Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 577–585 | Cite as

Efficiency of sequential UV/H2O2 and biofilm process for the treatment of secondary effluent

  • Peng-Fei Yan
  • Shoujun Yuan
  • Wei WangEmail author
  • Zhen-Hu HuEmail author
  • Yang Mu
  • Han-Qing Yu
Research Article
  • 102 Downloads

Abstract

In response to the shortage of water resources, multiple processes have been applied to turn wastewater secondary effluent (SE) into potable water. However, trace organic contaminants (TOrCs) and high concentrations of organic matter contained in SE pose a significant challenge to the reclamation. In this manuscript, combined UV-based and biofilm processes were used to treat the SE spiked with ibuprofen (IBU) and clofibric acid (CA). The efficiency of these sequential treatments was characterized in terms of changes in dissolved organic carbon (DOC), absorbance at 254 nm (A254), fluorescence excitation-emission matrix (FEEM), the concentration of IBU and CA, and molecular weight of SE. Parallel factor (PARAFAC) was applied as the analysis method for FEEM of the samples and two fluorescent components were successfully identified: humic-like substances (C1) and protein-like matter (C2). Large reductions in A254, C1, C2, IBU, and CA were observed during the UV-based processes, especially with the addition of H2O2. Nearly 50% of A254, 80% of the component C1 were decreased and almost complete removal of the component C2 and TOrCs was achieved by UV/2.0 mM H2O2 after 90-min treatment. During the oxidation processes, the formation of lower molecular weight (LMW) compounds was detected, and the biodegradability of the organic matters was greatly increased. Although no significant DOC reduction was obtained in UV-based processes, an obvious further DOC reduction (30~60%) was achieved by biofilm treatment following UV-based processes, especially after UV/H2O2 treatments. In the meantime, large amounts of LMW were removed in the biofilm treatment process. This manuscript provides an effective advanced treatment of SE for the removal of DOC and TOrCs, facilitating the wastewater reclamation.

Keywords

Biofilm Dissolved organic carbon Removal Secondary effluent Trace organic contaminants UV/H2O2 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was partially supported by the National Science Foundation of China (51538012, 51578205, 51728801) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (JZ2016HGTB0722).

References

  1. Acero JL, Benitez FJ, Real FJ, Teva F (2017) Removal of emerging contaminants from secondary effluents by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. Sep Purif Technol 181:123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alberts JJ, Takacs M (2004) Total luminescence spectra of IHSS standard and reference fulvic acids, humic acids and natural organic matter: comparison of aquatic and terrestrial source terms. Org Geochem 35:243–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen CM, Bro R (2003) Practical aspects of PARAFAC modeling of fluorescence excitation-emission data. J Chemom 17:200–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baghoth SA, Sharma SK, Amy GL (2011) Tracking natural organic matter (NOM) in a drinking water treatment plant using fluorescence excitation-emission matrices and PARAFAC. Water Res 45:797–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bro R, Kiers HAL (2003) A new efficient method for determining the number of components in PARAFAC models. J Chemom 17:274–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carstea EM, Baker A, Bieroza M, Reynolds DM, Bridgeman J (2014) Characterisation of dissolved organic matter fluorescence properties by PARAFAC analysis and thermal quenching. Water Res 61:152–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen W, Westerhoff P, Leenheer JA, Booksh K (2003) Fluorescence excitation–emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter. Environ Sci Technol 37:5701–5710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen E, Levy GJ, Borisover M (2014) Fluorescent components of organic matter in wastewater: efficacy and selectivity of the water treatment. Water Res 55:323–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gao F, Yang ZH, Li C, Zeng GM, Ma DH, Zhou L (2015) A novel algal biofilm membrane photobioreactor for attached microalgae growth and nutrients removal from secondary effluent. Bioresour Technol 179:8–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garcia-Segura S, Keller J, Brillas E, Radjenovic J (2015) Removal of organic contaminants from secondary effluent by anodic oxidation with a boron-doped diamond anode as tertiary treatment. J Hazard Mater 283:551–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gentry-Shields J, Wang A, Cory RM, Stewart JR (2013) Determination of specific types and relative levels of QPCR inhibitors in environmental water samples using excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy and PARAFAC. Water Res 47:3467–3476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Giannakis S, Voumard M, Grandjean D, Magnet A, De Alencastro LF, Pulgarin C (2016) Micropollutant degradation, bacterial inactivation and regrowth risk in wastewater effluents: influence of the secondary pre-treatment on the efficiency of advanced oxidation processes. Water Res 102:505–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Henderson RK, Baker A, Murphy KR, Hamblya A, Stuetz RM, Khan SJ (2009) Fluorescence as a potential monitoring tool for recycled water systems: a review. Water Res 43:863–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hu HY, Du Y, Wu QY, Zhao X, Tang X, Chen Z (2016) Differences in dissolved organic matter between reclaimed water source and drinking water source. Sci Total Environ 551:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ishii SKL, Boyer TH (2012) Behavior of reoccurring PARAFAC components in fluorescent dissolved organic matter in natural and engineered systems: a critical review. Environ Sci Technol 46:2006–2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. James CP, Germain E, Judd S (2014) Micropollutant removal by advanced oxidation of microfiltered secondary effluent for water reuse. Sep Purif Technol 127:77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Karadag D, Koroglu OE, Ozkaya B, Cakmakci M (2015) A review on anaerobic biofilm reactors for the treatment of dairy industry wastewater. Process Biochem 50:262–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lamsal R, Walsh ME, Gagnon GA (2011) Comparison of advanced oxidation processes for the removal of natural organic matter. Water Res 45:3263–3269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li P, Xing W, Zuo JN, Tang L, Wang YJ, Lin J (2013) Hydrogenotrophic denitrification for tertiary nitrogen removal from municipal wastewater using membrane diffusion packed-bed bioreactor. Bioresour Technol 144:452–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liao QN, Ji F, Li JC, Zhan X, Hu ZH (2016) Decomposition and mineralization of sulfaquinoxaline sodium during UV/H2O2 oxidation processes. Chem Eng J 284:494–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu MM, Zhao Y, Xi BD, Hou LA (2015) Efficiency of a hybrid granular bed-contact oxidation biofilm baffled reactor for treating molasses wastewater. Desalin Water Treat 53:619–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Merel S, Anumol T, Park M, Snyder SA (2015) Application of surrogates, indicators, and high-resolution mass spectrometry to evaluate the efficacy of UV processes for attenuation of emerging contaminants in water. J Hazard Mater 282:75–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Puspita P, Roddick FA, Porter NA (2011) Decolourisation of secondary effluent by UV-mediated processes. Chem Eng J 171:464–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Puspita P, Roddick F, Porter N (2015) Efficiency of sequential ozone and UV-based treatments for the treatment of secondary effluent. Chem Eng J 268:337–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sarathy SR, Mohseni M (2007) The impact of UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation on molecular size distribution of chromophoric natural organic matter. Environ Sci Technol 41:8315–8320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sarp S, Lee S, Park N, Hanh NT, Cho J (2009) Controlling various contaminants in wastewater effluent through membranes and engineered wetland. Front Environ Sci Eng China 3:98–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Souza BS, Dantas RF, Agullo-Barcelo M, Lucena F, Sans C, Esplugas S, Dezotti M (2013) Evaluation of UV/H2O2 for the disinfection and treatment of municipal secondary effluents for water reuse. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 88:1697–1706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Srinivasan SV, Mary GPS, Kalyanaraman C, Sureshkumar PS, Balakameswari KS, Suthanthararajan R, Ravindranath E (2012) Combined advanced oxidation and biological treatment of tannery effluent. Clean Techn Environ Policy 14:251–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stedmon CA, Markager S (2005) Resolving the variability in dissolved organic matter fluorescence in a temperate estuary and its catchment using PARAFAC analysis. Limnol Oceanogr 50:686–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sui Q, Huang J, Deng SB, Chen WW, Yu G (2011) Seasonal variation in the occurrence and removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in different biological wastewater treatment processes. Environ Sci Technol 45:3341–3348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thomson J, Parkinson A, Roddick FA (2004) Depolymerization of chromophoric natural organic matter. Environ Sci Technol 38:3360–3369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang GS, Hsieh ST, Hong CS (2000) Destruction of humic acid in water by UV light—catalyzed oxidation with hydrogen peroxide. Water Res 34:3882–3887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang XM, Mao YQ, Tang S, Yang HW, Xie YFF (2015) Disinfection byproducts in drinking water and regulatory compliance: a critical review. Front Environ Sci Eng 9:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang X, Wang J, Li K, Zhang H, Yang M (2017) Molecular characterization of effluent organic matter in secondary effluent and reclaimed water: comparison to natural organic matter in source water. J Environ Sci 63:140–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wei YL, Yin XF, Qi L, Wang HC, Gong YW, Luo YQ (2016) Effects of carrier-attached biofilm on oxygen transfer efficiency in a moving bed biofilm reactor. Front Environ Sci Eng 10:569–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xie WM, Ni BJ, Sheng GP, Seviour T, Yu HQ (2015) Quantification and kinetic characterization of soluble microbial products from municipal wastewater treatment plants. Water Res 88:703–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xue S, Jin W, Zhang ZH, Liu H (2017) Reductions of dissolved organic matter and disinfection by-product precursors in full-scale wastewater treatment plants in winter. Chemosphere 179:395–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yamashita Y, Jaffe R (2008) Characterizing the interactions between trace metals and dissolved organic matter using excitation-emission matrix and parallel factor analysis. Environ Sci Technol 42:7374–7379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yan PF, Hu ZH, Yu HQ, Li WH, Liu L (2015) Fluorescence quenching effects of antibiotics on the main components of dissolved organic matter. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:5667–5675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang LY, Shin HS, Hur J (2014) Estimating the concentration and biodegradability of organic matter in 22 wastewater treatment plants using fluorescence excitation emission matrices and parallel factor analysis. Sensors 14:1771–1786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ye ZH, Zhang H, Zhang X, Zhou DJ (2016) Treatment of landfill leachate using electrochemically assisted UV/chlorine process: effect of operating conditions, molecular weight distribution and fluorescence EEM-PARAFAC analysis. Chem Eng J 286:508–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang YL, Yin Y, Feng LQ, Zhu GW, Shi ZQ, Liu XH, Zhang YZ (2011) Characterizing chromophoric dissolved organic matter in Lake Tianmuhu and its catchment basin using excitation-emission matrix fluorescence and parallel factor analysis. Water Res 45:5110–5122CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil EngineeringHefei University of TechnologyHefeiChina
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiChina

Personalised recommendations