Advertisement

The effect of inorganic salt in wastewater on the viscosity of coal water slurry

  • Chunyu Wang
  • Hui Zhao
  • Zhenghua Dai
  • Weifeng Li
  • Haifeng LiuEmail author
Research Article
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

The preparation of coal water slurry (CWS) using wastewater, which contains inorganic and organic components, is one method of wastewater utilization. In this study, the effect of inorganic salts on the viscosity of CWS was examined. The results show that monovalent salts (NaCl, KCl) decreased the viscosity of CWS. The viscosity of CWS was not affected by bivalent salts (CaCl2, MgCl2). However, CWS combined with trivalent salt (AlCl3) sharply increased the viscosity. The zeta potential of CWS with inorganic salts increased which can enhance the electric repulsion and beneficial to reduce the viscosity. The content of free water in CWS with trivalent salt decreased, and the freedom of the free water in CWS with trivalent salt decreased which were all bad to the viscosity and the adsorption of the dispersant on the particles. Compared with the surface polarity of the particles without inorganic salts, the surface polarity of the particles with divalent salts was similar to those without inorganic salts. Under the comprehensive influence, divalent salt has little effect on the viscosity of CWS.

Keywords

Viscosity Inorganic salt Cations Coal water slurry Zeta potential Low-field NMR 

Notes

Funding information

This research was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC0808500), National Natural Science Foundation of China (21506059), the Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Coal Gasification (18DZ2283900), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

References

  1. Aktaş Z, Woodburn ET (2000) Effect of addition of surface active agent on the viscosity of a high concentration slurry of a low-rank British coal in water. Fuel Process Technol 62:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Degs YS, El-Barghouthi MI, El-Sheikh AH, Walker GM (2008) Effect of solution pH, ionic strength, and temperature on adsorption behavior of reactive dyes on activated carbon. Dyes Pigments 77:16–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almuktar SAAAN, Abed SN, Scholz M (2018) Wetlands for wastewater treatment and subsequent recycling of treated effluent: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 25:23595–23623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arismendi WA, Ortiz-Ardila AE, Delgado CV, Lugo L, Sequeda-Castaneda LG, Celis-Zambrano CA (2018) Modified tannins and their application in wastewater treatment. Water Sci Technol 78:1115–1128.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2018.336
  5. Arriaga S et al (2016) Evaluation of a membrane bioreactor system as post-treatment in waste water treatment for better removal of micropollutants. Water Res 107:37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Batt AL, Kim S, Aga DS (2007) Comparison of the occurrence of antibiotics in four full-scale wastewater treatment plants with varying designs and operations. Chemosphere 68:428–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bunani S et al (2018) Utilization of reverse osmosis (RO) for reuse of MBR-treated wastewater in irrigation-preliminary tests and quality analysis of product water. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:3030–3037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chong MN, Jin B, Chow CW, Saint C (2010) Recent developments in photocatalytic water treatment technology: a review. Water Res 44:2997–3027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guo R, Mannhardt K, Kantzas A (2007) Characterizing moisture and gas content of coal by low-field NMR. J Can Pet Technol 46:49–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harmer J, Callcott T, Maeder M, Smith BE (2001) A novel approach for coal characterization by NMR spectroscopy: global analysis of proton T1 and T2 relaxations. Fuel 80:417–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jiang Y (2009) China’s water scarcity. J Environ Manag 90:3185–3196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jianzhong L, Ruikun W, Jianfei X, Junhu Z, Kefa C (2014) Pilot-scale investigation on slurrying, combustion, and slagging characteristics of coal slurry fuel prepared using industrial wasteliquid. Appl Energy 115:309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaji R, Muranaka Y, Miyadera H, Hishinuma Y (1986) Effect of electrolyte on the rheological properties of coal-water mixtures. AlChE J 33:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Keerthi, Vinduja V, Balasubramanian N (2013) Electrocoagulation-integrated hybrid membrane processes for the;treatment of tannery wastewater. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:7441–7449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kerker M (1991) Fundamentals of interface and colloid science. Academic Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee KM, Lai CW, Ngai KS, Juan JC (2016) Recent developments of zinc oxide based photocatalyst in water treatment technology: a review. Water Res 88:428–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu M, Duan Y, Bikane K, Zhao L (2017) Effect of waste liquid produced from the hydrothermal treatment of both low-rank coal and sludge on the slurryability of coal sludge slurry. Fuel 203:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lu L, Huang Z, Rau GH, Ren ZJ (2015) Microbial electrolytic carbon capture for carbon negative and energy positive wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Technol 49:8193–8201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Makarov AS, Boruk SD, Egurnov AI, Dimitryuk TN, Klishchenko RE (2014) Utilization of industrial wastewater in production of coal-water fuel. J Water Chem Technol 36:180–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maya-Altamira L, Baun A, Angelidaki I, Schmidt JE (2008) Influence of wastewater characteristics on methane potential in food-processing industry wastewaters. Water Res 42:2195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miklos DB, Remy C, Jekel M, Linden KG, Drewes JE, Hübner U (2018) Evaluation of advanced oxidation processes for water and wastewater treatment – A critical review. Water Res 139:118–131Google Scholar
  22. Özacar M (2003) Equilibrium and kinetic modelling of adsorption of phosphorus on calcined alunite. Adsorption 9:125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Qin Y, Yang D, Gu F, Li X, Xiong W, Zhu JY (2016) Biorefinery lignosulfonates as a dispersant for coal water slurry. Sustain Chem Processes 4:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Qiu YH, Tan QY, Si W, Chen YF (2014) Ion specificity in NaCl solution confined in silicon nanochannels. Sci China Technol Sci 57:230–238.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-013-5420-1
  25. Qiyan T (2015) Experiment study on ion-ion correlations and electric double layer at solid/liquid interface. Southeast University, NanjingGoogle Scholar
  26. Shook CA, Nurkowski J (2010) The effect of some alkaline additives on the viscosity of coal water slurries. Can J Chem Eng 55:510–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sun X, Yao Y, Liu D, Elsworth D, Pan Z (2016) Interactions and exchange of CO2 and H2O in coals: an investigation by low-field NMR relaxation. Sci Rep 6:19919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tan Q, Zhao G, Qiu Y, Kan Y, Ni Z, Chen Y (2014) Experimental observation of the ion-ion correlation effects on charge inversion and strong adhesion between mica surfaces in aqueous electrolyte solutions. Langmuir 30:10845–10854.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la5024357 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tu YN, Sun NX, Yang Y (2013) Study on using coking wastewater to prepare low-rank CWS and its rheology changes at different temperatures. Adv Mater Res 726-731:2845–2849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vaccari M, Foladori P, Nembrini S, Vitali F (2018) Benchmarking of energy consumption in municipal wastewater treatment plants—a survey of over 200 plants in Italy. Water Sci Technol 77:2242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang C, Zhao H, Dai Z, Li W, Liu H (2019) Influence of alkaline additive on viscosity of coal water slurry. Fuel 235:639–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Xie XX, Zhu YQ (2013) Study of preparing coal water slurry with industrial wastewater and coal liquefaction residue. Appl Chem Ind 42:1448–1450Google Scholar
  33. Yang D, Qiu X, Zhou M, Lou H (2007) Properties of sodium lignosulfonate as dispersant of coal water slurry. Energy Convers Manag 48:2433–2438.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2007.04.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yang R, Li H, Huang M, Yang H, Li A (2016) A review on chitosan-based flocculants and their applications in water treatment. Water Res 95:59–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yao Y, Liu D (2012) Comparison of low-field NMR and mercury intrusion porosimetry in characterizing pore size distributions of coals. Fuel 95:152–158.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.12.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang F, Rothermund K, Gangadharan SB, Pommier Y, Prochownik EV, Lazo JS (2012a) Phenotypic screening reveals topoisomerase I as a breast cancer stem cell therapeutic target. Oncotarget 3:998–1010Google Scholar
  37. Zhang T, Jiang A, Harrison JH, Chen S (2012b) Pigment removal in anaerobically digested effluent through polyelectrolyte flocculation and liquid–liquid extraction. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 87:1098–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang J, Zhao H, Wang C, Li W, Xu J, Liu H (2016a) The influence of pre-absorbing water in coal on the viscosity of coal water slurry. Fuel 177:19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang J, Zhao H, Wang CY, Li WF, Xu JL, Liu HF (2016b) Influence of small oxygen-containing organic molecules on the rheology of the coal water slurry. Energy Fuel 30:5506–5512.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b00703
  40. Zhu J, Zhang G, Li J, Zhao F (2013) Synthesis, adsorption and dispersion of a dispersant based on starch for coal–water slurry. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 422:165–171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.01.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chunyu Wang
    • 1
  • Hui Zhao
    • 1
  • Zhenghua Dai
    • 1
  • Weifeng Li
    • 1
  • Haifeng Liu
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Coal Gasification and Energy Chemical Engineering of Ministry of EducationEast China University of Science and TechnologyShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations