Is the World Health Organization predicted exposure assessment model for space spraying of insecticides applicable to agricultural farmers?
- 40 Downloads
Agricultural farmers in developing countries are at high risk of pesticide exposure and adverse effects because of unsafe practices and inappropriate legislation. Biological monitoring is considered a useful tool for pesticide exposure assessment; however, its use is limited in developing countries due to a lack of techniques and resources such as laboratory analysis, trained staff and budgets. This study examines whether the World Health Organization predicted exposure assessment model (WHO-PEAM) is a suitable alternative tool for assessing insecticide exposure among agricultural farmers. WHO-PEAM was used to predict daily doses (PDD) of chlorpyrifos for a group of Vietnamese rice farmers using a set of exposure parameters obtained from a questionnaire survey of participant famers during a field study. These results were compared to absorbed daily doses (ADD) of chlorpyrifos for the farmers measured using a biological monitoring program, in which 24-h urine samples were collected and analysed for the chlorpyrifos metabolite, 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol (TCP) using LC/MS. Validation of the model results was tested using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (WSR) and two-way mixed-model intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The mean of total ADD was 20 μg/kg/day while that of total PDD was 22 μg/kg/day. The WSR test revealed no statistically significant difference in the average values of ADDT and PDDT. ICC indicated substantial agreement for both single and average measures between ADDT and PDDT (ICC, 0.62 and 0.77, respectively). The results demonstrate that a refined WHO-PEAM model can be readily used as a field method, without biological monitoring, to evaluate chlorpyrifos exposure among agricultural farmers in Vietnam and similar developing countries.
KeywordsInsecticide Exposure assessment Agricultural farmer WHO exposure model Biological monitoring
This research was supported by a Griffith University Postdoctoral Research Fellowship (#2640731).
Compliance with ethical standards
The biological monitoring program was approved for ethical clearance by Griffith University Human Research Committee (HREC) and issued with authorization to be commenced from 14/04/2009 SU Protocol Number ENV/04/09/HERC).
- Aponso ML, Exposure and Assessment for Farmers Occupationally Exposed to Chlopyrifos. Annals of Sri Lanka Department of Agriculture 2002;4:233–244Google Scholar
- Cohen J, (1988) Statistical power analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
- Cowles J, Penn M & Quin R (1998) Magnitude of chlorpyrifos residues in rice treated with Lorsban 30EC Insecticide in Vietnam GHF-P 1792. Dow AgroSciences. UnpublishedGoogle Scholar
- Dung NH 2006. The case of farmers in Rice production in the Mekong Delta Vietnam. Sub-regional conference on Proverty environment Nexus - LAO PDRGoogle Scholar
- Graber MA, Toth PP & Herting RL 1997. University of Iowa Family Practice Handbook. 3rd Edition Department of Family Medicine, University of Iowa College of medicineGoogle Scholar
- Hung LM (2003) Economic characteristics of population of Vietnam. Population Census Conference, Japan, p 2003Google Scholar
- IBM CORP 2011. Released 2011. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
- Jayjock MA et al (2007) Modeling framework for human exposure assessment. Journal Of Exposure Science And Environmental Epidemiology 17: p S81Google Scholar
- Kappa-Skrzypczak L, Cyranka M, Skrzypczak M, Kruszewski M (2011) Biological and biomarlers of organophosphate pesticides exposure - state of the art. Ann Agr Environ Med 18:294–303Google Scholar
- OECD 1997. Guidance document for teh conduct of studies of occupational exposure to pesticides during agricultural applicationGoogle Scholar
- PSD 2007. UK predictive operator exposure model (POEM): a user's guide. York, England, pesticide safety directorate. In: www.pesticides.gov.uk/approvals.asp?id=2427
- US EPA 1996. Occupational and Residential Exposure Test Guidelines - Series 875Google Scholar
- US EPA 1997. Exposure Factor Handbook, National Center for Environmnetal assessment. Office of Research and DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
- WHO (2011). Generic risk assessment model for indoor and outdoor space spraying of insecticides. WHO/HTM/NTD/WHOPES/2010.6. In WHO website: https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20103293081
- World Health Organization (1982). Field surveys of exposure to pesticides: standard protocol. World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar