Advertisement

Zinc oxide nanostructures as a control strategy of bacterial speck of tomato caused by Pseudomonas syringae in Egypt

  • Mohsen Elsharkawy
  • Aly DerbalahEmail author
  • Amany Hamza
  • Abdelhamid El-Shaer
Nanotechnology, Nanopollution, Nanotoxicology and Nanomedicine (NNNN)

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the ability of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZONPs) with unique properties to protect tomato against the bacterial speck pathogen, caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pst). Protection of tomato against bacterial speck using ZONPS was evaluated by its direct antibacterial activity and its ability for inducing resistance in tomato plants. The results revealed that ZONPs showed significant direct antibacterial activity against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato under laboratory conditions. Moreover, tomato plants treated with ZONPs showed a significant reduction in disease severity and bacterial proliferation relative to non-treated plants. Furthermore, tomato plants treated with ZONPs showed higher self-defense enzyme activity relative to untreated plants. The regulatory and defense genes, LePR-1a and Lipoxygenase (LOX), involved in the salicylic acid (SA) and (JA) signaling pathways, respectively, were highly expressed in tomato plants treated with ZONPs compared to untreated plants. Growth characters of tomato plants treated with ZONPs were significantly enhanced relative to untreated plants. The control of bacterial speck pathogen of tomato using ZONPs through its direct antibacterial and by developing of systemic resistance in treated tomatoes against the pathogen is considered the first report.

Keywords

Tomato Bacterial speck Nanoparticles Systemic resistance induction Control 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aime S, Alabouvette C, Steinberg C, Olivain A (2013) The endophytic strain Fo47: a good candidate for priming the defense response in tomato roots. Mol Plant Microbiol Interact 26:918–926.  https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-12-12-0290-R CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akhtar MJ, Kumar AM, Khan MM, Ahmad J, Alrokayan SA (2012) Zinc oxide nanoparticles selectively induce apoptosis in human cancer cells through reactive oxygen species. Inter J of Nanomed 7:845–857.  https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S29129 Epub 2012 Feb 21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aruoja V, Dubourguier H, Kasamets C, Kahru KA (2009) Toxicity of nanoparticles of CuO, ZnO and TiO2 to microalgae, Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. Sci Total Environ 407:1461–1468.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.10.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barik TK, Sahu B, Swain V (2008) Nanosilica-from medicine to pest control. Parasitol Res 103:253–258.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-008-0975-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Batsmanova LM, Gonchar LM, Taran NY, Okanenko AA (2013) Using a colloidal solution of metal nanoparticles as micronutrient fertilizer for cereals, Proceedings of the International Conference Nanomaterials, 2, no. 4, 2 pages.Google Scholar
  6. Bradley EL, Castle L, Chaudhry Q (2011) Applications of nanomaterials in food packaging with a consideration of opportunities for developing countries. Trends Food Sci Technol 22(11):604–610.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2011.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryan MK (1933) Bacterial speck of tomatoes. Phytopathol 23:897–904Google Scholar
  8. Chaudhry Q, Scotter M, Blackburn J, Ross B, Boxall A, Castle L, Aitken R, Watkins R (2008) Applications and implications of nanotechnologies for the food sector. Food Addit & Cont Part A 25(3):241–258.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2011.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cioffi N, Torsi L, Ditaranto N, Tantillo G, Ghibelli L, Sabbatini L, Bleve-Zacheo T, D'Alessio M, Zambonin PG, Traversa E (2005) Copper nanoparticle/polymer composites with antifungal and bacteriostatic properties. Chem Mater 17(21):5255–5262.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cm0505244 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dietz KJ, Herth S (2011) Plant nanotoxicology. Trends Plant Sci 16: 582-589. doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2011.08.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dimkpa CO, McLean JE, Britt DW, Anderson AJ (2013) Antifungal activity of ZnO nanoparticles and their interactive effect with a biocontrol bacterium on growth antagonism of the plant pathogen Fusarium graminearum. BioMet 26:913–924.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10534-013-9667-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Divyapriya S, Sowmia C, Sasikala S (2014) Synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles and antimicrobial activity of murraya koeiniggi. World J of Pharm and Phram Sci 3: 12. In: 1 1635 -1645Google Scholar
  13. Eichert T, Kurtz A, Steiner U, Goldbach HE (2008) Size exclusion limits and lateral heterogeneity of the stomatal foliar uptake pathway for aqueous solutes and water suspended nanoparticles. Physiol Plant 134:151–160.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01135.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elizabath A, Bahadur V, Misra P, Prasad VM, Thomas T (2017) Effect of different concentrations of iron oxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles on growth and yield of carrot (Daucus carota L.). J of Pharm and. Phytochem 6(4):1266–1269Google Scholar
  15. Elsharkawy MM, Mousa KM (2015) Induction of systemic resistance against Papaya ring spot virus (PRSV) and its vector Myzus persicae by Penicillium simplicissimum GP17-2 and silica (Sio2) nanopowder. Int J Pest Manag 61: 353- 358. doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2015.1070930 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elsharkawy MM, Shimizu M, Takahashi H, Hyakumachi M (2012) Induction of systemic resistance against Cucumber mosaic virus by Penicillium simplicissimum GP17-2 in Arabidopsis and tobacco. Plant Pathol 61: 964-976. doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02573.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huang L, Dian-Qing L, Yan-Jun W, Min David G, Xueb ED (2005) Controllable preparation of Nano-MgO and investigation of its bactericidal properties. J Inorganic. Biochem 99:986–993.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2004.12.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Idrees M, Naeem N, Aftab T, Khan MM, Moinuddin A (2011) Salicylic acid mitigates salinity stress by improving antioxidant defense system and enhances vincristine and vinblastine alkaloids production in periwinkle. Acta Physiol Plant 33:987–999.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-010-0631-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ippolito A, El Ghaouth A, Wilson CL, Wisniewski M (2000) Control of postharvest decay of apple fruit by Aureobasidium pullulans and induction of defense responses. Postharvest Biol Technol 19:265–272.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(00)00104-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ibupoto ZH, Khun K, Eriksson M, AlSalhi M, Atif M, Ansari A, Willander M (2013) Hydrothermal growth of vertically aligned ZnO nanorods using a biocomposite seed layer of ZnO nanoparticles. Mater 6:3584–3597.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma6083584 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jung JH, Kim S, Min J, Kim Y, Lamsal K, Kim KS, Lee YS (2010) The effect of nano-Silver liquid against the white rot of the green onion caused by Sclerotium cepivorum. Mycobiol (1):39–45.  https://doi.org/10.4489/MYCO.2010.38.1.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li Y, Yang D, Cui J (2017) Graphene oxide loaded with copper oxide nanoparticles as an antibacterial agent against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato. RSC Adv 7:38853–38,860.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA05520J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lin JH, Patil RA, Devan RS, Liu ZA, Wang YP, Ho CH, Ma YR (2014) Photoluminescence mechanisms of metallic Zn nanospheres, semiconducting ZnO nanoballoons, and metal-semiconductor Zn/ZnO nanospheres. Sci Rep 4(6967):1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06967 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martin HL, Hamilton VA, Kopittke RA (2004) Copper-tolerance in Australian populations of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria contributes to poor field control of bacterial spot of pepper. Plant Dis 88:921–924.  https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2004.88.9.921 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maxwell DP, Batman DF (1967) Changes in the activities of some oxidases in extracts of Rhizoctonia infected bean hypocotyls in relation to lesion maturation. Phytophath 57:132Google Scholar
