Assessment of occupational exposure to pesticide mixtures with endocrine-disrupting activity
- 55 Downloads
Occupational exposure to pesticide mixtures comprising active substance(s) and/or co-formulant(s) with known/possible endocrine-disrupting activity was assessed using long-term activity records for 50 professional operators representing arable and orchard cropping systems in Greece, Lithuania, and the UK. Exposure was estimated using the harmonised Agricultural Operator Exposure Model, and risk was quantified as a point of departure index (PODI) using the lowest no observed (adverse) effect level. Use of substances with known/possible endocrine activity was common, with 43 of the 50 operators applying at least one such active substance on more than 50% of spray days; at maximum, one UK operator sprayed five such active substances and 10 such co-formulants in a single day. At 95th percentile, total exposure was largest in the UK orchard system (0.041 × 10−2 mg kg bw−1 day−1) whereas risk was largest in the Greek cropping systems (PODI 0.053 × 10−1). All five cropping systems had instances indicating potential for risk when expressed at a daily resolution (maximum PODI 1.2–10.7). Toxicological data are sparse for co-formulants, so combined risk from complex mixtures of active substances and co-formulants may be larger in reality.
KeywordsProfessional operator Active substance Co-formulant Combined effect Risk Regulation
The authors gratefully acknowledge sponsorship of this research by the Ministry of Education, Malaysia, and the Universiti Malaysia Kelantan (UMK).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bullock WH, Ignacio JS (2006) A strategy for assessing and managing occupational exposures, 3rd edn. American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA Press), FairfaxGoogle Scholar
- EFSA (2013a) Scientific opinion on the hazard assessment of endocrine disruptors: scientific criteria for identification of endocrine disruptors and appropriateness of existing test methods for assessing effects mediated by these substances on human health and the Environment. EFSA J 11(3):3132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- EFSA (2013b) Scientific opinion on the identification of pesticides to be included in cumulative assessment groups on the basis of their toxicological profile. EFSA J 11(7):3293Google Scholar
- Ewence A, Rumsby P, Johnson I (2013) Extended impact assessment study of the human health and environmental criteria for endocrine disrupting substances proposed by HSE, CRD. Report number Defra9088.02. WRc plc, SwindonGoogle Scholar
- Groβkopf C, Martin S, Mielke H et al (2013) Joint development of a new agricultural operator exposure model. BfR Wissenschaft, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Hass U, Boberg J, Christiansen S, Jacobsen PR, Vinggaard AM, Taxvig C, Poulsen ME, Herrmann SS, Jensen BH, Petersen A, Clemmensen LH, Axelstad M (2012) Adverse effects on sexual development in rat offspring after low dose exposure to a mixture of endocrine disrupting pesticides. Reprod Toxicol 34:261–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- OECD (2012) Guidance document on standardised test guidelines for evaluating chemicals for endocrine disruption. Joint Meeting of the Chemicals Committee and the Working Party on Chemicals, Pesticides and Biotechnology. ENV/JM/MONO(2012)22. http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=env/jm/mono%282012%2922&doclanguage=en. Accessed 15 March 2018
- PPDB (2018) The Pesticide Properties Database (PPDB) developed by the Agriculture & Environment Research Unit (AERY), University of Hertfordshire, funded by UK national sources and the EU-funded Footprint Project (FP6-SSP-022704). http://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/ppdb/en/atoz.htm. Accessed 15 March 2018
- Solecki R, Kortenkamp A, Bergman A, Chahoud I, Degen GH, Dietrich D, Greim H, Håkansson H, Hass U, Husoy T, Jacobs M, Jobling S, Mantovani A, Marx-Stoelting P, Piersma A, Ritz V, Slama R, Stahlmann R, van den Berg M, Zoeller RT, Boobis AR (2017) Scientific principles for the identification of endocrine-disrupting chemicals: a consensus statement. Arch Toxicol 91:1001–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- WHO/IPCS (2002) Global assessment of the state-of-the-science of endocrine disruptors. http://www.who.int/ipcs/publications/new_issues/endocrine_disruptors/en/. Accessed 15 Jan 2018