Advertisement

Spatial identification of environmental health hazards potentially associated with adverse birth outcomes

  • Alina Svechkina
  • Boris A. Portnov
Research Article
  • 55 Downloads

Abstract

Reduced birth weight (RBW) and reduced head circumference (RHC) are adverse birth outcomes (ABOs), often linked to environmental exposures. However, spatial identification of specific health hazards, associated with these ABOs, is not always straightforward due to presence of multiple health hazards and sources of air pollution in urban areas. In this study, we test a novel empirical approach to the spatial identification of environmental health hazards potentially associated with the observed RHC and RBW patterns. The proposed approach is implemented as a systematic search, according to which alternative candidate locations are ranked based on the strength of association with the observed birth outcome patterns. For empirical validation, we apply this approach to the Haifa Bay Area (HBA) in Israel, which is characterized by multiple health hazards and numerous sources of air pollution. We identified a spot in the local industrial zone as the main risk source associated with the observed RHC and RBW patterns. Multivariate regressions, controlling for personal, neighborhood, and geographic factors, revealed that the relative risks of RHC and RBW tend to decline, other things being equal, as a function of distance from the identified industrial spot. We recommend the proposed identification approach as a preliminary risk assessment tool for environmental health studies, in which detailed information on specific sources of air pollution and air pollution dispersion patterns is unavailable due to limited reporting or insufficient monitoring.

Keywords

Adverse birth outcomes (ABOs) Reduced birth weight (RBW) Reduced head circumference (RHC) Air pollution Distance gradient method (DGM) Wind adjustment Environmental hazards Haifa Bay Area (HBA) Israel 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors express their gratitude to the members of the study’s steering committee of the Israel Ministry of Health, specifically to Dr. Jonathan Dubnov, Ms. Batia Madjar, and Ms. Riki Shemer for consultations, quality control of birth records, and initial processing of data for this research. Our gratitude is also due to Mr. Shahar Fertig for his valuable help with database preparation.

Funding

The first author thanks the Israel Ministry of Absorption and the Rieger Foundation-Jewish National Fund Program for Environmental Studies for their financial support of this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical considerations

The study was approved by the Helsinki committee of the Ministry of Health (MoH 084-2016) and the Ethical Board of University of Haifa (394/15).

References

  1. Adela CA, Río I, García-Pérez J et al (2013) Adverse birth outcomes in the vicinity of industrial installations in Spain 2004–2008. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20(7):4933–4946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahern M, Mullett M, Mackay K, Hamilton C (2011) Residence in coal-mining areas and low-birth-weight outcomes. Matern Child Health J 15(7):974–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anselin L, Syabri I, Kho YGD (2010) an introduction to spatial data analysis. Geogr Anal 38:15–22Google Scholar
  4. Bacci S, Bartolucci F, Minelli L, Chiavarini M (2016) Preterm birth: analysis of longitudinal data on siblings based on random-effects logit models. Frontiers in public health: population, reproductive and sexual health 4:278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Backes CH, Nelin T, Gorr MW, Wold LE (2013) Early life exposure to air pollution: how bad is it? Toxicol Lett 216(1):47–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ballester et al (2010) Air pollution exposure during pregnancy and reduced birth size: a prospective birth cohort study in Valencia, Spain. Environ Health 9(6)Google Scholar
  7. Banerjee T, Murari V, Kumar M, Raju MP (2015) Source apportionment of airborne particulates through receptor modeling: Indian scenario. Atmos Res 164(165):167–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barnett AG, Plonka K, Seow WK, Wilson LA, Hansen C (2011) Increased traffic exposure and negative birth outcomes: a perspective cohort in Australia. Environ Health 10:26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baron-Epel O, Keinan-Boker L, Weinstein R, Shohat T (2010) Persistent high rates of smoking among Israeli Arab males with concomitant decrease among Jews. Isr Med Assoc J: IMAJ 12(12):732–737Google Scholar
  10. Begum BA, Kimb E, Biswasa SK, Hopke PK (2004) Investigation of sources of atmospheric aerosol at urban and semi-urban areas in Bangladesh. Atmos Environ 38:3025–3038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bell ML, Ebisu K, Belanger K (2007) Ambient air pollution and low birth weight in Connecticut and Massachusetts. Environ Health Perspect 115:1118–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bertin M, Chevrier C, Serrano T, Monfort C, Rouget F, Cordier S, Viel JF (2015) Association between prenatal exposure to traffic-related air pollution and preterm birth in the PELAGIE mother-child cohort, Brittany, France. Does the urban-rural context matter? Environ Res 142:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bhutta AT, Cleves MA, Casey PH, Cradock MM, Anand KJS (2002) Cognitive and behavioral outcomes of school-aged children who were born preterm: a meta-analysis. JAMA 288(6):728–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ et al (2012) National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet 379(9832):2162–2172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Castello A, Rio I, Fernandez-Novarro P, Waller LA, Clennon JA et al (2013) Adverse birth outcomes in the vicinity of industrial installations in Spain 2004-2008. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 20:4933–4946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cesari R, Paradisi P, Allegrini P (2014) A trajectory statistical method for the identification of sources associated with concentration peak events. Int J Environ Pollut 55:94–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen X, Ye J (2015) When the wind blows: spatial spillover effects of urban air pollution. environment for development discussion: paper series. EFD DP 15–15Google Scholar
  18. Chiavarini M, Bartolucci F, Gili A, Pieroni L, Minelli L (2012) Effects of individual and social factors on preterm birth and low birth weight: empirical evidence from regional data in Italy. Int J Public Health 57(2):261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cooper JA, Watson JG (1980) Receptor oriented methods of Air Particulate Source Apportionment. J Air Pollut Control Assoc:1116–1124Google Scholar
  20. Dadvand et al (2013) Maternal exposure to particulate air pollution and term birth weight: a multi-country evaluation of effect and heterogeneity. Environ Health Perspect 121(3):367–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dadvand P, Ostro B, Figueras F et al (2014) Residential proximity to major roads and term low birth weight: the roles of air pollution, heat, noise and road-adjacent trees. Epidemiology 25(4):518–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dore AJ, Vieno M, Fournier N, Weston KJ, Sutton MA (2006) Development of a new wind-rose for the British Isles using radiosonde data, and application to an atmospheric transport model. Q J R Meteorol Soc 132:2769–2784Google Scholar
  23. Dummer TJ, Dickinson HO, Parker L (2003) Adverse pregnancy outcomes around incinerators and crematoriums in Cumbria, North West England, 1956-93. J Epidemiol Community Health 57(6):456–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eliyahu S, Weiner E, Nachum Z, Shalev E (2002) Epidemiologic risk factors for preterm delivery. The Israel Medical Association Journal: IMAJ 4(12):1115–1117Google Scholar
  25. ESRI: ArcGIS desktop help 10.2. http://webhelp.esri.com (2015) Accessed 20 January 2016
  26. Ferguson KK, O’Neill MS, Meeker JD (2013) Environmental contaminant exposures and preterm birth: a comprehensive review. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B: Critical Reviews 16(2):69–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fleischer NL et al (2014) Outdoor air pollution, preterm birth, and low birth weight: analysis of the World Health Organization global survey on maternal and perinatal health. Environ Health Perspect 122(4):425–430Google Scholar
  28. Gehring U, Wijga AH, Fischer P et al (2011) Traffic-related air pollution, preterm birth and term birth weight in the PIAMA birth cohort study. Environ Res 111(1):125–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gehring U, Tamburic L, Sbihi H, Davies HW, Brauer M (2014) Impact of noise and air pollution on pregnancy outcomes. Epidemiology 25(3):351–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Greenland S (2001) Ecologic versus individual-level sources of bias in ecologic estimates of contextual health effects. Int J Epidemiol 30(6):1343–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hannam K, MacNamee R, Baker P et al (2014) Air pollution exposure and adverse pregnancy outcomes in a large UK birth cohort: use of a novel spatio-temporal modeling technique. Scand J Work Environ Health 40(5):518–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hansen CA (2005) Investigating the effect of maternal exposure to ambient air pollution during pregnancy on birth outcomes: challenges related to exposure assessment methods and data analysis. Australasian Epidemiologist 12(2):11–15Google Scholar
  33. Heaman M, Kingston D, Chalmers B, Sauve R, Lee L, Young D (2013) Risk factors for preterm birth and small-for-gestational-age births among Canadian women. Pediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 27(1):54–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hopke PK (2003) Recent developments in receptor modeling. J Chemom 17:255–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. IBM: SPSS Statistics desktop help 22. http://www.ibm.com; Accessed 1 May 2016.
  36. Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation (2006) www.healthdata.org. Accessed 1 May 2016.
  37. Isayama T, Lee SK, Mori R et al (2012) Comparison of mortality and morbidity of very low birth weight infants between Canada and Japan. Paediatrics 130(4):965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Israel Central Bureau of Statistics (ICBS) (2016) Statistical abstract of Israel 2015: population, by district, sub districtand religion. http://www.cbs.gov.il/. Accessed 1 May 2016
  39. Israel Ministry of Environmental Protection (IMEP). Map of the air monitoring stations. http://www.sviva.gov.il (2016). Accessed 21 Apr 2016.
  40. Khan S, Cao Q, Zheng YM, Huang YZ, Zhu YG (2008) Health risks of heavy metals in contaminated soils and food crops irrigated with wastewater in Beijing. China Environmental Pollution 152(3):686–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kim E, Hopke PK (2004) Comparison between conditional probability function and nonparametric regression for fine particle source directions. Atmos Environ 38:4667–4673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Neter, J. Applied Linear Regression Models. McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2004.Google Scholar
  43. Lau C, Ambalavanan N, Chakraborty H, Wingate MS, Carlo WA (2013) Extremely low birth weight and infant mortality rates in the United States. Paediatrics 131(5)Google Scholar
  44. Li Z, Ma Z, Kuijp v d TJ, Yuan Z (2014) Huang L. A review of soil heavy metal pollution from mines in China: Pollution and health risk assessment. Sci Total Environ 468(469):843–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lin MC, Yu HS, Tsai SS et al (2001) Adverse pregnancy outcome in a petrochemical polluted area in Taiwan. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. Part A: Current Issues 63(8):565–574Google Scholar
  46. Liu X, Song Q, Tang Y, Li W, Xu J, Wu J, Wang F, Brookes PC (2013) Human health risk assessment of heavy metals in soil–vegetable system: a multi-medium analysis. Sci Total Environ 463(464):530–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Llop S, Ballester F, Estarlich M, Esplugues A, Rebagliato M, Iñiguez C (2010) Preterm birth and exposure to air pollutants during pregnancy. Environ Res 110(8):778–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Loney T, Nagelkerke NJ (2014) The individualistic fallacy, ecological studies and instrumental variables: a causal interpretation. Emerg Themes in Epidemiol 11:18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lundgren P et al (2014) Low birth weight is a risk factor for severe retinopathy of prematurity depending on gestational age. PLoS One 9(10)Google Scholar
  50. Luo ZC, Wilkins R, Kramer MS (2006) Effect of neighborhood income and maternal education on birth outcomes: a population-based stud. CMAJ 174(10):1415–1420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mahmood A, Malik RN (2014) Human health risk assessment of heavy metals via consumption of contaminated vegetables collected from different irrigation sources in Lahore, Pakistan. Arabian J Chem 7(1):91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Maisonet M, Correa A, Misra D (2004) Jaakkolaf JJK. A review of the literature on the effects of ambient air pollution on foetal growth. Environ Res 95:106–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Marcdante KJ, Kliegman RM (2015) Nelsons essentials of pediatrics. Philadelphia, PA, 784Google Scholar
  54. McKenzie LM, Ruixin G, Witter RZ, Savitz DA, Newman LS, et al. (2014) Birth outcomes and maternal residential proximity to natural gas development in rural Colorado. Environ Health Perspect 412Google Scholar
  55. MH (2014) Environmental health in Israel 2014. Ministry of health of Israel. http://www.health.gov.il/publicationsfiles/bsv_sviva2014e.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2015
  56. Moore DA, Carpenter TE (1999) Spatial analytical methods and geographic information systems: use in health research and epidemiology. Epidemiologic Reviews 21(2):143–161Google Scholar
  57. Morello-Frosch R, Jesdale BM, Sadd JL, Pastor M (2010) Ambient air pollution exposure and full-term birth weight in California. Environ Health 9(44):1–13Google Scholar
  58. Morken NH (2012) Preterm birth: new data on a global health priority. Lancet 379(9832):2128–2130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Paz S, Linn S, Portnov BA, Lazimi A, Futerman B, Barchana M (2009) Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) linkage with residence near heavy roads - a case study from Haifa Bay. Israel Health and Place 15:636–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pedersen M, Gehring U, Beelen R et al (2016) Elemental constituents of particulate matter and newborn’s size in eight European cohorts. Environ Health Perspect 124(1):141–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rushton G, Armstrong MP, Gittler J, Greene BR, Pavlik CE, West MM, Zimmerman DL (2006) Geocoding in cancer research: a review. Am J Prev Med 30(2):16–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Salvador P, Artinano B, Alonso DG, Querol X, Alastuey A (2004) Identification and characterization of sources of PM10 in Madrid (Spain) by statistical methods. Atmos Environ 38:435–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Seinfeld JH, Pandis SN (2006) Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. Hoboken; NJ. WileyGoogle Scholar
  64. Sermage-Faure C, Laurier D, Goujon-Bellec S, Chartier M, Guyot-Goubin A, Rudant J, Hemon D, Clave J (2012) Childhood leukemia around French nuclear power plant. The Geocap study, 2002–2007. Int J Cancer 131(5):E769–E780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sorbye IK, Wanigaratne S, Urquia M (2016) Variations in gestational length and preterm delivery by race, ethnicity and migration. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet & Gynaecol 32:60–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Spencer N, Bambang S, Logan S, Gill L (1999) Socioeconomic status and birth weight: comparison of an area-based measure with the Registrar General’s social class. J Epidemiol Community Health 53:495–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stacy SL, Brink LL, Larkin JC, Sadovsky Y, Goldstein BD, Pitt BR, Talbott EO (2015) Perinatal outcomes and unconventional natural gas in Southwest Pennsylvania. PLoS One 10(6):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stohl A (1996) Trajectory statistics-a new method to establish source-receptor relationships of air pollutants and its application to the transport of particulate sulphate in Europe. Atmos Environ 30(4):579–587Google Scholar
  69. Svechkina A, Portnov BA (2017) A new approach to spatial identification of potential health hazards associated with childhood asthma. Sci Total Environ 595:413–424Google Scholar
  70. Svechkina A, Zusman M, Rybnikov N, Portnov BA (2017) Spatial identification of potential health hazards: a systematic areal search approach. Int J Health Geogr 16(5):1–13Google Scholar
  71. UNICEF data: Monitoring the situation of children and women (2016) http://data.unicef.org/nutrition/low-birthweight.html#sthash.tfLramHH.dpuf. Accessed 20 June 2016.
  72. Urquia ML et al (2010) International migration and adverse birth outcomes: role of ethnicity, region of origin and destination. J Epidemiol Community Health 64:243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wang C, Zhou X, Chen R, Duan X, Kuang X, Kan H (2013) Estimation of the effects of ambient air pollution on life expectancy of urban residents in China. Atmos Environ 80:347–351Google Scholar
  74. Wen SW, Smith G, Yang Q, Walker M (2004) Epidemiology of preterm birth and neonatal outcome. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 9(6):429–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. WHO (2012) Born too soon: the global action report on preterm birth: World Health Organization report. http://www.who.int/pmnch/media/news/2012/ preterm_birth_report/en/. Accessed 11 May 2016
  76. WHO (2016) Children: reducing mortality: World Health Organization fact sheet. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs178/en/. Accessed 1 May 2016
  77. Xie Y, Berkowitz CM (2006) The use of positive matrix factorization with conditional probability functions in air quality studies: an application to hydrocarbon emissions in Houston. Texas Atmospheric Environment 40:3070–3091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Xu X, Akhtar US (2010) Identification of potential regional sources of atmospheric total gaseous mercury in Windsor, Ontario, Canada using hybrid receptor modeling. Atmos Chem Phys 10:7073–7083Google Scholar
  79. Yang CY, Chang CC, Chuang HY, Ho CK, Wu TN, Chang PY (2004) Increased risk of preterm delivery among people living near the three oil refineries in Taiwan. Environ Int 30(3):337–342Google Scholar
  80. Zhang ZY, Wong MS, Lee KH (2015) Estimation of potential source regions of PM2.5 in Beijing using backward trajectories. Atmospheric Pollution 6:173–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zoë L, Fleming ZL, Monks PS, Manning AJ (2012) Review: untangling the influence of air-mass history in interpreting observed atmospheric composition. Atmos Res 104–105:1–39Google Scholar
  82. Zusman M, Dubnov J, Barchana M, Portnov BA (2012) Residential proximity of petroleum storage tanks and associated cancer risks: Double Kernel Density approach vs. zonal estimates. Sci Total Environ 441:265–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Management, Faculty of ManagementUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations