Advertisement

Tailoring the textural properties of an activated carbon for enhancing its adsorption capacity towards diclofenac from aqueous solution

  • Adriana I. Moral-Rodríguez
  • Roberto Leyva-RamosEmail author
  • Conchi O. Ania
  • Raul Ocampo-Pérez
  • Elizabeth D. Isaacs-Páez
  • Damarys H. Carrales-Alvarado
  • Jose B. Parra
Research Article
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

A series of activated carbons (ACs) were prepared by modifying a commercial AC by physical activation using CO2 during different activation times. The ACs were designated as F, F12, F24, and F40 corresponding to the activation times of 0, 12, 24, and 40 h, respectively. The surface area, total pore volume, micropore volume, and mean micropore width were determined for all the ACs. The textural properties of the modified ACs increased substantially with the activation time, and the capacity of the ACs for adsorbing diclofenac (DCF) was almost linearly dependent upon the surface area of the ACS. The maximum adsorption capacities of F, F12, F24, and F40 carbons towards diclofenac (DCF) from aqueous solution were 271, 522, 821, and 1033 mg/g, respectively. Hence, the adsorption capacities of ACs were considerably enhanced with the activation time, and F12, F24, and F40 carbons presented the highest adsorption capacities towards DCF reported in the technical literature. The F40 adsorption capacity was at least twice those of other carbon materials. The adsorption capacities decreased by raising the pH from 7 to 11 due to electrostatic repulsion between the ACs surface and anionic DCF in solution. The removal of DCF from a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluent was effectively carried out by adsorption on F40. Hence, the capacity of ACs for adsorbing DCF can be optimized by tailoring the porous structure of ACs.

Keywords

Activated carbon Adsorption CO2 activation Diclofenac Microporosity Tailoring porosity 

Notes

Funding information

This work was supported by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia, CONACyT, Mexico (grants numbers INFR-2012-01-188381 and CB-2012-02-182779). COA and JBP thank the support of the Spanish MINECO (grant number CTM2014/56770-R).

Supplementary material

11356_2018_3991_MOESM1_ESM.docx (55 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 54 kb)

References

  1. Álvarez Torrellas S, García Lovera R, Escalona N, Sepúlveda C, Sotelo JL, García J (2015) Chemical-activated carbons from peach stones for the adsorption of emerging contaminants in aqueous solutions. Chem Eng J 279:788–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Álvarez Torrellas S, Muñoz M, Zazo JA, Casas JA, García J (2016) Synthesis of high surface area carbon adsorbents prepared from pine sawdust-Onopordum acanthium L. for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs adsorption. J Environ Manag 183:294–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Álvarez S, Ribeiro RS, Gomes HT, Sotelo JL, García J (2015) Synthesis of carbon xerogels and their application in adsorption studies of caffeine and diclofenac as emerging contaminants. Chem Eng Res Des 95:229–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. An HJ, Bhadra BN, Khan NA, Jhung SH (2018) Adsorptive removal of wide range of pharmaceutical and personal care products from water by using metal azolate framework-6 derived porous carbon. Chem Eng J 343:447–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ania CO, Cabal B, Parra JB, Pis JJ (2007) Importance of the hydrophobic character of activated carbons on the removal of naphthalene from the aqueous phase. Adsorpt Sci Technol 25:155–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carvalho AP, Mestre AS, Haro M, Ania CO (2012) Advanced methods for the removal of acetaminophen from water. In: Javaherian A, Latifpour P (eds) Acetaminophen, properties, clinical uses and adverse effects. Nova Science Publishers Inc, New York, pp 57–105Google Scholar
  7. Carvalho AP, Mestre AS, Andrade M, Ania CO (2013) Ibuprofen in the aquatic environment: occurrence, ecotoxicity and water remediation technologies. In: Carter WC, Brown BR (eds) Ibuprofen: clinical pharmacology medical uses and adverse effects. Nova Science Publishers Inc, New York, pp 1–60Google Scholar
  8. Clara M, Strenn B, Gans O, Martinez E, Kreuzinger N, Kroiss H (2005) Removal of selected pharmaceuticals, fragrances and endocrine disrupting compounds in a membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment plants. Water Res 39:4797–4807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cleuvers M (2003) Aquatic ecotoxicity of pharmaceuticals including the assessment of combination effects. Toxicol Lett 142:185–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Contreras MS, Páez CA, Zubizarreta L, Léonard A, Blacher S, Olivera-Fuentes CG, Arenillas A, Pirard JP, Job N (2010) A comparison of physical activation of carbon xerogels with carbon dioxide with chemical activation using hydroxides. Carbon 48:3157–3168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coughlin RW, Ezra FS (1968) Role of surface acidity in the adsorption of organic pollutants on the surface of carbon. Environ Sci Technol 2:291–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Daughton CG, Ternes TA (1999) Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: agents of subtle change? Environ Health Perspect 107:907–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Franco MAE, de Carvalho CB, Bonetto MM, de Pelegrini Soares R, Féris LA (2018) Diclofenac removal from water by adsorption using activated carbon in batch mode and fixed-bed column: isotherms, thermodynamic study and breakthrough curves modeling. J Clean Prod 181:145–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Figueiredo JL, Pereira MFR, Freitas MMA, Órfão JJM (1999) Modification of the surface chemistry of activated carbons. Carbon 37:1379–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Garrido J, Linares- Solano A, Martin- Martinez JM, Molina-Sabio M, Rodriguez- Reinoso F, Torregrosa R (1987) Use of nitrogen vs. carbon dioxide in the characterization of activated carbons. Langmuir 3:76–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gomis-Berenguer A, Iniesta J, Moro A, Maurino V, Lima JC, Ania CO (2016) Boosting visible light conversion in the confined pore space of nanoporous carbons. Carbon 96:98–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Houeto P, Carton A, Guerbet M, Mauclaire AC, Gatignol C, Lechat P, Masset D (2012) Assessment of the health risks related to the presence of drug residues in water for human consumption: application to carbamazepine. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 62:41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jagiello J, Olivier JP (2013a) Carbon slit pore model incorporating surface energetical heterogeneity and geometrical corrugation. Adsorption 19:777–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jagiello J, Olivier JP (2013b) 2D-NLDFT adsorption models for carbon slit-shaped pores with surface energetical heterogeneity and geometrical corrugation. Carbon 55:70–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jodeh S, Abdelwahab F, Jaradat N, Warad I, Jodeh W (2015) Adsorption of diclofenac from aqueous solution using Cyclamen persicum tubers based activated carbon (CTAC). J Association of Arab Univ for Basic and App Sci 20:32–38Google Scholar
  21. Jung C, Boateng LK, Flora JRV, Oh J, Braswell MC, Son A, Yoon Y (2015) Competitive adsorption of selected non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on activated biochars: experimental and molecular modeling study. Chem Eng J 264:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kasprzyk-Hordern B, Dinsdale RM, Guwy AJ (2009) The removal of pharmaceuticals, personal care products, endocrine disruptors and illicit drugs during wastewater treatment and its impact on the quality of receiving waters. Water Res 43:363–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Malhotra M, Suresh S, Garg A (2018) Tea waste derived activated carbon for the adsorption of sodium diclofenac from wastewater: adsorbent characteristics, adsorption isotherms, kinetics, and thermodynamics. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:32210–32220.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3148-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mestre AS, Pires J, Nogueira JMF, Parra JB, Carvalho AP, Ania CO (2009) Waste-derived activated carbons for removal of ibuprofen from solution: role of surface chemistry and pore structure. Bioresour Technol 100:1720–1726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moral-Rodríguez AI, Leyva-Ramos R, Ocampo-Pérez R, Mendoza-Barron J, Serratos-Alvarez IN, Salazar-Rabago JJ (2016) Removal of ronidazole and sulfamethoxazole from water solutions by adsorption on granular activated carbon: equilibrium and intraparticle diffusion mechanisms. Adsorption 22:89–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nam SWD, Choi J, Kim SK, Her N, Zoh KD (2014) Adsorption characteristics of selected hydrophilic and hydrophobic micropollutants in water using activated carbon. J Hazard Mater 270:144–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nam SW, Jung C, Li H, Yu M, Flora JRV, Boateng LK, Her N, Zoh K-D, Yoon Y (2015) Adsorption characteristics of diclofenac and sulfamethoxazole to graphene oxide in aqueous solution. Chemosphere 136:20–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nowicki P, Kazmierczak J, Pietrzak R (2015) Comparison of physicochemical and sorption properties of activated carbons prepared by physical and chemical activation of cherry stones. Powder Technol 269:312–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rakić V, Rac V, Krmar M, Otman O, Auroux A (2015) The adsorption of pharmaceutically active compounds from aqueous solutions onto activated carbons. J Hazard Mater 282:141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Richards SM, Wilson CJ, Johnson DJ, Castle DM, Lam M, Mabury SA, Sibley PK, Solomon KR (2004) Effects of pharmaceutical mixtures in aquatic microcosms. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:1035–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rivera-Utrilla J, Prados-Joya G, Sánchez- Polo M, Ferro-García MA, Bautista-Toledo I (2009) Removal of nitroimidazole antibiotics from aqueous solution by adsorption/bioadsorption on activated carbon. J Hazard Mater 170:298–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rouquerol F, Rouquerol J, Sing KSW, Llewellyn P, Maurin G (2014) Adsorption by powders and porous solids: principles, methodology and applications. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Rúa-Gómez PC, Püttmann W (2012) Occurrence and removal of lidocaine, tramadol, venlafaxine, and their metabolites in German wastewater treatment plants. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19:689–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Saucier C, Adebayo MA, Lima EC, Cataluña R, Thue PS, Prola LDT, Puchana-Rosero MJ, Machado FM, Pavan FA, Dotto GL (2015) Microwave-assisted activated carbon from cocoa shell as adsorbent for removal of sodium diclofenac and nimesulide from aqueous effluents. J Hazard Mater 289:18–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sotelo JL, Ovejero G, Rodríguez A, Álvarez S, Galán J, García J (2014) Competitive adsorption studies of caffeine and diclofenac aqueous solutions by activated carbon. Chem Eng J 240:443–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stoeckli F, Ballerini L (1991) Evolution of microporosity during activation of carbon. Fuel 70:557–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ternes TA (1998) Occurrence of drugs in German sewage treatment plants and rivers. Water Res 32:3245–3260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ternes TA, Meisenheimer M, McDowell D, Sacher F, Brauch H-J, Haist-Gulde B, Preuss G, Wilme U, Zulei-Seibert N (2002) Removal of pharmaceuticals during drinking water treatment. Environ Sci Technol 36:3855–3863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vedenyapina MD, Borisova DA, Simakova AP, Proshina LP, Vedenyapin AA (2013) Adsorption of diclofenac sodium from aqueous solutions on expanded graphite. Solid Fuel Chem 47:59–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Watkinson JA, Murby EJ, Costanzo SD (2007) Removal of antibiotics in conventional and advanced wastewater treatment: implications for environmental discharge and wastewater recycling. Water Res 41:4164–4176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wei H, Deng S, Huang Q, Nie Y, Wang B, Huang J, Yu G (2013) Regenerable granular carbon nanotubes/alumina hybrid adsorbents for diclofenac sodium and carbamazepine removal from aqueous solution. Water Res 47:4139–4147CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adriana I. Moral-Rodríguez
    • 1
  • Roberto Leyva-Ramos
    • 1
  • Conchi O. Ania
    • 2
  • Raul Ocampo-Pérez
    • 1
  • Elizabeth D. Isaacs-Páez
    • 1
  • Damarys H. Carrales-Alvarado
    • 1
  • Jose B. Parra
    • 3
  1. 1.Centro de Investigación y Estudios de PosgradoFacultad de Ciencias Químicas, UASLPSan Luis PotosíMéxico
  2. 2.POR2E Group, CEMHTI (UPR 3079) CNRS, Univ. OrléansOrléansFrance
  3. 3.Instituto Nacional del Carbón (INCAR, CSIC)OviedoSpain

Personalised recommendations