Advertisement

Effects of biogas residues containing antibiotics on soil enzyme activity and lettuce growth

  • Jiancong Han
  • Congguang Zhang
  • Jia Cheng
  • Fei Wang
  • Ling QiuEmail author
Research Article
  • 49 Downloads

Abstract

To investigate the effects of biogas residues containing antibiotics on lettuce growth and soil enzyme activity, the antibiotics oxytetracycline and sulfadiazine were used as additives; two kinds of feedstocks including pig manure and straw were chosen. Results showed that the higher the concentrations of the antibiotics are, the stronger the inhibition of soil sucrase activity becomes. The activity of sucrose enzyme in the test group with a single concentration of 60 mg/kg was significantly lower than the group that was treated with 0 mg/kg. In the mass, the organic fertilizer containing antibiotics can improve the soil urease activity and increase the urease activity of the soil. In the growth phase, urease activity increased by 27% from 0.85 mg NH3-N/(g day) in the blank group to 1.08 NH3-N/(g day) in the 0-mg test group. During all growing stages of lettuce, though the effects of the biogas residues containing oxytetracycline and sulfadiazine on the soil catalase activity were not obvious, the field application could inhibit the activity of soil catalase to some extent.

Keywords

Oxytetracycline Sulfadiazine Biogas residues Soil enzyme activity Lettuce 

Notes

Funding information

The authors are grateful for the support of the Agricultural Eco-environmental Special Foundation Project of Chinese Ministry of Agriculture (2110402-7), the National Foundation of Natural Science (51576167), Special Agricultural Program of Shaanxi Province (2017-136), and the Postgraduate Scholarship Project of China Scholarship Council (201806300084).

References

  1. Adami PF, Pelissari A, Moraes AD, Modolo AJ, Assmann TS, Franchin MF, Cassol LC (2012) Grazing intensities and poultry litter fertilization levels on corn and black oat yield. Pesq Agrop Brasileira 47:360–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berry PM, Kendall S, Rutterford Z, Orford S, Griffiths S (2015) Historical analysis of the effects of breeding on the height of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) and consequences for lodging. Euphytica 203:375–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caldwell BA (2005) Enzyme activities as a component of soil biodiversity: a review. Pedobiologia 49:637–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ge G, Li Z, Fan F, Chu G, Hou Z, Liang Y (2009) Soil biological activity and their seasonal variations in response to long-term application of organic and inorganic fertilizers. Plant Soil 326:31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Guan S (1986) Soil enzyme and its research methods. Agriculture Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  6. Guo Y, Yang H, Zhang C (2014) Changes of cellulase and sucrase activities in soils of soybean root nodule mutants. Jiangsu Agric Sci 42:83–84Google Scholar
  7. Hamscher G, Sczesny S, Abu-Qare A, Hoper H, Nau H (2000) Substances with pharmacological effects including hormonally active substances in the environment: identification of tetracyclines in soil fertilized with animal slurry. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr 107:332–334Google Scholar
  8. He, J. (2012) Study on the degradation of sulfonamides in livestock and poultry farming waste by composting, Hunan Agricultural University, ChangshaGoogle Scholar
  9. Hillis DG, Fletcher J, Solomon KR, Sibley PK (2011) Effects of ten antibiotics on seed germination and root elongation in three plant species. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 60:220–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang J, Peng Z, Yu J (2010) Effects of straw compost on lettuce quality and soil enzyme activity. Guangdong Agric Sci 11:97–99Google Scholar
  11. Islam MDS, Ahmed A, Mahmud S, Tusher TR, Khanom S (2012) Effects of organic fertilizer on the growth and yield of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) used as vegetables. Int J Agric Sci Res 2:116–128Google Scholar
  12. Jechalke S, Heuer H, Siemens J, Amelung W, Smalla K (2014) Fate and effects of veterinary antibiotics in soil. Trends Microbiol 22:536–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kumar, K., Gupta, S.C., Chander, Y., and Singh, A.K. (2005) Antibiotic use in agriculture and its impact on the terrestrial environment. in: Advances in agronomy, Vol 87, (Ed.) D.L. Sparks, Vol. 87, pp. 1–54Google Scholar
  14. Kwon SI, Owens G, Ok YS, Lee DB, Jeon WT, Kim JG, Kim KR (2011) Applicability of the Charm II system for monitoring antibiotic residues in manure-based composts. Waste Manag 31:39–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marcinkeviciene A, Boguzas V, Balnyte S, Pupaliene R, Velicka R (2013) Influence of crop rotation, intermediate crops, and organic fertilizers on the soil enzymatic activity and humus content in organic farming systems. Eurasian Soil Sci+ 46:198–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Masarirambi MT, Mbokazi BM, Wahome PK, Oseni TO (2012) Effects of kraal manure, chicken manure and inorganic fertilizer on growth and yield of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var Commander) in a semi-arid environment. Asian J Agric Sci 4(1):58–64Google Scholar
  17. Milek J, Wojcik M (2011) Effect of temperature on the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide by catalase Terminox Ultra. Przemysl Chemiczny 90:1260–1263Google Scholar
  18. Molaei A, Lakzian A, Datta R, Haghnia G, Astaraei A, Rasouli-Sadaghiani M, Ceccherini MT (2017) Impact of chlortetracycline and sulfapyridine antibiotics on soil enzyme activities. Int Agrophys 31:499–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nannipieri. (1994) The potential use of soil enzymes as indicators of productivity, sustainability and pollution. Soil biota: management in sustainable farming systems, 2:238–244Google Scholar
  20. Nicol GW, Leininger S, Schleper C, Prosser JI (2008) The influence of soil pH on the diversity, abundance and transcriptional activity of ammonia oxidizing archaea and bacteria. Environ Microbiol 10:2966–2978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sarmah AK, Meyer MT, Boxall ABA (2006) A global perspective on the use, sales, exposure pathways, occurrence, fate and effects of veterinary antibiotics (VAs) in the environment. Chemosphere 65:725–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shi J, Liu J, Shi J (2015) Effects of plastic film re-use on soil catalase activity in sunflower field. J Inner Mongolia Agric Univ (Nat Sci Edn) 36:17–20Google Scholar
  23. Singh A, Ghoshal N (2013) Impact of herbicide and various soil amendments on soil enzymes activities in a tropical rainfed agroecosystem. Eur J Soil Biol 54:56–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Singh J, Kunhikrishnan A, Bolan NS, Saggar S (2013) Impact of urease inhibitor on ammonia and nitrous oxide emissions from temperate pasture soil cores receiving urea fertilizer and cattle urine. Sci Total Environ 465:56–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Telesinski A, Platkowski M, Cybulska K, Telesinska N, Wrobel J, Pawlowska B (2018) Response of soil enzymes to two antibiotics: polymyxin B And penicillin G. Fresenius Environ Bull 27:3837–3845Google Scholar
  26. Tomkiel M, Bacmaga M, Wyszkowska J, Kucharski J, Borowik A (2015) The effect of carfentrazone-ethyl on soil microorganisms and soil enzymes activity. Arch Environ Prot 41:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vandecasteele B, Reubens B, Willekens K, De Neve S (2014) Composting for increasing the fertilizer value of chicken manure: effects of feedstock on P availability. Waste Biomass Valorization 5:491–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Veres Z, Kotroczo Z, Fekete I, Toth JA, Lajtha K, Townsend K, Tothmeresz B (2015) Soil extracellular enzyme activities are sensitive indicators of detrital inputs and carbon availability. Appl Soil Ecol 92:18–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang G, Cao F (2011) Integrated evaluation of soil fertility in Ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba L.) agroforestry systems in Jiangsu, China. Agrofor Syst 83:89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang G, Li Z, Zhang S, Ma X, Liang Y (2013) Degradation of oxytetracycline in chicken feces aerobic-composting and its effects on their related parameters. Environ Sci 34:795–803Google Scholar
  31. Xiong G, Lin X, Zhang Y (2005) Advances in the effects of organic manure on soil environmental quality in vegetable protected areas. Bull Sci Technol 21:84–90Google Scholar
  32. Xu Q, Bao C, Zhang M (2014) Effects of soil antibiotic pollution on seed germination and root growth of three vegetable species. Acta Agric Jiangxi 26:37–43Google Scholar
  33. Yin W, Wang X, Gao J (2010) Characteristics of plant height formation of hexaploid forage type rye. Chin Agric Sci Bull 27:35–40Google Scholar
  34. Zhang C, Qiu L (2018) Comprehensive sustainability assessment of a biogas-linked agro-ecosystem: a case study in China. Clean Techn Environ Policy 20:1847–1860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhang, S. (2004) Determination of harmful components in large-scale breeding livestock and poultry manure and its harmless treatment effect. Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, BeijingGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jiancong Han
    • 1
    • 2
  • Congguang Zhang
    • 1
    • 3
  • Jia Cheng
    • 1
  • Fei Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ling Qiu
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.College of Mechanical and Electronic EngineeringNorthwest A&F UniversityYanglingChina
  2. 2.Western Scientific Observation and Experiment Station of Development and Utilization of Rural Renewable Energy of Ministry of AgricultureNorthwest A&F UniversityYanglingChina
  3. 3.Department of Food, Agricultural and Biological EngineeringThe Ohio State UniversityWoosterUSA

Personalised recommendations