Evaluation of management procedures for a length-frequency data-limited fishery
Management procedures (MPs) based on data-limited methods (DLMs) recently developed to give management advices for data-limited stocks worldwide are scarce or yet to be implemented on freshwater species. In this study, case studies (CSs) were developed using length-frequency data (LFD) of common carp species harvested from Dianshan Lake to estimate life-history parameters from existing methods. These CSs were later used to examine their influences when tested with various MPs under scenarios when operating models (OMs) were subjected to observation and estimation uncertainties. The results after management strategy evaluation (MSE) was run for various defined OMs showed that three MPs emerged best for providing managing advice. For high yield to be maintained during short-term periods, MinlenLopt1 suggested the smallest length at full retention (sLFR) to be 42.11 cm; while Slotlim and matlenlim2 suggested that to maintain biomass and stable spawning biomass (SBMSY) and also avoid overfishing from occurring in this fishery, sLFR should be 56.1 cm. Values given by these MPs allowed the removal of species that spawned at least once. Also, life-history parameters derived from CS4 presented the best results, being more reliable in presenting better inputs for effective management of the said fishery.
KeywordsData-limited methods Management procedure Management strategy evaluation Cyprinus carpio Length-frequency data Stock assessment
We thank all the individuals, including staffs and students of the College of Marine Sciences, Shanghai Ocean University who assisted with data preparation and for supporting this study. The authors are also grateful to the developers of TropFishR and DLMtool for their splendid work and technical support. We would also like to thank the handling editor and the two anonymous reviewers for their suggestions and comments that helped to improve this paper.
This study was funded by the Shanghai Municipal Council.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Balon EK (2006) The oldest domesticated fishes, and the consequences of an epigenetic dichotomy in fish culture. Aqua 11:47–86Google Scholar
- Beverton RJ, Holt SJ (1957) On the dynamics of exploited fish populations, vol 19. Chapman and Hall, London, Ministry of Agriculture, UK, p 533Google Scholar
- Bunnefeld N, Hoshino E, Milner-Gulland EJ (2017) Management strategy evaluation: a powerful tool for conservation? Trends Ecol Evol 26(441):447Google Scholar
- Carruthers TR, Hordyk AR (2018a) DLMtool: data-limited methods toolkit v5.2.2. URL https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/DLMtool/index.html. Accessed Sept 2018
- Costello C et al. (2016) Global fishery futures under contrasting management regimes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America: in review.Google Scholar
- Edwards CT (2015) Review of data-poor assessment methods for New Zealand fisheries. Ministry for Primary Industries, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
- Froese R, Pauly D (2018) http://www.fishbase.org/summary/Cyprinus-carpio.html. Accessed 06 Oct 2018
- Gulland JA, Rosenberg AA (1992) A review of length-based approaches to assessing fish stocks (no. 321–325). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
- Harford WJ, Harford SR, Isely SJJ, Smith MW (2016) Technical description of operating models in data-limited methods toolkit (DLMtool). SEDAR49-AW-10. SEDAR, North Charleston 33 ppGoogle Scholar
- Hilborn R, Ovando D (2014) Reflections on the success of traditional fisheries management. ICES J Mar Sci 71(5):1040–1046. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsu034
- Hoenig JM (1983) Empirical use of longevity data toestimate mortality rates. Fish Bull 81:898–903Google Scholar
- Hordyk A, Newman D, Carruthers T, Suatoni L (2017) Applying management strategy evaluation to California fisheries: case studies and recommendations. Data Limited Methods Toolkit. Available: https://www.datalimitedtoolkit.org/wp content/uploads/2017/07/Applying MSE-to-CA-Fisheries-Case-Studies Recommendations.pdf. Accessed 06 Oct 2018.
- ICES (2012) ICES implementation of advice for data-limited stocks in 2012 in its 2012 advice. ICES CM 2012/ACOM 68Google Scholar
- Jenning S, Dulvy N (2009) Beverton and Holt’s insights into life history theory: influence, application and future use. In: Payne A, Cotter J, Potter T (eds) Advances in fisheries science 50 years on from Beverton and Holt. Blackwell Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Miller T (2015) Blueline Tilefish Working Group report. Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council. http://static1.squarespace.com/static/511cdc7fe4b00307a2628ac6/t/56e046a37c65e4cd0ba8f8ce/1457538725993/BLT+Subcommittee+Report+20160309.pdf. Accessed 22 Oct 2018
- Newman D, Carruthers T, MacCall A, Porch C, Suatoni L (2014) Improving the science and management of data-limited fisheries: an evaluation of current methods and recommended approaches. Natural Resources Defense Council, NRDC Report R, New York CityGoogle Scholar
- Pauly D, Morgan GR (eds) (1987) Length-based methods in fisheries research. International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management, Metro Manila, Philippines and Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, SafatGoogle Scholar
- Quinn TJ, Deriso RB (1999) Quantitative fish dynamics. Oxford University Press, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review (SEDAR) (2016) SEDAR-49—stock assessment report for Gulf of Mexico data-limited species. http://sedarweb.org/sedar-49. Accessed 22 Oct 2018
- Sun M, Zhang CL, Chen Y, Xu BD, Xue Y, Ren YP (2018) Assessing the sensitivity of data-limited methods (DLMs) to the estimation of life-history parameters from length–frequency data. Can J Fish Aquat Sci: 1–10 https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2017-0325.
- Walsh JC, Minto C, Jardim E, Anderson SC, Jensen OP, Afflerbach J, Dickey-Collas M, Kleisner KM, Longo C, Osio GC, Selig ER, Thorson JT, Rudd MB, Papacostas KJ, Kittinger JN, Rosenberg AA, Cooper AB (2018) Trade-offs for data-limited fisheries when using harvest strategies based on catch-only models. Fish Fish 00:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12316 Google Scholar
- Walters CJ, Martell SJ (2004) Fisheries ecology and management. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Wiedenmann J (2015) Application of data-poor harvest control rules to Atlantic mackerel. Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council. http://sedarweb.org/docs/wsupp/S46_RD_09_Mackerel_ABC_reportOpt.pdf. Accessed 22 Oct 2018