  26. Milani N, Hettiarachchi GM, Kirby JK, Beak DG, Stacey SP, McLaughlin MJ (2015) Fate of zinc oxide nanoparticles coated onto macronutrient fertilizers in an alkaline calcareous soil. PLoS One 10(5).  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126275 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miller SA, Jones JB (2014) Diseases caused by bacteria. In: Jones JB, Zitter T, Momol MT, Miller SA, (Eds.), Compendium of tomato diseases and pests, 2 ed. The American Phytopathological Society.Google Scholar
  28. Morones JR, Elechiguerra JL, Camacho A, Holt K, Kouri JB, Ramırez JT, Yacaman MJ (2005) The bactericidal effect of silver nanoparticles. Nanotechnol 16:2346–2353.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/16/10/059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Navale GR, Thripuranthaka M, Late DJ, Shinde SS (2015) Antimicrobial activity of ZnO nanoparticles against pathogenic bacteria and fungi. JSM Nanotechnol Nanomed 3(1):1033Google Scholar
  30. Pandey AC, Sanjay S, Yadav R (2010) Application of ZnO nanoparticles in influencing the growth rate of Cicer arietinum. J Exp Nanosci 5(6):488–497.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17458081003649648 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Park HJ, Kim SH, Kim HJ, Choi SH (2006) A new composition of nanosized silica–silver for control of various plant diseases. Plant Pathol J 22:25–34.  https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.2006.22.3.295 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rai M, Yadav A, Gade A (2009) Silver nanoparticles as a new generation of antimicrobials. Biotechnol Adv 27(1):76–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Raikova OP, Panichkin, LA, Raikova NN (2006) Studies on the effect of ultrafine metal powders produced by different methods on plant growth and development. Nanotechnologies and information technologies in the 21st century, in Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, pp. 108–111, Moscow, Russia.Google Scholar
  34. Ramesh M, Palanisamy K, Babu K, Sharma NK (2014) Effects of bulk & nano-titanium dioxide and zinc oxide on physio-morphological changes in Triticum aestivum Linn. J Global Biosci 3:415–422Google Scholar
  35. Salam MA, Obaid AY, El-Shishtawy R, Mohamed SA (2017) Synthesis of nanocomposites of polypyrrole/carbon nanotubes /silver nano particles and their application in water disinfection. RSC Adv 7:16878–16884.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA01033H CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sanchez-Ferrer A, Bru R, Cabanes J, Garcia-Carmona F (1988) Characterization of catecholase and cresolase activities of grape polyphenol oxidase. Phytochem 27(2):319–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sawai J (2003) Quantitative evaluation of antibacterial activities of metallic oxide powders (ZnO, MgO and CaO) by conductimetric assay. J of Microbiol Meth 54(2):177–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sedghi M, Hadi M, Toluie SG (2013) Effect of nano zinc oxide on the germination of soybean seeds under drought stress. Annal West University Timisoara series Biol XVI 2:73–78Google Scholar
  39. Shah MA, Towkeer A (2010) Principles of nanosciences and nanotechnology. Naroosa Publishing House, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  40. Sharma VK, Yngard RA, Lin Y (2009) Silver nanoparticles: green synthesis and their antimicrobial activities. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 145:83–96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2008.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shenge KC, Wydra K, Mabagala RB, Mortensen CN (2008) Assessment of strains of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato from Tanzania for resistance to copper and streptomycin. Arch Phytopathol Plant Protect 41:572–585.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03235400600881851 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sirelkhatim AS, Mahmud A, Seeni NM, Kaus LC, Ann SK, Bakhori H, Hasan DM (2015) Review on zinc oxide nanoparticles: antibacterial activity and toxicity mechanism. Nano-Micro Lett 7(3):219–242.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-015-0040-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Soni BH, Deshpande MP, Bhatt SV, Garg N, Chaki SH (2013) Studies on ZnO nanorods synthesized by hydrothermal method and their characterization. J of Nano-and Electronic Physic 5(4):4077–7081Google Scholar
  44. Sourabh D, Rizwan W, Farheen K, Yogendra KM, Javed M, Abdulaziz AA (2014) Reactive oxygen species-mediated bacterial biofilm inhibition via zinc oxide nanoparticles and their statistical determination. PLoS One 9:111–289.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111289 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stangarlin JR, Kuhn OJ, Toledo MV, Portz RL, Schwan-Estrada KRF, Pascholati SF (2011) Plant Defense against Pathogens. Scientia Agraria Paranaensis 10:18–46Google Scholar
  46. Sunada K, Kikuchi Y, Hashimoto K, Fujishima A (1998) Bactericidal and detoxification effects of TiO2 thin film photocatalysts. Environ Sci Technol 32:726–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Taheri M, Qarache HA, Qarache AA, Yoosef M (2015) The effects of zinc-oxide nanoparticles on growth parameters of corn (SC704). Nanoparticles 1(2):17–20.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-289 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Valero E, Varon R, Garcia-Carmona F (1988) Characterization of polyphenol oxidase from Airen grapes. J Food Sci 53:1482–1485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yunis H, Bashan Y, Okon Y, Henis Y (1980) Two sources of resistance to bacterial speck of tomato caused by Pseudomonas tomato. Plant Dis 64:937–939CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohsen Elsharkawy
    • 1
  • Aly Derbalah
    • 2
    Email author
  • Amany Hamza
    • 2
  • Abdelhamid El-Shaer
    • 3
  1. 1.Agricultural Botany Department, Faculty of AgricultureKafrelsheikh UniversityKafrelsheikhEgypt
  2. 2.Pesticides Chemistry and Toxicology Department, Faculty of AgricultureKafrelsheikh UniversityKafresheikhEgypt
  3. 3.Physics Department, Faculty of ScienceKafreleheikh UniversityKafrelsheikhEgypt

Personalised recommendations