Advertisement

Ingestion of plastic fragments by the Guri sea catfish Genidens genidens (Cuvier, 1829) in a subtropical coastal estuarine system

  • David V. DantasEmail author
  • Cristian I. R. Ribeiro
  • Catarina de C. A. Frischknecht
  • Rodrigo Machado
  • Eduardo G. G. Farias
Short Research and Discussion Article
  • 83 Downloads

Abstract

One of the most recognized anthropogenic impacts in marine environments is solid waste pollution, especially plastic, which can be ingested by fish, thus interfering with their health. In this context, the aim of this study is to describe the ingestion of plastic fragments and to identify the possible effect of this contamination in the condition factor of Genidens genidens in the Laguna Estuarine System. The stomach contents of 92 G. genidens (26 juveniles and 66 adults) were analyzed. The Index of Relative Importance was performed to identify the contribution of each prey item. Condition factor (CF) was used to analyze the effect of plastic ingestion on the fish’s body condition (by comparing individuals in the same ontogenetic phase). For the juveniles, eight items were observed, the most important of which were Penaeidae, followed by Portunidae and plastic. For the adults, 12 items were observed, the most important of which were Penaeidae, Portunidae, Polychaeta, and plastic. The analysis of CF demonstrated higher values for individuals without plastic in the stomach, which indicated a better health condition. The CF of a fish may be affected by variations in the physiological condition, environmental stresses, and nutritional and biological variations, and could be used to compare the body condition or health of a fish species. The ingestion of plastic could significantly influence the worst body condition of the individuals that were analyzed in the present study. The plastic pollution in marine coastal waters is associated with the appropriate waste management levels.

Keywords

Marine pollution Fishery impacts Feeding ecology Condition factor 

Notes

Funding information

The authors thank the support of Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC – Campus Laguna) (Proc. NPP2015020002570; Proc. NPP2015020002571) and CNPq Universal Proc. 406539/2018-9.

References

  1. Barboza LGA, Vieira LR, Branco V, Figueiredo N, Carvalho F, Carvalho C, Guilhermino L (2018) Microplastics cause neurotoxicity, oxidative damage and energy-related changes and interact with the bioaccumulation of mercury in the European seabass, Dicentrarchus labrax (Linnaeus, 1758). Aquat Toxicol 195:49–57.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2017.12.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barletta M, Dantas DV (2016) Environmental gradient. In: Kennish MJ (ed) Encyclopedia of estuaries. Springer, Netherlands, pp 237–242.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8801-4_136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barletta M, Saint-Paul U, Amaral CS, Corrêa MF, Guebert F, Dantas DV, Lorenzi L (2008) Factors affecting seasonal variations in fish assemblages at an ecocline in a tropical/subtropical mangrove-fringed estuary. J Fish Biol 73:1314–1336.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.02005.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barletta M, Lima ARA, Dantas DV, Oliveira IM, Reis Neto J, Fernandes CAF, Farias EGG, Rodrigues Filho JL, Costa MF (2017) How can accurate landing stats help designing better fisheries and environmental management for Western Atlantic estuaries? In: Finkl CW, Makowski C (eds) (Org.)Coastal wetlands: alteration and remediation, vol 21, 1st edn. Springer Nature, Dordrecht, pp 1–64.  https://doi.org/10.1007/2F978-3-319-56179-0_20 Google Scholar
  5. Beck MW, Heck KL Jr, Able KW, Childers DL, Eggleston DB, Gillanders BM, Halpern BS, Hays CG, Hoshino K, Minello TJ, Orth RJ, Sheridan PF, Weinstein MP (2001) The identification, conservation and management of estuarine and marine nursery for fish and invertebrates. BioScience 51:633–641. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0633:TICAMO]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar
  6. Bittar VT, Di Beneditto M (2009) Diet and potential feeding overlap between Trichiurus lepturus (Osteichthyes: Perciformes) and Pontoparia blainvillei (Mammalia: Cetacea) in northern Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Zoologia 26:374–378.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-46702009000200023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burgess BE (1989) An atlas of freshwater and marine catfishes. A preliminary survey of the Siluriformes. T.H.F. Publications, Inc., Neptune City 784pGoogle Scholar
  8. Cardozo ALP, Farias EGG, Rodrigues-Filho JL, Monteiro IB, Scandolo TM, Dantas DV (2018) Feeding ecology and ingestion of plastic fragments by Priacanthus arenatus: what’s the fisheries contribution to the problem? Mar Pollut Bull 130:19–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.03.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Costa MF, Barletta M (2015) Microplastics in coastal and marine environments of the western tropical and sub-tropical Atlantic Ocean. Environ Sci Proc Imp 17:1868–1879.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EM00158G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Costa MF, Silva-Cavalcanti JS, Barbosa CC, Barletta M (2011) Plastic buried in the inter-tidal plain of a tropical estuarine ecosystem. J Coast Res 64:339–343 http://www.cerf-jcr.org/images/stories/2011_ICS_Proceedings/SP64_339-343_M._F._Costa.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2018
  11. Critchell K, Hoogenboom MO (2018) Effects of microplastic exposure on the body condition and behaviour of planktivorous reef fish (Acanthochromis polyacanthus). PlosOne 13(3):e0193308.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dantas DV (2018) Mapeamento dos territórios tradicionais de pesca, o conhecimento ecológico tradicional e as regras informais de gestão existentes no Complexo Lagunar Sul de Santa Catarina: Conclusões e recomendações para a gestão pesqueira. In: Subsídios ao Ordenamento Pesqueiro Nacional / SEAPE-PR, OEI, Brasília, DF. p 43–66. https://oei.org.br/acervo_tecnico. Accessed 22 Dec 2018
  13. Dantas DV, Barletta M, Costa MF, Barbosa-Cintra SCT, Possatto FE, Ramos JAA, Lima ARA, Saint-Paul U (2010) Movement patterns of catfishes (Ariidae) in a tropical semi-arid estuary. J Fish Biol 76:2540–2557.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02646.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dantas DV, Barletta M, Costa MF (2012) The seasonal and spatial patterns of ingestion of polyfilament nylon fragments by estuarine drums (Sciaenidae). Environ Sci Pollut Res 19:600–606.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-011-0579-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dantas DV, Barletta M, Costa MF (2015) Feeding ecology and seasonal diet overlap between Stellifer brasiliensis and Stellifer stellifer in a tropical estuarine ecocline. J Fish Biol 86(2):707–733.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12592 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Denuncio P, Mandiola AM, Salles SBP, Machado R, Otto PH, Oliveira LR, Rodriguez DH (2017) Marine debris ingestion by the South American fur seal from the Southwest Atlantic Ocean. Mar Pollut Bull 122:420–425.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.07.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eriksen M, Lebreton LCM, Carson HS, Thiel M, Moore CJ, Borerro JC, Galgani F, Ryan PG, Reisser J (2014) Plastic pollution in the world’s oceans: more than 5 trillion plastic pieces weighing over 250000 tons afloat at sea. PLoS One 9(12):e111913.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111913 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farias EGG, Preichardt PR, Dantas DV (2018) Influence of fishing activity over marine debris composition close to coastal jetty. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(16):16246–16253.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2012-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferreira GVB, Barletta M, Lima ARA, Dantas DV, Justino AKS, Costa MF (2016) Plastic debris contamination in the life cycle of acoupa weakfish (Cynoscion acoupa) in a tropical estuary. ICES J Mar Sci 73(10):2695–2707.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferreira VB, Barletta M, Lima ARA (2019) Use of estuarine resources by top predator fishes. How do ecological patterns affect rates of contamination by microplastics? Sci Total Environ 655:292–304.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.229 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Froese R (2006) Cube law, condition factor and weight-length relationships: history, meta-analysis and recommendations. J Appl Ichthyol 22:241–253.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00805.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hostim-Silva M (2001) Reprodução de Netuma barba (Lacépède, 1803) e Genidens genidens (Valenciennes, 1839) (Siluriformes, Ariidae) da Foz do Rio Itajaí-Açu, Santa Catarina, Brasil. Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR), Tese de DoutoradoGoogle Scholar
  23. Hynes HBN (1950) The food of fresh-water sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus and Pygosteus pungitius), with a review of methods used in studies of the food of fishes. J Anim Ecol 19:36–57.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1570 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hyslop EJ (1980) Stomach contents analysis-a review of methods and their application. J Fish Biol 17:411–429.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1980.tb02775.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ivar do Sul JA, Santos IR, Friedrich AC, Matthiensen A, Fillmann G (2011) Plastic pollution at a sea turtle conservation area in NE Brazil: contrasting developed and undeveloped beaches. Estuar Coast 34(4):814–823.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-011-9392-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jambeck JR, Geyer R, Wilcox C, Siegler TR, Perryman M, Andrady A, Narayan R, Law KL (2015) Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science 347(6223):768–771.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260352 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jin S, Yan X, Zhang H, Fan W (2015) Weight-length relationships and Fulton’s condition factors of skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelanis) in the western and Central Pacific Ocean. PeerJ 3:e758.  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.758 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Laist DW (1997) Impacts of marine debris: entanglement of marine life in marine debris including a comprehensive list of species with entanglement and ingestion records. In: Coe JM, Rogers BD (eds) Marine debris: sources, impacts and solutions. Springer, Berlin, pp 99–141.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8486-1_10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lima ARA, Costa MF, Barletta M (2014) Distribution patterns of microplastics within the plankton of a tropical estuary. Environ Res 132:146–155.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2014.03.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lusher AL, Hollman PCH, Mendoza-Hill JJ (2017a) Microplastic in fisheries and aquaculture: status of knowledge on their occurrence and implications for aquatic organisms and food safety. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper. No. 615, Rome, Italy. 147p. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i7677e.pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
  31. Lusher AL, Welden NA, Sobral P, Cole M (2017b) Sampling, isolating and identifying microplastics ingested by fish and invertebrates. Anal Methods 9:1346–1360.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6AY02415G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McLusky DS, Elliott M (2004) The estuarine ecosystem: ecology, threats, and management, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford 223pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nash RDM, Valencia AH, Geffen AJ (2006) The origin of Fulton’s condition factor – setting the record straight. Fisheries 31(5):346–238Google Scholar
  34. Oliveira KR, Correa LLC, Petry MV (2018) Dieta de Nannopterum brasilianus (Aves: Phalocrocoracidae), no Sul do Brasil. Oecologia Australis in press https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/oa/article/view/17723. Accessed 15 July 2018
  35. Pinkas LM, Oliphant S, Iverson ILK (1971) Food habits of albacore, bluefin tuna and bonito in Californian waters. Calif Fish Game 152:1–105 https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7t868rd. Accessed 02 Jan 2018
  36. Possatto FE, Barletta M, Costa MF, Ivar do Sul J, Dantas DV (2011) Plastic debris ingestion by marine catfish: an unexpected fisheries impact. Mar Pollut Bull 62:1098–1102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.01.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Prince ED (1975) Pinnixid crabs in the diet of young-of-the-year copper Rockfis (Sebastes caurinus). T Am Fish Soc 99:440–443.  https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1975)104<539:PCITDO>2.0.CO;2 Google Scholar
  38. Ramos JAA, Barletta M, Dantas DV, Lima ARA, Costa MF (2014) Trophic niche and habitat shifts of sympatric Gerreidae. J Fish Biol 85:1446–1469.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12499 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Richardson N, Gordon AK, Muller WJ, Whitfield AK (2011) A weight-of-evidence approach to determine estuarine fish health using indicators from multiple levels of biological organization. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshwat Ecosyst 21(5):423–432Google Scholar
  40. Rochman CM, Hoh E, Kurobe T, The SJ (2013) Ingested plastic transfers hazardous chemicals to fish and induces hepatic stress. Sci Rep 3:3263.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03263 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ruppert EE, Fox RS, Barnes RD (2005) Zoologia dos invertebrados. 7ª ed. 1168pGoogle Scholar
  42. Stachowitsch M (1992) The invertebrates: an illustrated glossary. Wiley, 690pGoogle Scholar
  43. Tesch FW (1968) Age and growth. In: Ricker WE (ed) Methods for assessment of fish production in fresh waters. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 93–123Google Scholar
  44. Thurman HV, Trujillo AP (2004) Introductory oceanography, 10th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 608pGoogle Scholar
  45. Tourinho PS, Ivar do Sul JA, Fillmann G (2010) Is marine debris ingestion still a problem for the coastal marine biota of southern Brazil? Mar Pollut Bull 60(3):396–401.  https://doi.org/10.1015/j.marpolbul.2009.10.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zar JH (2010) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River 944pGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Grupo de Gestão, Ecologia e Tecnologia Marinha (GTMar), Departamento de Engenharia de Pesca e Ciências BiológicasUniversidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)LagunaBrazil
  2. 2.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Planejamento Territorial e Desenvolvimento Socioambiental (PPGPLAN)/FAEDUDESCFlorianópolisBrazil

Personalised recommendations