Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 2253–2269 | Cite as

Impact of financial development and economic growth on environmental quality: an empirical analysis from Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) countries

  • Shah SaudEmail author
  • Songsheng Chen
  • Danish
  • Abdul Haseeb
Research Article
  • 263 Downloads

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the impact of financial development, foreign direct investment, economic growth, electricity consumption, and trade openness on environmental quality for a panel of 59 Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) countries, over the period of 1980–2016. The presence of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis is investigated. The cross-sectional augmented Dickey-Fuller (CADF) and cross-sectional Im, Pesaran, and Shin panel unit root test; the Westerlund cointegration test, the dynamic seemingly unrelated regression (DSUR) approach; and the Dumitrescu and Hurlin (Econ Model 29:1450–1460, 2012) panel causality approach are employed. It is found that the analyzed variables are stationary at first differences and are cointegrated. It is also found that an increase in financial development, foreign direct investment, and trade openness enhance environmental quality, while the increase in economic growth and electricity consumption degrade environmental quality. The presence of the EKC hypothesis for the selected panel countries is validated. Furthermore, the Dumitrescu-Hurlin (DH) panel causality test result confirmed the presence of bidirectional causality among economic growth, foreign direct investment, financial development, electricity consumption, and trade openness with environmental quality.

Keywords

Financial development Economic growth Environmental quality EKC DSUR Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank to the responsible editor: Dr. Muhammad Shahbaz and anonymous reviewers’ referees for their constructive and valuable comments for enhancing the quality of the paper. This work is a research achievement of the National Natural Science Foundation of China under the project of (NSFC-71672009.71372016).

References

  1. Abbasi F, Riaz K (2016) CO2 emissions and financial development in an emerging economy: an augmented VAR approach. Energy Policy 90:102–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.12.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali G, Ashraf A, Bashir MK, Cui S (2017) Exploring environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) in relation to green revolution: a case study of Pakistan. Environ Sci Pol 77:166–171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.08.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I, Lean HH (2015a) The influence of economic growth, urbanization, trade openness, financial development, and renewable energy on pollution in Europe. Nat Hazards 79:621–644.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1865-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Mulali U, Weng-Wai C, Sheau-Ting L, Hakim A (2015b) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecol Indic 48:315–323.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Al-Mulali U, Solarin SA, Ozturk I (2016) Investigating the presence of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in Kenya: an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach. Nat Hazards 80:1729–1747.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-2050-x
  6. Apergis N, Danuletiu DC (2014) Renewable energy and economic growth: evidence from the sign of panel long-run causality. Renew Energy Econ 4:578–587Google Scholar
  7. Apergis N, Ozturk I (2015) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecol Indic 52:16–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.11.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Awad A, Abugamos H (2017) Income-carbon emissions nexus for Middle East and North Africa countries: a semi-parametric approach. Int J Energy Econ Policy 7:152–159. Online available at: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/4010/2740. Accessed 03 May 2018Google Scholar
  9. Balaguer J, Cantavella M (2016) Estimating the environmental Kuznets curve for Spain by considering fuel oil prices (1874-2011). Ecol Indic 60:853–859.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bekhet HA, Othman NS (2017) Impact of urbanization growth on Malaysia CO2 emissions: evidence from the dynamic relationship. J Clean Prod 154:1–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.174 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bilgili F, Koçak E, Bulut Ü (2016) The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions : A revisited Environmental Kuznets Curve approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 54:838–845.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.080
  12. Central Committee (2013) Decision of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on some major issues concerning comprehensively deepening the reform, Third Plenum of the 18th national congress, November 2013, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  13. Charfeddine L, Khediri KB (2015) Financial development and environmental quality in UAE: cointegration with structural breaks. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 55:1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.059 Google Scholar
  14. Chen Y, Zhang S, Xu S, Li GY (2011) Fundamental trade-offs on green wireless networks. IEEE Commun Mag 49:30–37.  https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2011.5783982 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chin H (2017) The Belt and Road Initiative and its business implications. Online available at: https://www.fbicgroup.com/?q=publication/belt-and-road-initiative-and-its-business-implications. Accessed 27 Nov 2017
  16. Chin H, He W (2016) The Belt and Road Initiative: 65 countries and beyond. Fung Bus Intell Cent 16. Online available at: https://www.fbicgroup.com/sites/default/files/B%26R_Initiative_65_Countries_and_Beyond.pdf. Accessed 05 July 2017
  17. Choi Y, Zhang N, Zhou P (2012) Efficiency and abatement costs of energy-related CO2 emissions in China: a slacks-based efficiency measure. Appl Energy 98:198–208.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.03.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Demirel M, Demirel DH, Isik U (2016) Environmental sustainability for future generations (a comparison of 2020’s candidate cities). Anthropologist 24:652–656. Online available at: http://krepublishers.com/02-Journals/T-Anth/Anth-24-0-000-16-Web/Anth-24-2-000-16-Abst-PDF/T-ANTH-24-2-652-16-1395-Demirel-M/T-ANTH-24-2-652-16-1395-Demirel-M-Tx%5B30%5D.pdf. Accessed 22 June 2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dogan E, Seker F (2016a) The influence of real output, renewable and non-renewable energy, trade and financial development on carbon emissions in the top renewable energy countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 60:1074–1085.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dogan E, Seker F (2016b) Determinants of CO2 emissions in the European Union: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy. Renew Energy 94:429–439.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dogan E, Turkekul B (2015) CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:1203–1213.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5323-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dumitrescu E, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29:1450–1460.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Farhani S, Ozturk I (2015) Causal relationship between CO2 emissions, real GDP, energy consumption, financial development, trade openness, and urbanization in Tunisia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4767-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Farhani S, Chaibi A, Rault C (2014) CO2 emissions, output, energy consumption, and trade in Tunisia. Econ Model 38:426–434.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.01.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Frankel JA, Romer D (1999) Does trade cause growth? Am Econ Rev 89:379–399. Online avaibale at: https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/aer.89.3.379. Accessed 21 June 2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Frankel J, Rose A (2002) An estimate of the effect of common currencies on trade and income. Q J Econ 117:437–466.  https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302753650292 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fung Business Intelligence (2017) The Belt and Road Initiative: seeking deeper and broader cooperationGoogle Scholar
  28. Gokmenoglu K, Taspinar N (2016) The relationship between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth and FDI: the case of Turkey. J Int Trade Econ Dev 25:706–723.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2015.1119876 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. Natl Bur Econ Res Work Pap Ser No 3914:1–57.  https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914
  30. Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110:353–377. Online available at: http://web.econ.ku.dk/nguyen/teaching/Grossman%20and%20Krueger%201995.pdf. Accessed 25 Sep 2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hafeez M, Chunhui Y, Strohmaier D, Ahmed M, Jie L (2018) Does finance affect environmental degradation: evidence from One Belt and One Road Initiative region? Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:9579–9592.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1317-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hao Y, Chen H, Wei YM, Li YM (2016) The influence of climate change on CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions: an empirical estimation based on Chinese provincial panel data. J Clean Prod 131:667–677.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Heidari H, Turan Katircioǧlu S, Saeidpour L (2015) Economic growth, CO2 emissions, and energy consumption in the five ASEAN countries. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 64:785–791.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.07.081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Huang Y (2016) Understanding China’s Belt & Road Initiative: motivation, framework and assessment. China Econ Rev 40:314–321.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2016.07.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ibrahim MH, Law SH (2016) Institutional quality and CO2 emission-trade relations: evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. S Afr J Econ 84:323–340.  https://doi.org/10.1111/saje.12095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Inglesi-Lotz R, Dogan E (2018) The role of renewable versus non-renewable energy to the level of CO2 emissions: a panel analysis of Sub-Saharan Africa’s 10 big 10 electricity generators. Renew Energy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.041
  37. Jakob M, Steckel J, Edenhofer O (2014) Consumption vs production-based emission policies. Annu Rev Resour Econ 6:297–318. Online available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/731a/19498b69b89df54e78b7e1df508a3ec6a187.pdf. Accessed 08 July 2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jalil A, Feridun M (2011) The impact of growth, energy and financial development on the environment in China: a cointegration analysis. Energy Econ 33:284–291.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jansen V (1996) Trade and environment: the pollution haven hypothesis and the industrial flight hypothesis; some perspectives on theory and empirics. Working paper. Centre for Development and the Environment, University of Oslo, OsloGoogle Scholar
  40. Javid M, Sharif F (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve and financial development in Pakistan. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:406–414.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kahia M, Safouane M, Aïssa B, Charfeddine L (2016) Impact of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on economic growth: new evidence from the MENA Net Oil Exporting Countries (NOECs). Energy 116:102–115.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kasman A, Duman YS (2015) CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: a panel data analysis. Econ Model 44:97–103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.10.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kasman A, Duman YS, Shahbaz M et al (2015) CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: a panel data analysis. Econ Model 44:97–103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.10.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Katircioglu S (2017) Investigating the role of oil prices in the conventional EKC model: evidence from Turkey. Asian Econ Financ Rev 7:498–508.  https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr/2017.7.5/102.5.498.508 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Katircioğlu ST, Taşpinar N (2017) Testing the moderating role of financial development in an environmental Kuznets curve: empirical evidence from Turkey. Renew Sustain Energy 68:572–586.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Keho Y (2017) Revisiting the income, energy consumption and carbon emissions nexus: new evidence from quantile regression for different country groups. Int J Energy Econ Policy 7:356–363. Online available at: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/4772/3100. Accessed 23 March 2018Google Scholar
  47. Khan MTIY, Rizwan M, Ali Q (2017) Dynamic relationship between financial development, energy consumption, trade and greenhouse gas: comparison of upper middle income countries from Asia, Europe, Africa and America. J Clean Prod 161:567–580.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Krane J (2018) KraneShares and CICC to host One Belt One Road Summit at NYSE. Online available at: https://www.bizjournals.com/newyork/prnewswire/press_releases/New_York/2018/01/09/NY83658. Accessed 15 Feb 2018
  49. Kumbaroǧlu G, Karali N, Arikan Y (2008) CO2, GDP and RET: an aggregate economic equilibrium analysis for Turkey. Energy Policy 36:2694–2708.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.03.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kuznet S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev 45:1–28.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.151.3712.867-a Google Scholar
  51. Latif Z, Mengke Y, Danish et al (2018) The dynamics of ICT, foreign direct investment, globalization and economic growth: panel estimation robust to heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence. Telematics Inform 35:318–328.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Le T-H (2016) Dynamics between energy, output, openness and financial development in Sub-Saharan African countries. Appl Econ 48:914–933.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2015.1090550 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Le TH, Quah E (2018) Income level and the emissions, energy, and growth nexus: evidence from Asia and the Pacific. Int Econ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2018.03.002
  54. Li T, Wang Y, Zhao D (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve in China: new evidence from dynamic panel analysis. Energy Policy 91:138–147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Linh DH, Lin S (2012) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth and FDI in Vietnam. Manag Glob Transitions 12:219–232. Online available at: http://www.fm-kp.si/zalozba/ISSN/1581-6311/12_219-232.pdf. Accessed 10 Sep 2017Google Scholar
  56. Mahalik MK, Babu MS, Loganathan N, Shahbaz M (2017) Does financial development intensify energy consumption in Saudi Arabia? Renew Sust Energ Rev 75:1022–1034.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mahdi Ziaei S (2015) Effects of financial development indicators on energy consumption and CO2 emission of European, East Asian and Oceania countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 42:752–759.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mark NC, Ogaki M, Sul D (2005) Dynamic seemingly unrelated cointegrating regressions. Rev Econ Stud 72:797–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mukhopadhyay (2009) Trade and the environment: implications for climate change. 36:83–102. Online avaiable at:http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/trade%20%26%20environment.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2017
  60. NDRC, FM and, MC (2015) Vision and action for jointly building the Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road, Bo’ao Forum. HainanGoogle Scholar
  61. O’Connell PGJ (1998) The overvaluation of purchasing power parity. J Int Econ 44:1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(97)00017-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Omri A, Daly S, Rault C, Chaibi A (2015) Financial development, environmental quality, trade and economic growth: what causes what in MENA countries. Energy Econ 48:2010–2012.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.01.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ouyang X, Lin B (2017) Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions during urbanization: a comparative study between China and Japan. J Clean Prod 143:356–368.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ozturk I, Al-Mulali U (2015a) Natural gas consumption and economic growth nexus: panel data analysis for GCC countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 51:998–1003.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ozturk I, Al-Mulali U (2015b) Investigating the validity of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Cambodia. Ecol Indic 57:324–330.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ozturk I, Al-Mulali U, Saboori B (2016) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of tourism and ecological footprint. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:1916–1928.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5447-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Panayotou T (1993) Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development. ILO Work Pap 45. Online available at:http://www.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/1993/93B09_31_engl.pdf. Acessed 25 Nov 2017
  68. Pesaran MH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Work Pap Econ 0435 3:1–39. Online available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/cam/camdae/0435.html. Accessed 21 Jan 2018
  69. Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econ 47:265–312.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jae CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Salahuddin M, Alam K, Ozturk I, Sohag K (2017) The effects of electricity consumption, economic growth, financial development and foreign direct investment on CO2 emissions in Kuwait. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81:2002–2010.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Saud S, Danish, Chen S (2018) An empirical analysis of financial development and energy demand: establishing the role of globalization. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 25:24326–24337.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2488-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Seker F, Ertugrul HM, Cetin M (2015) The impact of foreign direct investment on environmental quality: a bounds testing and causality analysis for Turkey. Renew Sust Energ Rev 52:347–356.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Shahbaz M, Lean H (2012) Does financial development increase energy consumption? The role of industrialization and urbanization in Tunisia. Energy Policy 40:473–479.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.10.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Shahbaz M, Adebola S, Mahmood H, Arouri M (2013a) Does financial development reduce CO2 emissions in Malaysian economy? A time series analysis. Econ Model 35:145–152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.06.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Shahbaz M, Kumar A, Nasir M (2013b) The effects of financial development, economic growth, coal consumption and trade openness on CO2 emissions in South Africa. Energy Policy 61:1452–1454. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8. Online available at:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.006. Accessed 01 Aug 2017
  76. Shahbaz M, Shahzad SJH, Ahmad N, Alam S (2016) Financial development and environmental quality: the way forward. Energy Policy 98:353–364.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Shahbaz M, Van Hoang TH, Mahalik MK, Roubaud D (2017) Energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in India: new evidence from a nonlinear and asymmetric analysis. Energy Econ 63:199–212.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.01.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Shao Y (2018) Does FDI affect carbon intensity? New evidence from dynamic panel analysis. Int J Clim Chang Strateg Manag 10:27–42.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-03-2017-0062 Google Scholar
  79. Tamazian A, Chousa JP, Vadlamannati KC (2009) Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy 37:246–253.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wang Q, Chiu YH, Chiu CR (2015) Driving factors behind carbon dioxide emissions in China: a modified production-theoretical decomposition analysis. Energy Econ 51:252–260.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.07.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wang S, Li Q, Fang C, Zhou C (2016) The relationship between economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from China. Sci Total Environ 542:360–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.027{Bibliography}Google Scholar
  82. Wang Z, Danish, Zhang B, Wang B (2018) The moderating role of corruption between economic growth and CO2 emissions: evidence from BRICS economies. Energy 148:506–513.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 69:709–748.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Yang G, Sun T, Wang J, Li X (2015) Modeling the nexus between carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth. Energy Policy 86:104–117.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.06.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zaman K, Moemen MA (2017) Energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions and economic development: evaluating alternative and plausible environmental hypothesis for sustainable growth. Renew Sust Energ Rev 74:1119–1130.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zaman K, Shahbaz M, Loganathan N, Ali S (2016) Tourism development, energy consumption and environmental Kuznets curve: trivariate analysis in the panel of developed and developing countries. Tour Manag 54:275–283.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Zambrano-Monserrate MA, Valverde-Bajana I, Aguilar-Bohorquez J, Mendoza-Jimenez MJ (2016) Relationship between economic Groth and environmental degradation: is there evidence of an enviromental Kuznets curve for Brazil. Int J Energy Econ Policy 6:208–216. Online available at: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/1850. Accessed 21 July 2017Google Scholar
  88. Zhang L, Gao J (2016) Exploring the effects of international tourism on China’s economic growth, energy consumption and environmental pollution: evidence from a regional panel analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 53:225–234.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zhang S, Liu X, Bae J (2017) Does trade openness affect CO2 emissions: evidence from ten newly industrialized countries? Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9392-8

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Management and EconomicsBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina
  2. 2.School of Economics and Trade, Guangdong University of Foreign StudiesGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations