Advertisement

The efficiency of carbon trading market in China: evidence from variance ratio tests

  • Jianguo Zhou
  • Xuejing HuoEmail author
  • Baoling Jin
  • Xuechao Yu
Research Article
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

On December 19, 2017, China’s National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) announced the official launch of the much-anticipated national emissions trading system (ETS), which is a critical period for the transition from the eight carbon emission trading pilot projects to the national market at this stage. Comprehensively evaluating the efficiency of China’s eight carbon trading pilots is vital for strengthening the construction of its national ETS. This paper investigates the weak-form efficiency of eight carbon trading markets in China. We use a series of variance ratio tests to identify the efficiency from the market set up to the May 4, 2018, of all markets. The results indicate that the majority of the carbon trading markets are inefficient and only Beijing, Hubei, and Fujian markets are efficient. The China’s carbon trading market is gradually maturing and implemented. In addition, we analyze the factors have impact on the market efficiency. It shows that the liquidity, volume, allocation allowance, and transparency in information are significant factors; meanwhile, the regional policy and cross cooperation also are important factors. Finally, this paper puts forward several policy recommendations on how to strengthen the effectiveness of China carbon trading markets based on the empirical results.

Keywords

Market efficiency Carbon trading market Variance ratio test 

Notes

References

  1. Alberto M, Frans P (2010) Carbon trading thickness and market efficiency. Energy Econ 32:1331–1336.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chang Y-C, Wang N (2010) Environmental regulations and emissions trading in China. Energy Policy 38(7):3356–3364.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang K, Lu S, Song X (2018) The impacts of liquidity dynamics on emissions allowances price: different evidence from China’s emissions trading pilots. J Clean Prod 183:786–796.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Charles A, Darné O, Fouilloux J (2013) Market efficiency in the European carbon markets. Energy Policy 60(5):785–792.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chow KV, Denning KC (1993) A simple multiple variance ratio test. J Econ 58:385–401.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(93)90051-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daskalakis G (2013) On the efficiency of the European carbon market: new evidence from Phase II. Energy Policy 54:369–375.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.055
  7. Daskalakis G, Markellos RN (2008) Are the European carbon markets efficient? Social Science Electronic Publishing 17(2):103–128Google Scholar
  8. Deo RS, Richardson M (2003) On the asymptotic power of the variance ratio test. Dev Comp Immunol 19:231–239 https://www.jstor.org/stable/3533351. Accessed 8 Mar 2019
  9. Du S, Tang W, Song M (2016) Low-carbon production with low-carbon premium in cap-and-trade regulation. J Clean Prod 134:652–662.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Engle RF (1982) Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica 50(4):987–1007 https://www.jstor.org/stable/1912773. Accessed 8 Mar 2019
  11. Fan JH, Todorova N (2017) Dynamics of China’s carbon prices in the pilot trading phase. Appl Energy 208:1452–1467.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goncalves S, Kilian L (2004) Bootstrapping autoregressive with conditional heteroskedasticity of unknown form. J Econ 123:83–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2003.10.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ibikunle G, Gregoriou A, Hoepner AGF, Rhodes M (2016) Liquidity and market efficiency in the world’s largest carbon market. Br Account Rev 48(4):431–447.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2015.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ICAP (2018) Emissions trading worldwide: status report 2018. ICAP, Berlin https://icapcarbonaction.com/zh/ Google Scholar
  15. Jiang J-J, Xie D-J, Ye B, Shen B, Chen Z-M (2016) Research on China’s cap-and-trade carbon emission trading scheme: overview and outlook. Appl Energy 178:902–917.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jotzo F, Löschel A (2014) Emissions trading in China: emerging experiences and international lessons. Energy Policy 75:3–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.09.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim JH (2006) Wild bootstrapping variance ratio tests. Econ Lett 92:38–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2006.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Komariah KS, Machbub C, Prihatmanto AS, Sin BK (2016) A study on efficient market hypothesis to predict exchange rate trends using sentiment analysis of Twitter data. J Korea Multimed Soc 19(7):1107–1115.  https://doi.org/10.9717/kmms.2016.19.7.1107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu C, Feng Y (2011) Low-carbon economy: theoretical study and development path choice in China. Energy Procedia 5(1):487–493.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu L-W, Chen C-X, Zhao Y-F, Zhao E-D (2015) China’s carbon-emissions trading: overview, challenges and future. Renew Sust Energ Rev 49:254–266.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu Y, Tan X-J, Yu Y, Qi SZ (2016) Assessment of impacts of Hubei pilot emission trading schemes in China - a CGE-analysis using term CO2 model. Appl Energy 189.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.085
  22. Lo AW, Mackinlay AC (1988) Stock market prices do not follow random walks: evidence from a simple specification test. Rev Financ Stud 1(1):41–66.  https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/1.1.41 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lo AW, Mackinlay AC (1989) The size and power of the variance ratio test in finite samples: a Monte Carlo investigation. J Econ 40(2):203–238.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(89)90083-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mammen E (1993) Bootstrap and wild bootstrap for high dimensional linear models. Ann Stat 21:255–285 https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aos/1176349025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Michael H, Sebastian V, Andreas L (2014) Designing an emissions trading scheme for China-an up-to-date climate policy assessment. Energy Policy 75:57–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Muir DM, Schipani CA (2007) The use of efficient market hypothesis: beyond SOX. Mich Law Rev 105(8):1941–1980 https://www.jstor.org/stable/40041570 Google Scholar
  27. National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) (2011). A circular on launching pilot carbon emissions tradingGoogle Scholar
  28. Shen W (2015) Chinese business at the dawn of its domestic emissions trading scheme: incentives and barriers to participation in carbon trading. Clim Pol 15:339–354.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.926263 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tan X-P, Wang X-Y (2017) The market performance of carbon trading in China: a theoretical framework of structure-conduct-performance. J Clean Prod 159:410–424.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tang B-J, Shen C, Gao C (2013) The efficiency analysis of the European CO2 futures market. Appl Energy 112:1544–1547.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.02.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. The State Council (2016) Notice of the State Council on issuing the work plan for greenhouse gas emission control during the 13th Five-Year Plan period. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2016-03/17/content_5054992.htm
  32. Wang Y, Du L (2015) Research on the effectiveness of China's carbon financial trading market——based on the fractal theory analysis of Beijing carbon trading market. Manage World 12:174–175 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  33. Wang Q, Wang S (2014) Study on market efficiency of China’s carbon trading market. Soc Sci J 4:30–36 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  34. Wright JH (2000) Alternative variance-ratio tests using ranks and signs. J Bus Econ Stat 18(1):1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2000.10524842 Google Scholar
  35. Wu L-B, Qian H-Q, Li J (2014) Advancing the experiment to reality: perspectives on Shanghai pilot carbon emissions trading scheme. Energy Policy 75:22–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xia R-T (2018) Study on the effectiveness of China’s carbon emission trading market——an empirical analysis based on fractal market hypothesis. China Price 09:45–47 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  37. Yi L, Li Z-P, Yang L, Liu J, Liu Y-R (2018) Comprehensive evaluation on the “maturity” of China’s carbon markets. J Clean Prod 198:1336–1344.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang B, Li X-M (2003) An evolving market efficiency test on Chinese stock market. Econ Res J 1:54–61 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  39. Zhang D, Karplus VJ, Cassia C, Zhang X (2014) Emission trading in China: progress and prospects. Energy Policy 75:9–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang Y-J, Yao T, Lin Y-P (2016) Efficiency measurement of China’s carbon quota trading markets. J Nanjing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut (Social Sciences) 18(02):1–9 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  41. Zhang W-L, Lei Y, Wang F (2017) Study on the weak-form effectiveness of China’s carbon trading pilot market from the perspective of light market. Contemporary Finance and Economics 3–11 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  42. Zhang B, Lai K-h, Wang B, Wang Z-h (2018) The clean development mechanism and corporate financial performance: empirical evidence from China. Resour Conserv Recycl 129:278–289.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhao S (2015) Chinese carbon trading pilots: progress and current status. Munk School of Global Affairs, University of TorontoGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhao X-G, Jiang G-W, Nie D, Chen H (2016) How to improve the market efficiency of carbon trading: a perspective of China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 59:1229–1245.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhao X-G, Wu L, Li A (2017) Research on the efficiency of carbon trading market in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 79:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and ManagementNorth China Electric Power UniversityBaodingChina

Personalised recommendations