Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 11, pp 10776–10789 | Cite as

The impact of nanoparticles zero-valent iron (nZVI) and rhizosphere microorganisms on the phytoremediation ability of white willow and its response

  • Sahar Mokarram-Kashtiban
  • Seyed Mohsen HosseiniEmail author
  • Masoud Tabari Kouchaksaraei
  • Habibollah Younesi
Research Article
  • 108 Downloads

Abstract

Soil contaminated with heavy metals (HMs) is a serious problem throughout the world that threatens all living organisms in the soil. Therefore, large-scale remediation is necessary. This study investigated a new combination of remediation techniques on heavy metal contaminated soil, phytoremediation, and soil amendment with nano-sized zero-valent iron (nZVI) and rhizosphere microorganisms. White willow (Salix alba L.) was grown for 160 days in pots containing Pb, Cu, and Cd and amended with 0, 150, and 300 (mg kg−1) of nZVI and rhizosphere microorganisms, including the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF), Rhizophagus irregularis, and the plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), Pseudomonas fluorescens. The results showed that inoculation with PGPR and AMF, particularly dual inoculation, improved plant growth as well as the physiological and biochemical parameters of white willow, and increased the bioconcentration factor (BCF) of Pb, Cu, and Cd. The low dose of nZVI significantly increased the root length and the leaf area of the seedlings and increased the BCF of Cd. In contrast, the high dose of nZVI had negative effects on the seedlings growth and the BCF of Pb and Cu, about − 32% and − 63%, respectively. Our results demonstrate that nZVI at low doses can improve plant performance in a phytoremediation context and that the use of beneficial rhizosphere microorganisms can minimize nZVI stress in plants and make them less susceptible to stress even under high dose conditions.

Keywords

Metal accumulator plant Mixed contaminated soil Phytotoxicity Phytoremediation techniques Soil amendments Trace metals remediation 

Abbreviations

AMF

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus

BCF

Bioconcentration factor

C

Organic carbon

Ci

Intercellular CO2 concentration

CMC

Carboxymethyl cellulose

E

Transpiration rate

EC

Electrical conductivity

EL

Electrolyte leakage

Gs

Stomatal conductance

HMs

Heavy metals

MDA

Malondialdehyde

N

Total nitrogen

nZVI

Nano-sized zero-valent iron

PGPR

Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria

Pn

Photosynthetic rates

SLA

Specific leaf area

TF

Translocation factors

Ti

Tolerance index

WUE

Water-use efficiency

Notes

Acknowledgments

We do also extend our appreciation to the Soil and Water Research Institute (SWRI) who provided the bacteria and fungi. We also would like to thank Dr. Erik Joner for his useful comments on the manuscript.

Author contributions

All authors contributed equally to conceive and design the analysis; SMK carried out the experiment and analyses, and wrote the manuscript with support from SMH, MTK, and HY.

Funding information

The authors wish to thank the financial support provided by The Tarbiat Modares University (TMU).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest. All authors also participated in all stages of research including the conception and design of the study, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the article, and approval of the final version of the manuscript.

Supplementary material

11356_2019_4411_MOESM1_ESM.docx (226 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 225 kb)

References

  1. Agnello AC, Bagard M, Van Hullebusch ED, Esposito G, Huguenot D (2016) Comparative bioremediation of heavy metals and petroleum hydrocarbons co-contaminated soil by natural attenuation, phytoremediation, bioaugmentation and bioaugmentation-assisted phytoremediation. Sci Total Environ 563:693–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison LE (1975) Organic carbon. In: Black CA (ed) Methods of soil analysis, part 2. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 1367–1378Google Scholar
  3. Arnon DI (1949) Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts: polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 24:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arslan M, Afzal M, Amin I, Iqbal S, Khan Q (2014) Nutrients can enhance the abundance and expression of alkane hydroxylase CYP153 gene in the rhizosphere of ryegrass planted in hydrocarbon-polluted soil. PLoS One 9(10):e111208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ayangbenro AS, Babalola OO (2017) A new strategy for heavy metal polluted environments: a review of microbial biosorbents. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14:94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balseiro-Romero M, Gkorezis P, Kidd PS, Van Hamme J, Weyens N, Monterroso C, Vangronsveld J (2017) Use of plant growth promoting bacterial strains to improve Cytisus striatus and Lupinus luteus development for potential application in phytoremediation. Sci Total Environ 581:676–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bates L, Waldren R, Teare I (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 39:205–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bremner JM, Mulvaney CS (1982) Nitrogen-total. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney RR (eds) Methods of soil analysis, part 2, second edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 595–624Google Scholar
  9. Burges A, Epelde L, Benito G, Artetxe U, Becerril JM, Garbisu C (2016) Enhancement of ecosystem services during endophyte-assisted aided phytostabilization of metal contaminated mine soil. Sci Total Environ 562:480–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cao J, Feng Y, Lin X, Wang J, Xie X (2017) Iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles deteriorate the mutual interaction between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant. J Soils Sediments 17:841–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chaney RL, Malik M, Li YM, Brown SL, Brewer EP, Angle JS, Baker AJ (1997) Phytoremediation of soil metals. Curr Opin Biotechnol 8(3):279–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen B, Shen H, Li X, Feng G, Christie P (2004) Effects of EDTA application and arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization on growth and zinc uptake by maize (Zea mays L.) in soil experimentally contaminated with zinc. Plant Soil 261:219–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chirakkara RA, Reddy KR (2015) Biomass and chemical amendments for enhanced phytoremediation of mixed contaminated soils. Ecol Eng 85:265–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Courchesne F, Turmel MC, Cloutier-Hurteau B, Tremblay G, Munro L, Masse J, Labrecque M (2017) Soil trace element changes during a phytoremediation trial with willows in southern Québec, Canada. Int J Phytoremediation 19:632–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cunningham SD, Ow DW (1996) Promises and prospects of phytoremediation. Plant Physiol 110(3):715–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. de Souza ES, Texeira RA, da Costa HSC, Oliveira FJ, Melo LCA, Faial KDCF, Fernandes AR (2017) Assessment of risk to human health from simultaneous exposure to multiple contaminants in an artisanal gold mine in Serra Pelada, Pará, Brazil. Sci Total Environ 576:683–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elloumi N, Belhaj D, Mseddi S, Zouari M, Abdallah FB, Woodward S, Kallel M (2017) Response of Nerium oleander to phosphogypsum amendment and its potential use for phytoremediation. Ecol Eng 99:164–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. El-Temsah YS, Oughton DH, Joner EJ (2013) Effects of nano-sized zero-valent iron on DDT degradation and residual toxicity in soil: a column experiment. Plant Soil 368(1–2):189–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Feng NX, Yu J, Zhao HM, Cheng YT, Mo CH, Cai QY, Li YW, Li H, Wong MH (2017) Efficient phytoremediation of organic contaminants in soils using plant–endophyte partnerships. Sci Total Environ 583:352–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frenk S, Ben-Moshe T, Dror I, Berkowitz B, Minz D (2013) Effect of metal oxide nanoparticles on microbial community structure and function in two different soil types. PLoS One 8(12):e84441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fresno T, Moreno-Jiménez E, Zornoza P, Peñalosa JM (2018) Aided phytostabilisation of As-and Cu-contaminated soils using white lupin and combined iron and organic amendments. J Environ Manag 205:142–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ghafariyan MH, Malakouti MJ, Dadpour MR, Stroeve P, Mahmoudi M (2013) Effects of magnetite nanoparticles on soybean chlorophyll. Environ Sci Technol 47(18):10645–10652Google Scholar
  23. Ghosh I, Mukherjee A, Mukherjee A (2017) In planta genotoxicity of nZVI: influence of colloidal stability on uptake, DNA damage, oxidative stress and cell death. Mutagenesis 32(3):371–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gil-Díaz M, Pinilla P, Alonso J, Lobo MC (2017) Viability of a nanoremediation process in single or multi-metal (loid) contaminated soils. J Hazard Mater 321:812–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Giovannetti M, Mosse B (1980) An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New Phytol 84(3):489–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Glick BR (2003) Phytoremediation: synergistic use of plants and bacteria to clean up the environment. Biotechnol Adv 21(5):383–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gomiero T (2016) Soil degradation, land scarcity and food security: reviewing a complex challenge. Sustainability 8(3):281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gong X, Huang D, Liu Y, Zeng G, Wang R, Wan J, Zhang C, Cheng M, Qin X, Xue W (2017) Stabilized nanoscale zerovalent iron mediated cadmium accumulation and oxidative damage of Boehmeria nivea (L.) gaudich cultivated in cadmium contaminated sediments. Environ Sci Technol 51(19):11308–11316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gouda S, Kerry RG, Das G, Paramithiotis S, Shin HS, Patra JK (2017) Revitalization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for sustainable development in agriculture. Microbiol Res 206:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Guarino C, Sciarrillo R (2017) Effectiveness of in situ application of an integrated phytoremediation system (IPS) by adding a selected blend of rhizosphere microbes to heavily multi-contaminated soils. Ecol Eng 99:70–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Guha T, Ravikumar KVG, Mukherjee A, Mukherjee A, Kundu R (2018) Nanopriming with zero valent iron (nZVI) enhances germination and growth in aromatic rice cultivar (Oryza sativa cv. Gobindabhog L.). Plant Physiol Biochem 127:403–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hrynkiewicz K, Baum C (2012) The potential of rhizosphere microorganisms to promote the plant growth in disturbed soils. In: Malik A, Grohmann E (ed) Environmental protection strategies for sustainable development. Strategies for sustainability. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 35–64Google Scholar
  33. Hu W, Huang B, Tian K, Holm PE, Zhang Y (2017) Heavy metals in intensive greenhouse vegetable production systems along Yellow Sea of China: levels, transfer and health risk. Chemosphere 167:82–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Huang D, Qin X, Peng Z, Liu Y, Gong X, Zeng G, Huang C, Cheng M, Xue W, Wang XHZ (2018) Nanoscale zero-valent iron assisted phytoremediation of Pb in sediment: impacts on metal accumulation and antioxidative system of Lolium perenne. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 153:229–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Karn B, Kuiken T, Otto M (2009) Nanotechnology and in situ remediation: a review of the benefits and potential risks. Environ Health Perspect 117(12):1813–1831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Khan AG, Kuek C, Chaudhry TM, Khoo CS, Hayes WJ (2000) Role of plants, mycorrhizae and phytochelators in heavy metal contaminated land remediation. Chemosphere 41(1–2):197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kim KR, Owens G (2010) Potential for enhanced phytoremediation of landfills using biosolids—a review. J Environ Manag 91(4):791–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Komives T, Gullner G (2006) Dendroremediation: the use of trees in cleaning up polluted soils. In: Phytoremediation Rhizoremediation. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Larsen J, Cornejo P, Barea JM (2009) Interactions between the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices and the plant growth promoting rhizobacteria Paenibacillus polymyxa and P. macerans in the mycorrhizosphere of Cucumis sativus. Soil Biol Biochem 41:286–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lebeau T, Braud A, Jézéquel K (2008) Performance of bioaugmentation-assisted phytoextraction applied to metal contaminated soils: a review. Environ Pollut 153(3):497–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Li Z, Ma Z, van der Kuijp TJ, Yuan Z, Huang L (2014) A review of soil heavy metal pollution from mines in China: pollution and health risk assessment. Sci Total Environ 468:843–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Li X, Yang Y, Gao B, Zhang M (2015) Stimulation of peanut seedling development and growth by zero-valent iron nanoparticles at low concentrations. PLoS One 10(4):e0122884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Li S, Wang W, Liang F, Zhang WX (2017) Heavy metal removal using nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI): theory and application. J Hazard Mater 322:163–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ma X, Gurung A, Deng Y (2013) Phytotoxicity and uptake of nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI) by two plant species. Sci Total Environ 443:844–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mahar A, Wang P, Ali A, Awasthi MK, Lahori AH, Wang Q, Li R, Zhang Z (2016) Challenges and opportunities in the phytoremediation of heavy metals contaminated soils: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 126:111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Miransari M (2011) Hyperaccumulators, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and stress of heavy metals. Biotechnol Adv 29:645–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mukaro E, Nyakudya IW, Jimu L (2017) Edaphic conditions, aboveground carbon stocks and plant diversity on nickel mine tailings dump vegetated with Senegalia polyacantha (Willd.) Seigler & Ebinger. Land Degrad Dev 28(5):1641–1651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Němeček J, Lhotský O, Cajthaml T (2014) Nanoscale zero-valent iron application for in situ reduction of hexavalent chromium and its effects on indigenous microorganism populations. Sci Total Environ 485:739–747Google Scholar
  49. Ortiz N, Armada E, Duque E, Roldán A, Azcón R (2015) Contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and/or bacteria to enhancing plant drought tolerance under natural soil conditions: effectiveness of autochthonous or allochthonous strains. J Plant Physiol 174:87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Papazoglou EG, Fernando AL (2017) Preliminary studies on the growth, tolerance and phytoremediation ability of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) grown on heavy metal contaminated soil. Ind Crop Prod 107:463–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Parra A, Zornoza R, Conesa E, Gómez-López M, Faz A (2014) Seedling emergence, growth and trace elements tolerance and accumulation by Lamiaceae species in a mine soil. Chemosphere 113:132–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Phillips JM, Hayman D (1970) Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans Br Mycol Soc 55(1):158–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pulford ID, Watson C (2003) Phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated land by trees-a review. Environ Int 29(4):529–540Google Scholar
  54. Rónavári A, Balázs M, Tolmacsov P, Molnár C, Kiss I, Kukovecz Á, Kónya Z (2016) Impact of the morphology and reactivity of nanoscale zero-valent iron (NZVI) on dechlorinating bacteria. Water Res 95:165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Siani NG, Fallah S, Pokhrel LR, Rostamnejadi A (2017) Natural amelioration of zinc oxide nanoparticle toxicity in fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-gracum) by arbuscular mycorrhizal (Glomus intraradices) secretion of glomalin. Plant Physiol Biochem 112:227–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Soleimani M, Akbar S, Hajabbasi MA (2011) Enhancing phytoremediation efficiency in response to environmental pollution stress. Plants Environ 23:10–14Google Scholar
  57. Souza RD, Ambrosini A, Passaglia LM (2015) Plant growth-promoting bacteria as inoculants in agricultural soils. Genet Mol Biol 38(4):401–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stefaniuk M, Oleszczuk P, Ok YS (2016) Review on nano zerovalent iron (nZVI): from synthesis to environmental applications. Chem Eng J 287:618–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tang X, Li Q, Wu M, Lin L, Scholz M (2016) Review of remediation practices regarding cadmium-enriched farmland soil with particular reference to China. J Environ Manag 181:646–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Todd LF, Landman K, Kelly S (2016) Phytoremediation: an interim landscape architecture strategy to improve accessibility of contaminated vacant lands in Canadian municipalities. Urban For Urban Green 18:242–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tóth G, Hermann T, Da Silva MR, Montanarella L (2016) Heavy metals in agricultural soils of the European Union with implications for food safety. Environ Int 88:299–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Valko M, Morris H, Cronin M (2005) Metals, toxicity and oxidative stress. Curr Med Chem 12:1161–1208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vatehová Z, Kollárová K, Zelko I, Richterová-Kučerová D, Bujdoš M, Lišková D (2012) Interaction of silicon and cadmium in Brassica juncea and Brassica napus. Biologia 67(3):498–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Venkatachalam P, Priyanka N, Manikandan K, Ganeshbabu I, Indiraarulselvi P, Geetha N, Muralikrishna K, Bhattacharya RC, Tiwari M, Sharma N, Sahi SV (2017) Enhanced plant growth promoting role of phycomolecules coated zinc oxide nanoparticles with P supplementation in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant Physiol Biochem 110:118–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wahsha M, Bini C, Fontana S, Wahsha A, Zilioli D (2012) Toxicity assessment of contaminated soils from a mining area in Northeast Italy by using lipid peroxidation assay. J Geochem Explor 113:112–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wang HQ, LU SJ, YAO ZH (2007) EDTA-enhanced phytoremediation of lead contaminated soil by Bidens maximowicziana. J Environ Sci 19(12):1496–1499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wang S, Shi X, Sun H, Chen Y, Pan H, Yang X, Rafiq T (2014a) Variations in metal tolerance and accumulation in three hydroponically cultivated varieties of Salix integra treated with lead. PLoS One 9(9):e108568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wang Y, Fang Z, Kang Y, Tsang EP (2014b) Immobilization and phytotoxicity of chromium in contaminated soil remediated by CMC-stabilized nZVI. J Hazard Mater 275:230–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wang J, Fang Z, Cheng W, Tsang PE, Zhao D (2016) Ageing decreases the phytotoxicity of zero-valent iron nanoparticles in soil cultivated with Oryza sativa. Ecotoxicology 25(6):1202–1210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wenzel WW, Lombi E, Adriano DC (1999) Biochemical processes in the rhizosphere: role in phytoremediation of metal-polluted soils. In: Prasad MNV, Hagemeyer J (eds) Heavy metal stress in plants: from molecules to ecosystems. Springer, Berlin, pp 273–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wilkins DA (1978) The measurement of tolerance to edaphic factors by means of root growth. New Phytol 80(3):623–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Xue W, Huang D, Zeng G, Wan J, Zhang C, Xu R, Cheng M, Deng R (2017) nanoscale zero-valent iron coated with rhamnolipid as an effective stabilizer for immobilization of cd and Pb in river sediments. J Hazard Mater 341:381–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Xue W, Huang D, Zeng G, Wan J, Cheng M, Zhang C, Hu C, Li J (2018) Performance and toxicity assessment of nanoscale zero valent iron particles in the remediation of contaminated soil: a review. Chemosphere 210:1145–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yang Y, Liang Y, Han X, Chiu TY, Ghosh A, Chen H, Tang M (2016) The roles of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (VAM) in phytoremediation and tree-herb interactions in Pb contaminated soil. Sci Rep 6:20469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zhao L, Sun Y, Hernandez-Viezcas JA, Hong J, Majumdar S, Niu G, Duarte-Gardea M, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2015) Monitoring the environmental effects of CeO2 and ZnO nanoparticles through the life cycle of corn (Zea mays) plants and in situ μ-XRF mapping of nutrients in kernels. Environ Sci Technol l49:2921–2928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zhou S, Zhao H, Zhang B, Fang P (2017) Stabilization of cadmium-and lead-contaminated sites using sodium tetraethylenepentamine-multi dithiocarbamate. Water Air Soil Pollut 228:6Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sahar Mokarram-Kashtiban
    • 1
  • Seyed Mohsen Hosseini
    • 1
    Email author
  • Masoud Tabari Kouchaksaraei
    • 1
  • Habibollah Younesi
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Forestry, Faculty of Natural ResourcesTarbiat Modares UniversityNoorIran
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural ResourcesTarbiat Modares UniversityNoorIran

Personalised recommendations