Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 975–985 | Cite as

Performance and emission characteristics of CNG-fueled compression ignition engine with Ricinus communis methyl ester as pilot fuel

  • Sunil Kumar MahlaEmail author
  • Amit Dhir
Research Article
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

Surge in petroleum prices, its drying sources and degradation in air quality focused interest on renewable energy sources as substitute for existing fuels for internal combustion engines. This study highlights the combustion, performance, and emission characteristics of diesel engines fueled with compressed natural gas (CNG) as primary fuel and castor (Ricinus communis) oil methyl ester (COME) as pilot fuel. COME was produced from non-edible grade Ricinus communis oil. The biodiesel fuel properties and characterization was done as per ASTM D6751 specifications. The CNG was inducted through inlet manifold fumigation at a consistent flow rate of 15 l/min under dual-fuel mode. It is evident from the test results that B20-CNG yields brake thermal efficiency of 23.6% when compared to 25 and 27% for D-CNG and diesel fuel, respectively. The peak cylinder gas pressure was lower in dual-fuel mode when compared to conventional diesel. The emission results show increase in NOx emission by 24.5 and 28.4% for D-CNG and B20-CNG, respectively when compared to baseline diesel fuel at full engine load. There was increase in HC emission by 6.7 and 11% whereas CO emissions decreased by 31.6 and 37.4% for B20-CNG and D-CNG, respectively at similar operating conditions. Reduction in smoke opacity by 49.4 and 59.6% was achieved respectively for D-CNG and B20-CNG under dual-fuel mode. On the whole, COME exhibits a better pilot fuel choice for dual-fuel combustion mode in comparison to conventional fossil petroleum diesel in terms of combustion, performance, and emissions characteristics.

Keywords

Dual fuel Smoke Biodiesel Emissions CNG 

Nomenclature

CNG

Compressed natural gas

COME

Castor oil methyl ester

LCV

Lower calorific value

DFM

Dual-fuel mode

ASTM

American Society for Testing and Methods

LPM

Liter per minute

NOx

Oxides of nitrogen

NaOH

Sodium hydroxide

SI

Spark ignition engine

CI

Compression ignition engine

TDC

Top dead center

SOI

Start of injection

BTE

Brake thermal efficiency

BSEC

Brake-specific energy consumption

CO

Carbon monoxide

CO2

Carbon dioxide

HC

Hydrocarbons

rpm

Revolutions per minute

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the staff members of the Department of Mechanical Engineering, I.K. Gujral Punjab Technical University Campus, Hoshiarpur and School of Energy and Environment, Thapar University Patiala for extending wholehearted support during the experimental work.

References

  1. Abdelaal MM, Hegab AH (2012) Combustion and emissions characteristics of a natural gas fueled diesel engines with EGR. Energy Convers Manag 64:301–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashok B, Denis AS, Ramesh Kumar C (2015) LPG diesel dual fuel engine–a critical review. Alxendria Eng J 54:105–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atabani AE, Silitonga AS, Badruddin IA, Mahlia TMI, Masjuki HH, Mekhilef S (2012) A comprehensive review on biodiesel as an alternative energy resource and its characteristics. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16:2070–2093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barik D, Murugen S (2014) Investigation on combustion performance and emission characteristics of a DI (direct injection) diesel engine fueled with biogas–diesel in dual fuel mode Energy. 72:760–771Google Scholar
  5. Bora BJ, Saha UK (2016) Experimental evaluation of a rice bran biodiesel e biogas run dual fuel diesel engine at varying compression ratios. Renew Energy 87:782–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gharehghani A, Hosseini R, Mirsalim M, Jazayeri SA, Yusaf T (2015) An experimental study on reactivity controlled compression ignition engine fueled with biodiesel/natural gas. Energy 89:58–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gunea C, Razavi MRM, Karim GA (1998) The effects of pilot fuel quality on dual fuel engine ignition delay SAE paper, 982453Google Scholar
  8. Heywood JB (1988) Internal combustion engines fundamentals. McGraw-Hill IncGoogle Scholar
  9. Hohenberg GH (1979) Advance approach for heat transfer calculations. SAE Paper. 790825Google Scholar
  10. Hosmath RS, Banapurmath NR, Khandal SV, Gaitonde VN, Basavarajappa YH, Yaliwal VS (2016) Effect of compression ratio, CNG flow rate and injection timing on the performance of dual fuel engine operated on honge oil methyl ester (HOME) and compressed natural gas (CNG). Renew Energy 93:579–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jindal M, Rosha P, Mahla SK, Dhir A (2015) Experimental investigation of performance and emissions characteristics of waste cooking oil biodiesel and n-butanol blends in a compression ignition engine. RSC Adv 5(43):33863–33868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Karabektas M, Ergen G, Hosoz M (2014) The effects of using diethyl ether as additive on the performance and emissions of a diesel engine fuelled with CNG. Fuel 115:855–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Keera ST, El Sabagh SM, Taman AR (2018) Castor oil biodiesel production and optimization. Egypt J Pet.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2018.02.007
  14. Krisnangkura K (1986) A simple method for estimation of cetane index of vegetable oil methyl esters. J Am Oil Chem Soc 63:552–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kumar P, Kumar N (2016) Effect of EGR on performance and emissions characteristics of a dual fuel engine fuelled with CNG and JOME. Biofuels 6:2–9Google Scholar
  16. Liu J, Yang F, Wang H, Ouyang M, Hao S (2013) Effects of pilot fuel quantity on the emissions characteristics of a CNG/diesel dual fuel engine with optimized pilot injection timing. Appl Energy 110:201–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lounici MS, Loubar K, Tarabet L, Balistrou L, Niculescu DC, Tazerout M (2014) Towards improvement of natural gas-diesel engine dual fuel mode: an experimental investigation on performance an emissions characteristics. Energy 64:200–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mahla SK, Dhir A, Gill KJS, Cho HM, Lim HC, Chauhan BS (2018a) Influence of EGR on the simultaneous reduction of NOx-smoke emissions trade-off under CNG-biodiesel dual fuel engine. Energy 152:303–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mahla SK, Dhir A, Singla V, Rosha P (2018b) Investigations on environmental emissions characteristics of CI engine fuelled with castor (Ricinus communis) biodiesel blends. J Environ Biol 39(3):353–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mahla SK, Singla V, Sandhu SS, Dhir A (2018c) Studies on biogas-fuelled compression ignition engine under dual fuel mode. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(10):9722–9729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mansour C, Bounif Aris A, Gaillard F (2001) Gas–diesel (dual-fuel) modeling in diesel engine environment. Int J Therm Sci 40:409–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mohsin R, Majid ZA, Shihnan AH, Nasri NS, Sharer Z (2014) Effect of biodiesel blends on engine performance and exhaust emission for diesel dual fuel engine. Energy Convers Manag 88:821–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mustafi NN, Raine RR, Verhelst S (2013) Combustion and emissions characteristics of a dual fuel engine operated on alternative gaseous fuels. Fuel 109:669–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Namasivayam AM, Korakianitis T, Crookes RJ, Bob-Manuel KDH, Olsen J (2010) Biodiesel, emulsified biodiesel and dimethyl ether as pilot fuels for natural gas fuelled engines. Appl Energy 87:769–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nayak SK, Mishra PC (2016) Emissions characteristics of jatropha oil blends using waste wood producer gas. Energy Sourc A, Recovery Util Environ Effects 38(14):2153–2160Google Scholar
  26. Nwafor OMI (2000) Effect of choice of pilot fuel on the performance of natural gas in diesel engine. Renew Energy 495-505(2000):21Google Scholar
  27. Pali HS, Kumar N, Alhassan Y (2015) Performance and emissions characteristics of an agricultural diesel engine fueled with blends of Sal methyl ester and diesel. Energy Convers Manag 90:146–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Papagiannakis RG (2013) Study of air inlet preheating and EGR impacts for improving operation of compression ignition engine running under dual fuel mode. Energy Convers Manag 40-53(2013):68Google Scholar
  29. Papagiannakis RG, Hountalas DT (2003) Experimental investigation concerning the effect of natural gas percentage on performance and emissions of a DI dual fuel diesel engine. Appl Therm Eng 23(3):353–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Paul A, Bose PK, Panua RS, Banerjee R (2015) An experimental investigation of performance-emission trade off of a CI engine fueled by diesel–compressed natural gas (CNG) combination and diesel–ethanol blends with CNG enrichment. Energy 55:787–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Qi DH, Chen H, Geng LM, Bain YZ (2011) Effect of diethyl ether and ethanol additives on the combustion and emissions characteristics of biodiesel-diesel blended fuel engine. Renew Energy 36:1252–1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ramesh A, Reddy JN (2004). Experimental studies on a straight vegetable oil biogas dual fuel engine. SAE Paper 2004-28-031Google Scholar
  33. Ruhul AM, Kalam MA, Masjuki HH, Alabdulkarem A, Atabani AE, Rizwanul Fattah IM, Abedin MJ (2016) Production, characterization, engine performance and emission characteristics of Croton megalocarpus and Ceiba pentandra complementary blends in a single-cylinder diesel engine. RSC Adv 6:24584–24595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ryu K (2013) Effects of pilot injection pressure on the combustion and emissions characteristics in a diesel engine using biodiesel–CNG dual fuel Energy Conversion Management 76: 506–516Google Scholar
  35. Saez-Bastante J, Pinzi S, Jiménez-Romero FJ, Luque de Castro MD, Priego-Capote F, Dorado MP (2015) Synthesis of biodiesel from castor oil: silent versus sonicated methylation and energy studies. Energy Convers Manag 96:561–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sahoo BB, Sahoo N, Saha UK (2009) Effect of engine parameters and type of gaseous fuelon the performance of dual-fuel gas diesel engines—a critical review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 13(6):1151–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Semin RAB (2008) A technical review of compressed natural gas as an alternative fuel for internal combustion engines. Am J EngAppl Sci 1(4):302–311Google Scholar
  38. Senthilraja R, Sivakumar V, Thirugnanasambandham K, Nedunchezhian N (2016) Performance, emissions and combustion characteristics of a dual fuel engine with diesel-ethanol-cotton seed oil methyl ester blends and compressed natural gas (CNG) as fuel. Energy 112:899–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Singh M, Gandhi SK, Mahla SK, Sandhu SS (2017) Experimental investigations on performance and emission characteristics of variable speed multi-cylinder compression ignition engine using diesel/argemonne biodiesel blends. Energy Explor Exploit 36(3):535–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tarabet L, Loubar K, Lounici MS, Khiari K, Belmrabet T, Tazerout M (2014) Experimental investigation of DI diesel engine operating with eucalyptus biodiesel/natural gas under dual fuel mode. Fuel 133:129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weaver CS, Turner SH (1994) Dual fuel natural gas/diesel engines: technology, performance and emissions. SAE Paper 940548Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringI.K. Gujral Punjab Technical University CampusHoshiarpurIndia
  2. 2.School of Energy and EnvironmentThapar Institute of Engineering and TechnologyPatialaIndia

Personalised recommendations