Advertisement

Biochar as low-cost sorbent of volatile fuel organic compounds: potential application to water remediation

  • Ruth Saiz-RubioEmail author
  • María Balseiro-Romero
  • Juan Antelo
  • Elena Díez
  • Sarah Fiol
  • Felipe Macías
Low cost organic and inorganic sorbents to fight soil and water pollution
  • 61 Downloads

Abstract

Pyrolysis of waste materials to produce biochar is an excellent and suitable alternative supporting a circular bio-based economy. One of the properties attributed to biochar is the capacity for sorbing organic contaminants, which is determined by its composition and physicochemical characteristics. In this study, the capacity of waste-derived biochar to retain volatile fuel organic compounds (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene (BTEX) and fuel oxygenates (FO)) from artificially contaminated water was assessed using batch-based sorption experiments. Additionally, the sorption isotherms were established. The results showed significant differences between BTEX and FO sorption on biochar, being the most hydrophobic and non-polar contaminants those showing the highest retention. Furthermore, the sorption process reflected a multilayer behaviour and a relatively high sorption capacity of the biochar materials. Langmuir and Freundlich models were adequate to describe the experimental results and to detect general differences in the sorption behaviour of volatile fuel organic compounds. It was also observed that the feedstock material and biochar pyrolysis conditions had a significant influence in the sorption process. The highest sorption capacity was found in biochars produced at high temperature (> 400 °C) and thus rich in aromatic C, such as eucalyptus and corn cob biochars. Overall, waste-derived biochar offers a viable alternative to be used in the remediation of volatile fuel organic compounds from water due to its high sorption capacity.

Keywords

Biochar Sorption BTEX Fuel oxygenates HS-GC-MS Isotherms Water remediation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the laboratory technicians of the Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry of the USC for the assistance in biochar characterization and Alvaro Gil from the Ceramic Institute of the USC for the BET measurement. The authors also thank CVAN (Centro de Valorización Ambiental del Norte. Touro, Spain) for the production of the biochar samples.

Funding information

This work was supported by the Group of Excellence GI-1245, AMBIOSOL (Instituto de Investigaciones Tecnológicas, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela; GRC2014/003) financed by Xunta de Galicia and co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER-Galicia) under research project “Micotecnosol”-Conecta Peme 2014 (2014-CE131). The authors belong to the CRETUS Strategic Partnership (AGRUP2015/02), co-funded by FEDER (UE). Dr. Balseiro-Romero was granted a postdoctoral fellowship (Programa de axudas á etapa posdoutoral; ED481B 2017/073) by the Consellería de Cultura, Educación e Ordenación Universitaria (Xunta de Galicia, Spain).

Supplementary material

11356_2018_3798_MOESM1_ESM.docx (171 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 170 kb)

References

  1. Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE, Zhang M, Bolan N, Mohan D, Vithanage M, Lee SS, Ok YS (2014) Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere 99:19–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aivalioti M, Vamvasakis I, Gidarakos E (2010) BTEX and MTBE adsorption onto raw and thermally modified diatomite. J Hazard Mater 178:136–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali I, Gupta VK (2007) Advances in water treatment by adsorption technology. Nat Protoc 1:2661–2667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson LL, Tillman DA (1977) Fuels from waste. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Antal MJ, Grønli M (2003) The art, science, and technology of charcoal production. Ind Eng Chem Res 42:1619–1640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balseiro-Romero M, Monterroso C (2013) A headspace-analysis approach to assess the sorption of fuel volatile compounds by soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 77:800–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Balseiro-Romero M, Gkorezis P, Kidd PS, Vangronsveld J, Monterroso C (2016a) Enhanced degradation of diesel in the rhizosphere of after inoculation with diesel-degrading and plant growth-promoting bacterial strains. J Environ Qual 45:924–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Balseiro-Romero M, Chaves-Padín R, Monterroso C (2016b) Development and optimization of headspace (HS) and headspace-solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) for the determination of volatile fuel compounds in environmental samples. SJSS 6:230–243Google Scholar
  9. Bascom C (1986) Distribution of pyrophosphate extractable iron and organic carbon in soils of various groups. J Soil Sci 19:251–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bornemann LC, Kookana RS, Welp G (2007) Differential sorption behaviour of aromatic hydrocarbons on charcoals prepared at different temperatures from grass and wood. Chemosphere 67:1033–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Breus IP, Mishchenko AA (2006) Sorption of volatile organic contaminants by soils (a review). Eurasian Soil Sci 39:1271–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cech M, Davis P, Gambardella F, Haskamp A, Herrero González P, Spence M, Larivé JF (2017) Performance of European cross-country oil pipelines: Statistical summary of reported spillages in 2015 and since 1971. CONCAWE ReportsGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen B, Yuan M (2011) Enhanced sorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by soil amended with biochar. J Soils Sediments 11:62–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen B, Zhou D, Zhu L (2008) Transitional adsorption and partition of nonpolar and polar aromatic contaminants by biochars of pine needles with different pyrolytic temperatures. Environ Sci Technol 42:5137–5143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen Y, Camps-Arbestain M, Shen Q, Singh B, Cayuela ML (2018) The long-term role of organic amendments in building soil nutrient fertility: a meta-analysis and review. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 111(2–3):103–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chiou CT, Kile DE, Rutherford DW, Sheng G, Boyd SA (2000) Sorption of selected organic compounds from water to a peat soil and its humic-acid and humin fractions: potential sources of the sorption nonlinearity. Environ Sci Technol 34:1254–1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chun Y, Sheng G, Chiou GT, Xing B (2004) Compositions and sorptive properties of crop residue-derived chars. Environ Sci Technol 38:4649–4655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Compton HR, Prince GR, Fredericks SC, Gussman CD (2003) Phytoremediation of dissolved phase organic compounds: optimal site considerations relative to field case studies. Remediation 13:21–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cornelissen G, Gustafsson Ö, Bucheli TD, Jonker MTO, Koelmans AA, Van Noort PCM (2005) Extensive sorption of organic compounds to black carbon, coal, and kerogen in sediments and soils: mechanisms and consequences for distribution, bioaccumulation, and biodegradation. Environ Sci Technol 39:6881–6895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De Toledo RA, Hin Chao U, Shen T, Lu Q, Li X, Shim H (2018) Development of hybrid processes for the removal of volatile organic compounds, plasticizer, and pharmaceutically active compound using sewage sludge, waste scrap tyres, and wood chips as sorbents and microbial immobilisation matrices. Environ Sci Pollut Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2877-2
  21. Fakhru'l-Razi A, Pendashteh A, Abdullah LC, Biak DR, Madaeni SS, Abidin ZZ (2009) Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment. J Hazard Mater 170:530–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fayemiwo OM, Daramola MO, Moothi K (2017) BTEX compounds in water - future trends and directions for water treatment. Water SA 43:602–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fingas M (2012) Oil spills in the basic of oil spill cleanup. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fiorentin LD, Trigueros DEG, Módenes AN, Espinoza-Quiñones FR, Pereira NC, Barros STD, Santos OAA (2010) Biosorption of reactive blue 5G dye onto drying orange bagasse in batch system: kinetic and equilibrium modelling. Chem Eng J 163:68–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fries MR, Zhou J, Chee-Sanford J, Tiedje JM (1994) Isolation, characterization, and distribution of denitrifying toluene degraders from a variety of habitats. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:2802–2810Google Scholar
  26. Goss K-U, Schwarzenbach RP (2003) Rules of thumb for assessing equilibrium partitioning of organic compounds: successes and pitfalls. J Chem Educ 80:450–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gupta R, Kulkarni GU (2011) Removal of organic compounds from water by using a gold nanoparticle–poly (dimethylsiloxane) nanocomposite foam. ChemSusChem 4:737–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harvey O, Kuo L, Zimmerman A, Louchouarn P, Amonette J, Herbert BE (2012) An index-based approach to assessing recalcitrance and soil carbon sequestration potential of engineered black carbons (biochars). Environ Sci Technol 46:1415–1421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. ITOF (2017) Oil tanker spill statistics 2016. Impact PR & Design Limited, CanterburyGoogle Scholar
  30. Jecu L, Gheorghe A, Popea F, Rosu A, Stoica A, Stroescu M (2008) Potential of microbial species in biodegradation of volatile organic compounds from waters. Chem Eng Trans 14:501–507Google Scholar
  31. Kanai H, Inouye V, Goo R, Chow R, Yazawa L, Maka J (1994) GC/MS analysis of MTBE, ETBE, and TAME in gasolines. Anal Chem 66:924–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kim D, Song W, Lu JC (2011) Interdisciplinary investigation of contaminants fate and transport at a former UST site (10-year case study). Environ Earth Sci 64:277–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kookan R, Graber E, Smernik R (2017) Guiding principles for measuring sorption of organic compounds on biochars. In: Singh B, Camps-Arbestain M, Lehmann J (eds) . Biochar a guide to analytical methods. CSIRO Publishing, Clayton South, pp 141–150Google Scholar
  34. Kuppusamy S, Thavamani P, Megharaj M, Venkateswarly K, Naidu R (2016) Agronomic and remedial benefits and risks of applying biochar to soil: current knowledge and future research directions. Environ Int 87:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kupryianchyk D, Hale S, Zimmerman AR, Harvey O, Rutherford D, Abiven S, Knicker H, Schmidt HP, Rumpel C, Cornelissen G (2016) Sorption of hydrophobic organic compounds to a diverse suite of carbonaceous materials with emphasis on biochar. Chemosphere 144:879–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lattao C, Cao X, Mao J, Schmidt-Rohr K, Pignatello JJ (2014) Influence of molecular structure and adsorbent properties on sorption of organic compounds to a temperature series of wood chars. Environ Sci Technol 48:4790–4798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management: an introduction. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology, 1st edn. Earthscan, London, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  38. Lehmann J, Abiven S, Kleber M, Pan G, Singh BP, Sohi SP, Zimmerman AR (2015) Persistence of biochar in soil. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: Science, technology and implementation, 2nd edn. Earthscan, London, pp 289–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Limousin G, Gaudet JP, Charlet L, Szenknect S, Barthès V, Krimissa M (2007) Sorption isotherms:a review on physical bases, modelling and measurement. Appl Geochem 22:249–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moore FP, Barac T, Borremans B, Oeyen L, Vangronsveld J, van der Lelie D, Campbell CD, Moore ERB (2006) Endophytic bacterial diversity in poplar trees growing on a BTEX-contaminated site: the characterisation of isolates with potential to enhance phytoremediation. Syst Appl Microbiol 29:539–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Paulauskiene T, Jucike I, Juščenko N, Baziuke D (2014) The use of natural sorbents for spilled crude oil and diesel cleanup from the water surface. Water Air Soil Pollut 225:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pointner M, Kuttner P, Obrlik T, Jäger A, Kahr H (2014) Composition of corncobs as a substrate for fermentation of biofuels. Agron Res 12:391–396Google Scholar
  43. Sander M, Pignatello JJ (2005) Characterization of charcoal adsorption sites for aromatic compounds: insights drawn from single-solute and bi-solute competitive experiments. Environ Sci Technol 39:1606–1615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sano T, Hasegawa M, Kawakami Y, Yanagishita H (1995) Separation of methanol/methyl-tert-butyl ether mixture by pervaporation using silicalite membrane. J Membr Sci 107:193–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Scheufele FB, Módenes AN, Borba CE, Ribeiro C, Espinoza-Quiñones FR, Bergamasco R, Pereira NC (2016) Monolayer–multilayer adsorption phenomenological model: kinetics, equilibrium and thermodynamics. Chem Eng J 284:1328–1341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Serrano A, Gallego M (2006) Sorption study of 25 volatile organic compounds in several Mediterranean soils using headspace-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1118:261–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Silvani L, Vrchotova B, Kastanek P, Demnerova K, Pettiti I, Papini MP (2017) Characterizing biochar as alternative sorbent for oil spill remediation. Sci Rep 7:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Site AD (2001) Factors affecting sorption of organic compounds in natural sorbent/water systems and sorption coefficients for selected pollutants. a review. J Phys Chem Ref Data 30:187–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Smernik RJ (2009) Biochar and sorption of organic compounds. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: Science and technology, 1st edn. Earthscan, London, pp 289–300Google Scholar
  50. Sun K, Jin J, Keiluweit M, Kleber M, Wang Z, Pan Z, Xing B (2012) Polar and aliphatic domains regulate sorption of phthalic acid esters (PAEs) to biochars. Bioresour Technol 118:120–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows User's guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer PowerGoogle Scholar
  52. Tirol-Padre A, Ladha J (2004) Assessing the reliability of permanganate oxidizable carbon as an index of soil labile carbon. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:969–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Uchimiya M, Wartelle LH, Klasson KT, Fortier CA, Lima IM (2011) Influence of pyrolysis temperature on biochar property and function as a heavy metal sorbent in soil. J Agric Food Chem 59:2501–2510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. USEPA (2010) Waste and cleanup risk assessment glossary. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/oswer/riskassessment/glossary.htm. Accessed 1 July 2015
  55. Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weishaar JA, Tsao D, Burken JG (2009) Phytoremediation of BTEX hydrocarbons: potential impacts of diurnal groundwater fluctuation on microbial degradation. Int J Phytoremediation 11:509–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wijmans JG, Kamaruddin HD, Segelke SV, Wessling SV, Baker RW (2006) Removal of dissolved VOCs from water with an air stripper/membrane vapor separation system. Sep Sci Technol 32:2267–2287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wilbur S, Bosch S (2004) Interaction profile for: Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX). Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  59. Xiao L, Bi E, Du B, Zhao X, Xing C (2014) Surface characterization of maize-straw-derived biochars and their sorption performance for MTBE and benzene. Environ Earth Sci 71:5195–5205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Xiao X, Chen Z, Chen B (2016) H/C atomic ratio as a smart linkage between pyrolytic temperatures, aromatic clusters and sorption properties of biochars derived from diverse precursory materials. Sci Rep 6:22644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zadaka-Amir D, Nasser A, Nir S, Mishael YG (2012) Removal of methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) from water by polymer-zeolite composites. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 151:216–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zaib Q, Aina OD, Ahmad F (2014) Using multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) for oilfield produced water treatment with environmentally acceptable endpoints. Environ Sci: Processes Impacts 16:2039–2047Google Scholar
  63. Zhang M, Lu L (2016) Biochar for organic contaminant management in water and wastewater. In: Sik Ok Y, Uchimiya SM, Chang SX, Bolan N (eds) Biochar: production, characterization, and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 221–244Google Scholar
  64. Zhang X, McGrouther K, He L, Huang H, Lu K, Wang H (2015) Biochar for organic Contaminant Management in Soil. In: Sik Ok Y, Uchimiya SM, Chang SX, Bolan N (eds) Biochar: production, characterization, and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 140–165Google Scholar
  65. Zhang X, Gao B, Zheng Y, Hu X, Creamer AE, Annable MD, Li Y (2017) Biochar for volatile organic compound (VOC) removal: sorption performance and governing mechanisms. Bioresour Technol 245:606–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhao L, Cao X, Mašek O, Zimmerman A (2013) Heterogeneity of biochar properties as a function of feedstock sources and production temperatures. J Hazard Mater 256–257:1–9Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruth Saiz-Rubio
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • María Balseiro-Romero
    • 1
    • 3
  • Juan Antelo
    • 2
  • Elena Díez
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sarah Fiol
    • 2
    • 4
  • Felipe Macías
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Soil Science and Agricultural ChemistryUniversidade de Santiago de CompostelaSantiago de CompostelaSpain
  2. 2.Technological Research InstituteUniversidade de Santiago de CompostelaSantiago de CompostelaSpain
  3. 3.UMR ECOSYS, AgroParisTechUniversité Paris-SaclayThiverval-GrignonFrance
  4. 4.Department of Physical ChemistryUniversidade de Santiago de CompostelaSantiago de CompostelaSpain

Personalised recommendations