Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 13, pp 13103–13114 | Cite as

Bibliometric analysis of global research on air pollution and human health: 1998–2017

  • Sushma DhitalEmail author
  • Dipesh Rupakheti
Research Article
  • 445 Downloads

Abstract

To give a basic overview of research publications on air pollution and human health, a bibliometric analysis of 2179 documents published during the last two decades (year 1998 to 2017) was carried out. The relevant data was retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) and analyzed by using the software such as VOSviewer 1.6.7, Tableau Public 2018.1, and Origin Pro 9.0 for visualization and mapping. The publication trend showed a drastic increase during the second decade. The most productive countries working in the field of air pollution and human health were the USA, China, Italy, England, and Canada, whereas top institutions were Chinese Academy of Sciences, US EPA, Harvard University, Peking University, and University of Sao Paulo. Likewise, leading authors in the context of number of documents published and co-citation were Michael Bell and C. Arden Pope respectively. Majority of the researches were published in the journals like Atmospheric Environment, Science of the Total Environment, and Environmental Science and Pollution Research whereas most common author keywords in the publications were “air pollution,” “particulate matter,” and “PM2.5.”

Keywords

Bibliometric analysis Web of Science Air pollution Human health VOSviewer 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We want to thank the people behind the Web of Science Core Collection database and the VOSviewer.

References

  1. Aghaei Chadegani A, Salehi H, Yunus M, Farhadi H, Fooladi M, Farhadi M, Ale Ebrahim N (2013) A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of Science and Scopus databases. Asian Soc Sci 9(5):18–26Google Scholar
  2. Amegah AK, Quansah R, Jaakkola JJ (2014) Household air pollution from solid fuel use and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. PLoS One 9(12):e113920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buzea C, Pacheco II, Robbie K (2007) Nanomaterials and nanoparticles: sources and toxicity. Biointerphases 2(4):MR17–MR71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chan CK, Yao X (2008) Air pollution in mega cities in China. Atmos Environ 42(1):1–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen B, Kan H (2008) Air pollution and population health: a global challenge. Environ Health Prev Med 13(2):94–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dastoorpoor M, Idani E, Goudarzi G, Khanjani N (2018) Acute effects of air pollution on spontaneous abortion, premature delivery, and stillbirth in Ahvaz, Iran: a time-series study. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(6):5447–5458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ellegaard O, Wallin JA (2015) The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: how great is the impact? Scientometrics 105(3):1809–1831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feigin VL, Roth GA, Naghavi M, Parmar P, Krishnamurthi R, Chugh S, ... & Estep K (2016) Global burden of stroke and risk factors in 188 countries, during 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet Neurol 15(9):913–924Google Scholar
  9. Fitzmaurice C, Allen C, Barber RM, Barregard L, Bhutta ZA, Brenner H, ... & Fleming T (2017) Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol 3(4):524–548Google Scholar
  10. Forouzanfar MH, Afshin A, Alexander LT, Anderson HR, Bhutta ZA, Biryukov S, ... & Cohen AJ (2016) Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 388(10053):1659–1724.Google Scholar
  11. Guo Y, Zeng H, Zheng R, Li S, Barnett AG, Zhang S, Zou X, Huxley R, Chen W, Williams G (2016) The association between lung cancer incidence and ambient air pollution in China: a spatiotemporal analysis. Environ Res 144:60–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gurjar BR, Ravindra K, Nagpure AS (2016) Air pollution trends over Indian megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmos Environ 142:475–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gurung A, Son JY, Bell ML (2017) Particulate matter and risk of hospital admission in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal: a case-crossover study. Am J Epidemiol 186(5):573–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harrison RM, Yin J (2000) Particulate matter in the atmosphere: which particle properties are important for its effects on health? Sci Total Environ 249(1-3):85–101Google Scholar
  15. Ho YS, Satoh H, Lin SY (2010) Japanese lung cancer research trends and performance in Science Citation Index. Intern Med 49(20):2219–2228Google Scholar
  16. Ho YS, Siu E, Chuang KY (2016) A bibliometric analysis of dengue-related publications in the Science Citation Index Expanded. Futur Virol 11(9):631–648Google Scholar
  17. Huang RJ, Zhang Y, Bozzetti C, Ho KF, Cao JJ, Han Y et al (2014) High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in China. Nature 514(7521):218Google Scholar
  18. Karlsson HL, Gustafsson J, Cronholm P, Möller L (2009) Size-dependent toxicity of metal oxide particles—a comparison between nano-and micrometer size. Toxicol Lett 188(2):112–118Google Scholar
  19. Lam CW, James JT, McCluskey R, Arepalli S, Hunter RL (2006) A review of carbon nanotube toxicity and assessment of potential occupational and environmental health risks. Crit Rev Toxicol 36(3):189–217Google Scholar
  20. Lelieveld J, Evans JS, Fnais M, Giannadaki D, Pozzer A (2015) The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature 525(7569):367–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li LL, Ding GH, Feng N, Wang MH, Ho YS (2009) Global stem cell research trend: bibliometric analysis as a tool for mapping of trends from 1991 to 2006. Scientometrics 80(1):39–58Google Scholar
  22. Li C, Wu K, Wu J (2017) A bibliometric analysis of research on haze during 2000–2016. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(32):24733–24742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li Z, Ho YS (2008) Use of citation per publication as an indicator to evaluate contingent valuation research. Scientometrics 75(1):97–110Google Scholar
  24. Lighty JS, Veranth JM, Sarofim AF (2000) Combustion aerosols: factors governing their size and composition and implications to human health. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 50(9):1565–1618Google Scholar
  25. Liu M, Huang Y, Ma Z, Jin Z, Liu X, Wang H, Liu Y, Wang J, Jantunen M, Bi J, Kinney PL (2017) Spatial and temporal trends in the mortality burden of air pollution in China: 2004–2012. Environ Int 98:75–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu X, Zhang Y, Han W, Tang A, Shen J, Cui Z et al (2013) Enhanced nitrogen deposition over China. Nature 494(7438):459Google Scholar
  27. Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJ (eds) (2006) Global burden of disease and risk factors. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  28. Mahmood T, Singh RK, Kant S, Shukla AD, Chandra A, Srivastava RK (2017) Prevalence and etiological profile of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in nonsmokers. Lung India: official organ of Indian Chest. Society 34(2):122Google Scholar
  29. Noyes PD, McElwee MK, Miller HD, Clark BW, Van Tiem LA, Walcott KC et al (2009) The toxicology of climate change: environmental contaminants in a warming world. Environ Int 35(6):971–986Google Scholar
  30. Oberdörster G, Oberdörster E, Oberdörster J (2005) Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 113:823–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Osareh F (1996) Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis: a review of literature I. Libri 46(3):149–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pope CA 3rd (2000) Epidemiology of fine particulate air pollution and human health: biologic mechanisms and who's at risk? Environ Health Perspect 108(suppl 4):713–723Google Scholar
  33. Pope CA III, Ezzati M, Dockery DW (2009) Fine-particulate air pollution and life expectancy in the United States. N Engl J Med 360(4):376–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Raaschou-Nielsen O, Andersen ZJ, Beelen R, Samoli E, Stafoggia M, Weinmayr G, ... & Xun WW (2013) Air pollution and lung cancer incidence in 17 European cohorts: prospective analyses from the European Study of Cohorts for Air Pollution Effects (ESCAPE). Lancet Oncol 14(9):813–822Google Scholar
  35. Sarli CC, Dubinsky EK, Holmes KL (2010) Beyond citation analysis: a model for assessment of research impact. J Med Libr Assoc 98(1):17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shindell D, Kuylenstierna JC, Vignati E, van Dingenen R, Amann M, Klimont Z et al (2012) Simultaneously mitigating near-term climate change and improving human health and food security. Science 335(6065):183–189Google Scholar
  37. Small H (1973) Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 24(4):265–269Google Scholar
  38. Tang M, Liao H, Wan Z, Herrera-Viedma E, Rosen MA (2018) Ten years of sustainability (2009 to 2018): a bibliometric overview. Sustainability 10(5):1655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tao Y, Mi S, Zhou S, Wang S, Xie X (2014) Air pollution and hospital admissions for respiratory diseases in Lanzhou, China. Environ Pollut 185:196–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Valavanidis A, Fiotakis K, Vlachogianni T (2008) Airborne particulate matter and human health: toxicological assessment and importance of size and composition of particles for oxidative damage and carcinogenic mechanisms. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev 26(4):339–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2010) Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84(2):523–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2014) Visualizing bibliometric networks. In: Measuring scholarly impact. Springer International Publishing, pp 285–320Google Scholar
  43. Vingarzan R (2004) A review of surface ozone background levels and trends. Atmos Environ 38(21):3431–3442Google Scholar
  44. Vos T, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abd-Allah F, ... & Aboyans V (2017) Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 390(10100):1211–1259Google Scholar
  45. WHO (2018a) 9 out of 10 people worldwide breathe polluted air, but more countries are taking action. Available at: http://www.who.int/airpollution/en/. Accessed 25 May 2018
  46. WHO (2018b) Air pollution levels rising in many of the world’s poorest cities. Available at http://wwwwhoint/news-room/detail/12-05-2016-air-pollution-levels-rising-in-many-of-the-world-s-poorest-cities. Accessed 20 May 2018
  47. Yang S, Sui J, Liu T, Wu W, Xu S, Yin L et al (2018) Trends on PM 2.5 research, 1997–2016: a bibliometric study. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–15Google Scholar
  48. Yi F, Yang P, Sheng H (2016) Tracing the scientific outputs in the field of Ebola research based on publications in the Web of Science. BMC Res Notes 9(1):221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhang GF, Xie SD, Ho YS (2010) A bibliometric analysis of world volatile organic compounds research trends. Scientometrics 83(2):477–492Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public HealthLanzhou UniversityLanzhouChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Science, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and ResourcesChinese Academy of SciencesLanzhouChina

Personalised recommendations