Advertisement

Swimming performance of a freshwater fish during exposure to high carbon dioxide

  • Eric VC Schneider
  • Caleb T Hasler
  • Cory D Suski
Research Article
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

Deterring the spread of invasive fishes is a challenge for managers, and bigheaded carp (including bighead and silver carp, Hypophthalmichthys spp.) are invasive fish that have spread throughout large portions of the Mississippi River basin and threaten to invade the Great Lakes’ ecosystem. Studies have shown that elevated levels of carbon dioxide gas (CO2) have the ability to act as a nonphysical fish barrier, but little work has been done on the efficacy of CO2 to deter fish movement in flowing water. An annular swim flume was used to measure Uburst and sprint duration of the model species largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) across a range of pCO2 levels (< 400 μatm [ambient]; 10,000 μatm; 50,000 μatm; and 100,000 μatm). This species was tested as a proxy because of the likelihood of a similar CO2 response being produced, as well as constraints in obtaining and housing appropriately sized Asian carp. A significant decrease in Uburst swimming occurred when exposed to 100,000 μatm. No effects on sprint duration were detected. In both swimming tests, 15% of fish lost equilibrium when exposed to 50,000 μatm pCO2, while 50% of fish lost equilibrium when exposed to 100,000 μatm. Together, results define target levels for managers to impede the spread of largemouth bass and potentially other invasive freshwater fishes, helping guide policy to conserve aquatic ecosystems.

Keywords

Barrier Climate change Hypercarbia Invasive species Swimming performance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Jianna Wankel for providing valuable assistance during the course of the experiment.

Funding information

Funding for this project was provided by the United States Geological Survey, through funds provided by the USEPA’s Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (G14AC00119).

Compliance with ethical standards

This work conformed to protocols set through the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the University of Illinois (Protocol #15137).

Supplementary material

11356_2018_3849_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (276 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 275 kb)

