Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 11, pp 11113–11125 | Cite as

Bioremediation of palm oil mill effluent (POME) using indigenous Meyerozyma guilliermondii

  • Birintha Ganapathy
  • Adibah Yahya
  • Norahim IbrahimEmail author
Research Article
  • 54 Downloads

Abstract

Despite being a key Malaysian economic contributor, the oil palm industry generates a large quantity of environmental pollutant known as palm oil mill effluent (POME). Therefore, the need to remediate POME has drawn a mounting interest among environmental scientists. This study has pioneered the application of Meyerozyma guilliermondii with accession number (MH 374161) that was isolated indigenously in accessing its potential to degrade POME. This strain was able to treat POME in shake flask experiments under aerobic condition by utilising POME as a sole source of carbon. However, it has also been shown that the addition of suitable carbon and nitrogen sources has significantly improved the degradation potential of M. guilliermondii. The remediation of POME using this strain resulted in a substantial reduction of chemical oxygen demand (COD) of 72%, total nitrogen of 49.2% removal, ammonical nitrogen of 45.1% removal, total organic carbon of 46.6% removal, phosphate of 60.6% removal, and 92.4% removal of oil and grease after 7 days of treatment period. The strain also exhibited an extracellular lipase activity which promotes better wastewater treatment. Additionally, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analyses have specifically shown that M. guilliermondii strain can degrade hydrocarbons, fatty acids, and phenolic compounds present in the POME. Ultimately, this study has demonstrated that M. guilliermondii which was isolated indigenously exhibits an excellent degrading ability. Therefore, this strain is suitable to be employed in the remediation of POME, contributing to a safe discharge of the effluent into the environment.

Keywords

Palm oil mill effluent Bioremediation Chemical oxygen demand Oil and grease Lipase Aerobic treatment Indigenous 

Notes

Funding information

The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE), Malaysia, for the MyPhD scholarship awarded to Birintha Ganapathy. Our sincere gratitude is also dedicated to Universiti Teknologi Malaysia for the Research University Grant (15H98).

References

  1. Affandi IE, Suratman NH, Abdullah S, Ahmad WA, Zakaria ZA (2014) Degradation of oil and grease from high strength industrial effluents using locally isolated aerobic biosurfactant-producing bacteria. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 95(A):33–40Google Scholar
  2. Agamuthu P, Tan EL, Shaifal AA (1986) Effect of aeration and soil inoculum on the composition of palm oil effluent (POME). Agric Wastes 15:121–132Google Scholar
  3. Agamy R, Hashem M, Alamri S (2013) Effect of soil amendment with yeasts as bio-fertilizers on the growth and productivity of sugar beet. Afr J Agric Res 8:46–56Google Scholar
  4. Akar ST, Gorgulu A, Kaynak Z, Anilan B, Akar T (2009) Biosorption of Reactive Blue 49 dye under batch and continuous mode using a mixed biosorbent of macro-fungus Agaricus bisporus and Thuja orientalis cones. Chem Eng 148:26–34Google Scholar
  5. American Public Health Association (APHA) (1995) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American water works association and water pollution control federation. APHA, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  6. American Public Health Association (APHA) (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, in, 21st edition. American Public Health Association (APHA), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. Amprayn K, Rose MT, Kecskés M, Pereg L, Nguyen HT, Kennedy IR (2012) Plant growth promoting characteristics of soil yeast (Candida tropicalis HY) and its effectiveness for promoting rice growth. Appl Soil Ecol 61:295–299Google Scholar
  8. Atlas R, Brag J (2009) Bioremediation of marine oil spills; when and when not- the Exxon valdex experience. Microb Biotechnol 2:213–221Google Scholar
  9. Bala JD, Lalung J, Ismail N (2014) Biodegradation of palm oil mill effluent (POME) by bacterial strains. Int J Sci Res Publ 4(3):2250–3153Google Scholar
  10. Bernal MP, Alburquerque JA, Moral R (2009) Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment: a review. Bioresour Technol 100(22):5444–5453Google Scholar
  11. Bhumibhamon O, Koprasertsak A, Funthong S (2002) Biotreatment of high fat and oil wastewater by lipase producing microorganisms. Kasetsart J Soc Sci 36:261–267Google Scholar
  12. Brunetti G, Farrag K, Plaza C, Senesi N (2012) Advanced techniques for characterization of organic matter from anaerobically digested grapemarc distillery effluents and amended soils. Environ Monit Assess 184:2079–2089Google Scholar
  13. Carmichael LM, Plaender FK (1997) The effect of inorganic and organic supplements on the microbial degradation of phenanthrene and pyrene in soils. Biodegradation 8:1–13Google Scholar
  14. Chaıneau CH, Rougeux G, Yepremian C, Oudot J (2005) Effects of nutrient concentration on the biodegradation of crude oil and associated microbial populations in the soil. Soil Biol Biochem 37(8):1490–1497Google Scholar
  15. Challain F, Chaıneau CH, Point V, Saliot A, Oudot J (2006) Factors inhibiting bioremediation of soil contaminated with weathered oils and drill cuttings. Environ Pollut 144:255–265Google Scholar
  16. Chin KK, Lee SW, Mohammad HH (1996) A study of palm oil mill effluent treatment using a pond system. Water Sci Technol 34(11):119–123Google Scholar
  17. Choi SC, Kwon KK, Sohn JH, Kim SJ (2002) Evaluation of fertilizer additions to stimulate oil biodegradation in sand seashore mesocosms. J Microbiol Biotechnol 12(3):431–436Google Scholar
  18. Davis JB, Westlake DWS (1979) Crude oil utilization by fungi. Can J Microbiol 25:146–156Google Scholar
  19. De Felice B, Pontecorvo G, Carfagna M (1997) Degradation of waste waters from olive oil mills by Yarrowia lipolytica ATCC 20255 and Pseudomonas putida. Acta Biotechnol 17:231–239Google Scholar
  20. Dhouib A, Ellouz M, Aloui F, Sayadi S (2006) Effect of bioaugmentation of activated sludge with white rot fungi on olive mill wastewater detoxification. Lett Appl Microbiol 42(4):405–411Google Scholar
  21. Gargouri B, Mhiri N, Karray F, Fathi A, Sayadi A (2015) Isolation and characterization of hydrocarbon-degrading yeast strains from petroleum contaminated industrial wastewater. Biomed Res Int 929424Google Scholar
  22. Ghannoun MA (2000) Potential role of phospholipase in virulence and fungal pathogenesis. Clin Microbiol Rev 13:122–143Google Scholar
  23. Gopinath SCB, Anbu P, Hilda A (2005) Extracellular enzymatic activity profiles in fungi isolated from oil-rich environments. Mycoscience 46:119–126Google Scholar
  24. Gouda MK, Omar SH, Chekroud ZA, Eldin HMN (2007) Bioremediation of kerosene IL a case study in liquid media. Chemosphere 69:1807–1814Google Scholar
  25. Govinden R, Pillay B, van Zyl WH, Pillay D (2001) Xylitol production by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing the Pichia stipitis and Candida shehatae XYL1 genes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 55(1):76–80Google Scholar
  26. Gupta R, Gupta N, Rathi P (2004) Bacterial lipases: an overview of production, purification and biochemical properties. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 64(6):763–781Google Scholar
  27. HACH (2005) Hach water analysis DR5000 spectrohotometer procedures manual. HACH Company, USAGoogle Scholar
  28. Heiner CR, Hunkapiller KL, Chen SM, Glass JI, Chen EY (1998) Sequencing multimegabase-template DNA with BigDye terminator chemistry. Genome Res 8:557–561Google Scholar
  29. Ibiene AA, Orji FA, Ezidi CO, Ngwobia CL (2011) Bioremediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soil in the Niger delta using spent mushroom compost and other organic wastes. Nigeria J Agric Food Environ 7(3):1–7Google Scholar
  30. Islam MA, Yousuf A, Karim A, Pirozzi D, Khan MMR, Wahid ZA (2018) Bioremediation of palm oil mill effluent and lipid production by Lipomyces starkeyi: a combined approach. J Clean Prod 172:1779–1787Google Scholar
  31. Jameel AT, Olanrewaju AA (2011) Aerobic biodegradation of oil and grease in palm oil mill effluent using consortium of microorganisms. In: Alam MDZ, Jameel AT, Amid A (eds) Current research and development in biotechnology engineering at International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) Vol. III. IIUM Press, Kuala Lumpur, pp 43–51Google Scholar
  32. Khaled MAR, Abdel Azeiz AZ, Hassanien SE, Eissa HF (2012) Biodegradation of used lubricating and diesel oils by new yeast strain Candida viswanathii KC-2011. Afr J Biotechnol 11(77):4166–14174Google Scholar
  33. Koshimizu S, Ohtake I, Yoshioka H, Saito Y, Taki H (1997) Development of kitchen wastewater treatment system using fats and oils degrading microorganisms. Kuuki-chouwa Eiseikougaku 71:999–1009 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  34. Koutinas AA, Vlysidis A, Pleissner D, Kopsahelis N, Garcia IL, Kookos IK, Papanikolaou S, Kwan TH, Lin CSK (2014) Valorization of industrial waste and by-product streams via fermentation for the production of chemicals and biopolymers. Chem Soc Rev 43:2587–2627Google Scholar
  35. Kumar A, Kumar S, Kumar S (2005) Biodegradation kinetics of phenol and catechol using Pseudomonas putida MTCC 1194. Biochem Eng 22:151–159Google Scholar
  36. Kurtzman CP, Robnett CJ (1997) Identification of clinically important ascomycetous yeasts based on nucleotide divergence in the 5' end of the large-subunit (26S) ribosomal DNA gene. Clinical. Microbiology 35:1216–1223Google Scholar
  37. Liew WL, Kassim MA, Muda K, Loh SK, Affam AC (2015) Conventional methods and emerging wastewater polishing technologies for palm oil mill effluent treatment: a review. Environ Manag 149:222–235Google Scholar
  38. Lim CK, Bay HH, Aris A, Abdul Majid Z, Ibrahim Z (2013) Biosorption and biodegradation of Acid Orange 7 by Enterococcus faecalis strain ZL: optimisation by response surface methodological approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20(7):5056–5066Google Scholar
  39. Lima VMG, Krieger N, Sarquis MIM, Mitchell DA, Ramos LP, Fontana JD (2003) Effect of nitrogen and carbon sources on lipase production by Penicillium aurantiogriseum. Food Technol Biotechnol 41(2):105–110Google Scholar
  40. Long Z, Xu J, Pan J (2007) Significant improvement of Serratia marcescens lipase fermentation by optimizing medium, induction, and oxygen supply. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 142:148–157Google Scholar
  41. Malcolm S (2000) Tween 80 opacity test responses of various Candida species. J Clin Microbiol 38(12):4626–4628Google Scholar
  42. Maryam K, Mehdi H (2016) Isolation and characterization of phenol degrading yeasts from wastewater in the coking plant of Zarand, Kerman. Braz J Microbiol 47:18–24Google Scholar
  43. MPOB (2013) Oil Palm & The Environment Malaysia, Malaysian Palm Oil BoardGoogle Scholar
  44. Neoh C, Yahya A, Adnan R, Abdul Majid Z, Ibrahim Z (2013) Optimisation of decolorization of palm oil mill effluent (POME) by growing cultures of Aspergillus fumigatus using response surface methodology. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:2912–2923Google Scholar
  45. Nitschke M, Costa SGVAO, Haddad R, Goncalves LAG, Eberlin MN, Contiero J (2005) Biosurfactant production by Pseudomonas aeroginosa LBI. Biotechnol Prog 21:1562–1566Google Scholar
  46. Norhasmillah AH, Puah CW, Nor AI, Azhari SB, Choo YM (2015) Composting of oil palm biomass: Fourier transform infrared and thermogravimetry analysis. J Oil Palm Res 27(3):241–249Google Scholar
  47. Nwoko CO, Ogunyemib S, Eddy EN, Innocent CN (2010) Evaluation of phytotoxicity effect of palm oil mill effluent and cassava mill effluent on tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum) after pretreatment options. Int J Environ Sci Dev 1(1):2010–0264Google Scholar
  48. Omotayo AE, Efetie OA, Oyetibo G, Ilori MO, Amund OO (2011) Degradation of aviation fuel by microorganisms isolated from tropical polluted soils. Int J Biol Chem Sci 5(2):698–708Google Scholar
  49. Oswal N, Sarma PM, Zinjarde SS, Pant A (2002) Palm oil mill effluent treatment by a tropical marine yeast. Bioresour Technol 85:35–37Google Scholar
  50. Oudot J, Merlin FX, Pinvidic P (1998) Weathering rates of oil components in a bioremediation experiment in estuarine sediments. Mar Environ Res 45:113–125Google Scholar
  51. Pascual JA, Hernandez T, Ayuso M, Garcia C (1997) Changes in the microbial activity of arid soils amended with urban organic wastes. Biol Fertil Soils 24:429–434Google Scholar
  52. Phanit N, Asif H, Satnam S, Li-Sen Y, Mei-Hua H, Chiu-Chung Y (2013) Phosphate-solubilizing soil yeast Meyerozyma guilliermondii CC1 improves maize (Zeamays L.) productivity and minimizes requisite chemical fertilization. Plant Soil 373:301–315Google Scholar
  53. Sharma K (2011) Inorganic phosphate solubilization by fungi isolated from agriculture soil. Phytol Res 3:11–12Google Scholar
  54. Smidt E, Tintner J, Bohm K, Binner E (2011) Transformation of biogenic waste materials through anaerobic digestion and subsequent composting of the residues – a case study. Global Science Book. Dyn Soil Dyn Plant 5(2):63–69Google Scholar
  55. Stephen E1, Emmanuel OS, Okwute LO (2014) Comparative study of in vitro biodegradation of Spent Lubricating Oil by Aspergillus niger and Bacillus subtilis 6(7): 50–57. http://www.sciencepub.net/researcher. Accessed 2018
  56. Swannell RPJ, Lee K, McDonagh M (1996) Field evaluations of marine oil spill bioremediation. Microbiol Rev 60:342–365Google Scholar
  57. Thanagrit B, Thidarat P (2013) Effect of carbon and nitrogen sources on lipase production by isolated lipase-producing soil yeast. J Life Sci Technol 1(3):176–179Google Scholar
  58. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25:4876–4882Google Scholar
  59. Vijayaraghavan K, Ahmad D, Ezani Bin Abdul Aziz M (2007) Aerobic treatment of palm oil mill effluent. Environ Manag 82(1):24–31Google Scholar
  60. Wan Razali WA, Baharuddin AS, Talib AT, Sulaiman A, Naim M, Hassan MA, Shirai Y (2012) Degradation of oil palm empty fruit bunches (OPEFB) fibre during composting process using in-vessel composter. BioResources 7(4):4786–4805Google Scholar
  61. Watkinson RJ, Morgan P (1990) Physiology of aliphatic hydrocarbon degrading microorganisms. Biodegradation 1:79–92Google Scholar
  62. Wu L, Ge G, Wan J (2009) Biodegradation of oil wastewater by free and immobilized Yarrowia lipolytica W29. J Environ Sci 21:237–242Google Scholar
  63. Young LS, Hameed A, Peng SY, Shan YH, Wu S (2013) Endophytic establishment of the soil isolate Burkholderia sp. CC-Al74 enhances growth and P-utilization rate in maize (Zea mays L.). Appl Soil Ecol 66:40–47Google Scholar
  64. Zhang C, Zong H, Zhuge B (2015) Production of xylitol from d-xylose by overexpression of xylose reductase in osmotolerant yeast Candida glycerinogenes WL2002-5. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 176(5):1511–1527Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Science, Department of BiosciencesUniversiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM)Johor BahruMalaysia

Personalised recommendations