Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 1422–1434 | Cite as

The relative role of spatial and environmental processes on seasonal variations of phytoplankton beta diversity along different anthropogenic disturbances of subtropical rivers in China

  • Yun Zhang
  • Chengrong Peng
  • Shun Huang
  • Jun Wang
  • Xiong Xiong
  • Dunhai LiEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

The phytoplankton community structure is potentially influenced by both environmental and spatial processes. In addition, the relative importance of these two processes to phytoplankton assemblage will be affected by hydrological connectivity. However, the impacts of anthropogenic activities on phytoplankton beta diversity and the relative importance of these two processes to phytoplankton are still poorly understood, especially in water conservation areas. Here, we examined the relative importance of local and regional environmental control and spatial structuring of phytoplankton communities in five rivers with different degrees of disturbance during wet and dry seasons. We found that community structure and local environmental conditions varied greatly in seasons and rivers. The reference river (with minimum disturbance) had the highest homogeneity of environmental conditions and phytoplankton assemblage, while the excessive disturbance rivers (sand mining activities) had the greatest environmental heterogeneity and species dissimilarity between sites. Variation partitioning analysis showed that the phytoplankton community variation was mainly explained by the spatial variables in the wet season (summer and autumn) and winter, while the local environmental variables explained the largest variation of phytoplankton community in the dry season (spring). However, broad-scale variables were selected by redundancy analysis in both dry and wet seasons, which indicates that long-distance scales always have low river connectivity, regardless of whether the river is overflowing or drying up. Local environmental processes explained the most variation in phytoplankton community within all of the rivers, suggesting that deterministic processes usually work on relatively small spatial scales. However, this effect would be weakened by anthropogenic activities, especially sand mining activities. We inferred that sand mining activities increased the environmental heterogeneity and species dissimilarity between sites by causing watercourse habitat patches and obstructing river connectivity. On the other hand, as the excessive disturbance, sand mining activities significantly reduced the species richness and abundance of phytoplankton.

Keywords

Anthropogenic activities Beta diversity Phytoplankton South-to-North Water Diversion Project Spatial and environmental processes 

Notes

Funding

This work was supported by Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment (No. 2017ZX07108-001) and the key deployment project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (ZDRW-ZS-2016-7-1). We are grateful to Yintao Jia, Kang Chen, and Zhengfei Li for their assistance during the field survey.

Supplementary material

11356_2018_3632_MOESM1_ESM.doc (3 mb)
ESM 1 (DOC 3.03 mb)

References

  1. Alahuhta J, Heino J (2013) Spatial extent, regional specificity and metacommunity structuring in lake macrophytes. J Biogeogr 40:1572–1582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson MJ (2006) Distance-based tests for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions. Biometrics 62:245–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson MJ, Robinson J (2003) Generalized discriminant analysis based on distances. Aust N Z J Stat 45:301–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson MJ, Willis TJ (2003) Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: a useful method of constrained ordination for ecology. Ecology 84:511–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson MJ, Ellingsen KE, McArdle BH (2006) Multivariate dispersion as a measure of beta diversity. Ecol Lett 9:683–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. APHA (1999) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. Ashraf MA, Maah MJ, Yusoff I, Wajid A, Mahmood K (2011) Sand mining effects, causes and concerns: a case study from Bestari Jaya, Selangor, Peninsular Malaysia. Sci Res Essays 6:1216–1231Google Scholar
  8. Astorga A, Death R, Death F, Paavola R, Chakraborty M, Muotka T (2014) Habitat heterogeneity drives the geographical distribution of beta diversity: the case of New Zealand stream invertebrates. Ecol Evol 4:2693–2702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beisner BE, Peres-Neto PR, Lindström ES, Barnett A, Longhi ML (2006) The role of environmental and spatial processes in structuring lake communities from bacteria to fish. Ecology 87:2985–2991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borcard D, Legendre P (2002) All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices. Ecol Model 153:51–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Borcard D, Legendre P, Avois-Jacquet C, Tuomisto H (2004) Dissecting the spatial structure of ecological data at multiple scales. Ecology 85:1826–1832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Borcard D, Gillet F, Legendre P (2011) Numerical ecology with R. Springer. Springer International PublishingGoogle Scholar
  13. Boyd SE, Limpenny DS, Rees HL, Cooper KM (2005) The effects of marine sand and gravel extraction on the macrobenthos at a commercial dredging site (results 6 years post-dredging). ICES J Mar Sci 62:145–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Campbell RE, Winterbourn MJ, Cochrane TA, McIntosh AR (2015) Flow-related disturbance creates a gradient of metacommunity types within stream networks. Landsc Ecol 30:667–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chase JM (2007) Drought mediates the importance of stochastic community assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:17430–17434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chaussard E, Kerosky S (2016) Characterization of black sand mining activities and their environmental impacts in the Philippines using remote sensing. Remote Sens Basel 8:100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clarke KR (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol 18:117–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clarke KR, Warwick RM (2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd edn. PRIMER-E. Plymouth Marine Laboratory PressGoogle Scholar
  19. Cuker BE, Gama PT, Burkholder JM (1990) Type of suspended clay influences lake productivity and phytoplankton community response to phosphorus loading. Limnol Oceanogr 35:830–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Devercelli M, Scarabotti P, Mayora G, Schneider B, Giri F (2016) Unravelling the role of determinism and stochasticity in structuring the phytoplanktonic metacommunity of the Paraná River floodplain. Hydrobiologia 764:139–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dini-Andreote F, Stegen JC, van Elsas JD, Salles JF (2015) Disentangling mechanisms that mediate the balance between stochastic and deterministic processes in microbial succession. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:1326–1332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diniz-Filho JAF, Bini LM (2005) Modelling geographical patterns in species richness using eigenvector-based spatial filters. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 14:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Finlay BJ (2002) Global dispersal of free-living microbial eukaryote species. Science 296:1061–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gilbert B, Bennett JR (2010) Partitioning variation in ecological communities: do the numbers add up? J Appl Ecol 47:1071–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guenther M, Bozelli R (2004) Effects of inorganic turbidity on the phytoplankton of an Amazonian lake impacted by bauxite tailings. Hydrobiologia 511:151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hájek M, Roleček J, Cottenie K, Kintrová K, Horsák M, Poulíčková A, Hájková P, Fránková M, Dítě D (2011) Environmental and spatial controls of biotic assemblages in a discrete semi-terrestrial habitat: comparison of organisms with different dispersal abilities sampled in the same plots. J Biogeogr 38:1683–1693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heino J (2011) A macroecological perspective of diversity patterns in the freshwater realm. Freshw Biol 56:1703–1722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Heino J, Melo AS, Bini LM (2015a) Reconceptualising the beta diversity-environmental heterogeneity relationship in running water systems. Freshw Biol 60:223–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heino J, Melo AS, Siqueira T, Soininen J, Valanko S, Bini LM (2015b) Metacommunity organisation, spatial extent and dispersal in aquatic systems: patterns, processes and prospects. Freshw Biol 60:845–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heino J, Soininen J, Alahuhta J, Lappalainen J, Virtanen R (2017) Metacommunity ecology meets biogeography: effects of geographical region, spatial dynamics and environmental filtering on community structure in aquatic organisms. Oecologia 183:121–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Huang C, Zhou Z, Wang D, Dian Y (2016) Monitoring forest dynamics with multi-scale and time series imagery. Environ Monit Assess 188:273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Isabwe A, Yang JR, Wang Y, Liu L, Chen H, Yang J (2018) Community assembly processes underlying phytoplankton and bacterioplankton across a hydrologic change in a human-impacted river. Sci Total Environ 630:658–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. John R, Dalling JW, Harms KE, Yavitt JB, Stallard RF, Mirabello M, Hubbell SP, Valencia R, Navarrete H, Vallejo M, Foster RB (2007) Soil nutrients influence spatial distributions of tropical tree species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:864–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jyrkänkallio-Mikkola J, Heino J, Soininen J (2016) Beta diversity of stream diatoms at two hierarchical spatial scales: implications for biomonitoring. Freshw Biol 61:239–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lai X, Shankman D, Huber C, Yesou H, Huang Q, Jiang J (2014) Sand mining and increasing Poyang Lake’s discharge ability: a reassessment of causes for lake decline in China. J Hydrol 519:1698–1706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lindholm M, Grönroos M, Hjort J, Karjalainen SM, Tokola L, Heino J (2018) Different species trait groups of stream diatoms show divergent responses to spatial and environmental factors in a subarctic drainage basin. Hydrobiologia 816:213–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liu J (1996) Macro-scale survey and dynamic study of natural resources and environment of China by remote sensing. China Science and Technology Press (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  38. Lu S, Wang BP, He H, Li JK, Gao HY (2014) Climate characteristics of area precipitation in flood season in upper reaches of the Hanjiang River. J Arid Meteorol 32:201–206 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  39. Maberly SC, King L, Gibson CE, May L, Jones RI, Dent MM, Jordan C (2003) Linking nutrient limitation and water chemistry in upland lakes to catchment characteristics. Hydrobiologia 506:83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Magurran AF (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell, Oxford, p 256Google Scholar
  41. Maloufi S, Catherine A, Mouillot D, Louvard C, Couté A, Bernard C, Troussellier M (2016) Environmental heterogeneity among lakes promotes hyper β-diversity across phytoplankton communities. Freshw Biol 61:633–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Meier S, Soininen J (2014) Phytoplankton metacommunity structure in subarctic rock pools. Aquat Microb Ecol 73:81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Meng XL, Jiang XM, Li ZF, Wang J, Cooper KM, Xie ZC (2018) Responses of macroinvertebrates and local environment to short-term commercial sand dredging practices in a flood-plain lake. Sci Total Environ 631:1350–1359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Niño-García JP, Ruiz-González C, del Giorgio PA (2016) Interactions between hydrology and water chemistry shape bacterioplankton biogeography across boreal freshwater networks. ISME J 10:1755–1766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nogueira SID, Nabout JC, Ibañez MDSR, Bourgoin LM (2010) Determinants of beta diversity: the relative importance of environmental and spatial processes in structuring phytoplankton communities in an Amazonian floodplain. Acta Limnol Bras 22:247–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P (2013) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.0–9Google Scholar
  47. Özkan K, Jeppesen E, Søndergaard M, Lauridsen TL, Liboriussen L, J-Christian S (2013) Contrasting roles of water chemistry, lake morphology, land-use, climate; and spatial processes in driving phytoplankton richness in the Danish landscape. Hydrobiologia 710:173–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Peres-Neto PR, Legendre P, Dray S, Borcard D (2006) Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. Ecology 87:2614–2625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shayo S, Lugomela C, Machiwa J (2011) Influence of land use patterns on some limnological characteristics in the south-eastern part of Lake Victoria, Tanzania. Aquatic Ecosyst Health 14:246–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Soininen J (2010) Species turnover along abiotic and biotic gradients: patterns in space equal patterns in time? Bioscience 60:433–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stockner JG, Benson WW (1967) The succession of diatom assemblages in the recent sediments of Lake Washington. Limnol Oceanogr 12:513–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Taka M, Kokkonen T, Kuoppamäki K, Niemi T, Sillanpää N, Valtanen M, Warsta L, Setälä H (2017) Spatio-temporal patterns of major ions in urban stormwater under cold climate. Hydrol Process 31:1564–1577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tonkin JD, Stoll S, Jähnig SC, Haase P (2016) Contrasting metacommunity structure and beta diversity in an aquatic-floodplain system. Oikos 125:686–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vilmi A, Karjalainen SM, Hellsten S, Heino J (2016) Bioassessment in a metacommunity context: are diatom communities structured solely by species sorting? Ecol Indic 62:86–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Walther GR, Post E, Convey P, Menzel A, Parmesan C, Beebee TJC, J-Marc F, Hoehg-Guldberg O, Bairlein F (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416:389–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wu G, de Leeuw J, Skidmore AK, Prins HHT, Liu Y (2007) Concurrent monitoring of vessels and water turbidity enhances the strength of evidence in remotely sensed dredging impact assessment. Water Res 41:3271–3280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wyzga B, Oglecki P, Radecki-Pawlik A, Zawiejska J (2011) Diversity of macroinvertebrate communities as a reflection of habitat heterogeneity in a mountain river subjected to variable human impacts. In: Simon A, Bennett SJ, Castro JM (eds) Stream restoration in dynamic fluvial systems. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D. C, pp 189–207Google Scholar
  58. Yang JR, Lv H, Isabwe A, Liu L, Yu X, Chen H, Yang J (2017a) Disturbance-induced phytoplankton regime shifts and recovery of cyanobacteria dominance in two subtropical reservoirs. Water Res 120:52–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yang W, Zheng Z, Zheng C, Lu K, Ding D, Zhu J (2017b) Temporal variations in a phytoplankton community in a subtropical reservoir: an interplay of extrinsic and intrinsic community effects. Sci Total Environ 612:720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zeni JO, Casatti L (2014) The influence of habitat homogenization on the trophic structure of fish fauna in tropical streams. Hydrobiologia 726:259–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yun Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Chengrong Peng
    • 1
  • Shun Huang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jun Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xiong Xiong
    • 1
  • Dunhai Li
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Algal Biology, Institute of HydrobiologyChinese Academy of SciencesWuhanChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations