google Scholar
  74. Tsihrintzis VA (2017) The use of vertical flow constructed wetlands in wastewater treatment. Water Resour Manag 31(10):3245–3270Google Scholar
  75. US Environmental Protection Agency, USEPA (2000) Constructed Wetlands treatment of municipal wastewaters. National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, OhioGoogle Scholar
  76. Vymazal J (2010) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Water Res 2(3):530–549Google Scholar
  77. Vymazal J (2013) Emergent plants used in free water surface constructed wetlands: a review. Ecol Eng 61:582–592Google Scholar
  78. Vymazal J, Kropfelova L (2009) Removal of organics in constructed wetlands with the horizontal sub-surface flow: a review of the field experience. Sci Total Environ 407(13):3911–3922Google Scholar
  79. Wang CY, Sample DJ (2013) Assessing floating treatment wetlands nutrient removal performance through a first order kinetics model and statistical inference. Ecol Eng 61:292–302Google Scholar
  80. Wang J, Yang N (2004) Partial nitrification under limited dissolved oxygen conditions. Process Biochem 39:1223–1229Google Scholar
  81. Wang R, Korboulewsky N, Prudent P, Domeizel M, Rolando C, Bonin G (2010) Feasibility of using an organic substrate in a wetland system treating sewage sludge: impact of plant species. Bioresour Technol 101(1):51–57Google Scholar
  82. Wang R, Baldy V, Périssol C, Korboulewsky N (2012) Influence of plants on microbial activity in a vertical-down flow wetland system treating waste activated sludge with high organic matter concentrations. J Environ Manag 95:S158–S164Google Scholar
  83. Wang M, Zhang D, Dong J, Tan SK (2018) Application of constructed wetlands for treating agricultural runoff and agro-industrial wastewater: a review. Hydrobiologia 805(1):1–31Google Scholar
  84. Wu H, Zhang J, Ngo HH, Guo W, Hu Z, Liang S, Liu H (2015) A review on the sustainability of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: design and operation. Bioresour Technol 175:594–601Google Scholar
  85. Wu H, Lin L, Zhang J, Guo W, Liang S, Liu H (2016) Purification ability and carbon dioxide flux from surface flow constructed wetlands treating sewage treatment plant effluent. Bioresour Technol 219:768–772Google Scholar
  86. Wu H, Fan J, Zhang J, Ngo HH, Guo W (2017) Large-scale multi-stage constructed wetlands for secondary effluents treatment in northern China: carbon dynamics. Environ Pollut 233:933–942Google Scholar
  87. Xing W, Wu H, Hao B, Huang W, Liu G (2013) Bioaccumulation of heavy metals by submerged macrophytes: looking for hyper accumulators in eutrophic lakes. Environ Sci Technol 47(9):4695–4703Google Scholar
  88. Xu D, Xu J, Wu J, Muhammad A (2006) Studies on the phosphorus sorption capacity of substrates used in constructed wetland systems. Chemosphere 63(2):344–352Google Scholar
  89. Yadav AK, Kumar N, Sreekrishnan TR, Satya S, Bishnoi NR (2010) Removal of chromium and nickel from aqueous solution in a constructed wetland: mass balance, adsorption–desorption and FTIR study. J Chem Eng 160(1):122–128Google Scholar
  90. Yahiaoui K, Zoubeidi A, Rouahna N, Ouakouak A (2018) Study of domestic wastewater treatment by macrophyte plant in Arid Region of South-east Algeria (case of el oued region). J Fundam App Sci 10(2)Google Scholar
  91. Yan Y, Xu J (2014) Improving winter performance of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in northern China: a review. Wetlands 34(2):243–253Google Scholar
  92. Zhang CB, Wang J, Liu WL, Zhu SX, Ge HL, Chang SX, Ge Y (2010) Effects of plant diversity on microbial biomass and community metabolic profiles in a full-scale constructed wetland. Ecol Eng 36(1):62–68Google Scholar
  93. Zhang T, Xu D, He F, Zhang Y, Wu Z (2012) Application of constructed wetland for water pollution control in China during 1990–2010. Ecol Eng 47:189–197Google Scholar
  94. Zhang DQ, Jinadasa KBSN, Gersberg RM, Liu Y, Ng WJ, Tan SK (2014) Application of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in developing countries–a review of recent developments (2000–2013). J Environ Manag 141:116–131Google Scholar
  95. Zhang Y, Carvalho PN, Lv T, Arias C, Brix H, Chen Z (2016) Microbial density and diversity in constructed wetland systems and the relation to pollutant removal efficiency. Water Sci Technol 73(3):679–686Google Scholar
  96. Zhao Z, Chang J, Han W, Wang M, Ma D, Du Y, Ge Y (2016) Effect of plant diversity and sand particle size on methane emission and nitrogen removal in microcosms of constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng 95:390–398Google Scholar
  97. Zuo M, Renman G, Gustafsson JP, Klysubun W (2018) Dual slag filters for enhanced phosphorus removal from domestic waste water: performance and mechanisms. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(8):7391–7400Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science (DES), School of Environmental Science (SES)Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar (A Central) UniversityLucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations