Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 1733–1750 | Cite as

What determines compliance with cleaner production? An appraisal of the tanning industry in Sialkot, Pakistan

  • Ihtsham Ul Haq PaddaEmail author
  • Muhammad Asim
Research Article
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

Leather tanneries which produce significant amounts of solid waste, effluents, and emissions are a major contributor to industrial waste. A cleaner production program was launched by the government of Pakistan to implement the cleaner production measures for tanneries of Sialkot from 1999 to 2005. The main objective of this study is to identify the impact of a cleaner production program, along with other determinants of a cleaner production in the leather industry. The study analyses firm-level primary data collected from leather tanneries in Sialkot. The primary data were collected from tanneries in Sialkot. The econometric analysis is conducted using the Poisson regression analysis. Overall results show that there is no significant impact of cleaner production in 2015, while the panel data results indicate that the effect of cleaner production support by CPC on cleaner production practices diminished once the support came to an end. The other main factor is firm size, which indicates the financial position of the firm; international and regulator pressures are major determinants of the adoption of cleaner production measures. The analysis also indicates that there is higher probability of large firms adopting a cleaner production in comparison with small ones. Export orientation of firms is another important determinant of cleaner production. The enforcement of the environment compliance laws also has positive effect. The compliance with cleaner production measures is quite low, at 6.4 out of 19 cleaner production practice measures. There is a need to adopt measures that are environmentally friendly and are favorable towards both labor health and product quality, which are important for the sustainable growth of the tanning industry.

Keywords

Cleaner production Environment regulations Social activism International pressure 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study has been undertaken with the financial support provided by the South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics (SANDEE). We are indebted to Jean Marie Baland for his invaluable guidance. His contribution to bring the study to into its present shape was considerable. We are also thankful to Priya Shyamsundar for help with proposal development and encouragement at every stage of the study. We are also indebted to Eswaran Somanathan, Enamul Haq, Celine Nauges, Heman Lohano and Mani Nepal for their invaluable guidance and support during the course of research.

References

  1. Anton WR (2005) The choice of management practices: what determines the design of an Environmental Management System? Annual Meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Association, July 24–27, 2005, Providence, Rhode IslandGoogle Scholar
  2. Anton WRQ, Deltas G, Khanna M (2004) Incentives for environmental self-regulation and implications for environmental performance. J Environ Econ Manag 48(1):632–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bickerdyke I, Lattimore R (1997) Reducing the regulatory burden: does firm size matter? Industry Commission, AGPS, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  4. Blackman A (2008) Can voluntary environmental regulation work in developing countries? Lessons from case studies. Policy Stud J 36(1):119–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blackman A (2010a) Adoption of clean leather-tanning technologies in Mexico. Environ Econ Policy Stud 12(3):115–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blackman A (2010b) Alternative pollution control policies in developing countries. Rev Environ Econ Policy 4(2):234–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blackman A, Kildegaard A (2010) Clean technological change in developing-country industrial clusters: Mexican leather tanning. Environ Econ Policy Stud 12:115–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blackman A Sisto N (2005) Muddling through while environmental regulatory capacity evolves: What role for voluntary agreements? Discussion Paper 05–16, Resources for the Future,Washing DCGoogle Scholar
  9. Christmann P, Taylor G (2006) Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation. J Int Bus Stud 37(6):863–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dandira V, Mugwindiri K, Chikuku T (2012) A cleaner production exercise of a leather manufacturing company: a Zimbabwean experience. Int J Sci Technol Res 1(11):97–101Google Scholar
  11. Dasgupta S, Hettige H, Wheeler D (2000) What improves environmental compliance? Evidence from Mexican industry. J Environ Econ Manag 39(1):39–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Delmas MA, Toffel MW (2008) Organizational responses to environmental demands: opening the black box. Strateg Manag J 29(10):1027–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Escobar N, Chávez C (2013) Monitoring, firms’ compliance and imposition of fines: evidence from the Federal Industrial Inspection Program in Mexico City. Environ Dev Econ 18(6):723–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Florida R, Davison D (2001) Gaining from green management: environmental management systems inside and outside the factory. Calif Manag Rev 43(3):64–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frondel M, Horbach J, Rennings K (2007) End-of-pipe or cleaner production? An empirical comparison of environmental innovation decisions across OECD countries. Bus Strateg Environ 16(8):571–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gangadharan L (2006) Environmental compliance by firms in the manufacturing sector in Mexico. Ecol Econ 59(4):477–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garai J (2014) Environmental aspects and health risks of leather tanning industry: a study in the Hazaribag area. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment 12(3):278–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ghafoor A, Zafar M (2014) Determinants of leather exports from Pakistan: a time series analysis. VFAST Transactions on Education and Social Sciences 5(2):77–86Google Scholar
  19. González del Rio P (2009) The empirical analysis of the determinants for environmental technological change: a research agenda. Ecol Econ 68:861–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gordon K, O’Connor K (2010) Playing fair? Ethos 18(3):9Google Scholar
  21. Government of Pakistan (2015) Pakistan economic survey 2014–2015. Ministry of Finance, IslamabadGoogle Scholar
  22. Hashmi GJ, Dastageer G, Sajid MS, Ali Z, Malik MF, Liaqat I (2017) Leather industry and environment: Pakistan scenario. Int J Appl Biol Forensic 1(2):20–25Google Scholar
  23. Hemachandra DWK (2015) Adoption of voluntary environmental practices: evidence from the textile and apparel industry in Sri Lanka, SANDEE Working Paper No. 93–15, South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics (SANDEE), Kathmandu, NepalGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoogendoorn B, Guerra D, van der Zwan P (2014) What drives environmental practices of SMEs? Small Bus Econ 44:759–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lan J, Munro A (2013) Environmental compliance and human capital: evidence from Chinese industrial firms. Resour Energy Econ 35(4):534–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li X, Hamblin D (2016) Factors impacting on cleaner production: case studies of Chinese pharmaceutical manufacturers in Tianjin, China. J Clean Prod 131:121–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Luken R, Navratil J (2004) A programmatic review of UNIDO/UNEP national cleaner Production centres. J Clean Prod 12:195–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mahmood T, Iqbal ZM (1995) Vegetation and soil characteristics of the wasteland of Valika chemical industries near Manghopir, Karachi. J Arid Environ 30:453–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maqbool A, Ali S, Rizwan M, Ishaque W, Rasool N, Rehman MZ, Bashir A, Abid M, Wu L (2018) Management of tannery wastewater for improving growth attributes and reducing chromium uptake in spinach through citric acid application. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:10848–10856.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1352-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maxwell JW, Lyon TP (2000) Self regulation and social welfare: the political economy of corporate environmentalism. J Law Econ 43:583–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mudalige UKJ, Udagama JMM (2013) Role of regulation for firms to adopt environmental controls: an analysis based on panel data solid waste management in agri-food processing sector in Sri Lanka. Journal of Environmental Professionals Sri Lanka 2(1):65–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nadvi K (1999) The cutting edge: collective efficiency and international competitiveness in Pakistan. Oxf Dev Stud 27(1):81–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nazer DW, Al-Sa'ed RM, Siebel MA (2006) Reducing the environmental impact of the unhairing-liming process in the leather tanning industry. J Clean Prod 14(1):65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. OECD (2007) Small businesses and environmental compliance: review and possible application of international experience in Georgia. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  35. Pakistan Tanners Association (PTA) (2018). Available on http://www.pakistantanners.org/. Accessed 30 Sept 2018
  36. PCRWR (2007) Water quality report 2003–2004. Available at: http://www.pakistantanners.org/industrial_statistics.html [Accessed in 2017]
  37. Polinsky AM, Shavell S (2000) The economic theory of public enforcement of law. J Econ Lit 36:45–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Priyadarshini K, Gupta OK (2003) Compliance to environmental regulations: the Indian context. Int J Bus Econ 2(1):9–28Google Scholar
  39. Rabelo LM, Guimarães ATB, de Souza JM, da Silva WAM, de Oliveira Mendes B, de Oliveira Ferreira R, de Lima Rodrigues AS, Malafaia G (2018) Correction to: histological liver chances in Swiss mice caused by tannery effluent. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:16267–16268.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1805-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roy C (2012) A study on environmental compliance of Indian leather industry and its far-reaching impact on leather exports. Foreign Trade Review 47(2):3–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sáez-Martínez F, González-Moreno A, Hogan T (2014) The role of university in eco-entrepreneurship: evidence from the Eurobarometer Survey on attitudes of European entrepreneurs towards eco-innovation. Environ Eng Manag J 10:2541–2549Google Scholar
  42. Sáez-Martínez F, Díaz-García C, González-Moreno Á (2016) Factors promoting environmental responsibility in European SMEs: the effect on performance. Sustainability 8:898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Samad G, Gulzar W, Ahmad V (2015) Environmental regulations and compliance in the textile processing sector in Pakistan: empirical evidence. SANDEE Working Paper No. 98–15, South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics (SANDEE), Kathmandu, NepalGoogle Scholar
  44. Sarkis J, Cordeiro JJ (2001) An empirical evaluation of environmental efficiencies and firm performance: pollution prevention versus end-of-pipe practice. Eur J Oper Res 135(1):102–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schjolden A (2000) Leather tanning in India: environmental regulations and firms’ compliance, FIL Working Papers, No. 21, Forurensende Industri-Lokalisering, Oslo, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  46. Sial SA (2018) Review of existing environmental laws and regulations in Pakistan. WWF-Pakistan. Available at https://wwfpak.org/consultancy/images/10517_environmentallaws.pdf
  47. Siddiqui A, Uroos A, Nadeem F (2016) Sectoral competitiveness and value chain analysis: leather gloves value chain analysis in Pakistan. Trade development authority of Pakistan. Available at http://trtapakistan.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/leather-final-report.pdf
  48. Tariq SR (2006) Correlation studies on trade trace metal levels in effluents in relation to soil and water in proximity of tanneries, Pakistan, PhD Thesis, Quid-e-Azam University, IslamabadGoogle Scholar
  49. Tariq SR, Shaheen N, Khalique A, Shah MH (2010) Distribution, correlation, and source apportionment of selected metals in tannery effluents, related soils, and groundwater—a case study from Multan, Pakistan. Environ Monit Assess 166(1–4):303–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. TDAP (2018) Football Diplomacy of Pakistan, retrived on 2018-09-30 from https://www.tdap.gov.pk/pdf/Press-Release-Football-Diplomacy.pdf
  51. Teixeira AA, Jabbour CJC, Jabbour ABLS (2012) Relationship between green management and environmental training in companies located in Brazil: a theoretical framework and case studies. Int J Prod Econ 140(1):318–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. The Punjab Environmental Protection Act 1997 (n.d.) http://punjablaws.gov.pk/laws/2192a.html
  53. The Punjab environmental protection Act 2012 (n.d.) (XXXV of 2012) available at http://www.punjabcode.punjab.gov.pk/ available on: 10-05-2018
  54. Uchida T, Ferraro PJ (2007) Voluntary development of environmental management systems: motivations and regulatory implications. J Regul Econ 32(1):37–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ullah R, Malik RN, Qadir A (2009) Assessment of groundwater contamination in an industrial city, Sialkot, Pakistan. Afr J Environ Sci Technol 3(12):429–446Google Scholar
  56. UNEP (1996) Cleaner production in leather industry: a workbook for trainers. Division of Technology, Industry and Economics, ParisGoogle Scholar
  57. UNIDO and UNEP (2015) National cleaner production centres: 20 years of achievement: towards decoupling resource use and environmental impact from manufacturing growth. Division of Technology, Industry and Economics, ParisGoogle Scholar
  58. Winter SC, May PJ (2001) Motivation for compliance with environmental regulations. J Policy Anal Manage 20(4):675–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. World Bank (2011) Implementable recommendations for cleaner production programs in Pakistan, Consultant report prepared for non-lending technical assistance for Ministry of Industries and Production, Government of Pakistan. World Bank, Washington D.CGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and TechnologyIslamabadPakistan
  2. 2.Preston UniversityIslamabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations