Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 1336–1354 | Cite as

Pollutant source analysis and tempo-spatial analysis of pollutant discharge intensity in a transboundary river basin

  • Hongwei Lu
  • Sen YuEmail author
Research Article
  • 78 Downloads

Abstract

From the perspective of river basin refined management and pollution control of water bodies, a transboundary river basin and its regional pollutant sources are identified and the typical status of discharging processes of different pollutant sources are screened. Then organic connection which can comprehensively reflect and dynamically characterize the discharge of transboundary water pollutants is constructed. In addition, the integrated prediction (IP) model of the transboundary river basin and its regional water pollutants discharge is established. Finally, the dynamic simulation of typical status characteristics of the transboundary river basin and its regional pollutant sources discharge as well as the tempo-spatial changing pattern of pollutant discharge intensity is conducted in this paper. This paper selected the Songhua River basin as an example where planting, industry, household (urban living and rural living), and livestock and poultry are the main pollutant sources. The dynamic simulation of water pollution discharge in Songhua River basin during the 13th Five-year Plan and its tempo-spatial changing trend analysis are conducted by employing the established IP model of transboundary river basin water pollution discharge. The results show that during the 13th Five-year Plan, through comprehensive management and control of pollutant sources in Songhua River basin, the discharge amounts of different pollutant sources (planting, industry, household, livestock, and poultry) present an overall decreasing trend and the main pollutants discharge intensity decreases significantly year by year. It is demonstrated that pollution discharge in Songhua River basin is controlled effectively.

Keywords

Pollution sources Tempo-spatial analysis Pollutant discharge intensity River basin refined management Transboundary river basin Songhua River basin 

Notes

Funding information

This research was supported by the Program for China Postdoctoral Science Foundation–China (NO.2016M591139), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities–China (NO.JB2016072), and the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC0405900).

References

  1. Artinyan E, Vincendon B, Kroumova K, Nedkov N, Tsarev P, Balabanova S, Koshinchanov G (2016) Flood forecasting and alert system for Arda River basin. J Hydrol 541:457–470.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. de Graaf IEM, van Beek LPH, Wada Y, Bierkens MFP (2014) Dynamic attribution of global water demand to surface water and groundwater resources: effects of abstractions and return flows on river discharges. Adv Water Resour 64(1):21–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2013.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. De Stefano L, Petersen-Perlman JD, Sproles EA, Eynard J, Wolf AT (2017) Assessment of transboundary river basins for potential hydro-political tensions. Glob Environ Chang 45:35–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.04.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Degefu DM, He W, Yuan L, Zhao JH (2016) Water allocation in transboundary river basins under water scarcity: a cooperative bargaining approach. Water Resour Manag 30(12):4451–4466.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1431-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dore J, Lebel L, Molle F (2012) A framework for analysing transboundary water governance complexes, illustrated in the Mekong Region. J Hydrol 466–467(2):23–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.07.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eliasson J (2015) The rising pressure of global water shortages. Nature 517:6.  https://doi.org/10.1038/517006a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Finkel E, Normile D (2012) River basin management plan secures water for the environment. Science 338(6112):1273–1274.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.338.6112.1273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gleeson T, Wada Y, Bierkens MF, van Beek LP (2012) Water balance of global aquifers revealed by groundwater footprint. Nature 488(7410):197–200.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11295 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. González SO, Almeida CA, Calderón M, Mallea MA, González P (2014) Assessment of the water self-purification capacity on a river affected by organic pollution: application of chemometrics in spatial and temporal variations. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21(18):10583–10593.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3098-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heikkila T, Gerlak AK, Bell AR, Schmeier S (2013) Adaptation in a transboundary river basin: linking stressors and adaptive capacity within the Mekong River Commission. Environ Sci Pol 25(1):73–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.09.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Holbach A, Floehr T, Kranzioch I, Wolf A (2013) Dilution of pollution? Processes affecting the water quality in the river-style Three Gorges Reservoir. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20(10):7140–7141.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-1252-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Howard KWF, Howard KK (2016) The new “Silk Road Economic Belt” as a threat to the sustainable management of Central Asia’s transboundary water resources. Environ Earth Sci 75(11):1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5752-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jaramillo F, Destouni G (2015) Local flow regulation and irrigation raise global human water consumption and footprint. Science 350(6265):1248–1251.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad1010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Khan HF, Yang YCE, Xie H, Ringler C (2017) A coupled modeling framework for sustainable watershed management in transboundary river basins. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 21:6275–6288.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-6275-2017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kucukmehmetoglu M, Geymen A (2014) Transboundary water resources allocation under various parametric conditions: the case of the Euphrates & Tigris river basin. Water Resour Manag 28(11):3515–3538.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0685-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuzmanović M, Ginebreda A, Petrović M, Barceló D (2015) Risk assessment based prioritization of 200 organic micropollutants in 4 Iberian rivers. Sci Total Environ 503–504:289–299.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu H, Savić D, Kapelan Z, Zhao M, Yuan YX, Zhao HB (2014) A diameter-sensitive flow entropy method for reliability consideration in water distribution system design. Water Resour Res 50(7):5597–5610.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014882 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mianabadi H, Mostert E, Pande S, van de Giesen N (2015) Weighted bankruptcy rules and transboundary water resources allocation. Water Resour Manag 29(7):2303–2321.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-0942-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Munia H, Guillaume JHA, Mirumachi N, Porkka M, Wada Y, Kummu M (2016) Water stress in global transboundary river basins: significance of upstream water use on downstream stress. Environ Res Lett 11:014002.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/1/014002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Net S, Rabodonirina S, Sghaier RB, Dumoulin D, Chbib C, Tlili I, Ouddane B (2015) Distribution of phthalates, pesticides and drug residues in the dissolved, particulate and sedimentary phases from transboundary rivers (France-Belgium). Sci Total Environ 521(1):152–159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Orme M, Cuthbert Z, Sindico F, Gibson J, Bostic R (2015) Good transboundary water governance in the 2015 Sustainable Development Goals: a legal perspective. Water Int 40(7):1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2015.1099083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Plengsaeng B, Wehn U, Zaag PVD (2014) Data-sharing bottlenecks in transboundary integrated water resources management: a case study of the Mekong River Commission’s procedures for data sharing in the Thai context. Water Int 39(7):933–951.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2015.981783 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Poff LR, Brown CM, Grantham TE, Matthews JH, Palmer MA, Spence CM, Wilby RL, Haasnoot M, Mendoza GF, Dominique KC, Baeza A (2016) Sustainable water management under future uncertainty with eco-engineering decision scaling. Nat Clim Chang 6:25–34.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2765 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Porse EC, Sandoval-Solis S, Lane BA (2015) Integrating environmental flows into multi-objective reservoir management for a transboundary, water-scarce river basin: Rio Grande/Bravo. Water Resour Manag 29(8):1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-0952-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shi GM, Wang JN, Zhang B, Zhang Z, Zhang YL (2016) Pollution control costs of a transboundary river basin: empirical tests of the fairness and stability of cost allocation mechanisms using game theory. J Environ Manag 177:145–152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.04.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Silva E, Daam MA, Cerejeira MJ (2015) Aquatic risk assessment of priority and other river basin specific pesticides in surface waters of Mediterranean river basins. Chemosphere 135:394–402.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.05.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Singh R, Garg KK, Wani SP, Tewari RK, Dhyani SK (2014) Impact of water management interventions on hydrology and ecosystem services in Garhkundar-Dabar watershed of Bundelkhand region, Central India. J Hydrol 509(2):132–149.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Trang NT, Shrestha S, Shrestha M, Datta A, Kawasaki A (2017) Evaluating the impacts of climate and land-use change on the hydrology and nutrient yield in a transboundary river basin: a case study in the 3S River Basin (Sekong, Sesan, and Srepok). Sci Total Environ 576:586–598.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Voss KA, Famiglietti JS, Lo MH, de Linage C, Rodell M, Swenson SC (2013) Swenson SCGroundwater depletion in the Middle East from GRACE with implications for transboundary water management in the Tigris-Euphrates-Western Iran region. Water Resour Res 49(2):904–914.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wada Y, van Beek LPH, Bierkens MFP (2011) Modelling global water stress of the recent past: on the relative importance of trends in water demand and climate variability. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 8(4):3785–3808.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3785-2011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wongsanit J, Teartisup P, Kerdsueb P, Tharnpoophasiam P, Worakhunpiset S (2015) Contamination of nitrate in groundwater and its potential human health: a case study of lower Mae Klong river basin, Thailand. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(15):11504–11512.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4347-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yu S, Lu HW (2018) Relationship between pollutants emissions of transboundary river basins and urbanization process under the strategy of The Belt and Road Initiative. Chemosphere 203:11–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.172 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yu S, Jiang HQ, Chang M, Liu J (2015) Dynamic simulation scheme on integrated control of water resources and water pollution in the Songhua River basin. Acta Sci Circumst 35(6):1866–1874.  https://doi.org/10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2014.0964 Google Scholar
  34. Yu S, He L, Lu HW (2016) An environmental fairness based optimisation model for the decision-support of joint control over the water quantity and quality of a river basin. J Hydrol 535:366–376.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Renewable EnergyNorth China Electric Power UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Process, Institute of Geographic Science and Natural Resources ResearchChinese Academy of ScienceBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations