Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 2297–2304 | Cite as

Removal of ciprofloxacin from simulated wastewater by pomegranate peels

  • Waffa Mekhamer
  • Salma Al-TamimiEmail author
Research Article
  • 66 Downloads

Abstract

The adsorption of Ciprofloxacin (CPX) from aqueous solution by Pomegranate peels (POP) was investigated in a batch process. The influence of time (5–60 min) and CPX concentration (100–10,000 mg/L) on the adsorption ability of POP was studied. The POP was characterized by FTIR, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and Zeta sizer. The kinetic of adsorption was analyzed by the pseudo-first-order and the pseudo-second-order kinetic equations using non-linear regression analysis. As well as non-linear regression analysis of Langmuir and Freundlich models were applied to specify the best non-linear curves, fitted to experimental data and estimate isotherm parameters. In order to assess the best-fit kinetic model or adsorption isotherm, three error analysis methods were used to evaluate the result of adsorption process, namely the sum of the squares of the errors (SSE), residual root mean square error (RMSE), and chi-square (χ2). On the basis of low three error analysis and high correlation (R2) of determination, it can be concluded that both the non-linear form of pseudo-second-order kinetic model and non-linear form of Langmuir are best suited to explain the adsorption of CPX onto POP. The maximum adsorption capacity for pomegranate peel as calculated by non-linear Langmuir curve was much higher than in previous work (999 mg/g) at natural pH (4–5) and 25 °C. The high adsorption capacity of POP makes them very low-cost and effective adsorbent materials for CPX from aqueous solution.

Keywords

Adsorption Ciprofloxacin Kinetics Langmuir Pomegranate peels Non-linear regression 

References

  1. Akhtar J, Amin NAS, Shahzad K (2016) A review on removal of pharmaceuticals from water by adsorption. Desalin Water Treat 57:12842–12860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Heetimi DTA, Kadhum MAR, Alkhazrajy OS (2014) Adsorption of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride from aqueous solution by Iraqi porcelinaite adsorbent. J Al-Nahrain Univ 17:41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carabineiro S, Thavorn-Amornsri T, Pereira M, Serp P, Figueiredo J (2012) Comparison between activated carbon, carbon xerogel and carbon nanotubes for the adsorption of the antibiotic ciprofloxacin. Catal Today 186:29–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Elhussien ME, Hussein RM, Elsaim MH (2017) Removal of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride from aqueous solution by pomegranate peel grown in Alziedab agricultural scheme-River Nile State, Sudan. Adv Biochem 5:89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. El-Shafey E-SI, Al-Lawati H, Al-Sumri AS (2012) Ciprofloxacin adsorption from aqueous solution onto chemically prepared carbon from date palm leaflets. J Environ Sci (China) 24:1579–1586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Febrianto J, Kosasih AN, Sunarso J, Ju Y-H, Indraswati N, Ismadji S (2009) Equilibrium and kinetic studies in adsorption of heavy metals using biosorbent: a summary of recent studies. J Hazard Mater 162:616–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fick J, Söderström H, Lindberg RH, Phan C, Tysklind M, Larsson DJ (2009) Contamination of surface, ground, and drinking water from pharmaceutical production. Environ Toxicol Chem 28:2522–2527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Genç N, Dogan EC (2015) Adsorption kinetics of the antibiotic ciprofloxacin on bentonite, activated carbon, zeolite, and pumice. Desalin Water Treat 53:785–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Genç N, Dogan EC, Yurtsever M (2013) Bentonite for ciprofloxacin removal from aqueous solution. Water Sci Technol 68:848–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gu C, Karthikeyan K (2005) Sorption of the antimicrobial ciprofloxacin to aluminum and iron hydrous oxides. Environ Sci Technol 39:9166–9173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ho Y, Chiang C (2001) Sorption studies of acid dye by mixed sorbents. Adsorption 7:139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li X, Chen S, Fan X, Quan X, Tan F, Zhang Y, Gao J (2015) Adsorption of ciprofloxacin, bisphenol and 2-chlorophenol on electrospun carbon nanofibers: in comparison with powder activated carbon. J Colloid Interface Sci 447:120–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Özacar M, Şengil İA (2006) A two stage batch adsorber design for methylene blue removal to minimize contact time. J Environ Manag 80:372–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Peng X, Hu F, Lam FL, Wang Y, Liu Z, Dai H (2015) Adsorption behavior and mechanisms of ciprofloxacin from aqueous solution by ordered mesoporous carbon and bamboo-based carbon. J Colloid Interface Sci 460:349–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rakshit S, Sarkar D, Elzinga EJ, Punamiya P, Datta R (2013) Mechanisms of ciprofloxacin removal by nano-sized magnetite. J Hazard Mater 246:221–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Roca Jalil ME, Baschini M, Sapag K (2017) Removal of ciprofloxacin from aqueous solutions using pillared clays materials. Materials (Basel) 10:1345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sun Y, Li H, Li G, Gao B, Yue Q, Li X (2016) Characterization and ciprofloxacin adsorption properties of activated carbons prepared from biomass wastes by H3PO4 activation. Bioresour Technol 217:239–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tiwari M, Shukla S, Bhargava D, Kisku G (2013) Color removal potential of coal fly ash-a low cost adsorbent from aqueous solutions of disperse dyes used in textile mill through batch technique. Our Earth 10:5–8Google Scholar
  19. Wang C-J, Li Z, Jiang W-T (2011) Adsorption of ciprofloxacin on 2: 1 dioctahedral clay minerals. Appl Clay Sci 53:723–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chemistry DepartmentKing Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations