Advertisement

In situ evaluation of the NOx removal efficiency of photocatalytic pavements: statistical analysis of the relevance of exposure time and environmental variables

  • Eva Jiménez-RelinqueEmail author
  • Ramón Hingorani
  • Francisco Rubiano
  • María Grande
  • Ángel Castillo
  • Marta CastelloteEmail author
Solar Chemistry and Photocatalysis: Environmental Applications
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

In the recent past, the NOx removal efficiency of photocatalytic materials has been subject of many studies with promising results. However, many of these studies involve laboratory tests carried out under standardized climatic exposure conditions, often not representative of the real-world environment. With the aim to bridge this gap, selected photocatalytic materials have been applied to different substrates in outdoor demonstrator platforms at pilot scale as part of the project LIFE-PHOTOSCALING. The paper presents the results of in situ measurements of NOx removal efficiency of the materials, performed during 17 months. Statistical models accounting for the influence of exposure time and relevant environmental variables are derived. They suggest that photocatalytic emulsions on the tested asphalt experience a significant loss of activity over time irrespective of climatic conditions. The efficiency of photocatalytic slurries on asphalt and of concrete tiles, with the photocatalyst applied on surface or in bulk, mainly depends on substrate humidity.

Keywords

NOx Photocatalysis Pavements Efficiency In situ Outdoor test Pilot scale Environmental variables 

Notes

Funding information

This study was funded by the LIFE program (Project LIFE PHOTOSCALING, LIFE 13/ENV/ES/001221, http://www.life-photoscaling.eu/). The authors wish to thank the manufacters for supplying the photocatalytic products implemented on platforms: Sociedad Financiera y Minera, S.A., Active Walls S.L., Industrial Breinco S.A., Cristal France S.A.S.; Impresa Bacchi S.R.L., GranitiFiandre S.p.A, and Fundación Cartif.

References

  1. Andrade C, Castillo A (2003) Evolution of reinforcement corrosion due to climatic variations. Mater Corros 54:379–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballari MM, Brouwers H (2013) Full scale demonstration of air-purifying pavement. J Hazard Mater 254:406–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ballari MM, Hunger M, Hüsken G, Brouwers H (2010) NOx photocatalytic degradation employing concrete pavement containing titanium dioxide. Appl Catal B Environ 95:245–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bengtsson N, Castellote M (2010) Photocatalytic activity for NO degradation by construction materials: parametric study and multivariable correlations. J Adv Oxid Technol 13:341–349Google Scholar
  5. Boonen E, Beeldens A (2014) Recent photocatalytic applications for air purification in Belgium. Coatings 4:553–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caillol S (2011) Fighting global warming: the potential of photocatalysis against CO2, CH4, N2O, CFCs, tropospheric O3, BC and other major contributors to climate change. J Photochem Photobiol C: Photochem Rev 12:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castellote M (2016): Device for determiming photocatalytic properties of materials. PCT/ES2016/070808Google Scholar
  8. Chen J, Poon C-S (2009) Photocatalytic construction and building materials: from fundamentals to applications. Build Environ 44:1899–1906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen DH, Li K, Yuan R (2007): Photocatalytic coating on road pavements/structures for NOx abatement. Lamar University Report, 1–17Google Scholar
  10. Dylla H, Asadi S, Hassan M, Mohammad LN (2013) Evaluating photocatalytic asphalt pavement effectiveness in real-world environments through developing models: a statistical and kinetic study. Road Mater Pavement Des 14:92–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. EEA (2016): National Emissions Ceilings Directive (EU) 2016/2284Google Scholar
  12. Folli A, Pade C, Hansen TB, De Marco T, Macphee DE (2012) TiO2 photocatalysis in cementitious systems: insights into self-cleaning and depollution chemistry. Cem Concr Res 42:539–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. IBM (2012) SPSS statistics for Windows. IBM Corp, Armonk, NYGoogle Scholar
  14. Jimenez-Relinque E, Castellote M (2015) Quantification of hydroxyl radicals on cementitious materials by fluorescence spectrophotometry as a method to assess the photocatalytic activity. Cem Concr Res 74:108–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jimenez-Relinque E, Rodriguez-Garcia J, Castillo A, Castellote M (2015) Characteristics and efficiency of photocatalytic cementitious materials: type of binder, roughness and microstructure. Cem Concr Res 71:124–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Maggos T, Bartzis J, Liakou M, Gobin C (2007) Photocatalytic degradation of NOx gases using TiO2-containing paint: a real scale study. J Hazard Mater 146:668–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maggos T, Plassais A, Bartzis J, Vasilakos C, Moussiopoulos N, Bonafous L (2008) Photocatalytic degradation of NOx in a pilot street canyon configuration using TiO2-mortar panels. Environ Monit Assess 136:35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mo J, Zhang Y, Xu Q, Lamson JJ, Zhao R (2009) Photocatalytic purification of volatile organic compounds in indoor air: a literature review. Atmos Environ 43:2229–2246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Smith G (1988) Statistical reasoning. Allyn and Bacob, IncGoogle Scholar
  20. Suarez S, Portela R, Hernández-Alonso MD, Sánchez B (2014) Development of a versatile experimental setup for the evaluation of the photocatalytic properties of construction materials under realistic outdoor conditions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:11208–11217CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eva Jiménez-Relinque
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ramón Hingorani
    • 1
  • Francisco Rubiano
    • 1
  • María Grande
    • 1
  • Ángel Castillo
    • 1
  • Marta Castellote
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of Construction Science,“Eduardo Torroja”, IETcc (CSIC)MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations