Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 1661–1674 | Cite as

Effect of n-butanol/diesel blends and piston bowl geometry on combustion and emission characteristics of CI engine

  • Siva Prasad KattelaEmail author
  • Rajesh Khana Raju Vysyaraju
  • Srinivasa Rao Surapaneni
  • Prabhakara Rao Ganji
Research Article


The present study describes the experimental and numerical analysis of the combustion and emission characteristics of CI engine operated with diesel-butanol blends. Experiments were carried with neat diesel fuel (i.e., Bu00) and its blends of n-butanol, 10%, 20% and 30% by volume (Bu10, Bu20 and Bu30) at a constant speed and rated load. From the experimental results, it is observed that CO, NOx and smoke emissions decreased, whereas the unburned hydrocarbon (UBHC) emission increased with increasing butanol content, as compared to Bu00. From the experimental analysis, it is also observed that Bu20 blend gives higher brake thermal efficiency (BTE) and lower brake specific energy consumption (BSEC) as compared to Bu00, Bu10 and Bu30, but produces higher UBHC. In order to decrease the UBHC emission, different piston bowl geometries were analysed using simulation studies. The combustion and emission characteristics of the CI engine operating with Bu20 blend for three different piston bowl geometries viz., hemispherical combustion chamber (HCC), shallow combustion chamber (SCC) and toroidal combustion chamber (TCC), were studied using CONVERGE CFD code. The simulation model was validated with experimental results of the baseline engine configuration (HCC) for diesel fuel as well as Bu20 blend. The results showed that there is a significant reduction in UBHC and improvement of performance for SCC and TCC piston geometry compared to HCC piston geometry. However, a slight increment of NOx emissions was observed.


Diesel-butanol blends CI engine HC emissions Piston geometry Performance and emissions 



Diesel-butanol blend, with (xy) percentage by volume of butanol


Hemi spherical Combustion Chamber


Brake specific energy consumption (J/kWh)


Before top dead centre


latent heat of vaporisation (kJ/kg)


Brake thermal efficiency (%)


Nitrogen oxides (g/kWh)


Compression ignition


Omega combustion chamber


Carbon monoxide (g/kWh)


Spark ignition


Computational fluid dynamics


Shallow combustion chamber


Direct injection


Toroidal combustion chamber


Exhaust gas recirculation


Unburned hydrocarbon (g/kWh)


Heat release rate (J/CAD)


Funding information

This work was supported by Centre for sustainable energy studies, NITW of Technical Education Quality Improvement Programme (TEQIP-II), India.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Chen Z, Wu Z, Liu J, Lee C (2014) Combustion and emissions characteristics of high n-butanol/diesel ratio blend in a heavy-duty diesel engine and EGR impact. Energy Convers Manag 78:787–795. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Doǧan O (2011) The influence of n-butanol/diesel fuel blends utilization on a small diesel engine performance and emissions. Fuel 90:2467–2472. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ganji PRAO, Singh RN, Raju VRK, Rao SS (2018) Design of piston bowl geometry for better combustion in direct-injection compression ignition engine. Sādhanā 43:1–9. Google Scholar
  4. Han Z, Uludogan A, Hampson GJ, Reitz RD (1996) Mechanism of soot and NOx emission reduction using multiple-injection in a diesel engine. SAE transactions 105:837–852Google Scholar
  5. Imran A, Varman M, Masjuki HH, Kalam MA (2013) Review on alcohol fumigation on diesel engine: a viable alternative dual fuel technology for satisfactory engine performance and reduction of environment concerning emission. Renew Sust Energ Rev 26:739–751. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jaichandar S, Annamalai K (2012) Influences of re-entrant combustion chamber geometry on the performance of Pongamia biodiesel in a DI diesel engine. Energy 44:633–640. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jaichandar S, Annamalai K (2013) Combined impact of injection pressure and combustion chamber geometry on the performance of a biodiesel fueled diesel engine. Energy 55:330–339. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jaichandar S, Senthil Kumar P, Annamalai K (2012) Combined effect of injection timing and combustion chamber geometry on the performance of a biodiesel fueled diesel engine. Energy 47:388–394. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Karabektas M, Hosoz M (2009) Performance and emission characteristics of a diesel engine using isobutanol-diesel fuel blends. Renew Energy 34:1554–1559. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kennedy IM (1997) Models of soot formation and oxidation. Prog Energy Combust Sci 23:95–132. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lapuerta M, García-Contreras R, Campos-Fernández J, Dorado MP (2010) Stability, lubricity, viscosity, and cold-flow properties of alcohol-diesel blends. Energy Fuel 24:4497–4502. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li J, Yang WM, An H, Maghbouli A, Chou SK (2014) Effects of piston bowl geometry on combustion and emission characteristics of biodiesel fueled diesel engines. Fuel 120:66–73. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nalgundwar A, Paul B, Sharma SK (2016) Comparison of performance and emissions characteristics of di CI engine fueled with dual biodiesel blends of palm and jatropha. Fuel 173:172–179. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Park S (2012) Optimization of combustion chamber geometry and engine operating conditions for compression ignition engines fueled with dimethyl ether. Fuel 97:61–71. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ra Y, Reitz RD (2009) A vaporization model for discrete multi-component fuel sprays. Int J Multiphase Flow 35:101–117. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rajesh Kumar B, Saravanan S (2016a) Use of higher alcohol biofuels in diesel engines: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 60:84–115. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rajesh Kumar B, Saravanan S (2016b) Effects of iso-butanol/diesel and n-pentanol/diesel blends on performance and emissions of a di diesel engine under premixed LTC (low temperature combustion) mode. Fuel 170:49–59. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rajesh Kumar B, Saravanan S, Rana D, Nagendran A (2016) A comparative analysis on combustion and emissions of some next generation higher-alcohol/diesel blends in a direct-injection diesel engine. Energy Convers Manag 119:246–256. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rakopoulos CD, Antonopoulos KA, Rakopoulos DC (2007) Experimental heat release analysis and emissions of a HSDI diesel engine fueled with ethanol-diesel fuel blends. Energy 32:1791–1808. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rakopoulos DC, Rakopoulos CD, Giakoumis EG, Dimaratos AM, Kyritsis DC (2010a) Effects of butanol-diesel fuel blends on the performance and emissions of a high-speed di diesel engine. Energy Convers Manag 51:1989–1997. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rakopoulos DC, Rakopoulos CD, Hountalas DT, Kakaras EC, Giakoumis EG, Papagiannakis RG (2010b) Investigation of the performance and emissions of bus engine operating on butanol/diesel fuel blends. Fuel 89:2781–2790. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reitz RD, Beale JC (1999) Modeling spray atomization with the kelvin-Helmholtz/Rayleigh-Taylor hybrid model. At Sprays 9:623–650. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Şahin Z, Aksu ON (2015) Experimental investigation of the effects of using low ratio n-butanol/diesel fuel blends on engine performance and exhaust emissions in a turbocharged DI diesel engine. Renew Energy 77:279–290. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Saravanan S, Rajesh Kumar B, Varadharajan A, Rana D, Sethuramasamyraja B, Lakshmi Narayana rao G (2017) Optimization of DI diesel engine parameters fueled with iso-butanol/diesel blends – response surface methodology approach. Fuel 203:658–670. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Siwale L, Kristóf L, Adam T, Bereczky A, Mbarawa M, Penninger A, Kolesnikov A (2013) Combustion and emission characteristics of n-butanol / diesel fuel blend in a turbo-charged compression ignition engine. Fuel 107:409–418. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Taylor P, Han Z, Reitz RD (2007) Combustion Science and Technology Turbulence Modeling of Internal Combustion Engines Using RNG κ - ε Models Turbulence Modeling of Internal Combustion Engines Using RNG k-E Models. 37–41Google Scholar
  27. Wang H, Deneys Reitz R, Yao M, Yang B, Jiao Q, Qiu L (2013) Development of an n-heptane-n-butanol-PAH mechanism and its application for combustion and soot prediction. Combust Flame 160:504–519. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang ZH, Chua SM, Balasubramanian R (2016) Comparative evaluation of the effect of butanol-diesel and pentanol-diesel blends on carbonaceous particulate composition and particle number emissions from a diesel engine. Fuel 176:40–47. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Institute of Technology WarangalWarangalIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Institute of Technology Andhra PradeshTadepalligudamIndia

Personalised recommendations