Advertisement

An empirical study on energy utilization efficiency, economic development, and sustainable management

  • Xin-Xin Pan
  • Mei-Lan Chen
  • Li-Meng Ying
  • Fang-Fang ZhangEmail author
Sustainable development of energy, water and environment systems
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

Based on the premise of sustainable development of the environment, how to achieve the balance of energy utilization, economic development, and sustainable management of the environment is becoming increasingly important in the process of stable economic development. This paper analyzes the concept of environmental Kuznets curve, taking 35 European countries as the research objects, first discusses the trend of energy utilization efficiency from 1990 to 2013, and then analyzes the relationship between energy efficiency and economic development. Empirical results show that labor has a significant negative impact on energy efficiency and the increase in labor input will reduce energy efficiency. If the added value of national manufacturing accounts for a higher percentage in GDP, it will have a negative impact on the effectiveness of energy utilization. In addition, when the national price level is high, price fluctuation will increase the price of energy utilization, or the cost of energy input in economic activities, which will further reduce the country’s energy efficiency performance. Lastly, the empirical study also found that energy efficiency and economic development showed a quadratic U-shaped relationship, indicating that the long-term energy efficiency of the country will first decline and then rise during economic activities.

Keywords

Economic growth Energy usage efficiency Environmental Kuznets curve 

Notes

References

  1. Adom OK, Kwakwa PA, Amankwaa A (2018) The long-run effects of economic, demographic, and political indices on actual and potential CO2 emissions. J Environ Manag 218:516–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akella AK, Saini RP, Sharma MP (2009) Social, economical and environmental impacts of renewable energy systems. Renew Energy 34:390–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Azapagic A (2004) Developing a framework for sustainable development indicators for the mining and minerals industry. J Clean Prod 12:639–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borghesi S (1999) The environmental Kuznets curve: a survey of the literature, FEEM Working Paper No 85–99Google Scholar
  5. Chen TY (2001) The impact of mitigating CO2 emissions on Taiwan’s economy. Energy Econ 23:141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cropper M, Griffiths C (1994) The interaction of population growth and environmental quality. Am Econ Rev 84:250–254Google Scholar
  7. Dasgupta P (2001) Human well-being and the natural environment. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dijkaraaf E, Vollebergh HRJ (2005) A test for parameter homogeneity in CO2 panel EKC estimations. Environ Resour Econ 32:229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dinda S (2004) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis a survey. Ecol Econ 49:431–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fang H (2000) The significance and approach of public participation in environmental management. Law and Governance 12:003Google Scholar
  11. Färe R, Grosskopf S, Heranadez-Sancho F (2004) Environmental performance: an index number approach. Resour Energy Econ 26:343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fridel B, Getzner M (2003) Determinants of CO2 emissions in a small open economy. Ecol Econ 45:133–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110:353–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heerink N, Mulatu A, Bulte E (2001) Income inequality and the environment: aggregation bias in environmental Kuznets curves. Ecol Econ 38:359–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heil MT, Selden TM (2001) Carbon emissions and economic development future trajectories based on historical experience. Environ Dev Econ 6:63–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kathuria V (2007) Informal regulation of pollution in a developing country: evidence from India. Ecol Econ 63(2–3):403–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lindmark M (2002) An EKC-pattern in historical perspective: carbon dioxide emissions, technology, fuel pieces and growth in Sweden. Ecol Econ 42:333–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mielnik O, Goldemberg J (1999) The evolution of the “carbonization index” in developing countries. Energy Policy 27:307–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nerlove M (1963) Chapter 7. Returns to Scale in Electricity Supply. In: Christ, C., et al., Eds, Measurement in Economics, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, 167–198Google Scholar
  20. Panayotou T (1997) Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve turning black box into a policy tool. Environ Dev Econ 2:465–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pargal S, Mani M (2000) Citizen activism, environmental regulation, and the location of industrial plants: evidence from India. Econ Dev Cult Chang 48(4):829–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pargal S, Wheeler D (1996) Informal regulation of industrial pollution in developing countries: evidence from Indonesia. J Polit Econ 104(6):1314–1327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ravallion M, Heil M, Jalan J (2000) Carbon emissions and income inequality. Oxford Economic Paper 52:651–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ren J, Andreasen KP, Sovacool BK (2014) Viability of hydrogen pathways that enhance energy security: a comparison of China and Denmark. Int J Hydrog Energy 39(28):15320–15329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ren J, Gao S, Tan S, Dong L (2015) Hydrogen economy in China: strengths- weaknesses- opportunities- threats analysis and strategies prioritization. Renew Sust Energ Rev 41(1):1230–1243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rezek JP, Rogers K (2008) Decomposing the CO2-income tradeoff: an output distance function approach. Environ Dev Econ 13:457–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Richmond AK, Kaufmann RK (2006) Energy prices and turning points the relationship between income and energy use carbon emissions. Energy J 27:157–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schmalensee R, Stoker T, Judson RA (1998) World carbon dioxide emissions: 1950-2050. Rev Econ Stat 80:15–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scruggs LA (1998) Political and economic inequality and the environment. Ecol Econ 26:259–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Selden TM, Song D (1994) Environmental quality and development: I there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? J Environ Econ Manag 27:147–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stroup RL, Goodman SL (1992) Property rights, environmental resources, and the future. Harv JL Pub Pol’y 15:427Google Scholar
  32. Suri V, Chapman D (1998) Economic growth, trade and energy: implications for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol Econ 25:195–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Unruh GC, Moomaw WR (1998) An alternative analysis of apparent EKC-type transitions. Ecol Econ 25:221–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vaninsky A (2008) Environmental efficiency of electric power industry of the United States: a data envelopment analysis approach. Proceeding of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 30:584–590Google Scholar
  35. Wang B, Mi Z, Nistor I, Yuan XC (2018) How does hydrogen-based renewable energy change with economic development? Empirical evidence from 32 countries. Int J Hydrog Energy 43(25):11629–11638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xepapadeas A, de Zeeuw A (1999) Environmental policy and competitiveness: the porter hypothesis and the composition of capital. J Environ Econ Manag 37(2):165–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zaim O, Taskin F (2000) A Kuznets curve in environmental efficiency: an application on OECD countries. Environ Resour Econ 17:21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zeng Q, Hu J (2015) Research on the influencing factors of China’s public environmental participation -- based on the empirical analysis of China’s provincial panel data. China Popul Resour Environ 25(12):62–69Google Scholar
  39. Zhou P, Ang BW, Zhou DQ (2012) Measuring economy-wide energy efficiency performance: a parametric frontier approach. Appl Energy 90:196–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xin-Xin Pan
    • 1
  • Mei-Lan Chen
    • 2
  • Li-Meng Ying
    • 3
  • Fang-Fang Zhang
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.College of Economics & ManagementSouthwest UniversityChongqingChina
  2. 2.International Business SchoolGuangdong University of Finance and EconomicsGuangzhouChina
  3. 3.Department of AccountingWenzhou Business CollegeWenzhouChina

Personalised recommendations