References

  1. Batty RS, Blaxter JHS (1992) The effect of temperature on the burst swimming performance of fish larvae. J Exp Biol 170:187–201Google Scholar
  2. Brauner CJ, Randall DJ (1996) The interaction between oxygen and carbon dioxide movements in fishes. Comp Biochem Physiol 113A(1):83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butman D, Raymond PA (2011) Significant efflux of carbon dioxide from streams and rivers in the United States. Nat Geosci 4:839–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cole JJ, Caraco NF, Kling GW, Kratz TK (1994) Carbon dioxide supersaturation in the surface waters of lakes. Science 265:1568–1570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cupp AR, Erickson RA, Fredricks KT, Swyers NM, Hatton TW, Amberg JJ (2016) Responses of invasive silver and bighead carp to a carbon dioxide barrier in outdoor ponds. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 74(3):297–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dennis CE, Adhikari S, Wright AW, Suski CD (2016a) Molecular, behavioral, and performance responses of juvenile largemouth bass acclimated to an elevated carbon dioxide environment. J Comp Physiol B 186:297–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dennis CE, Wright AW, Suski CD (2016b) Potential for carbon dioxide to act as a non-physical barrier for invasive sea lamprey movement. J Great Lakes Res 42:150–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dobson GP, Parkhouse WS, Hochachka PW (1987) Regulation of anaerobic ATP- generating pathways in trout fast-twitch skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol 253:186–194Google Scholar
  9. Domenici P, Blake RW (1997) The kinematics and performance of fish fast-start swimming. J Exp Biol 200:1165–1178Google Scholar
  10. Donaldson MR, Amberg J, Adhikari S, Cupp A, Jensen N, Romine J, Wright A, Gaikowski M, Suski CD (2016) Carbon dioxide as a tool to deter the movement of invasive bigheaded carps. Trans Am Fish Soc 145:657–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ehrenfeld JG (2010) Ecosystem consequences of biological invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41(1):59–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Evans DC, Piermarini PM, Choe KP (2005) The multifunctional fish gill: dominant site of gas exchange, osmoregulation, acid-base regulation, and excretion of nitrogenous waste. Physiol Rev 85:97–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Furimsky M, Cooke SJ, Suski CD, Wang Y, Tufts BL (2003) Respiratory and circulatory responses to hypoxia in largemouth bass and smallmouth bass: implications for “live-release” angling tournaments. Trans Am Fish Soc 132:1065–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garenc C, Couture P, Laflamme M-A, Guderley H (1999) Metabolic correlates of burst swimming capacity of juvenile and adult threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). J Comp Physiol B 169:113–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gilderhus PA, Marking LL (1987) Comparative efficacy of 16 anesthetic chemicals on rainbow trout. N Am J Fish Manag 7(2):288–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gregory TR, Wood CM (1998) Individual variation and interrelationships between swimming performance, growth rate, and feeding in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55(7):1583–1590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hasler CT, Butman D, Jeffrey JD, Suski CD (2016) Freshwater biota and rising pCO2? Ecol Lett 19(1):98–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hasler CT, Jeffrey JD, Schneider EVC, Hannan KD, Tix JA, Suski CD (2018) Biological consequences of weak acidification caused by elevated carbon dioxide in freshwater ecosystems. Hydrobiologia 806(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heuer RM, Grosell M (2014) Physiological impacts of elevated carbon dioxide and ocean acidification on fish. American Journal of Physiology- Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative. Physiology 307(9):1061–1084Google Scholar
  20. Janssen RG, Randall DJ (1975) The effects of changes in pH and PCO2 in blood and water on breathing in rainbow trout. Salmo gairdneri Respiration Physiology 25(2):235–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kates D, Dennis C, Noatch MR, Suski CD (2012) Responses of native and invasive fishes to carbon dioxide: potential for a nonphysical barrier to fish dispersal. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 69:1748–1759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McDermott SM, Irwin RE, Taylor BW (2013) Using economic instruments to develop effective management of invasive species: insights from a bioeconomic model. Ecological Society of America 23(5):1086–1100Google Scholar
  23. Noatch MR, Suski CD (2012) Non-physical barriers to deter fish movements. Environ Rev 20:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Perry SF, Abdallah S (2012) Mechanisms and consequences of carbon dioxide sensing in fish. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 184:309–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Plaut I (2001) Critical swimming speed: its ecological relevance. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A 131:41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Portner HO, Langenbuch M, Reipschlager A (2004) Biological impact of elevated ocean CO2 concentrations: lessons from animal physiology and earth history. J Oceanogr 60:705–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Randall D, Brauner C (1991) Effects of environmental factors on exercise in fish. J Exp Biol 160:113–126Google Scholar
  28. Reidy SP, Kerr SR, Nelson JA (2000) Aerobic and anaerobic swimming performance of individual Atlantic cod. J Exp Biol 203:347–357Google Scholar
  29. Roche DG, Binning SA, Bosiger Y, Johansen JL, Rummer JL (2013) Finding the best estimates of metabolic rates in a coral reef fish. J Exp Biol 216:2103–2110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith SDP, Mcintyre PB, Halpern BS, Cooke RM, Marino AL, Boyer GL, Buchsbaum A, Burton GA Jr, Campbell LM, Ciborowski JJH, Doran PJ, Infante DM, Johnson LB, Read JG, Rose JB, Rutherford ES, Steinman AD, Allan JD (2015) Rating impacts in a multi-stressor world: a quantitative assessment of 50 stressors affecting the Great Lakes. Ecol Appl 25(3):717–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tierney KB (2011) Swimming performance assessment in fishes. J Vis Exp 51:1–4Google Scholar
  32. Tierney KB (2016) Chemical avoidance responses of fishes. Aquat Toxicol 174:228–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tix JA, Hasler CT, Sullivan C, Jeffrey JD, Suski CD (2016) Elevated carbon dioxide has limited acute effects on Lepomis macrochirus behaviour. J Fish Biol:1–22Google Scholar
  34. Tix JA, Hasler CT, Sullivan C, Jeffrey JD, Suski CD (2017) Elevated carbon dioxide has the potential to impact alarm cue responses in some freshwater fishes. Aquat Ecol 51:59–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Treanor HB, Ray AM, Layhee M, Watten BJ, Gross JA, Gresswell RE, Webb MAH (2017) Using carbon dioxide in fisheries and aquatic invasive species management. Fisheries 42:621–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. United States Army Corps of Engineers (2014) The GLMRIS report: Great Lakes and Mississippi River interbasin study. USACE, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  37. Weiss LC, Pötter L, Steiger A, Kruppert S, Frost U, Tollrian R (2018) Rising pCO2 in freshwater ecosystems has the potential to negatively affect predator-induced defenses in Daphnia. Curr Biol 28:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yoshikawa H, Kawai F, Kanamori M (1994) The relationship between the EEG and brain pH in carp, Cyprinus carpio, subjected to environmental hypercapnia at an anesthetic level. Comp Biochem Physiol 107(2):307–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New JerseyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Natural Resources and Environmental SciencesUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA
  2. 2.The Cape Eleuthera InstituteEleutheraBahamas
  3. 3.Department of BiologyThe University of WinnipegWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations