Advertisement

Toxicity of exogenous antimony to the soil-dwelling springtail Folsomia candida

  • Xianglong Lin
  • Zaijin Sun
  • Long Zhao
  • Feiyue Fan
  • Jin Ma
  • Shutingi Zhao
  • Hong HouEmail author
Research Article
  • 61 Downloads

Abstract

Antimony (Sb) is a toxic pollutant, but data for Sb toxicity to springtails in soil are limited, and the effects of Sb speciation, soil physiochemical properties, and aging time on Sb toxicity have not been investigated. To address this, the effects of Sb on Folsomia candida were evaluated in laboratory studies. The results demonstrated that compared with Sb(III), no significant change in mortality was observed in Sb(V)-treated soil, but the EC50 value for the reproduction was 28-fold higher than that of Sb(III). Sb(III) toxicity was very different in four soils. The LC50 values for the survival were 2325–5107 mg kg−1 in the acute test and 605–2682 mg kg−1 in the chronic test, and the EC50 values for the reproduction were 293–2317 mg kg−1. The toxicity discrepancies were associated with the variations in oxidation potential and sorption capacity among corresponding soils. Toxicity significantly positively correlated with the clay and amorphous iron content but significantly negatively correlated with pH. Long-term aging markedly decreased Sb(III) toxicity, and the EC50 and LC50 values were unexpectedly higher than the highest test concentration in soil aged for 180 days. Sb(III) toxicity was probably modified more by oxidation than by changes in the available Sb fraction during aging.

Keywords

Toxicity test Folsomia candida Antimony speciation Soil properties Aging time 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Song Jing and Zhu Dong for providing the Folsomia candida, the anonymous reviewers for helping us to improve the manuscript, and Gareth Thomas, PhD, from Liwen Bianji, Edanz Group China (www.liwenbianji.cn/ac), for editing the English text of a draft of this manuscript.

Funding information

This work was financed by the “Research on Migration/Transformation and Safety Threshold of Heavy Metals in Farmland Systems” (2016YFD0800400), National Key Research and Development Program of China.

References

  1. Allison LE (1960) Wet-combustion apparatus and procedure for organic and inorganic carbon in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 24(1):36–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. An YJ, Kim SW, Lee WM (2013) The collembola Lobella sokamensis, juvenile as a new soil quality indicator of heavy metal pollution. Ecol Indic 27(4):56–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baek YW, Lee WM, Jeong SW, An YJ (2014) Ecological effects of soil antimony on the crop plant growth and earthworm activity. Environ Earth Sci 71(2):895–900.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2492-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buch AC, Niemeyer JC, Correia MEF, Silva-Filho EV (2016) Ecotoxicity of mercury to Folsomia candida, and Proisotoma minuta, (Collembola:Isotomidae) in tropical soils: baseline for ecological risk assessment. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 127:22–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cai YB, Mi YT, Zhang H (2016) Kinetic modeling of antimony (III) oxidation and sorption in soils. J Hazard Mater 316:102–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.05.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dohrmann R (2006) Cation exchange capacity methodology. II: a modified silver-thiourea method. Appl Clay Sci 34(1):38–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2006.02.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duester L, Geest HGVD, Moelleken S, Hirner AV, Kueppers K (2011) Comparative phytotoxicity of methylated and inorganic arsenic- and antimony species to Lemna minor, Wolffia arrhiza and Selenastrum capricornutum. Microchem J 97:30–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2010.05.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fan JX, Wang YJ, Cui XD, Zhou DM (2013) Sorption isotherms and kinetics of Sb(V) on several Chinese soils with different physicochemical properties. J Soils Sediments 13(2):344–353.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-012-0612-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fan JX, Wang YJ, Fan TT, Cui XD, Zhou DM (2014) Photo-induced oxidation of Sb(III) on goethite. Chemosphere 95(1):295–300.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.08.094 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Filella M, Belzile N, Chen YW (2002) Antimony in the environment: a review focused on natural waters I. Occurrence. Earth Sci Rev 57(1–2):125–176.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-8252(01)00070-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Flynn HC, Meharg AA, Bowyer PK, Paton GI (2003) Antimony bioavailability in mine soils. Environ Pollut 124(1):93–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(02)00411-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fountain MT, Hopkin SP (2004) Biodiversity of collembola in urban soils and the use of Folsomia candida to assess soil ‘quality’. Ecotoxicology 13(6):555–572.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ECTX.0000037192.70167.00 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fountain MT, Hopkin SP (2005) Folsomia candida (collembola): a “standard” soil arthropod. Annu Rev Entomol 50(1):201–222.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.50.071803.130331 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gebel T (1997) Arsenic and antimony: comparative approach on mechanistic toxicology. Chem Biol Interact 107(3):131–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2797(97)00087-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guillamot F, Calvert V, Millot MV, Criquet S (2014) Does antimony affect microbial respiration in Mediterranean soils? A microcosm experiment. Pedobiologia 57:119–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2014.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hammel W, Steubing L, Debus R (1998) Assessment of the ecotoxic potential of soil contaminants by using a soil-algae test. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 40(1–2):173–176.  https://doi.org/10.1006/eesa.1998.1659 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. He MC, Yang JR (1999) Effects of different forms of antimony on rice during the period of germination and growth and antimony concentration in rice tissue. Sci Total Environ 243–244:149–155.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00370-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. He MC, Wang NN, Long XJ, Zhang CJ, Ma CL, Zhong QY, Wang AH, Wang Y, Pervaiz A, Shan J (2018) Antimony speciation in the environment: recent advances in understanding the biogeochemical processes and ecological effects. J Environ Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2018.05.023
  19. Herath I, Vithanage M, Bundschuh J (2017) Antimony as a global dilemma: geochemistry, mobility, fate and transport. Environ Pollut 223:545–559.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.01.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hou H, Yao N, Li JN, Wei Y, Zhao L, Zhang J, Li FS (2013) Migration and leaching risk of extraneous antimony in three representative soils of China: lysimeter and batch experiments. Chemosphere 93(9):1980–1988.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.07.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ISO 11267 (1999) Soil quality—inhibition of reproduction of Collembola (Folsomia candida) by soil pollutants. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnson CA, Moench H, Wersin P, Kugler P, Wenger C (2005) Solubility of antimony and other elements in samples taken from shooting ranges. J Environ Qual 34(1):248–254.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2005.0248 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Krachler M, Shotyk W, Emons H (2001) Digestion procedures for the determination of antimony and arsenic in small amounts of peat samples by hydride generation–atomic absorption spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 432(2):303–310.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)01364-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kuperman RG, Checkai RT, Simini M, Phillips CT, Speicher JA, Barclift DJ (2006) Toxicity benchmarks for antimony, barium, and beryllium determined using reproduction endpoints for Folsomia candida, Eisenia fetida, and Enchytraeus crypticus. Environ Toxicol Chem 25(3):754–762.  https://doi.org/10.1897/04-545R.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leuz AK, Mönch H, Johnson CA (2006) Sorption of Sb(III) and Sb(V) to goethite: influence on Sb(III) oxidation and mobilization. Environ Sci Technol 40(23):7277–7282.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es061284b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu YR, Li J, He JZ, Ma YB, Zheng YM (2015) Different influences of field aging on nickel toxicity to Folsomia candida in two types of soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(11):1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3968-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lock K, Janssen CR (2003) Comparative toxicity of a zinc salt, zinc powder and zinc oxide to Eisenia fetida, Enchytraeus albidus and Folsomia candida. Chemosphere 53(8):851–856.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00593-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moser T. (2007) Acute and reproduction toxicity of antimony trioxide aged residues in contaminated soil according to the International Standard ISO 11267 (1999) Soil quality—inhibition of reproduction of Collembola (Folsomia candida) by soil pollutants for International Antimony Oxide Industry Association (IAOIA)Google Scholar
  29. Oorts K, Smolders E (2009) Ecological threshold concentrations for antimony in water and soil. Environ Chem 6(2):116–121.  https://doi.org/10.1071/EN08109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oorts K, Gasco G, Smolders E (2005) Toxicity of antimony in the terrestrial environment. Research project for the International Antimony Oxide Industry Association (IAOIA). IAOIA, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  31. Oorts K, Ghesquiere U, Smolders E (2007) Leaching and Aging decrease nickel toxicity to soil microbial processes in soils freshly spiked with nickel chloride. Environ Toxicol Chem 26 (6):1130–1138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Oorts K, Smolders E, Degryse F, Buekers J, Gascó G, Cornelis G, Mertens J (2008) Solubility and toxicity of antimony trioxide (Sb2O3) in soil. Environ Sci Technol 42:4378–4383.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es703061t CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pierart A, Shahid M, Séjalon-Delmas N, Dumat C (2015) Antimony bioavailability: knowledge and research perspective for sustainable agriculture. J Hazard Mater 289:219–234.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.201-5.02.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Qi PF, Pichler T (2016) Sequential and simultaneous adsorption of Sb(III) and Sb(V) on ferrihydrite: implications for oxidation and competition. Chemosphere 145:55–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.11.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Qin DY, Liu JX, Zhang XZ (2009) Application of speciation analysis for mercury and antimony by atomic fluorescence spectrometry speciation analyzer. Moder Sci Instrum 2009(2):74–77 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  36. Shtangeeva I, Steinnes E, Lierhagen S (2012) Uptake of different forms of antimony by wheat and rye seedlings. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19(2):502–509.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-011-0589-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smolders E, Oorts K, Van Sprang P, Schoeters I, Janssen CR, McGrath SP, McLaughlin MJ (2009) Toxicity of trace metals in soil as affected by soil type and aging after contamination: using calibrated bioavailability models to set ecological soil standards. Environ Toxicol Chem 28(8):1633–1642.  https://doi.org/10.1897/08-592.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tisarum R, Lessl JT, Dong X, de Oliveira LM, Rathinasabapathi B, Ma LQ (2014) Antimony uptake, efflux and speciation in arsenic hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata. Environ Pollut 186:110–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.11.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tschan M, Robinson B, Johnson CA, Bürgi A, Schulin R (2010) Antimony uptake and toxicity in sunflower and maize growing in SbIII and SbV contaminated soil. Plant Soil 334(1–2):235–245.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0378-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. van Gestel CAM (1997) Scientific basis for extrapolating results from soil ecotoxicity tests to field conditions and the use of bioassays. In: Van Straalen NM, Løkke H (eds) Ecological risk assessment of contaminants in soil. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 25–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xianglong Lin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zaijin Sun
    • 1
  • Long Zhao
    • 1
  • Feiyue Fan
    • 1
  • Jin Ma
    • 1
  • Shutingi Zhao
    • 3
  • Hong Hou
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk AssessmentChinese Research Academy of Environmental SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.College of Water SciencesBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.Yunnan Agricultural UniversityKunmingChina

Personalised recommendations