Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 11, pp 11314–11325 | Cite as

Photochemical removal of acetaldehyde using 172 nm vacuum ultraviolet excimer lamp in N2 or air at atmospheric pressure

  • Masaharu TsujiEmail author
  • Masato Miyano
  • Naohiro Kamo
  • Takashi Kawahara
  • Keiko Uto
  • Jun-ichiro Hayashi
  • Takeshi Tsuji
Research Article
  • 76 Downloads

Abstract

The photochemical removal of acetaldehyde was studied in N2 or air (O2 1–20%) at atmospheric pressure using side-on and head-on types of 172 nm Xe2 excimer lamps. When CH3CHO was decomposed in N2 using the head-on lamp (HL), CH4, CO, and CO2 were observed as products in FTIR spectra. The initial removal rate of CH3CHO in N2 was ascertained as 0.37 min−1. In air (1–20% O2), HCHO, HCOOH, CO, and CO2 were observed as products in FTIR spectra. The removal rate of CH3CHO in air using the side-on lamp (SL) increased from 3.2 to 18.6 min−1 with decreasing O2 concentration from 20 to 1%. It also increased from 2.5 to 3.7 min−1 with increasing CH3CHO concentration from 150 to 1000 ppm at 20% O2. The best energy efficiency of the CH3CHO removal using the SL in a flow system was 2.8 g/kWh at 1% O2. Results show that the contribution of O(1D) and O3 is insignificant in the initial decomposition of CH3CHO. It was inferred that CH3CHO is initially decomposed by the O(3P) + CH3CHO reaction at 5–20% O2, whereas the contribution of direct vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) photolysis increases concomitantly with decreasing O2 pressure at < 5% O2. After initial decomposition of CH3CHO, it was oxidized further by reactions of O(3P), OH, and O3 with various intermediates such as HCHO, HCOOH, and CO, leading to CO2 as a final product.

Keywords

VOC removal Acetaldehyde VUV photolysis Excimer lamp Catalyst free 

Notes

Funding information

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant No. 25550056 (2013–2014).

Supplementary material

11356_2019_4475_MOESM1_ESM.docx (653 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 653 kb)

References

  1. Atkinson R, Baulch DL, Cox RA, Hampson RF Jr, Kerr JA, Rossi MJ, Troe J (1997) J Phys Chem Ref Data 26:1329–1499 Updated data were obtained from NIST Chemical Kinetics Database on the Web, Standard Reference Database 17, Version 7.0 (Web Version), Release 1.6.8, Data Version 2017.07. http://kinetics.nist.gov/kinetics/index.jsp CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balcerek M, Pielech-Przybylska K, Patelski P, Dziekońska-Kubczak U, Tomaš Jusel T (2017) Treatment with activated carbon and other adsorbents as an effective method for the removal of volatile compounds in agricultural distillates. Food Addit Contam Part A 34:714–727.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2017.1284347 Google Scholar
  3. Borghoff SJ et al. (1999) Re-evaluation of some organic chemicals, hydrazine and hydrogen peroxide. In IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 77:319–335Google Scholar
  4. Chen HL, Lee JM, Chen SH, Chang MB, Yu SJ, Li SN (2009) Removal of volatile organic compounds by single-stage and two-stage plasma catalysis systems: a review of the performance enhancement mechanisms, current status, and suitable applications. Environ Sci Technol 43:2216–2227.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es802679b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. El-Sayed Y, Bandosz TJ (2002) Acetaldehyde adsorption on nitrogen-containing activated carbons. Langmuir 18:3213–3218.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la0116948 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hayashi T, Kumita M, Otani Y (2005) Removal of acetaldehyde vapor with impregnated activated carbons: effects of steric structure on impregnant and acidity. Environ Sci Technol 39:5436–5441.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es048514b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Limāo-Vieira P, Eden S, Mason NJ, Hoffmann SV (2003) Electronic state spectroscopy of acetaldehyde, CH3CHO, by high-resolution VUV photo-absorption. Chem Phys Lett 376:737–747.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(03)01070-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mo JH, Zhang YP, Xu Q, Lamson JJ, Zhao R (2009) Photocatalytic purification of volatile organic compounds in indoor air: a literature review. Atmos Environ 43:2229–2246.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.01.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Moortgat GK, Meyrahn H, Warneck P (2010) Photolysis of acetaldehyde in air: CH4, CO and CO2 quantum yields. ChemPhysChem 11:3896–3908.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201000757 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Morajkar P, Bossolasco A, Schoemaecker C, Christa Fittschen C (2014) Photolysis of CH3CHO at 248 nm: evidence of triple fragmentation from primary quantum yield of CH3 and HCO radicals and H atoms. J Chem Phys 140:214308.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4878668 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nee JB, Lee PC (1997) Detection of O(1D) produced in the photodissociation of O2 in the Schumann−Runge continuum. J Phys Chem A 101:6653–6657.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp970439m CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Okabe H (1978) Photochemisty of small molecules. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Okubo M, Yamamoto T, Kuroki T, Fukumoto H (2001) Electric air cleaner composed of nonthermal plasma reactor and electrostatic precipitator. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 37:1505–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pal R, Kim KH, Hong YJ, Jeon EC (2008) The pollution status of atmospheric carbonyls in a highly industrialized area. J Hazard Mater 153:1122–1135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sano N, Nagamoto T, Tamon H, Suzuki T, Okazaki M (1997) Removal of acetaldehyde and skatole in gas by a corona-discharge reactor. Ind Eng Chem Res 36:3783–3791.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie970056a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sarigiannis DA, Karakitsios SP, Gotti A, Liakos IL, Katsoyiannis A (2011) Exposure to major volatile organic compounds and carbonyls in European indoor environments and associated health risk. Environ Int 37:743–765.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2011.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tomatis M, Xu HH, He J, Zhang XD (2016) Recent development of catalysts for removal of volatile organic compounds in flue gas by combustion: a review. J Chem 8324826 DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8324826
  18. Tsuji M, Kawahara T, Kamo N, Miyano M (2010) Photochemical removal of benzene using 172 nm Xe2 excimer lamp in N2/O2 mixtures at atmospheric pressure. Bull Chem Soc Jpn 83:582–591.  https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.20090335 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tsuji M, Kawahara T, Uto K, Kamo N, Miyano M, Hayashi J, Tsuji T (2018) Efficient removal of benzene in air at atmospheric pressure using a side-on type 172 nm Xe2 excimer lamp. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:18980–18989.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2103-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vandenbroucke AM, Morent R, De Geyter N, Leys C (2011) Non-thermal plasmas for non-catalytic and catalytic VOC abatement. J Hazard Mater 195:30–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.08.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Materials Chemistry and Engineering and Research and Education Center of Green TechnologyKyushu UniversityKasugaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Applied Science for Electronics and Materials, Graduate School of Engineering SciencesKyushu UniversityKasugaJapan
  3. 3.Interdisciplinary Factory of Science and Engineering, Department of Materials ScienceShimane UniversityMatsueJapan

Personalised recommendations