Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 2929–2938 | Cite as

Economic growth, natural resources, and ecological footprints: evidence from Pakistan

  • Syed Tauseef HassanEmail author
  • Enjun Xia
  • Noor Hashim Khan
  • Sayed Mohsin Ali Shah
Research Article
  • 81 Downloads

Abstract

The ecological footprint, a measure of human demand on earth’s ecosystems, represents the amount of biologically productive land and sea area that is necessary to supply the resources a human population consumes and to mitigate associated waste. This study estimates the impact of economic growth and natural resources on Pakistan’s ecological footprint using an autoregressive distributive lag (ARDL) model for long-run estimation. The empirical findings indicate that natural resources have a positive effect on an ecological footprint that deteriorates environmental quality and that natural resources help to support the environmental Kuznets hypothesis (EKC). Bidirectional causality is found between natural resources and the ecological footprint, along with a long-run causality between biocapacity and the ecological footprint. The innovative findings have important implications for policy.

Keywords

Natural resources Ecological footprint Economic growth ARDL Pakistan 

References

  1. Alam MM, Murad MW, Noman AHM, Ozturk I (2016) Relationships among carbon emissions, economic growth, energy consumption and population growth: Testing Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis for Brazil, China, India and Indonesia. Ecol Indic 70:466–479.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Mulali U, Tang CF, Ozturk I (2015a) Estimating the environment Kuznets curve hypothesis: evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 50:918–924.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Mulali U, Weng-Wai C, Sheau-Ting L, Mohammed AH (2015b) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecol Indic 48:315–323.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alsamara M, Mrabet Z, Saleh AS, Anwar S (2018) The environmental Kuznets curve relationship: a case study of the Gulf Cooperation Council region. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:33183–33195.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3161-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ara R, Sohag K, Mastura S et al (2015) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic and population growth in Malaysia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 41:594–601.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.205 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baloch MA, Danish MF et al (2018) Financial instability and CO2 emissions: the case of Saudi Arabia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:26030–26,045.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2654-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Balsalobre-Lorente D, Shahbaz M, Roubaud D, Farhani S (2018) How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions? Energy Policy 113:356–367.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borucke M, Moore D, Cranston G, Gracey K, Iha K, Larson J, Lazarus E, Morales JC, Wackernagel M, Galli A (2013) Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere’s regenerative capacity: the National Footprint Accounts’ underlying methodology and framework. Ecol Indic 24:518–533.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.08.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charfeddine L (2017) The impact of energy consumption and economic development on Ecological Footprint and CO2 emissions: evidence from a Markov Switching Equilibrium Correction Model. Energy Econ 65:355–374.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.05.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Charfeddine L, Ben Khediri K (2015) Financial development and environmental quality in UAE: cointegration with structural breaks. Renew Sust Energ Rev 55:1322–1335.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Charfeddine L, Mrabet Z (2017) The impact of economic development and social-political factors on ecological footprint: a panel data analysis for 15 MENA countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 76:138–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Danish, Baloch MA (2017) Dynamic linkages between road transport energy consumption, economic growth, and environmental quality: evidence from Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-1072-1
  13. Danish, Wang Z, Zhang B et al (2017a) Role of renewable energy and non-renewable energy consumption on EKC: evidence from Pakistan. J Clean Prod 156:855–864.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Danish, Zhang B, Wang Z, Wang B (2017b) Energy production, economic growth and CO2 emission: evidence from Pakistan. Nat Hazards 90:1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3031-z Google Scholar
  15. Danish, Baloch MA, Suad S (2018a) Modeling the impact of transport energy consumption on CO2 emission in Pakistan: evidence from ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 9461–9473.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1230-0
  16. Danish, Saud S, Baloch MA, Lodhi RN (2018b) The nexus between energy consumption and financial development: estimating the role of globalization in Next-11 countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:18651–18661.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2069-0
  17. Danish, Baloch MA et al (2018c) The effect of ICT on CO2 emissions in emerging economies: does the level of income matters? Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2379-2
  18. Danish, Wang B, Wang Z (2018d) Imported technology and CO2 emission in China: collecting evidence through bound testing and VECM approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 82:4204–4214.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.11.002
  19. Destek MA (2018) Analyzing the environmental Kuznets curve for the EU countries : the role of ecological footprintGoogle Scholar
  20. Engle RF, Granger CWJ (1987) Co-integration and error correction : representation, estimation, and testing published by : the Econometric Society stable URL : http://www.jstor.org/stable/1913236. Yet drift too far apart. Typically economic theory will propose forces which tend to. Econometrica 55:251–276.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236
  21. Figge L, Oebels K, Offermans A (2017) The effects of globalization on Ecological Footprints: an empirical analysis. Environ Dev Sustain 19:863–876.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9769-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Galli A, Kitzes J, Niccolucci V, Wackernagel M, Wada Y, Marchettini N (2012) Assessing the global environmental consequences of economic growth through the Ecological Footprint: a focus on China and India. Ecol Indic 17:99–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. Natl Bur Econ Res Work 3914:1–57.  https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914 Google Scholar
  24. Hailu D, Kipgen C (2017) The Extractives Dependence Index (EDI). Res Policy 51:251–264.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kapur R (2016) Natural resources and environmental issues. J Ecosyst Ecography 6:2–5.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7625.1000196 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kasman A, Selman Y (2015) CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries : a panel data analysis. Econ Model 44:97–103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.10.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Katircioglu S, Gokmenoglu KK, Eren BM (2018) Testing the role of tourism development in ecological footprint quality : evidence from top 10 tourist destinations. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:33611–33619.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3324-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Khan NH, Ju Y, Hassan ST (2018) Modeling the impact of economic growth and terrorism on the human development index: collecting evidence from Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(34):34661–34673Google Scholar
  29. Lee JW, Brahmasrene T (2014) ICT, CO2 emissions and economic growth: evidence from a panel of ASEAN. Glob Econ Rev 43:93–109.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1226508X.2014.917803 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mirza FM, Kanwal A (2017) Energy consumption, carbon emissions and economic growth in Pakistan: dynamic causality analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 72:1233–1240.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mrabet Z, Alsamara M (2016) Testing the Kuznets Curve hypothesis for Qatar: a comparison between carbon dioxide and ecological footprint. Renew Sust Energ Rev 70:1366–1375.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mrabet Z, AlSamara M, Hezam Jarallah S (2017) The impact of economic development on environmental degradation in Qatar. Environ Ecol Stat 24:7–38.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-016-0359-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Narayan PK (2005) The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests. Appl Econ 37:1979–1990.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500278103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Narayan PK, Saboori B, Soleymani A (2016) Economic growth and carbon emissions. Econ Model 53:388–397.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.10.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. NFA (2014) Working guidebook to the national footprint accounts: 2016 edition. Glob Footpr Netw Rep 73Google Scholar
  36. Ng S, Perron P (2001) Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica 69:1519–1554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Omri A, Daly S, Rault C, Chaibi A (2015) Financial development, environmental quality, trade and economic growth: what causes what in MENA countries. Energy Econ 48:242–252.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.01.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ozcan B, Apergis N (2017) The impact of internet use on air pollution: evidence from emerging countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:4174–4189.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0825-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ozturk I, Al-Mulali U, Saboori B (2016) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of tourism and ecological footprint. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:1916–1928.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5447-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16:289–326.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rashid A, Irum A, Malik IA, Ashraf A, Rongqiong L, Liu G, Ullah H, Ali MU, Yousaf B (2018) Ecological footprint of Rawalpindi; Pakistan’s first footprint analysis from urbanization perspective. J Clean Prod 170:362–368.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.186 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rudolph A, Figge L (2017) Determinants of Ecological Footprints: what is the role of globalization? Ecol Indic 81:348–361.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.04.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shahbaz M, Mahalik MK, Shah SH, Sato JR (2016) Time-varying analysis of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth nexus: statistical experience in next 11 countries. Energy Policy 98:33–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.08.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Solarin SA, Al-mulali U (2018) Influence of foreign direct investment on indicators of environmental degradation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:24845–24859.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2562-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tutulmaz O (2015) Environmental Kuznets Curve time series application for Turkey: why controversial results exist for similar models? Renew Sust Energ Rev 50:73–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.184 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Uddin GA, Salahuddin M, Alam K, Gow J (2017) Ecological footprint and real income: panel data evidence from the 27 highest emitting countries. Ecol Indic 77:166–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ulucak R, Bilgili F (2018) A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. J Clean Prod 188:144–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ulucak R, Lin D (2017) Persistence of policy shocks to Ecological Footprint of the USA. Ecol Indic 80:337–343.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang Y, Kang L, Wu X, Xiao Y (2013) Estimating the environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint at the global level: a spatial econometric approach. Ecol Indic 34:15–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang Z, Danish ZB, Wang B (2018) The moderating role of corruption between economic growth and CO2 emissions: evidence from BRICS economies. Energy 148:506–513.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Xu Z, Baloch MA, Danish, Meng F, Zhang J, Mahmood Z (2018) Nexus between financial development and CO2 emissions in Saudi Arabia: analyzing the role of globalization. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:28378–28390.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2876-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Syed Tauseef Hassan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Enjun Xia
    • 1
  • Noor Hashim Khan
    • 1
  • Sayed Mohsin Ali Shah
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Management and EconomicsBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina
  2. 2.Central University of Finance and EconomicsBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations